This article describes a personal and disciplinary journey in, around and between getting more women in science and changing the nature of science education. Using the framework of Feminist Science Studies, I explore the gendered nature of science and offer a suggestion to make it more contextualised and more located in its specific setting. This will be beneficial not only for those excluded from science education but also for the provision of a better science education itself.
AgrawalS.P.AggarwalJ.C. (1992). Women’s education in India. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
2.
AllchinD.K. (2011). The gender of Boyle’s Law. Douglas Allchin: Publications: Works in progress. Retrieved on 2 October 2011, from Homo Icarus: http://www.tc.umn.edu/~allch001/papers/boyle.pdf
3.
BalV. (2004). Women scientists in India: Nowhere near the glass ceiling. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(32), 3647–3653. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4415389
4.
BalV.BalasubramaniumD.BamjiM.ButiB.DattaK.GodboleR.Khanna-ChopraR.RamanP.SahniA. (2004). Science career for Indian women: An examination of Indian women’s access to and retention in scientific careers. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy. Retrieved from http://www.ias.ac.in/womeninscience/INSA_1-17.pdf
5.
BarresB.A. (2006). Does gender matter?Nature, 442, 133–136.
ChandraN.GodboleR.M.GupteN.JollyP.MehtaA.NarasimhanS.RaoS.SharmaV.SuryaS. (2009). Women in physics in India—2008. In HartlineB.K.HortonK.R.KaicherC.M. (Eds), Women in physics: Third lUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics. Seoul, Korea, 8–10 October 2008 (pp. 120–121). Melville, New York: American Institute of Physics .
9.
DriverR.LeachJ.MillarR.ScottP. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham; Bristol, Pennsylvania: Open University Press.
10.
ElkanaY. (2000). Science, philosophy of science and science teaching. Science and Education, 9(5), 465–487. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008652109868
11.
Fausto-SterlingA. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.
12.
GodboleR. (2002). Women in physics. Current Science, 83(4), 359–361.
13.
HammondsE.SubramaniamB. (2003). A conversation on Feminist Science Studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 923–944.
14.
HardingS.G. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham: Duke University Press.
15.
HillC.CorbettC.RoseA.St. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women (AAUW).
16.
Indian Academy of Sciences. (2007). Lilavati’s daughters: The women scientists of India. Retrieved on 20 September 2011, from Women in Science: An Indian Academy of Sciences Initiative website: http://www.ias.ac.in/womeninscience/liladaug.html
17.
KellerE.F. (2001a). Gender and science: An update. In WyerM.BarbercheckM.GeismanD.OzturkH.Ö.WayneM. (Eds), Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (pp. 132–52). New York: Routledge.
18.
KellerE.F. (2001b). The anomaly of a woman in physics. In WyerM.BarbercheckM.GeismanD.OzturkH. Ö.WayneM. (Eds), Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (pp. 9–16). New York: Routledge.
19.
KurupA.MaithreyiR.KantharajuB.GodboleR. (2010). Trained scienti-fic women power: How much are we losing and why?Bangalore: Indian Academy of Sciences and National Institute of Advanced Studies.
20.
ManoramaS.ShahC. (1996, April20–27). Towards a new perspective on women’s bodies: Learning and unlearning together. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(16/17), WS35–WS38. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4404057
21.
MatthewsM.R. (1998). The nature of science and science teaching. In FraserB.J.TobinK.G. (Eds), International handbook of science education (pp. 981–999). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22.
MayberryM.SubramaniamB.WeaselL.H. (2001). Adventures across natures and cultures: An introduction. In MayberryM.SubramaniamB.WeaselL.H. (Eds), Feminist science studies: A new generation (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.
23.
NandyAshis (Ed.) (1989). Science, hegemony, and violence: A requiem for modernity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
24.
OkashaS. (2002). Philosophy of science: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
PoonachaV.GopalM. (2004). Women and science: An examination of women’s access to and retention in science careers. Mumbai: Research Centre for Women’s Studies, SNDT Women’s University.
26.
PotterE. (2001). Gender and Boyle’s law of gases. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27.
SharmaR.K.SharmaR.N. (2000). History of education in India. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.
28.
ShivaV. (1991). The violence of the green revolution: Third world agriculture, ecology, and politics. London: Zed Books.
29.
SurA. (2011). Dispersed radiance: Caste, gender, and modern science in India. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing.
