This article is a sharing of emergent ideas about the potential role of languages in teacher education (TE) programmes in multilingual contexts in India. Languages play a critical role in TE programmes where they shape both the learning as well as the future teaching of prospective teachers. This role acquires particular significance in multilingual contexts, such as those encountered in most Indian settings. We draw upon multiple disciplines to develop a theoretical conception of language and language learning that is both socio-culturally located as well as critical in nature. We contextualise the discussion by describing the situation vis-à-vis languages and language teaching in India. Next, we develop and describe a rationale for adopting a bilingual/multilingual position in TE programmes in India. Finally, we describe a few possibilities for the practice of language teaching. The article should be read as an invitation to further study and dialogue, rather than as a definitive position on the issues addressed.
AnanthamurthyU.R. (2005, May15). The great lit bazaar. Sunday Times of India, p. 10.
2.
AnderssonT.BoyerM. (1970). Bilingual schooling in the United States. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
3.
BernstenM. (2003). Collapse at the foundation: A study of literacy amongst third standard students in western Maharashtra. Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, 15(4), 776–796. Retrieved from http://www.ispepune.org.in/PDF%20ISSUE/2003/JISPE403/2036DOCU-1.PDF (last accessed on 13 November 2012).
4.
BrunerJ.S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
CanagarajahA.S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
6.
CanagarajahA.S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 923–939.
7.
ColemanH. (2011). Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language. London: British Council.
8.
CookV.J. (1992). Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4), 557–591.
9.
CookV.J. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3587717
10.
CoyleD.HoodP.MarshD. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CumminsJ. (1994). The acquisition of English as a second language. In Spangenberg-UrbschatK.PritchardR.H. (Eds), Kids come in all languages: Reading instruction for ESL students (pp. 36–62). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
12.
CumminsJ. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In StreetB.V.HornbergerN.H. (Eds), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed.), Vol. 2: Literacy (pp. 71–83). New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
13.
DriscollM.P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14.
EchevarriaJ.ShortD.PowersK. (2008). Making content comprehensible for non-native speakers of English: The SIOP Model. International Journal of Learning, 14(11), 41–50.
15.
FreireP. (1970/2007). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
16.
FreireP.MacedoD.P. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. London: Bergin & Garvey.
17.
GeeJ.P. (2001a). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44(8), 714–725.
18.
GeeJ.P. (2001b). A sociocultural perspective on early literacy development. In NeumanS.B.DickinsonD.K. (Eds), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 30–42). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
GirouxH.A. (1985). Introduction. In P. Freire, The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation (pp. xi–xxv). South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
20.
GutiérrezK.D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
21.
HallidayM.A.K.HassanR. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social–semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HawkinsM.NortonB. (2009). Critical language teacher education. In BurnsA.RichardsJ.C. (Eds). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 30–49). Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HornbergerN.H. (2004). The continua of biliteracy and the bilingual educator: Educational linguistics in practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(2–3), 155–171.
24.
IlaiahK. (1996). Why I am not a Hindu: A Sudra critique of Hindutva, philosophy, culture, and political economy. Calcutta: Samya.
JayaramN. (1993). The language question in higher education: Trends and issues. Higher Education, 26(1), 93–114. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3447879 (last accessed on 9 October 2012).
28.
JosephM.RamaniE. (2006). English in the world does not mean English everywhere: The case for multilingualism in the ELT/ESL profession. In RudbyR.SaraceniM. (Eds), English in the world: Global rules, global roles (pp. 186–199). London: New York: Continuum.
MayS. (2008). Bilingual/immersion education: What the research tells us. In CumminsJ.HornbergerN.H. (Eds), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed.), Vol. 5: Bilingual Education (pp. 19–34). New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
MohantyA. (2009). Multilingual education—A bridge too far? In MohantyA.PandaM.PhillipsonR.Skutnabb-KangasT. (Eds), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 5–19). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
34.
NarayanaK.V. (2000). The English that Kannada people speak. Namma Kannada, 41, 1–2.
35.
National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). (2009). National curriculum framework for teacher education. New Delhi: NCERT.
36.
O’MalleyJ.M.ChamotA.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
PavlenkoA. (2003). ‘I never knew I was bilingual’: Re-imagining teacher identities in TESOL. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 2(4), 251–268.
38.
PrabhuN.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
PrasadG.J.V. (2010). A minute stretching into centuries: Macaulay, English, and India. In ParanjapeM.R.PrasadG.J.V. (Eds), Indian English and ‘vernacular’ India (pp. 3–17). New Delhi: Pearson.
ShortD.J.EchevarriaJ. (1999). The sheltered instruction observation protocol: A tool for teacher–researcher collaboration and professional development [Educational Practice Report, 3]. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence; Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center.
42.
SinhaS. (2012). Reading without meaning: The dilemma of Indian classrooms. Language and Language Teaching, 1(1), 22–26.
43.
SteinP. (2004). Re-sourcing resources: Pedagogy, history and loss in a Johannesburg classroom. In HawkinsM.R. (Ed.), Language learning and teacher education: A sociocultural approach (pp. 35–51). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
44.
StreetB.V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. London: Longman.
ViswanathaV. (1998). Literary translation: A technique for teaching English literature in a bi-literacy context. In TharuS.J. (Ed.), Subject to change: Teaching literature in the nineties (pp. 170–179). New Delhi: Orient Longman.
48.
ViswanathaV. (2005). Language, literature, culture: Through the prism of translation. In SinghUdaya NarayanaGiridharP.P. (Eds), Translation Today, 2(1). Retrieved on 22 September 2013, from http://www.anukriti.net/vol2/notes2/page1.asp?
49.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
