Legitimisation of women leaders in school education is a new area of study in India. The present study is carried out by developing a conceptual model and subjecting it to empirical evidence from 20 women school heads of different states in India. It seeks to know how women establish legitimacy as leaders in schools. Women’s leadership-focused behaviours interacting with gender perspectives provides them avenues to navigate passivity of education system, building trust with community and love for children. They diffuse glass-cliff, illegitimacy and backlash effects by ignoring gendered notions or addressing them boldly, grow as experts, work at system level, swapping between promotion-focused and prevention-focused leadership behaviours adapting rational and traditional gender perspectives to their advantage according to the circumstances to establish their legitimacy as leaders.
AshrafD. (2008). Schools are like our homes: Women in teaching and school leadership in Northern Pakistan. In KirkJ. (Ed.), Women teaching in South Asia (pp. 34–55). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
2.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
4.
BatraP. (2009). Teacher empowerment: The education of entitlement-social transformation traverse. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 6(2), 121–156.
5.
BelliyappaJ. L.De SouzaS. (2017). Exercising agency within professional and social constraints: The career narration of Anglo-Indian woman employed as school teachers in Bangalore. International Journal of Anglo Indian Studies, 17(1), 30–61.
6.
BistaM. B. (2008). Policies and realities for women teachers in Nepal. In KirkJ. (Ed.), Women teaching in south Asia (pp. 87–107). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
7.
BiswasS. N.BiswasU. N. (2001, July–December). Legitimizing leadership: A framework for institutional leadership. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 33–42. DOI:10.1.1.851.8020
8.
BrescollV. L. (2011).Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001839212439994
9.
BruckmullerS.BranscombeN. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 433–451. doi:10.1348/014466609X466794
10.
CroweE.HigginsE. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
11.
CubilloL.BrownM. (2003). Women in educational leadership and management: International differences?Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 278–291.
EaglyA. H.SchmidtC. J. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797.
14.
EverettJ.CharltonS. E. M. (2014). Women navigating globalization: Feminist approach to development. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
FrenchJ. R. P.RavenB. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies of social power (pp. 155–164). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16.
FullerK. (2013). Gender, identity and educational leadership. New Delhi: Bloomsbury.
17.
GartonR. A.AlstonJ. A. (2012). School leadership and administration: Important concepts, case studies and simulations. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
HaslaimS. A.RyanM. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 530–546.
20.
JablinF. M. (1985). An exploratory study of vocational organizational communication socialization. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 261–282.
21.
JainD. (2015). Understanding leadership: Lessons from women’s movement In GoyalO. (Ed.), Interrogating women’s leadership and empowerment (pp. 1–12). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
22.
JandhyalaK.MehrotraN.RamachandranV. (2014). A Study of women teachers and achievement of gender and equity goals in secondary education. New Delhi: ERU Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
23.
JandhyalaK.RamachandranV. (2015). Why women teachers matter in secondary education. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(32), 48–54.
24.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
25.
KeynesM. L.HysomS. J.LupoK. L. (2000). The positive organization: Leadership legitimacy, employee well-being and the bottom line. Psychologist Manager Journal, 4(2), 143–153.
26.
KirkJ. (Ed.). (2008). Women teaching in South Asia. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
27.
KirkJ.WinthropR. (2008). Women teachers in community-based schools in Afghanistan. In KirkJ. (Ed.), Women teaching in South Asia (pp. 128–145). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
28.
KurshidA.SabaA. (2017). Contested womanhood: Women’s education and (re)production of gendered norms in rural Pakistan Muslim communities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(4), 550–563. Retrieved from doi.org.10.1080/01596306.2017.1282425
29.
LongCMellonyG.SayedY.LampenE. (2017). Enabling and constraining conditions of professional teacher agency: The South African context. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 14(1), 5–21.
30.
LimerickB.LingardB. (Eds.). (1995). Gender and changing educational management. Sydney: Holder and Stoughton.
31.
LucasW. J. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 464–480. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519733
32.
ManjrekarN. (2013). Women school teachers in new times: Some preliminary reflections. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 20(2), 335–356.
33.
MarshallC. (1985). The stigmatized woman: The professional woman in a male sex-typed career. The Journal of Educational Administration, 23(2), 131–152.
34.
MayerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
35.
Moss-RacusinC. A.RudmanL. A. (2010). Disruptions in women’s self-promotion: The backlash avoidance model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 186–202. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01561.x
36.
MythiliN. (2017). Representation of women in school leadership positions in India (Occasional Paper No. 51). New Delhi: National University of Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA).
37.
NairU. (1988). Women teachers in South Asia. New Delhi: Chanakya Publications.
38.
OgawaR. T.BossertS. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Education Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224–243.
39.
PatelG. (2013). Gender differences in leadership styles and the impact within corporate boards. A study commissioned by Commonwealth Secretariat, Social Transformation Programs Division. Retrieved from www.cpahq.org/cpahq/cpadocs/Genderdiffe.pdf
40.
RajanS. R.KrishnanV. R. (2002). Impact of gender on influence, power, and authoritarianism. Women in Management Review, 17(5), 197–206.
41.
RamachandranV. (2008, June). Health and girls’ education in South Asia: An essential synergy. A study undertaken by The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Regional office for South Asia and United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative (UNGEI). Retrieved from www.eruindia.org/…/Girls%20Edu%20&%20Health%20S%20Asia%20June%202008
42.
ReadP. B. (1974). Source of authority and the legitmation of leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 37(2), 189–204.
43.
ReskinB.RossC. E. (1992). Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers: The continuing significance of sex. Work and Occupations, 19(4), 342–365.
44.
RudmanL. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
45.
RyanM. K.HaslamS. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90.
VialC. A.NapierJ. L.BrescollV. L. (2016). A bed of thorns: Female leaders and self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 400–414.
49.
WalkerH. A.ZelditchM.Jr. (1993). Power, legitimacy, and the stability of authority: A theoretical research program. In BergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 364–381). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
WeberM. (1968). Economy & society (Vol. 1, trans. RothG.WittchC.). Berkley, CA: University of California.
51.
ZelditchM.Jr.WalkerH. A. (1984). Legitimacy and the stability of authority. In LawlerE. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 1, pp. 1–27). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
