Over-the-top (OTT) platforms have changed how people watch television due to technological affordance and interactivity. With the theoretical framework of the uses and gratifications theory (N = 421), this study identified eight motivational factors for OTT viewing: convenient navigability, improved viewing experience, entertainment, relaxation, social interaction, companionship, voyeurism and information seeking. Some of the study’s prominent findings were: convenient navigability, improved viewing experience, entertainment and voyeurism were positive predictors of OTT affinity; Entertainment, voyeurism and information-seeking gratifications positively predicted satisfaction with the OTT, while convenient navigability negatively predicted satisfaction; Convenient navigability, improved viewing experience, entertainment and relaxation gratifications along with interactivity and viewing levels positively predicted the intention to cord-cut.
AndersonC. A., & DillK. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.772
2.
BagdasarovZ., GreeneK., BanerjeeS. C., KrcmarM., YanovitzkyI., & RuginyteD. (2010). I am what I watch: Voyeurism, sensation seeking, and television viewing patterns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 299–315. 10.1080/08838151003734995
3.
BanerjeeA., RappoportP. N., & AllemanJ. (2014). Forecasting video cord-cutting: The bypass of traditional pay television. In: AllemanJ., Ní-ShúilleabháinA. & RappoportP. (Eds.), Demand for communications services—Insights and perspectives. The Economics of information, communication, and entertainment (The impacts of digital technology in the 21st century). Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7993-2_4
4.
BrooksB. L., PloetzD. M., & KirkwoodM. W. (2016). A survey of neuropsychologists’ use of validity tests with children and adolescents. Child Neuropsychology, 22(8), 1001–1020. 10.1080/09297049.2015.1075491
5.
CamilleriM. A., & FalzonL. (2020). Understanding motivations to use online streaming services: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the uses and gratifications, theory (UGT). Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC. Retrieved February23, 2021, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SJME-04-2020-0074/full/html
6.
ChaJ. (2013). Predictors of television and online video platform use: A coexistence model of old and new video platforms. Telematics and Informatics, 30(4), 296–310. 10.1016/j.tele.2013.01.001
7.
ChenG. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
8.
ChenY. N. K. (2019). Competitions between OTT TV platforms and traditional television in Taiwan: A niche analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), 101793. 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.10.006
9.
CunninghamS., & CraigD. (2016). Online entertainment: A new wave of media globalization? (Introduction). International Journal of Communication, 10, 5409–5425. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/222423/1/5725-22730-1-PB.pdf
10.
DairoA., & SzűcsK. (2021). Battle for digital customer ownership between the Telcos and over-the-top (OTT) players: Emerging markets perspective. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 1–8. 10.1080/20421338.2020.1866147
11.
Deloitte (2022). Big bets on smart phones, semi conductors and streaming services. https://www2.deloitte.com/in/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/big-bets-on-smartphones-semiconductors-and-streaming-service.html
12.
DetenberB. H., & ReevesB. (1996). A bio-informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. Journal of Communication. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01489.x
13.
EvansR. R., BurnettD. O., KendrickO. W., MacrinaD. M., SnyderS. W., RoyJ. P., & StephensB. C. (2009). Developing valid and reliable online survey instruments using commercial software programs. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet, 13(1), 42–52. 10.1080/15398280802674743
14.
EvensT., & DondersK. (2016). Television distribution: Economic dimensions, emerging policies. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 661–664. 10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.012
15.
Fernández-GómezE., & Martín-QuevedoJ. (2018). Connecting with audiences in new markets: Netflix’s Twitter strategy in Spain. Journal of Media Business Studies, 15(2), 127–146. 10.1080/16522354.2018.1481711
16.
ForristalL. (2022). Netflix losses 970,000 subscribers, its largest quarterly loss ever. TechCrunch+. https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/19/netflix-loses-970000-subscribers-its-largest-quarterly-loss-ever/
17.
FudurićM., MalthouseE. C., & ViswanathanV. (2018). Keep it, shave it, cut it: A closer look into consumers’ video viewing behaviour. Business Horizons, 61(1), 85–93. 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.008
18.
GreeneK., & KrcmarM. (2005). Predicting exposure to and liking of media violence: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Studies, 56(1), 71–93. 10.1080/0008957042000332250
19.
HaridakisP., & HansonG. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317–335. 10.1080/08838150902908270
20.
HeeterC. (1985). Program selection with abundance of choice: A process model. Human Communication Research, 12(1), 126–152. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00070.x
21.
HendrikxA., & CastroD. (2022). Netflix’s community relationship management. An analysis of its Facebook-USA page. Journal of Media Business Studies, 19(2), 108–125. 10.1080/16522354.2021.1932396
22.
JayakarK., & ParkE. A. (2020). Emergence of OTT video and the production expenditures of established audiovisual producers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1–22. 10.1080/08838151.2020.1842688
23.
JoinsonA. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook [Conference session]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy (pp. 1027–1036). 10.1145/1357054.1357213
24.
KangM. E., & AtkinD. J. (1999). Exploring the role of media uses and gratifications in multimedia cable adoption. Telematics and Informatics, 16(1–2), 59–74. 10.1016/S0736-5853(99)00019-2
25.
KatzE., BlumlerJ. G., & GurevitchM. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2747854
26.
KatzE., BlumlerJ. G., & GurevitchM. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In BlumlerJ. G. & KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communication. (pp.19–32). Sage Publications.
27.
KimH., Chan-OlmstedS. M., HwangK. H., & ChangB. H. (2021). Examining the use, perception, and motivation of cord-cutting: A consumer segment approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(1), 126–147. 10.1177/1077699020946442
28.
KimK. J., & SundarS. S. (2014). Does screen size matter for smartphones? Utilitarian and hedonic effects of screen size on smartphone adoption. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(7), 466–473. 10.1089/cyber.2013.0492
29.
LeinerD. J., & QuiringO. (2008). What interactivity means to the user essential insights into and a scale for perceived interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 127–155. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01434.x
30.
LeungL., & WeiR. (1998). The gratifications of pager use: Sociability, information-seeking, entertainment, utility, and fashion and status. Telematics and Informatics, 15(4), 253–264. 10.1016/S0736-5853(98)00016-1
31.
LevyM. R., & WindahlS. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11(1), 51–78. 10.1177/009365084011001003
32.
LimayemM., & CheungC. M. (2011). Predicting the continued use of Internet-based learning technologies: The role of habit. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 91–99. 10.1080/0144929X.2010.490956
33.
LinC. A. (1996). Standpoint: Looking back: The contribution of Blumler and Katz’s uses of mass communication to communication research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(4), 574–581. 10.1080/08838159609364379
34.
LinC. A. (2001). Audience attributes, media supplementation, and likely online service adoption. Mass Communication & Society, 4(1), 19–38. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0401_03
35.
LinC. A. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Communication Theory, 13(4), 345–365. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00296.x
36.
LinC. A. (2004). Webcasting adoption: Technology fluidity,-user innovativeness, and media substitution. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 157–178. 10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_6
37.
LinC. A. (2006). Predicting webcasting adoption via personal innovativeness and perceived utilities. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(2), 228–238. 10.2501/S0021849906060247
38.
LinC. A. (2008). Technology fluidity and on-demand webcasting adoption. Telematics and Informatics, 25(2), 84–98. 10.1016/j.tele.2006.06.002
39.
LombardM. (1995). Direct responses to people on the screen: Television and personal space. Communication Research, 22(3). 288–324. 10.1177/009365095022003002
40.
LucasK., & SherryJ. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication-based explanation. Communication Research, 31(5), 499–523. 10.1177/0093650204267930
41.
MalikA., AmandeepD., & NieminenM. (2015). Facebook photo tagging culture and practices among digital natives. In CCGIDIS 2015-Fifth international symposium on communicability, computer graphics and innovative design for interactive systems. Blue Herons Editions. 10.978.8896471/333
42.
MalikA., DhirA., & NieminenM. (2016). Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 129–138. 10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.009
43.
MasseyK. B. (1995). Analyzing the uses and gratifications concept of audience activity with a qualitative approach: Media encounters during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake disaster. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(3), 328–349. 10.1080/08838159509364310
44.
Martín-QuevedoJ., Fernández-GómezE., & Segado-BojF. (2019). How to engage with younger users on Instagram: A comparative analysis of HBO and Netflix in the Spanish and US markets. International Journal on Media Management, 21(2), 67–87. 10.1080/14241277.2019.1585355
45.
MatrixS. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young people, Exts, Cultures, 6(1), 119–138.
46.
MengK. S., & LeungL. (2021). Factors influencing TikTok engagement behaviors in China: An examination of gratifications sought, narcissism, and the Big Five personality traits. Telecommunications Policy, 45(7), 102172.
47.
MenonD. (2022). Purchase and continuation intentions of over-the-top (OTT) video streaming platform subscriptions: A uses and gratification theory perspective. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 5, 100006. 10.1016/j.teler.2022.100006
48.
NabiR. L., BielyE. N., MorganS. J., & StittC. R. (2003). Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology, 5(4), 303–330. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0504_01
49.
NagarajS., SinghS., & YasaV. R. (2021). Factors affecting consumers’ willingness to subscribe to over-the-top (OTT) video streaming services in India. Technology in Society, 65, 101534. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101534
50.
NishiokaY. (2021) Over-the-top (OTT) video service. In SugayaM. (Ed.), Perspectives on the Japanese media and content policies. Advances in information and communication research (Vol. 2). Springer. 10.1007/978-981-15-4704-1_12
51.
Oeldorf-HirschA., & SundarS. S. (2016). Social and technological motivations for online photo sharing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(4), 624–642. 10.1080/08838151.2016.1234478
52.
OliveiraT., FioreseA., & SargentoS. (2018, June). Forecasting over-the-top bandwidth consumption applied to network operators. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) (pp. 00859–00864). IEEE. 10.1109/ISCC.2018.8538539
53.
PalmgreenP., & RayburnJ. D. (1985). A comparison of gratification models of media satisfaction. Communications Monographs, 52(4), 334–346. 10.1080/03637758509376116
54.
PapacharissiZ., & MendelsonA. L. (2007). An exploratory study of reality appeal: Uses and gratifications of reality TV shows. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 355–370. 10.1080/08838150701307152
55.
PapacharissiZ., & RubinA. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. 10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
56.
ParkE. A. (2019). Prevalence of business models in global OTT video services: A cluster analysis. International Journal on Media Management, 21(3–4), 177–192. 10.1080/14241277.2019.1695257
57.
PatwardhanP., YangJ., & PatwardhanH. (2011). Understanding media satisfaction: Development and validation of an affect-based scale. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19(3), 169–188. 10.1080/15456870.2011.584508
58.
PerseE. M., & RubinA. M. (1988). Audience activity and satisfaction with favorite television soap opera. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 368–375. 10.1177/107769908806500216
59.
PittmanM., & SheehanK. (2015). Sprinting a media marathon: Uses and gratifications of binge-watching television through Netflix. First Monday. 10.5210/fm.v20i10.6138
60.
PuthiyakathH. H., & GoswamiM. P. (2021). Is over the top video platform the game changer over traditional TV channels in India? A niche analysis. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 31(1), 133–150. 10.1177/1326365X211009639
RogerE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Simon & Schuster.
63.
RubinA. M. (1981a). A multivariate analysis of ‘60 Minutes’ viewing motivations. Journalism Quarterly, 58(4), 529–534. 10.1177/107769908105800402
64.
RubinA. M. (1981b). An examination of television viewing motivations. Communication Research, 8(2), 141–165. 10.1177/009365028100800201
65.
RubinA. M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 27(1), 37–51. 10.1080/08838158309386471
66.
RubinA. M., & PerseE. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(2), 246–268. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
67.
RuggieroT. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
68.
RuiJ. R., & StefanoneM. A. (2016). The desire for fame: An extension of uses and gratifications theory. Communication Studies, 67(4), 399–418. 10.1080/10510974.2016.1156006
69.
SahuG., GaurL., & SinghG. (2021). Applying niche and gratification theory approach to examine the users’ indulgence towards over-the-top platforms and conventional TV. Telematics and Informatics, 65, 101713. 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101713
70.
SalehanM., KimD. J., & LeeJ. N. (2018). Are there any relationships between technology and cultural values? A country-level trend study of the association between information communication technology and cultural values. Information & Management, 55(6), 725–745. 10.1016/j.im.2018.03.003
71.
ShinJ., ParkY., & LeeD. (2016). Strategic management of over-the-top services: Focusing on Korean consumer adoption behaviour. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 329–337. 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.004
72.
SpilkerH. S., & ColbjørnsenT. (2020). The dimensions of streaming: toward a typology of an evolving concept. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1210–1225. 10.1177/0163443720904587
73.
Statista. (2020). OTT video. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/media/tv-video/ott-video/worldwide
74.
Statista.com (2021, April23). Pay TV-worldwide-statistics and facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/4985/pay-tv-worldwide/#dossierSummary
75.
SteinerE., & XuK. (2020). Binge-watching motivates change: Uses and gratifications of streaming video viewers challenge traditional TV research. Convergence, 26(1), 82–101. 10.1177/1354856517750365
76.
SundarS. S., & LimperosA. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504–525. 10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
77.
TefertillerA. (2018). Media substitution in cable cord-cutting: The adoption of web-streaming television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 390–407. 10.1080/08838151.2018.1451868
78.
TefertillerA. (2020). Cable cord-cutting and streaming adoption: Advertising avoidance and technology acceptance in television innovation. Telematics and Informatics, 51, 101416. 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101416
79.
TefertillerA., & SheehanK. (2019). TV in the streaming age: Motivations, behaviors, and satisfaction of post-network television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(4), 595–616. 10.1080/08838151.2019.1698233
80.
TefertillerA. C., & SheehanK. B. (2020). Innovativeness, interactivity, and the adoption of streaming television. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 35(2). http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3933-5276
81.
TRAI. (2018). Consultation paper on regulatory framework for over-the-top (OTT) communication services. https://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/CPOTT12112018.pdf
82.
WilliamsF., RiceR. E., & RogersE. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. Simon and Schuster.
83.
YooJ., LeeJ., & LeeD. (2020). A verification of motivations for over-the-top binge and short viewing of audio-visual content. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 1–30. 10.1080/13614568.2020.1865464
84.
YoonS. H., KimH. W., & KankanhalliA. (2021). What makes people watch online TV clips? An empirical investigation of survey data and viewing logs. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102329. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102329
85.
ZuckermanM. (1996). Sensation seeking and the taste for vicarious horror. In WeaverJ. B. & TamboriniR. (Eds.), Horror films: Current research on audience preferences and reactions, (pp. 147–160). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
