With the progress of the DESD, increasing numbers of researchers have been developing indicators to effectively measure the implementation of ESD in formal, informal and non-formal education. This paper aims to measure the implementation of ESD in secondary school curricula in three countries carrying the fingerprints of a developed (Germany), post-colonial (Mexico) and post-socialist (Romania) condition. The authors tested a set of four indicators measuring the depth and breadth of implementation. The results show that ESD continues to exist as (hyper-) specialized add-on knowledge in an overcrowded curriculum (Jucker, 2011) that seems to further differentiate between high- and low-status knowledge (Williams, 2008). The tested indicators offer an insight into the depth and breadth of ESD implementation across the entire curriculum.
Bagoly-SimóPéter (2012a). Implementation of education for sustainable development in Bavarian, Mexican and Romanian School Curricula. In DulamӑMaria Eliza (Eds), Tendințe actuale în predarea și învӑțarea geografiei—Contemporary Trends in Teaching and Learning Geography (pp. 365–73). Presa Universitarӑ Clujeanӑ, Cluj-Napoca.
2.
Bagoly-SimóPéter (2012b). Divided world vs. one world—A comparative analysis of non-continuous text elements in school geography textbooks of international selection. IARTEM e-Journal, 5(1), 33–43.
3.
BowersChet (2002). Toward a cultural and ecological understanding of curriculum. In DollWilliamGoughNoel (Eds), Curriculum visions (pp. 75–85). New York: Peter Lang.
4.
BMUNR (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorensicherheit)1992. Umweltpolitik. Agenda 21. Bonn: Köllen.
5.
BSTUK (Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Unterricht und Kultus) (2011). Schule und Bildung in Bayern. Munich: BSTUK.
6.
CruzLópez, Yazmín (2011). 5th International Barcelona conference on higher education: higher education’s commitment to sustainability from understanding to action. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5(2), 167–169.
7.
DGDC (Dirección General de Desarrollo Curricular) (2011). Se reunió el Grupo Agenda de Transversalidad SEP-Semarnat. Retrieved from http://basica.sep.gob.mx/dgdc/sitio/start.php?act=notapp290311. Accessed 1 November 2012.
8.
DobsonAndrew (1996). ‘Environment sustainabilities: an analysis and a typology. Environmental Politics, 5(3), 401–428.
9.
Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2007). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2007–2012. Retrieved from http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/ganaderia/Publicaciones/Lists/Otros/Attachments/1/PND_0712.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2012.
10.
HaanGerhard de (2008). Gestaltungskompetenz als Kompetenzkonzept für Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In BormannInkaHaanGerhard de (Eds), Kompetenzen der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Operationalisierung, Messung, Rahmenbedingungen, Befunde (pp. 23–43). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
11.
HakTomasMoldanBedrichArthurLyon Dahl (Eds). (2007). Sustainability indicators: a scientific assessment. SCOPE (Scientific Committee on the Problems of Environment based in Paris), Vol. 67. Washington DC: Island Press.
12.
JuckerRolf (2011). ESD between systemic change and bureaucratic obfuscation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5(1), 39–60.
13.
McKeownRosalyn (2007). Setting the stage for a strategic research agenda for the UNDESD: A Joint UNU-UNESCO Workshop’. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 91–96.
14.
MichelsenGerdAdomßentMaikBormannInkaBurandtSimonRobertFischbach (2011). Indikatoren der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung–Ein Werkstattbericht. Bad Homburg: VAS-Verlag.
15.
PadenMaryChhokarKiran (2007). Exploring research priorities for the DESD. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 71–75.
16.
ReidAlanNikelJuttaScottWilliam (2006). Indicators for education for sustainable development: a report on perspectives, challenges and progress. London: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society.
17.
SelbyDavidKagawaFumiyo (2010). Runaway climate change as challenge to the closing circle’ of education for sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 37–50.
18.
SEP (Secretaría de Educación Pública) (2011). Sistema educativo de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Principales cifras Ciclo escolar 2010–11. Mexico City: SEP.
19.
SollartKarin (2005). Framework on indicators for education for sustainable development: some conceptual thoughts. Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
20.
TilburyDaniella (2007). Monitoring and evaluation during the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(2), 239–54.
21.
TremmelJörg (2003). Nachhaltigkeit als politische und analytische Kategorie. Munich: ökom.
22.
UNDESA (2009). Johannesburg declaration on sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POI_PD.htm. Accessed 1 November 2012.
23.
UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). (2008). Extract of issues relevant to competences in ESD. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/inf.meeting.docs/EGonInd/8mtg/ExtractRFCompetencesEG_ESD_8_5.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2012.
24.
UNESCO (2009). Bonn Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.esd-world-conference-2009.org/fileadmin/download/ESD2009_BonnDeclaration080409.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2012.
25.
WalsArjen (2009). A Mid-DESD review: key findings and ways forward. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(2), 195–204.
26.
WECD (1987). ‘Report of the world commission on environment and development’. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/a42r187.htm. Accessed 1 November 2012.
27.
WilliamsDilafruz (2008). Sustainability education‘s gift: learning patterns and relationships. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2(1), 41–49.
