The Tyler Paradox

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antonelli

George A.

(1972) ‘Ralph W. Tyler: The Man and His Work’. Peabody Journal of Education 50(1): 68-74.

Cooley

William W.

(1990) Review of Madaus

George F.

Daneil

L. Stufflebeam

(eds.) Educational Evaluation: Classic Works of Ralph W. Tyler,Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1989) in Educational Researcher 18(9):29-30.

Kleibard

(1970) ‘The Tyler Rationale’. School Review 78(2): 259-72.

O’Shea

Joseph A.

(1985) ‘A Journey to the Midway: Ralph Winfred Tyler’. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 7(4): 447-59.

Hlebowitsh

(1999) ‘Burdens of the New Curricularist’. Curriculum Inquiry 29(3): 343-54.

Hunkins

Francis, P.

Patricia

A. Hammill

, (1994) ‘Beyond Tyler and Taba: Reconceptualizing the Curriculum Process’. Peabody Journal of Education 69(3):4-18.

MLL (1991) Minimum Levels of Learning at Primary Stage: Report of the Committee set up by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (Department of Education) Government of India. New Delhi: NCERT.

Spivak

(1956) ‘Testing the Schools: A controversial programme is begun to assess US Education’ Wall Street Journal, 7 December.

Stanford (1994) http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/94/940228Arc4425.html accessed on 24 October 2006.

10.

Tyler

Ralph W.

(1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.