This article analyses the H1N1 flu crisis coverage, in the Ahmedabad edition of The Times of India, the highest circulated English daily in India as well as in the western Indian state of Gujarat. The study aimed to look at the journalism practices followed in the coverage of the crisis and to determine how the newspaper framed the H1N1 issue. Systematic random sampling was used to select 127 from all 381 news stories that appeared in the Times between August and November 2009. The article identified six frames in the coverage: fear and panic, severity, safety, human interest, attribution of responsibility and scientific information It concludes that the article set the agenda for H1N1 crisis as a threat to human life and framed it as a war between humans, where the virus has an edge over humans.
Audit Bureau of Circulations (2011). A list of circulation certified for the six-monthly audit period ended 30th JUNE, 2011. Retrieved on 8December2011 from http://www.auditbureau.org/memlogin.cgi
2.
BeaudoinChristopher (2007). SARS news coverage and its determinants in China and the US. International Communication Gazette, 69, 509–524.
3.
BorahPorismita (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61, 246–263.
4.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
5.
da Silva MedeirosFlavia NatérciaMassaraniLuisa (2010). Pandemic on the air: A case study on the coverage of new influenza A/H1N1 by Brazilian prime time TV news. Journal of Science Communication, 9, 1–9.
6.
DudoAnthony D.DahlstromMichael F.BrossardDominique (2007). Reporting a potential pandemic: A risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in US newspapers. Science Communication, 28, 429–454.
7.
EntmanRobert M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58
8.
EvensenD.T.N.ClarkeChris E. (2012). Efficacy information in media coverage of infectious disease risks: An ill predicament?, Science Communication, 34, 392.
9.
FridkinKim L.KenneyPatrick J.GershonSarah AllenWoodallGina Serignese (2008). Spinning debates: The impact of the news media’s coverage of the final 2004 presidential debate. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 29–51.
10.
GaoFangfangZhangMengSadriSean (2011). Newspapers use more sources compared to health blogs in H1N1/swine flu coverage. Newspaper Research Journal, 32, 89–96.
11.
Government of India (2011). Consolidated status of influenza A H1N1 as on 20th November 2009. Retrieved on 14September2011 from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=54341
12.
GrunwaldEbbeRuparVerica (2009). Journalism curiosity and story-telling frame: A comparative study of Australian and Danish newspapers. Journalism Practice, 3(4), 392–403.
13.
HongT. (2007). Information control in time of crisis: The framing of SARS in China-based newspapers and internet sources. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, San Francisco, CA, 2007.
14.
HumeJ. (2000). The ‘forgotten’ 1918 influenza epidemic and press portrayal of public anxiety. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 898–915.
15.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
LasorsaD.L.LewisS.C. (2010). Reports, inferences, and judgments in deceptive and legitimate news stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 378–392.
17.
LutherC.A.ZhouX. (2005). Within the boundaries of politics: News framing of SARS in China and the United States. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 857–872.
18.
McCombsM.E.ShawD.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
19.
MelkoteS. (2009). News framing during a time of impending war: An examination of coverage in The New York Times prior to the 2003 Iraq War. International Communication Gazette, 71, 547–559.
20.
MenasheC.L.SiegelM. (1998). The power of a frame: An analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues—United States, 1985–1996. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 307–325.
21.
NandaS.PramanikA. (2010). Media exposure, gender stereotype and contextual stigma perceptions about HIV and AIDS: Evidences from Gujarat, India. Journal of Health Management, 12, 461–481.
22.
OhH.J.HoveT.PaekH.LeeB.LeeH.SongS.K. (2012). Attention cycles and the H1N1 pandemic: A cross-national study of US and Korean newspaper coverage. Asian Journal of Communication, 22, 14–232.
23.
ReeseS.D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148–154.
24.
Registrar of Newspapers for India (2012). Press in India highlights for the year 2010–11. Retrieved on 30January2012 from https://rni.nic.in/.
25.
RiegertK.OlssonE. (2007). The importance of ritual in crisis journalism. Journalism Practice, 1(2), 143–158.
26.
RocheJ.P.MuskavitchM.A.T. (2003). Limited precision in print media communication of West Nile Virus risks. Science Communication, 24, 353–365.
27.
RyanM. (1979). Reports, inferences and judgements in news coverage of social issues. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 497–503.
28.
ScheufeleD.A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.
29.
SemetkoH.A.ValkenburgP.M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 93–109.
30.
ShehataA. (2010). Unemployment on the agenda: A panel study of agenda-setting effects during the 2006 Swedish national election campaign. Journal of Communication, 60, 182–203.
31.
StrömbäckJ.ShehataA.DimitrovaD.V. (2008). Framing the Mohammad cartoons issue: A cross-cultural comparison of Swedish and US press. Global Media and Communication, 4(2), 117–138.
32.
SturgisP.AllumN. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55–74.
33.
The Times of India (2009). H1N1 Toll Nears 400 in India. 15October.
34.
Wagner-EggerP.BangerterA.GillesI.GreenE.RigaudD.KringsF.StaerkléC.ClémenceA. (2011). Lay perceptions of collectives at the outbreak of the H1N1 epidemic: heroes, villains and victims. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 461.
35.
WangW.SmithR.WorawongsW.T. (2010). Googling the H1N1 flu: Investigating media frames in online news coverage of the flu pandemic. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association: Singapore, 2010.
36.
WinettL. (1995). Advocate’s guide to developing framing memos. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Media Studies Group.
37.
WongN.HarvellL.NecatiA. (2010). Framing the H1N1 flu pandemic: Effect of visual and textual frames on perceptions of flu susceptibility, severity, and attributions for its global outbreak. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Suntec Singapore International Convention & Exhibition Centre, Suntec City, Singapore, 2010.
38.
World Health Organization (2010). Pandemic (H1N1) 2009—Update 86. Retrieved on 2December2010 from http://www.who.int/csr/don/2010_02_5/en/index.html
39.
Yusha’uM.J. (2011). News framing of the ‘Detroit Bomber’ in the Nigerian press. Global Media and Communication, 7(3), 281–286.
