SweetDGCarnielliVGreisenGEuropean Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome—2019 Update. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450.
2.
CummingsJJPolinRA.Committee on, fetus newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics: Noninvasive respiratory support. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3758. (Epub 2015 December 29. PMID: 26715607).
3.
Committee on F, Newborn, American Academy of P. Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):171-174.
4.
The National Neonatology Forum of India. Evidence based clinical practical guidelines. 2010. http://aimaonline.org/iap-neochap-2013/uploads/acd-corner/nnf_guidelines-2011.pdf.Accessed August 25, 2019.
5.
KumarABhatBV.Epidemiology of respiratory distress of newborns. Indian Jj Pediatr. 1996;63(1):93-98.
6.
MuheLMMcClureEMNigussieAK Major causes of death in preterm infants in selected hospitals in Ethiopia (SIP): a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(8):e1130-e1138.
7.
Report of National Neonatal Perinatal Database (NNPD) 2002-2003. http://www.newbornwhocc.org/nnpo.html.Accessed November 1, 2019.
8.
LaughonMMLangerJCBoseCLPrediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia by postnatal age in extremely premature infants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(12):1715-1722.
9.
BhunwalSMukhopadhyayKBhattacharyaSDeyPDhaliwalLK.Bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates in a level III neonatal unit in India. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55(3):211-215.
10.
SubramaniamPHoJJDavisPG.Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preventing morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016(6):CD001243.
11.
HoJJSubramaniamPDavisPG.Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(7):CD002271.
12.
BelenkyDAOrrRJWoodrumDEHodsonWA.Is continuous transpulmonary pressure better than conventional respiratory management of hyaline membrane disease? A controlled study. Pediatrics. 1976;58(6):800-808.
13.
BuckmasterAGArnoldaGWrightIMFosterJPHenderson-SmartDJ.Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for infants with respiratory distress in non tertiary care centers: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):509-518.
14.
DurbinGMHunterNJMcIntoshNReynoldsEOWimberleyPD.Controlled trial of continuous inflating pressure for hyaline membrane disease. Arch Dis Child. 1976;51(3):163-169.
15.
FanaroffAAChaCCSosaRCrumrineRSKlausMH.Controlled trial of continuous negative external pressure in the treatment of severe respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 1973;82(6):921-928.
16.
RhodesPGHallRT.Continuous positive airway pressure delivered by face mask in infants with the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome: a controlled study. Pediatrics. 1973;52(1):1-5.
KoyamaiboleLKadoJQovuJDColquhounSDukeT.An evaluation of bubble-CPAP in a neonatal unit in a developing country: effective respiratory support that can be applied by nurses. J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52(4):249-253.
19.
HoJJHenderson-SmartDJDavisPG.Early versus delayed initiation of continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD002975.
20.
Rowe JCGRHinkesPPrueittJMurphyJWoodrumDZHodsonWA.Time of initiation of CPAP in HMD (Abstract ). Pediatr Res. 1978;12:533.
21.
MockrinLDBancalariEH.Early versus delayed initiation of continuous negative pressure in infants with hyaline membrane disease. J Pediatr. 1975;87:596-600.
22.
KrouskopRWBrownEGSweetAY.The early use of continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 1975;87(2):263-267.
23.
HegyiTHiattIM.The effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the course of respiratory distress syndrome: the benefits on early initiation. Crit Care Med. 1981;9(1):38-41.
24.
GerardPFoxWWOuterbridgeEWBeaudryPH.Early versus late introduction of continuous negative pressure in the management of the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 1975;87(4):591-595.
25.
AllenLPReynoldsERRiversRPLe SouefPMWimberleyPD.Controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure given by face mask for hyaline membrane disease. Arch Dis Child. 1977;52(5):373-378.
26.
BadieeZNaseriFSadeghniaA.Early versus delayed initiation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature newborns: A randomized clinical trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2013;2:4.
27.
DavisPGHenderson-SmartDJ.Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD000143.
28.
HongHLiXXLiJZhangZQ.High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019:1-8.
29.
FleemanNDundarYShahPSShawBN.Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for preterm infants: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):298-306.
30.
GlackinSJO’SullivanAGeorgeSSemberovaJMiletinJ.High flow nasal cannula versus NCPAP, duration to full oral feeds in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102(4):F329-F332.
31.
IranpourRSadeghniaAHesarakiM.High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the management of respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(Suppl 2):A115-A116.
32.
KlingenbergCPettersenMHansenEA Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: A randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99(2):F134-F137.
33.
LavizzariAColnaghiMCiuffiniFHeated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016.
34.
ManleyBJArnoldaGRBWrightIMR Nasal high-flow therapy for newborn infants in special care nurseries. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(21):2031-2040.
35.
MurkiSSinghJKhantC High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241.
36.
Nair GKP.Comparison of the effects of vapotherm and nasal CPAP in respiratory distress in preterm infants. Pediatr Acad Soc. 2005; 57:2054.
37.
RobertsCTOwenLSManleyBJ Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(12):1142-1151.
38.
ShinJParkKLeeEHChoiBM.Humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as an initial respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32(4):650-655.
39.
YoderBAStoddardRALiMKingJDirnbergerDRAbbasiS.Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):e1482-1490.
40.
RobertsCTManleyBJDawsonJADavisPG.Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(10):806-810.
41.
OsmanMElsharkawyAAbdel-HadyH.Assessment of pain during application of nasal-continuous positive airway pressure and heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2015;35(4):263-267.
42.
HuangLRobertsCTManleyBJOwenLSDavisPGDalzielKM.Cost-effectiveness analysis of nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal high flow therapy as primary support for infants born preterm. J Pediatr. 2018;196:58-64e52.
43.
LemyreBLaughonMBoseCDavisPG.Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD005384.
44.
ArmanianAMBadieeZHeidariGFeiziASalehimehrN.Initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome with nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(12):1543-1551.
45.
BiscegliaMBelcastroAPoerioV A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 2007;59(2):91-95.
46.
KirpalaniHMillarDLemyreB A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(7):611-620.
47.
KugelmanAFeferkornIRiskinAChistyakovIKaufmanBBaderD.Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr. 2007;150(5):521-526, 526 e521.
48.
ListaGCastoldiFFontanaPNasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(2):F85-F89.
49.
MenesesJBhandariVAlvesJGHerrmannD.Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011;127(2):300-307.
50.
RamanathanRSekarKCRasmussenMBhatiaJSollRF.Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks’ gestation: A randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2012;32(5):336-343.
51.
Sai Sunil KishoreMDuttaSKumarP.Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(9):1412-1415.
52.
Salama GSAFAl-RabadiAJAlquranMLShakkouryAG.Nasal-IMV versus nasal-CPAP as an initial mode of respiratory support for premature infants with RDS: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Rawal J Med. 2015;40(2):197-202.
53.
WoodFGuptaSTinWSinhaS.Randomised controlled trial of synchronised intermittent positive airway pressure (SiPAP™) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(Suppl 1):A78-A78.
54.
Aguiar TMIVoutsenOSilvaPNonaJ.Nasal bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Trials. 2015;5:221. doi:10.4172/2167-0870.1000221.
55.
EsmaeilniaTNayeriFTaheritaftiRShariatMMoghimpour-BijaniF.Comparison of complications and efficacy of NIPPV and nasal CPAP in preterm infants with RDS. Iran J Pediatr. 2016;26(2):e2352.
56.
OncelMYArayiciSUrasN Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: A randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(4):F323-F328.
57.
GharehbaghiMMHosseiniMBEivaziGYasrebiniaS.Comparing the efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in early management of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Oman Med J. 2019;34(2):99-104.
58.
SilveiraCSLeonardiKMMeloAPZaiaJEBrunherottiMA.Response of preterm infants to 2 noninvasive ventilatory support systems: Nasal CPAP and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Respir Care. 2015;60(12):1772-1776.
59.
DunnMSKaempfJde KlerkARandomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1069-1076.
60.
MorleyCJDavisPGDoyleLW Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):700-708.
61.
SSGotEKSNNR61. NetworkFinerNNCarloWA Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(21):1970-1979.
62.
VaucherYEPeralta-CarcelenMFinerNN Neurodevelopmental outcomes in the early CPAP and pulse oximetry trial. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(26):2495-2504.
63.
ThukralASankarMJChandrasekaranAAgarwalRPaulVK.Efficacy and safety of CPAP in low- and middle-income countries. J Perinatol. 2016;36 (Suppl 1):S21-S28.
64.
CarnsJKawazaKLiaghati-MobarhanS Neonatal CPAP for respiratory distress across Malawi and mortality. Pediatrics. 2019;144(4):e20190668.
65.
IsayamaTChai-AdisaksophaCMcDonaldSD.Noninvasive ventilation with vs without early surfactant to prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):731-739.
66.
DilmenUOzdemirRTatar AksoyH Early regular versus late selective poractant treatment in preterm infants born between 25 and 30 gestational weeks: a prospective randomized multicenter study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(4):411-415.
67.
Imani MDRKhaliliMArbabisarjouA.Comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy with and without prophylactic surfactant in preterm neonates. Iranian J Neonatol. 2013;4(3):26-34.
68.
KandrajuHMurkiSSubramanianSGaddamPDeorariAKumarP.Early routine versus late selective surfactant in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome on nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2013;103(2):148-154.
69.
ReiningerAKhalakRKendigJWSurfactant administration by transient intubation in infants 29 to 35 weeks’ gestation with respiratory distress syndrome decreases the likelihood of later mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2005;25(11):703-708.
70.
RojasMALozanoJMRojasMXVery early surfactant without mandatory ventilation in premature infants treated with early continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):137-142.
71.
SandriFPlavkaRAncoraGProphylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):e1402-1409.
72.
VerderHAlbertsenPEbbesenFNasal continuous positive airway pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks’ gestation. Pediatrics. 1999;103(2):E24.
73.
VerderHRobertsonBGreisenGSurfactant therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Danish-Swedish Multicenter Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(16):1051-1055.
74.
SankarMJGuptaNJainKAgarwalRPaulVK.Efficacy and safety of surfactant replacement therapy for preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. J Perinatol. 2016;36 (Suppl 1):S36-S48.
75.
World Health Organization. WHO model list of essential medicines for children. 7th list. 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325772/WHO-MVP-EMP-IAU-2019.07-eng.pdf?ua=1.pdf. Accessed on November 25, 2019.
76.
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes. 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/183037/9789241508988_eng.pdf;jsessionid=A1030072B52ED8C397D6C0892D8D0 CA8?sequence=1.pdf. Accessed on 25 November, 2019.
77.
Salinas-EscuderoGReyes-LopezAGarduno-EspinosaJVillasis-KeeverMAMartinez-ValverdeSMunoz-HernandezO.Economic evaluation of the use of exogenous pulmonary surfactants in preterm newborns in a Mexican population. Salud Publica Mex. 2012;54 (Suppl 1):S73-S81.
78.
Henderson-SmartDJSubramanianPDavisPG.Continuous positive airway pressure versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001072.
79.
JonesRA.Apnoea of immaturity: 1. A controlled trial of theophylline and face mask continuous positive airways pressure. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57(10):761-765.
Henderson-SmartDJDe PaoliAG.Methylxanthine treatment for apnoea in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(12):CD000140.
82.
EichenwaldEC, Committee on F, Newborn AAoP. Apnea of Prematurity. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3757
83.
LemyreBDavisPGDe PaoliAG.Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD002272.
84.
LinCHWangSTLinYJYehTF.Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998;26(5):349-353.
85.
RyanCAFinerNNPetersKL.Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. Am J Dis Child. 1989;143(10):1196-1198.
86.
GizziCMontecchiaFPanettaV Is synchronised NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and NCPAP in treating apnoea of prematurity (AOP)? A randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(1):F17-F23.
87.
PantalitschkaTSieversJUrschitzMSHerbertsTReherCPoetsCF.Randomised crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(4):F245-F248.
88.
TapiaJLBancalariAGonzalezAMercadoME.Does continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during weaning from intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants have risks or benefits? A controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995;19(5):269-274.
89.
SoBHTamuraMMishinaJWatanabeTKamoshitaS.Application of nasal continuous positive airway pressure to early extubation in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995;72(3):F191-F193.
90.
PeakeMDillonPShawNJ.Randomized trial of continuous positive airways pressure to prevent reventilation in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;39(3):247-250.
91.
HigginsRDRichterSEDavisJM.Nasal continuous positive airway pressure facilitates extubation of very low birth weight neonates. Pediatrics. 1991;88(5):999-1003.
92.
EngelkeSCRoloffDWKuhnsLR.Postextubation nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a prospective controlled study. Am J Dis Child. 1982;136(4):359-361.
93.
DimitriouGGreenoughAKavvadiaVElective use of nasal continuous positive airways pressure following extubation of preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2000;159(6):434-439.
94.
DavisPJankovRDoyleLHenschkeP.Randomised, controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of infants weighing 600 to 1250 g. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79(1):F54-F57.
95.
ChanVGreenoughA.Randomised trial of methods of extubation in acute and chronic respiratory distress. Arch Dis Child. 1993;68(5 Spec No):570-572.
96.
AnnibaleDJHulseyTCEngstromPCWallinLAOhningBL.Randomized, controlled trial of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1994;124(3):455-460.
97.
DavisPGHenderson-SmartDJ.Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD000143.
98.
ChenJGaoWWXuFComparison of clinical efficacy of heated humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in very low birth weight infants. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2015;17(8):847-851.
99.
Collaborative Group for the Multicenter Study on Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula V. Efficacy and safety of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for prevention of extubation failure in neonates. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014;52(4):271-276.
100.
CollinsCLHolbertonJRBarfieldCDavisPG.A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013;162(5):949-954.e1.
101.
Elkhwad MDJJenniferGHarrietFAnandK.Randomized control trial: heated humidity high flow nasal cannula in comparison with NCPAP in the management of RDS in extreme low birth infants in immediate post extubation period. Neonat Pediatr Med. 2017; 3:121.
102.
KadivarMMMosayebiZMRaziNMNarimanSMSangsariRM.High flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome managed with INSURE method: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2016;41(6):494-500.
103.
ManleyBJOwenLSDoyleLWHigh-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1425-1433.
104.
Mostafa-GharehbaghiM MH.Comparing the effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in prevention of post extubation assisted ventilation. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2014; 17:e984.
105.
SoonsawadSTongsawangNNuntnarumitP.Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for weaning from continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2016;110(3):204-209.
106.
KangWQXuBLLiuDPEfficacy of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants aged less than 32 weeks after ventilator weaning. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2016;18(6):488-491.
107.
O’BrienKCampbellCBrownLWengerLShahV.Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants’ </= 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:43.
108.
MorettiCGianniniLFassiCGizziCPapoffPColariziP.Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low-birthweight infants: unmasked randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Int. 2008;50(1):85-91.
109.
KhoranaMParadeevisutHSangtawesinVKanjanapatanakulWChotigeatUAyutthayaJK.A randomized trial of non-synchronized Nasopharyngeal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(Suppl 3):S136-S142.
110.
KhalafMNBrodskyNHurleyJBhandariV.A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):13-17.
111.
KahramanerZErdemirATurkogluECosarHSutcuogluSOzerEA.Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants after extubation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(9):926-929.
112.
JasaniBNanavatiRKabraNRajdeoSBhandariV.Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(10):1546-1551.
113.
GaoWWTanSZChenYBZhangYWangY.Randomized trail of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2010;12(7):524-526.
114.
FriedlichPLecartCPosenRRamiconeEChanLRamanathanR.A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol. 1999;19(6 Pt 1):413-418.
115.
BarringtonKJBullDFinerNN.Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2001;107(4):638-641.
116.
KomatsuDFDinizEMFerraroAACecconMEVazFA.Randomized controlled trial comparing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after tracheal extubation. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016;62(6):568-574.
117.
RibeiroSNSFontesMJFBhandariVResendeCBJohnstonC.Noninvasive ventilation in newborns </= 1,500 g after tracheal extubation: randomized clinical trial. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(12):1190-1198.
118.
FleemanNDundarYShahPSShawBN.Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for preterm infants: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):298-306.
119.
PanditaAMurkiSOletiTP Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on infants with meconium aspiration syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(2):161-165.
120.
De PaoliAGDavisPGFaberBMorleyCJ.Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(1):CD002977.
121.
StefanescuBMMurphyWPHansellBJFuloriaMMorganTMAschnerJL.A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):1031-1038.
122.
SunSCTienHC.Randomized controlled trial of two methods of nasal CPAP (NCPAP): flow driver vs conventional NCPAP [Abstract]. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:322A.
123.
ColaizyTTMcEvoyCCrichtonCBubble vs. conventional CPAP: a prospective, randomized, pilot study (abstract). Pediatr Acad Soc. 2004; 55:264. http://www.pas-meeting.org/Accessed November 10, 2020.
124.
YadavSThukralASankarMJBubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: a pilot study. Indian J pediatr. 2012;79(9):1163-1168.
125.
TagareAKadamSVaidyaUPanditAPatoleS.Bubble CPAP versus ventilator CPAP in preterm neonates with early onset respiratory distress–a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr. 2013;59(2):113-119.
126.
BuettikerVHugMIBaenzigerOMeyerCFreyB.Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(5):926-930.
127.
BoberKSwietlinskiJZejdaJA multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(2):191-196.
128.
MazmanyanPMellorKDoreCJModiN.A randomised controlled trial of flow driver and bubble continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants in a resource-limited setting. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(1):F16-20.
129.
BhattiAKhanJMurkiSSundaramVSainiSSKumarP.Nasal Jet-CPAP (variable flow) versus Bubble-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress: an open label, randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2015;35(11):935-940.
130.
GuptaSSinhaSKTinWDonnSM.A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 2009;154(5):645-650.
131.
HosseiniMBHeidarzadehMBalilaMRandomized controlled trial of two methods of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: underwater bubbly CPAP vs. Medijet system device. TurkJ Pediatr. 2012;54(6):632-640.
132.
KingBCGandhiBBJacksonAKatakamLPammiMSureshG.Mask versus prongs for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2019;116(2):100-114.
133.
GoelSMondkarJPanchalHHegdeDUttureAManerkarS.Nasal mask versus nasal prongs for delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress: A randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(12):1035-1040.
134.
KieranEATwomeyARMolloyEJMurphyJFO’DonnellCP.Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):e1170-1176.
135.
SayBKanmaz KutmanHGOguzSSBinasal prong versus nasal mask for applying CPAP to preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2016;109(4):258-264.
136.
BashirTMurkiSKiranSReddyVKOletiTP.‘Nasal mask’ in comparison with ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs’ reduce the incidence of nasal injury in preterm neonates supported on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0211476.
137.
ChandrasekaranAThukralAJeeva SankarMAgarwalRPaulVKDeorariAK.Nasal masks or binasal prongs for delivering continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates: a randomised trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(3):379-386.
138.
YongSCChenSJBooNY.Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(6):F480-483.
139.
NewnamKMMcGrathJMSalyerJEstesTJalloNBassWT.A comparative effectiveness study of continuous positive airway pressure-related skin breakdown when using different nasal interfaces in the extremely low birth weight neonate. Appl Nurs Res. 2015;28(1):36-41.
140.
MurkiSNathaniPPSharmaDSubramaniamSOletiTPChawlaD.Initiating nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates at 5 cm as against 7 cm did not decrease the need for mechanical ventilation. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(8):e345-351.
141.
BuzzellaBClaureND’UgardCBancalariE.A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164(1):46-51.
142.
AmatyaSMacomberMBhutadaARastogiDRastogiS.Sudden versus gradual pressure wean from Nasal CPAP in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2017;37(6):662-667.
143.
BadieeZEshghiAMohammadizadehM.High flow nasal cannula as a method for rapid weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:33.
144.
EzeNMurphyDDharVRehanVK.Comparison of sprinting vs non-sprinting to wean nasal continuous positive airway pressure off in very preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2018;38(2):164-168.
145.
JensenCFSellmerAEbbesenFSudden vs pressure wean from nasal continuous positive airway pressure in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(9):824-831.
146.
O’DonnellSMCurrySJBuggyNAThe NOFLO trial: low-flow nasal prongs therapy in weaning nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2013;163(1):79-83.
147.
Rastogi SWWGuptaABhutadaARastogiDeepaMaimonides Neonatal Group. Gradual versus sudden weaning from nasal CPAP in preterm infants: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Respir Care. 2013;58:511-516.
148.
Singh SDBLClarkPGloverKPasquillARobinsonMJIs decreasing pressure or increasing time of a better strategy in weaning VLBW infants from NCPAP. Eur J Paediatr. 2006;165(Suppl 1):48.
149.
Soe AHJJaniBDuckerDA.Nasal continuous positive airway pressure weaning in preterm infants. Eur J Paediatr. 2006;165(Suppl 1):48-49.
150.
TangJReidSLutzTMalcolmGOliverSOsbornDA.Randomised controlled trial of weaning strategies for preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:147.
151.
ToddDAWrightABroomMMethods of weaning preterm babies <30 weeks gestation off CPAP: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(4):F236-240.
152.
NairVSwarnamKRabiYEffect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) cycling and continuous NCPAP on successful weaning: a randomized controlled trial. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82(9):787-793.
153.
AmmariASuriMMilisavljevicVVariables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2005;147(3):341-347.
154.
DargavillePAAiyappanADe PaoliAGContinuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants: incidence, predictors and consequences. Neonatology. 2013;104(1):8-14.
155.
TagliaferroTBatemanDRuzal-ShapiroCPolinRA.Early radiologic evidence of severe respiratory distress syndrome as a predictor of nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in extremely low birth weight newborns. J Perinatol. 2015;35(2):99-103.
156.
PillaiMSSankarMJManiKAgarwalRPaulVKDeorariAK.Clinical prediction score for nasal CPAP failure in pre-term VLBW neonates with early onset respiratory distress. J Trop Pediatr. 2011;57(4):274-279.
157.
RochaGFlor-de-LimaFProencaEFailure of early nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants of 26 to 30 weeks gestation. J Perinatol. 2013;33(4):297-301.
158.
FuchsHLindnerWLeiprechtAMendlerMRHummlerHD.Predictors of early nasal CPAP failure and effects of various intubation criteria on the rate of mechanical ventilation in preterm infants of <29 weeks gestational age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(5):F343-347.
159.
DargavillePAGerberAJohanssonSIncidence and Outcome of CPAP Failure in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1).
160.
GulczynskaESzczapaTHozejowskiRBorszewska-KornackaMKRutkowskaM.Fraction of inspired oxygen as a predictor of CPAP failure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective multicenter study. Neonatology. 2019;116(2):171-178.
161.
KotiJMurkiSGaddamPReddyAReddyMD.Bubble CPAP for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47(2):139-143.
162.
De JaegereAPvan der LeeJHCanteCvan KaamAH.Early prediction of nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(4):374-379.
163.
BooNYZuraidahALLimNLZulfiqarMA.Predictors of failure of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Trop Pediatr. 2000;46(3):172-175.
164.
UrsPSKhanFMaiyaPP.Bubble CPAP: a primary respiratory support for respiratory distress syndrome in newborns. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46(5):409-411.
165.
DaniCBertiEBarpJ.Risk factors for INSURE failure in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 2010;62(3 Suppl 1):19-20.
166.
BrixNSellmerAJensenMSPedersenLVHenriksenTB.Predictors for an unsuccessful INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation procedure: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:155.
167.
SahniRSchiaraturaMPolinRA.Strategies for the prevention of continuous positive airway pressure failure. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(3):196-203.
