This study aims to investigate the extent to which classic celebrity endorsement theories are applicable when such endorsements are performed on interactive social media platforms. It utilizes phenomenological semi-structured interviews with 73 participants. The data analysis shows several perceived characteristics of convincing celebrity endorsements on social media from the Saudi users’ viewpoints. Trustworthiness is perceived when an endorsement discloses that it is a paid advertisement or uses indirect ways to endorse the product. When it comes to high-tech products, it is not necessary for the celebrity to be an expert in the field of the product they are endorsing, but when endorsing accessories, these celebrities should be attractive, should test the product before advertising it and should endorse a reasonable number of products. Endorsements are most acceptable from either likeable celebrities or from normal people with a reasonable number of social media followers. The results show that while some elements of classic theories of celebrity endorsements are applicable on social media platforms, others should be modified to align with new media users. A celebrity endorsement model is proposed based on the current findings.
Aggarwal-GuptaM., & DangP. J. (2009). Examining celebrity expertise and advertising effectiveness in India. South Asian Journal of Management, 16(2), 61–75.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
ArsenaA., SilveraD. H., & PandelaereM. (2014). Brand trait transference: When celebrity endorsers acquire brand personality traits. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1537–1543.
4.
AshforthB. E., & MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
5.
Aureliano-SilvaL., LopesE. L., De Lamônica FreireO. B., & da SilvaD. (2015). O Efeito da Marca na Avaliação de Propagandas Endossadas por Celebridades: um Estudo Experimental. Brazilian Business Review, 12(4), 62–83.
6.
AyresL. (2008). Semi-structured interview. In GivenL. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopaedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 811–813). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
7.
BanytėJ., StonkienėE., & PiligrimienėŽ. (2011). Selecting celebrities in advertising: The case of Lithuanian sports celebrity in non-sport product advertisement. Economics & Management, 16, 1215–1224.
8.
BelchG. E., & BelchM. A. (2013). A content analysis study of the use of celebrity endorsers in magazine advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 32(3), 369–389.
9.
BhattN., JayswalR. M., & PatelJ. D. (2013). Impact of celebrity endorser’s source credibility on attitude towards advertisements and brands. South Asian Journal of Management, 20(4), 74–89.
10.
BiswasD., BiswasA., & DasN. (2006). The differential effects of celebrity and expert endorsements on consumer risk perceptions. The role of consumer knowledge, perceived congruency, and product technology orientation. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 17–31.
11.
BiswasS., HussainM., & O’DonnellK. (2009). Celebrity endorsements in advertisements and consumer perceptions: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Global Marketing, 22(2), 121–137.
12.
ChenA. C. H., ChangR. Y. H., BesheratA., & BaackD. W. (2013). Who benefits from multiple brand celebrity endorsements? An experimental investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 30(10), 850–860.
13.
CrawfordK. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(4), 525–535.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
15.
DeutschM., & GerardH. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.
16.
DiCicco-BloomB., & CrabtreeB. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321.
17.
DwivediA., & JohnsonL. W. (2013). Trust–commitment as a mediator of the celebrity endorser–brand equity relationship in a service context. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 21(1), 36–42.
18.
EisendM., & LangnerT. (2010). Immediate and delayed advertising effects of celebrity endorsers’ attractiveness and expertise. International Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 527–546.
19.
EllisonN. B., SteinfieldC., & LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
20.
GrantW., MoonB., & GrantJ. (2010). Digital dialogue? Australian politicians’ use of the social network tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 579–604.
21.
GreenJ., & ThorogoodN. (2009). Qualitative methods for health research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
22.
HallG. (2002). Associative structures in Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. In GallistelR. (Ed.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Learning, motivation, and emotion (pp. 1–45). New York, NY: Wiley.
23.
HovlandC. I., & WeissW. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650.
24.
JinS. A. A., & PhuaJ. (2014). Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of Twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181–195.
25.
JohnsR., & EnglishR. (2016). Transition of self: Repositioning the celebrity brand through social media—The case of Elizabeth Gilbert. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 65–72.
26.
KaminsM. A. (1990). An investigation into the ‘match-up’ hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13.
27.
KaplanM. F., & MillerC. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 306–313.
28.
KellerK. L. (1987). Memory factors in advertising: The effect of advertising retrieval cues on brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 316–333.
29.
LiZ. G., & DantR. P. (1997). An exploratory study of exclusive dealing in channel relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 201–213.
30.
LloydK. B., & JankowskiD. J. (1999). A cognitive information processing and information theory approach to diagram clarity: A synthesis and experimental investigation. Journal of Systems and Software, 45(3), 203–214.
31.
LordK. R., & PutrevuS. (2009). Informational and transformational responses to celebrity endorsements. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 31(1), 1–13.
32.
MathysJ., BurmesterA. B., & ClementM. (2016). What drives the market popularity of celebrities? A longitudinal analysis of consumer interest in film stars. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(2), 428–448.
33.
McCrackenG. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321.
34.
MorganR. M., & HuntS. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
35.
NahapietJ., & GhoshalS. (2000). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. In LesserE. (Ed.), Knowledge and social capital (pp. 119–157). London: Routledge.
36.
OhanianR. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
37.
OhanianR. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46–54.
38.
PremackD., & WoodruffG. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.
39.
PutnamR. D.(2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
SherifM., & HovlandC. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Oxford: Yale University Press.
41.
SherifC. W., SherifM., & NebergallR. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach (pp. 127–167). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
42.
ShimpT. A. (2003). Advertising, promotion and supplemental aspects of integrated marketing communications (6th ed.). Mason: Thomson South-Western.
43.
SilvermannD. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
44.
SimonB., PantaleoG., & MummendeyA. (1995). Unique individual or interchangeable group member? The accentuation of intragroup differences versus similarities as an indicator of the individual self-versus the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 106–119.
45.
SorrellJ. M., & RedmondG. M. (1995). Interviews in qualitative nursing research: Differing approaches for ethnographic and phenomenological studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(6), 1117–1122.
46.
SpryA., PappuR., & Bettina CornwellT. (2011). Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 45(6), 882–909.
47.
StarksH., & TrinidadS. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380.
48.
TillB. D., & BuslerM. (1998). Matching products with endorsers: Attractiveness versus expertise. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576–586.
49.
Van NorelN. D., KommersP. A., Van HoofJ. J., & VerhoevenJ. W. (2014). Damaged corporate reputation: Can celebrity Tweets repair it?Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 308–315.
50.
VenkateshV., & BrownS. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71–102.
51.
WojnarD. M., & SwansonK. M. (2007). Phenomenology an exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172–180.
