This article focuses on how South African youths from the town of Makhaza, Khayelitsha, who were transitioning from high school to tertiary education or full time employment, used their mobile phones. It also examines the meanings that the devices hold for them. Using ‘space’ as a key construct, the article relies on Victor Turner’s theory of ‘liminality’, Michel Foucault’s concept of heterotopias as conceptualized by Wearing and the power of contexts and spaces, to understand the uses of, and meanings ascribed to, mobile phones by youth in transition. These theoretical lenses allowed us to explore the way post-high school, unemployed youth use mobile media to resist subjectivities of inferiority, redefine themselves in the practice of their everyday lives, and expand their understanding of living in an increasingly networked world. The study found that the participants applied extensive ingenuity and creativity in the appropriation of mobile Internet technologies to configure their social surroundings in support of their interests, although they were not always able to channel these into developing opportunities for further study and work.
7 billion humans 7 billion phones. (2013). South China morning post. Retrieved 12September2013, from http://www.scmp.com/business/article/1167525/7-billion-humans-7-billion-phones
2.
AmitV. (2010). The limits of liminality: Capacities for change and transition among student travellers. In RapportN. (ed.) Human nature as capacity: Transcending discourse and classification (pp. 54–71). New York: Berghahn Books.
3.
ArminenI. (2010). New reasons for mobile communication: Intensification of time-space geography in the mobile era. In LingR.CampbellS.W. (eds), The Reconstruction of space and time: Mobile communication practices (pp. 89–107). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
4.
BalasubramanianK.ThamizoliP.UmarA.KanwarA. (2010). Using mobile phones to promote lifelong learning among rural women in Southern India. Distance Education,31(2), 193–209.
5.
BhavnaniA.ChuiR.W.JanakiramS.SilarszkyP. (2008). The role of mobile phones in sustainable rural poverty reduction. In ICT Policy Division: Global Information and Communications Department (GICT). Retrieved 12September2013, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTINFORMATIONANDCOMMUNICATIONANDTECHNOLOGIES/Resources/The_Role_of_Mobile_Phones_in_Sustainable_Rural_Poverty_Reduction_June_2008.pdf
6.
BrayR.GooskensI.MosesS.KahnL.SeekingsJ. (2010). Growing up in the new South Africa: Childhood and adolescence in post-apartheid Cape Town. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
7.
CecchiniS.ScottC. (2003). Can information and communications technology applications contribute to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India. Information Technology for Development,10, 73–84. Retrieved 12September2013, from http://itd.ist.unomaha.edu/archives/1.pdf
8.
FoucaultM.MiskowiecJ. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics,16(1), 22–27.
9.
GogginG. (2006). Cell Phone Culture. New York: Routledge.
10.
GoyalA. (2011). Developing women: Why technology can help. Information Technology for Development,17(2), 112–132.
11.
International Telecommunication Union. (2013). The World in 2013: ICT Facts and Figures. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
12.
International Telecommunication Union (2011). Key Global Telecom Indicators for the World Telecommunication Service Sector. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/KeyTelecom.html
13.
LingR. (2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. London: MIT Press.
14.
MosoetsaS. (2011). Eating from one pot: The dynamics of survival in poor South African households. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
15.
RapportN. & Overing, J. (2000). Social and cultural anthropology: The key concepts. London: Routledge.
16.
SeyA. (2011). ‘We use it different, different’: Making sense of trends in mobile phone use in Ghana. New Media & Society,13(3), 375–390.
17.
ShieldsR. (1991). Places on the margin: Alternative geographies of modernity. London: Routledge.
18.
SilberG.GreenN. (2009). Race, class and violent crime in South Africa: Dispelling the ‘Huntley thesis’. SA Crime Quarterly,30, 35–43.
19.
SkuseA.CousinsT. (2008). Getting connected: The social dynamics of urban telecommunications access and use in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. New Media & Society,10(1), 9–26.
20.
SlaterD.KwamiJ. (2005). Embeddedness and escape: Internet and mobile use as poverty reduction. Retrieved 12September2013, from http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/Output/185503/Default.aspx
21.
ThulinE.VilhelmsonB. (2010). Mobile phones: Transforming the everyday social communication practice of urban youth. In LingR.CampbellS.W. (eds), The Reconstruction of space and time: Mobile communication practices (pp. 137–158). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
22.
TiwariM. (2008). ICTs and poverty reduction: User perspective study of rural Madhya Pradesh, India. The European Journal of Development Research,20(3), 448–461.
23.
TurnerV. (1979). Process, performance and pilgrimage: A study in comparative symbology. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
24.
WaltonM.MarsdenG.HassreiterS.AllenS. (2012). Degrees of sharing: Proximate media sharing and messaging by young people in Khayelitsha. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 403–412. ACM.
25.
WaltonM.KreutzerT. (2009). A phone that has life has internet: Mobile-only internet access and media use by teens in Khayelitsha, South Africa. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, IAMCR, Mexico City, Mexico.
26.
WaskulD.D. (2005). Ekstasis and the internet: Liminality and computer-mediated communication. New Media & Society,7(1), 47–63.
27.
WearingB. (1999). Leisure and feminist theory. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
