The objective of the study was to analyze the differences between the members of a Software Project in Team Effectiveness and to examine the influence of the factors on Team Diversity. Two hundred software professionals, consisting of five groups, were surveyed using Team Effectiveness and the Team Diversity Questionnaires. The results showed that Team Diversity have no bearing on software professionals on matters relating to Team Effectiveness. Three sub-dimensions of the questionnaire were found to influence Team Effectiveness namely, Sorting Disagreement within the Teams, Participation and Involvement, and Informality among Team Members.
DailyBonnie F.JohnLovelandRobertSteiner (1997), “A Comparative Analysis of Reactions from Multicultural and Culturally Homogeneous Teams to Decision Making with and without GDSS Technology”, ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel.Vol. 18 (1), pp. 3–14.
2.
DeSanctisGerardineWrightMatthewJiangLu. (2001), “Building A Global Learning Community”, Communications of the ACM,Global Applications of Collaborative Technology, Vol. 44 (12), pp. 80–82.
3.
ElsassP.GravesL. (1994), Unravelling the paradox of diversity. A theoretical model. In JacksonS. E.RudermanM. N., Work-team dynamics and productivity in the context of diversity. Conference held at the Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro. NC.
4.
KirkmanBradley L.TeslukPaul, E.RosenBenson (2004), “The Impact of Demographic Heterogeneity and Team Leader — Team Member Demographic Fit on Team Empowerment and Effectiveness”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 29 (3), pp. 334–335.
5.
LarssonA. (2003). Making sense of collaboration. The challenge of thinking together in global design teams. Conference on Supporting Group Work. Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work. Sanibel Island. Florida. USA. pp. 153–160.
6.
MasseyAnne P.Caisy HungYu-TingMontoya-WeissMitziRameshV. (2001), When Culture and Style aren't about Clothes: Perceptions of Task-Technology “Fit” In Global Virtual Teams. Conference on Supporting Group Work. Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. Boulder. Colorado. USA. pp. 207–213.
7.
MayThornton A. (2004), “Demographics and IT Team Performance”, Computerworld, Vol. 38 (20), pp. 21.
8.
PaulSourenSeetharamanPriyaSamarahImadMykytynPeter P. (2004), Impact of Heterogeneity and Collaborative Conflict Management Style on the Performance of Synchronous Global Virtual Teams, Information and Management, Vol. 41 (3), pp. 303–321.
9.
PaulSourenSeetharamanPriyaSamarahImadMykytynPeterJr.. (2005). Understanding Conflict in Virtual Teams: An Experimental Investigation using Content Analysis. HICSS. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS1905), Vol. 3 (6), pp. 44a–44a.
10.
ReagansRayZuckermanEzra W. (2001), “Networks, Diversity, and Productivity”, The Social Capital of Corporate R & D Teams, Organization Science.Vol. 12 (4), pp. 502–517.
11.
SelmaG. Meyers (1996), Team Diversity Questionnaire. Team Building for Diverse Work Groups. Wheeler Publishing, New Delhi.
12.
SiakasKerstinGeorgiadouElli (2002), “Empirical Measurement of the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Software Quality Management”, Software Quality Control, Vol. 10 (2), pp. 169–180.
13.
TrimmerKenneth J.CollinsRosann WebbWillRichard P.BlantonJ. Ellis. (2000), Information systems development: can there be “good” conflict?. Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research. Chicago. Illinois. United States. pp.174–179.
14.
VelayudhanA. (2001). Team Effectiveness, Team Diversity, Emotional Competence and Personality Types of Professionals in Software Project Teams. Unpublished project.
