This study examined the presence and implications of post-feminist discourses in internationally award-winning femvertisements featuring Indian women and sociocultural themes. Using Windels et al.’s (2020, Journal of Advertising, 49(1), 18–33; 2023, Feminist Media Studies, 23(1), 1–18) six-element post-feminist framework, 102 advertisements (73 global and 29 Indian) were analysed for evidence of commodity feminism, individualisation, self-surveillance and related discourses. The findings revealed a dominant presence of commodity feminism and confidence culture in Indian femvertising, while global ads exhibited higher occurrences of self-surveillance and individualisation. Statistical comparisons showed significant differences between Indian and international campaigns, particularly in the portrayal of empowerment through brand consumption, objectification under the guise of agency and the invisibilisation of caste, class and intersectional struggles. Viewers in India favoured ads saturated with post-feminist tropes, reinforcing internalised neoliberal ideals. The study concludes that Indian femvertising largely reflects faux feminism, commodifying empowerment while neglecting the political and structural roots of inequality. It calls for more inclusive, intersectional representations aligned with the fourth wave of feminism. It introduces the Self-esteemed–Empowered–Allied framework as a tool for more authentic feminist advertising practices.
AmirA., RocaD., SadafL., & ObaidA. (2024). How does femvertising work in a patriarchal context? An unwavering consumer perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 29(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-03-2023-0040
2.
AnwerM., & AroraA. (2020). #ImNotAChickFlick: Neoliberalism and post-feminism in Veere Di Wedding (My Friend’s Wedding, 2018). BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies, 11(2), 146–168. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0974927621992595
3.
AryaS., & RathoreA. S. (2019). Introduction. In AryaS. & RathoreA. S. (Eds.), Dalit feminist theory (pp. 1–21). Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298110-1
4.
AyyarV., & KhandareL. (2013). Mapping color and caste discrimination in Indian society. In HallR. E. (Ed.), The melanin millennium (pp. 71–95). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4608-4_5
5.
Banet-WeiserS., GillR., & RottenbergC. (2020). Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation. Feminist Theory, 21(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700119842555
6.
BatliwalaS. (2015). Engaging with empowerment: An intellectual and experiential journey. Women Unlimited.
7.
BaykalN. (2016). Multimodal construction of female looks: An analysis of mascara advertisements. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2016(2), 39–59.
8.
BoroveckiA., TozzoP., CerriN., & CaenazzoL. (2018). Social egg freezing under public health perspective: Just a medical reality or a women’s right? An ethical case analysis. Journal of Public Health Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2018.1484
9.
ChandrasekharC. P. (2012). From dirigisme to neoliberalism: Aspects of the political economy of the transition in India. In Kyung-SupC., FineB., & WeissL. (Eds.), Developmental politics in transition: The neoliberal era and beyond (pp. 140–165). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137028303_8
10.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
11.
DasM., & SharmaS. (2016). Fetishizing women: Advertising in Indian television and its effects on target audiences. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 18(1), 114–132.
12.
DhanrajC. T., KarunakarnV., SoundararajanT., KowtalA., MashaalM., & LohitakshiS. A. (2015, April5). New series—Dalit history month: Dalit women fight!Crunk Feminist Collective.
13.
DosekunS. (2015). For Western girls only?Feminist Media Studies, 15(6), 960–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1062991
14.
DouglasS. J. (2017). The diverting seductions of marketplace feminism. We were feminists once: From riot grrrl to CoverGirl→, the buying and selling of a political movement. By ZeislerAndi. New York: Public Affairs, 2016. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(1), 204–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/692483
15.
EliasA., GillR., & ScharffC. (2017). Aesthetic labour: Beauty politics in neoliberalism. In AnaS. E., RosalindG., & ScharffC. (Eds.), Aesthetic labour (pp. 3–49). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_1
16.
FullerC. J. (2004). The camphor flame: Popular Hinduism and society in India. Princeton University Press.
17.
GilbertsonA. (2023). Outsourcing patriarchy to and within India: Intersectional and decolonial gender politics across scales. Antipode, 55(3), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12700
18.
GillR. (2008a). Commodity feminism. In DonsbachW. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (1st ed., pp. 1–3). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc055
19.
GillR. (2008b). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507084950
20.
GillR. (2017). The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: A postfeminist sensibility 10 years on. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(6), 606–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417733003
21.
GillR., & EliasA. S. (2014). ‘Awaken your incredible’: Love your body discourses and postfeminist contradictions. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 10(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.10.2.179_1
22.
GillR. C. (2007). Gender and the media. Polity.
23.
GoelS. (2018). Third generation sexism in workplaces: Evidence from India. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2018.1496616
24.
GooldI., & SavulescuJ. (2009). In favour of freezing eggs for non‐medical reasons. Bioethics, 23(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00679.x
25.
GriffinM., ViswanathK., & SchwartzD. (1994). Gender advertising in the US and India: Exporting cultural stereotypes. Media, Culture & Society, 16(3), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344379401600308
26.
GuruG. (1995). Dalit women talk differently. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(41/42), 2548–2550.
27.
HainnevilleV., GuèvremontA., & RobinotÉ. (2023). Femvertising or femwashing? Women’s perceptions of authenticity. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(4), 933–941. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2020
28.
India Today. (2015, January19). Landless labourers continue fight against lopsided land ownership pattern in Bihar. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19790915-landless-labourers-continue-fight-against-lopsided-land-ownership-pattern-in-bihar-822580-2014-02-21
29.
IskraA. (2023). “Be soft like water, little woman”: Cultivating postfeminism in postsocialist China. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 48(3), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1086/723271
30.
IyerK. V., & DaniK. (2025). Femvertising empowering or commodifying women? Exploring the changing feminist discourse in internationally award-winning advertisements. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2023-0157
31.
JohnM. E. (2015). Intersectionality: Rejection or critical dialogue?Economic & Political Weekly, 50(33), 72–76.
32.
JohnsonK. (2001). Media and social change: The modernizing influences of television in rural India. Media, Culture & Society, 23(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344301023002001
33.
JohnstonM., FuscaldoG., Zander-FoxD., HuntS., RombautsL., & MillsC. (2025). “What am I going to do with those eggs”: Patients’ experience of and attitudes toward surplus frozen eggs. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 104897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104897
34.
KapoorD., & MunjalA. (2019). Self-consciousness and emotions driving femvertising: A path analysis of women’s attitude towards femvertising, forwarding intention and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2017.1338611
35.
KaramB. (2018). Postfeminism and the South African context through the prism of a bloodsoaked imagination. Communication, 44(3), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2018.1542408
36.
KoffmanO., & GillR. (2014). ‘I Matter and so Does She’: Girl Power, (Post)feminism and the Girl Effect. In BuckinghamD., BraggS., & KehilyM. J. (Eds.), Youth Cultures in the Age of Global Media (pp. 242–257). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008152_15
37.
KureelP. (2021). Indian media and caste of politics, portrayals and beyond. CASTE: A Global Journal on Social Exclusion, 2(1), 97–108.
38.
LahotiU., PajaiS., ShegekarT., & JuganavarA. (2023). Exploring the landscape of social egg freezing: Navigating medical advancements, ethical dilemmas, and societal impacts. Cureus, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47956
39.
LinJ., & WangY. (2023). Back to Marx: Reflections on the feminist crisis at the crossroads of neoliberalism and neoconservatism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 954. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02341-2
40.
LunyalV. (2014). Examining the discourse of perfume advertisements: An analysis of the verbal and the visual. Journal of NELTA, 19(1–2), 117–131.
41.
MacPhailC., KhozaN., AblerL., & RanganathanM. (2016). Process guidelines for establishing Intercoder Reliability in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577012
42.
MarhiaN. (2012). Everyday (in)security / (re)securing the everyday: gender, policing and violence against women in Delhi. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/759/
43.
Martínez-JiménezL. (2020). Neoliberal postfeminism—or some other sexier thing: Gender and populism in the Spanish context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420902804
44.
McRobbieA. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. Sage Publications.
45.
MenonN. (2015). A critical view on intersectionality from India is feminism about ‘women’?Economic & Political Weekly, 50(17). https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/17/perspectives/feminism-about-women.html
46.
MensaM., & MuellerS. (2024). More than you see: Lack of diversity in Brazilian creative departments. Journal of Gender Studies, 33(8), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2326968
47.
MohantyC. T. (1984). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. On Humanism and University I: The Discourse of Humanism, 12(3), 333–358.
48.
NairR., & VollhardtJ. R. (2020). Intersectionality and relations between oppressed groups: Intergroup implications of beliefs about intersectional differences and commonalities. Journal of Social Issues, 76(4), 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12409
O’ConnorC., & JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940691989922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
51.
OrtnerS. B. (2016). Too soon for post-feminism: The ongoing life of patriarchy in neoliberal America. In TheodossopoulosD. (Ed.), De-pathologizing resistance (1st ed.). Routledge.
52.
PandeR. (2018). The history of feminism and doing gender in India. Revista Estudos Feministas, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2018v26n358567
53.
PandeR. (2000). From anti-arrack to total prohibition: The women’s movement in Andhra Pradesh, India. Gender, Technology and Development, 4(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2000.11909951
54.
PrasadI. (2021). ‘We have achieved great feats…but our struggle is far from over’: Centering caste difference in feminist discourse of the Bodhgaya Land Movement of Bihar, India. Women’s Studies International Forum, 85, 102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102438
55.
PrüglE. (2015). Neoliberalising feminism. New Political Economy, 20(4), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2014.951614
56.
RadkeH. R. M., HornseyM. J., & BarlowF. K. (2016). Barriers to women engaging in collective action to overcome sexism. American Psychologist, 71(9), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040345
57.
RatnaA. (2018). Not just merely different: Travelling theories, post-feminism and the racialized politics of women of color. Sociology of Sport Journal, 35(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2017-0192
58.
RegeS. (2000). ‘Real Feminism’ and Dalit Women: Scripts of Denial and Accusation. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(6), 492–495.
59.
RocaD., WilsonB., BarriosA., & Muñoz-SánchezO. (2017). Creativity identity in Colombia: The advertising creatives’ perspective. International Journal of Advertising, 36(6), 831–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1374318
60.
RojiA. (2015). The politics of representation in Indian media: implications of the portrayal of Hindus and minority groups [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Westminster.
61.
RottenbergC. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies, 28(3), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2013.857361
62.
RottenbergC. (2017). Neoliberal feminism and the future of human capital. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 42(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1086/688182
63.
RoyS. (2015). The Indian women’s movement. Journal of South Asian Development, 10(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174114567368
64.
RutherfordA. (2018). Feminism, psychology, and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194
65.
SaradhambikaK. (2022). Non verbal cues and gender bias in select Indian TV advertisements. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 13(2), 42–45.
66.
SchmalzS., & EbenauM. (2013). After neoliberalism? Brazil, India, and China in the global economic crisis 1. In van ApeldoornB., de GraaffN., & OverbeekH. W. (Eds.), The state–capital nexus in the global crisis (p. 15). Routledge.
67.
SchudsonM. (2000). Advertising as capitalist realism. Advertising & Society Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/asr.2000.0023
68.
SobandeF. (2019). Woke-washing: “Intersectional” femvertising and branding “woke” bravery. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2723–2745. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0134
69.
StroopeS. (2012). Caste, class, and urbanization: The shaping of religious community in contemporary India. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9784-y
70.
TambeA. (2019). (Hyper)Visible ‘women’/invisible (Dalit) women: Challenging the elusive sexism in Indian universities. In CrimminsG. (Ed.), Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy: Higher education, gender and intersectionality (1st ed., pp. 129–149). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04852-5_8
71.
TaylorJ., JohnstonJ., & WhiteheadK. (2016). A corporation in feminist clothing? Young women discuss the dove ‘real beauty’ campaign. Critical Sociology, 42(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501355
72.
ThornhamS., & PengpengF. (2010). “Just a slogan”. Feminist Media Studies, 10(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680771003672320
73.
TsaiW.-H. S., ShataA., & TianS. (2021). En-gendering power and empowerment in advertising: A content analysis. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 42(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2019.1687057
74.
VagdeviH. S., & ShantharajuS. (2014). The changing paradigm in gender constructed texts in media: A semiotic approach. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 3(7), 139–150.
75.
VargheseN., & KumarN. (2020). Femvertising as a media strategy to increase self-esteem of adolescents: An experiment in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104965
76.
VargheseN., & KumarN. (2022). Feminism in advertising: Irony or revolution? A critical review of femvertising. Feminist Media Studies, 22(2), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1825510
77.
WaqarA., JamilM., AL-HazmiN. M., & AmirA. (2024). Unveiling femvertising: Examining gratitude, consumers attitude towards femvertising and personality traits. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2297448
78.
WilsonK., Ung LohJ., & PurewalN. (2018). Gender, violence and the neoliberal state in India. Feminist Review, 119(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-018-0109-8
79.
WindelsK. (2016). Stereotypical or just typical: how do US practitioners view the role and function of gender stereotypes in advertisements?International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 864–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1160855
80.
WindelsK., ChamplinS., & MakadyH. (2023). Deferring gender equality until the next generation: Evidence of the persistence of postfeminist discourse in advertising. Feminist Media Studies, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1944256
YangF. (2023). Post-feminism and chick flicks in China: Subjects, discursive origin and new gender norms. Feminist Media Studies, 23(3), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1791928
