This article combines national input–output tables (1998–1999 to 2007–2008) with World Input–Output Database (1995–2011) to evaluate foreign value-added (FVA) content in India’s exports at aggregate and disaggregate levels. The results confirm rising FVA and declining domestic value added (DVA) in India’s total and merchandise exports across a majority of the commodities. India’s international fragmentation has risen but continues to be lower than that of East Asia and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Strikingly, a regression-based decomposition analysis shows greater positive impact of rise in FVA on India’s export growth as compared to imports, leading to substantial net gains. Second, India’s DVA content in exports did not decline much during 2007–2011, thereby displaying a sluggish upward trend in its FVA content. This article advocates the need for striking a right balance between the goals of increasing FVA (improving linkages into global value chains) to enhance export competitiveness and maintaining DVA (supporting the ‘Make in India’ initiative) in exports to generate employment opportunities domestically.
AhmadN. (2015). Measuring trade in value-added and beyond. In HousemanS. N. & MandelM. (Eds.), Measuring globalization: Better trade statistics for better policy (pp. 165–204). Upjohn Institute Press.
2.
Ali-YrkköJ., RouvinenP., SeppäläT., & Ylä-AnttilaP. (2011). Who captures value in global supply chains? Case Nokia N95 smartphone. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(3), 263–278.
3.
AmitiM., & KoningsJ. (2007). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. The American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611–1638.
4.
AthukoralaP. C., & YamashitaN. (2006). Production fragmentation and trade integration: East Asia in a global context. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 233–256.
5.
AthukoralaP. C. (2011). Production networks and trade patterns in East Asia: Regionalization or globalization?Asian Economic Papers, 10(1), 65–95.
6.
AthukoralaP. C. (2014). Global production sharing and Asian trade patterns: Implications for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) (Departmental Working Paper No.2014/16). Australian National University.
7.
BaldwinR., & Lopez-GonzalezJ. (2015). Supply-chain trade: A portrait of global patterns and several testable hypotheses. The World Economy, 38(11), 1682–1721.
8.
BaldwinR. (2009). Integration of the North American economy and new-paradigm globalization (Discussion Paper No. DP 7523). Centre for Economic Policy Research.
9.
BangaK. (2016). Impact of global value chains on employment in India. Journal of Economic Integration, 31(3), 631–673.
10.
BangaR. (2014a). Linking into global value chains is not sufficient: Do you export domestic value-added contents?Journal of Economic Integration, 29(2), 267–297.
11.
BangaR. (2014b). Trade facilitation and ‘hollowing-out’ of Indian manufacturing. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(40), 57–63.
12.
BasM. (2012). Input-trade liberalization and firm export decisions: Evidence from Argentina. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), 481–493.
13.
BhatT. P., GuhaA., PaulM., & SahuP. P. (2007). Estimates of import intensity in India’s manufacturing sector: Recent trends and dimensions (Working Paper No. 2007/08). Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
14.
BhattacharyaM. (1989). Import-intensity of exports: A case-study of Indian economy. The Indian Economic Journal, 36(3), 94–98.
15.
BurangeL. G. (2001). Import-intensity in the registered manufacturing sectors of India. Indian Economic Journal, 49(2), 42–52.
16.
CostinotA., & Rodríguez-ClareA. (2014). Chapter 4—Trade theory with numbers: Quantifying the consequences of globalization. Handbook of International Economics, 4, 197–261.
17.
DaudinG., RifflartC., & SchweisguthD. (2011). Who produces for whom in the world economy?The Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1403–1437.
18.
DeanJ. M., FungK. C., & WangZ. (2007). Measuring the vertical specialisation in Chinese trade (Office of Economics Working Paper No. 2007–01-A). U.S. International Trade Commission.
19.
DedrickJ., KraemerK. L., & LindenG. (2010). Who profits from innovation in global value chains? A study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 81–116.
20.
FeenstraR. C., & HansonG. H. (1999). The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: Estimates for the U.S., 1979–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 907–940.
21.
FengL., LiZ., & SwensonD. L. (2016). The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of International Economics, 101, 86–101.
22.
GoldarB. (2013). Determinants of import intensity of India’s manufactured exports under the new policy regime. Indian Economic Review, 48(1), 221–237.
23.
GoldbergP. K., KhandelwalA. K., PavcnikN., & TopalovaP. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1727–1767.
24.
Government of India (2015). Economic Survey 2014–15—Volume II. Ministry of Finance. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2015–2016/vol2_survey.asp
25.
Government of India (2017). Economic Survey 2016–17—Volume 2. Ministry of Finance. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2017–2018/es2016–17/echapter.pdf
26.
Government of India (2018). Annual Report 2017–18. Ministry of Commerce & Industry. https://commerce.gov.in/writereaddata/uploadedfile/MOC_636626711232248483_Annual%20Report%20%202017–18%20English.pdf
27.
Government of India (2019). Economic Survey 2018–19—Volume 2. Ministry of Finance. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2019–20/economicsurvey/index.php
28.
GuptaN. (2015). Estimating linkages of Indian manufacturing industries into global value chains using international input-output table. Review of Development & Change, XX(2), 177–202.
29.
GuptaN. (2016). Domestic value-added growth is vital: Are Indian industries gaining by linking into value chains?South Asia Economic Journal, 17(2), 271–294.
30.
HodaA., & RaiD.K. (2014). Trade and investment barriers affecting international production networks in India (Working Paper No. 281). Indian Council for Research in International Economic Relations.
31.
HummelsD., IshiiJ., & YiK. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(1), 75–96.
32.
JiangX., & MilbergW. (2012). Vertical specialization and industrial upgrading: A preliminary note (Working Paper No. 2012/10). Capturing The Gains.
33.
JohnsonR.C. (2014). Five facts about value-added exports and implications for macroeconomics and trade research. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 119–142.
34.
JohnsonR.C., & NogueraG. (2012a). Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added. Journal of International Economics, 86(2), 224–236.
35.
JohnsonR.C., & NogueraG. (2012b). Fragmentation and trade in value added over four decades (Working Paper No.18186). National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
KimuraF., TakahashiY., & HayakawaK. (2007). Fragmentation and parts and components trade: Comparison between East Asia and Europe. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 18(1), 23–40.
37.
KoopmanR., WangZ., & WeiS. (2014). Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459–494.
38.
LosB., TimmerM.P., & VriesG. J. (2015). How global are global value chains? A new approach to measure international fragmentation. Journal of Regional Science, 55(1), 66–92.
39.
NgF., & YeatsA. (2001). Production sharing in East Asia: Who does what for whom, and why? In ChengL. K. & KierzkowskiH. (Eds.), Global production and trade in East Asia (pp. 63–109). Springer.
40.
SatheD. (1995). Impact of diversification of composition of exports: An analysis of the linkages of Indian exports. Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, 7(1), 94–103.
41.
SenR., & SrivastavaS. (2012). Asia’s international production networks: Will India be the next assembly centre? (Working Paper No. 118). Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade.
42.
TempestR. (1996). Barbie and the world economy. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/1996-09–22/news/mn–46610_1_hong-kong
43.
TewariM., VeeramaniC., & SinghM. (2015). The potential for involving India in regional production networks: Analyzing networked production and vertically specialized trade patterns between India and ASEAN (Working Paper No. 292). Indian Council for Research in International Economic Relations.
44.
TimmerM.P., DietzenbacherE., LosB., StehrerR., & VriesG.J. (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23(3), 575–605.
45.
TopalovaP., & KhandelwalA. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995–1009.
46.
VeeramaniC., & DhirG. (2017). Make what in India? In DevS. M. (Ed.), India Development Report 2017 (pp. 187–208). Oxford University Press.
47.
VeeramaniC. & DhirG. (2019). Reaping Gains from Global Production Sharing: Domestic Value Addition and Job Creation by Indian Exports (Working Paper no. WP–2019–024). Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
