Sri Lanka has debated the decriminalization of homosexuality for several decades, but never with more vigour than in 2017, when the government considered this legislative change. This project was eventually abandoned, inspiring fierce opposition by local ‘LGBT’ non-governmental organizations (NGOs), resulting in an escalation of advocacy work in the country. This article interrogates the capacity ‘LGBT’ NGOs possess to (re)produce forms of structural violence and reify new idioms of normativity as they seek to emancipate the queer figure. The site of conflict between the state and civil society is rife with the problematics of nation and capital, for the NGO reifies ethno-nationalism and capitalist social cleavages. Meanwhile, reliance on material support from the Global North renders these organizations enmeshed in transnational neoliberal politics. In negotiating the narcissistic desires of state and global hegemonies, and the crisis of legitimacy that emerges through these encounters, NGOs demarcate a specifically interpellated figure as the normative ‘LGBT’ citizen, thereby collapsing a range of queer desires to flat, restrictive ontologies that exclude many. Using interviews, informal conversations and observations gleaned through an ethnography on genders and sexualities in Sri Lanka, this article explores the institutional politics of queer liberation in Sri Lanka, enmeshed as they are in the myriad complexities of postcolonial neoliberal modernity.
AlvarezS. (1999). Advocating feminism: The Latin American feminist NGO ‘Boom’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1(2), 181–209.
3.
AlvarezS. (2014). Beyond NGOization? Reflections from Latin America. In BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 285–300). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
AndersonB. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.
5.
BandaraJ. S.NarapanawaA. (2015). Garment industry in Sri Lanka and the removal of GSP Plus by EU. The World Economy, 38(9), 1438–1461.
6.
BarrettD. C.PollackL. M. (2005). Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression, and gay community involvement. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(3), 437–456.
7.
BernalV.GrewalI. (2014). The NGO form: Feminist struggles, states, and neoliberalism. In BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 1–19). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
BhabhaH. (1994). Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. In BhabhaH. (Ed.), The location of culture (pp. 85–92). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BondyopadhyayA. (2011). Laws affecting LGBT persons in South Asia: A desk review. Delhi: South Asia LGBT Network.
10.
ChazanN. (1992). Africa’s democratic challenge. World Policy Journal, 9(2), 279–307.
11.
CohenL. (2005). The Kothi wars: AIDS cosmopolitanism and the morality of classification. In PiggS. L.AdamsV. (Eds.), Sex in development: Science, sexuality, and morality in global perspective (pp. 269–303). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
CostaL. M. (2014). Power and difference in Thai women’s NGO activism. In BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 166–192). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
DasguptaR. K.DasGuptaD. (Eds.). (2018). Queering digital India: Activism, identities, subjectivities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
DaveN. N. (2012). Queer activism in India: A story in the anthropology of ethics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
DeVottaN. (2005). From ethnic outbidding to ethnic conflict: The institutional bases for Sri Lanka’s separatist war. Nations and Nationalism, 11(1), 141–159.
17.
DuttaA. (2012). Claiming citizenship, contesting civility: The institutional LGBT movement and the regulation of gender/sexual dissidence in West Bengal, India. Jindal Global Law Review, 4(1), 110–141.
18.
DuttaA. (2013). Legible identities and legitimate citizens: The globalization of transgender and subjects of HIV-AIDS prevention in Eastern India. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(4), 494–514.
19.
EllawalaT. (2018). Mismatched lovers: Exploring the compatibility between LGBTQ+ identity theories and gender and sexual plurality in Sri Lanka. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 22(4), 1321–1339.
20.
EscobarA. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
FeldmanS. (1997, November). NGOs and civil society: (Un)stated contradictions. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 46–65.
22.
FernandoJ. (2011). The political economy of NGOs: State formation in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. London, UK: Pluto Press.
23.
FisherW. F. (1997). Doing good? The politics and anti-politics of NGO practices. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 439–464.
GopinathG. (2005). Impossible desires: Queer diasporas and South Asian public cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
GunawardenaD. (2015). Contradictions of the Sri Lankan state. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(9), 56–62.
31.
HannC.DunnE. (Eds.). (1996). Civil society: Challenging western models. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HelmsE. (2014). The movementization of NGOs? Women’s organizing in post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina. In BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 21–49). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
HemmentJ. (2007). Empowering women in Russia: Activism, aid, and NGOs. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
34.
HodžićS. (2014). Feminist bastards: Towards a post-humanist critique of NGOs. In BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 221–247). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35.
HoutzagerP.LavalleA. G. (2010). Civil society’s claims to political representation in Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(1), 1–29.
36.
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission. (2014). Not gonna take it lying down. New York, NY: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission.
LangS. (2013). NGOs, civil society, and the public sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
LangS. (2014). Women’s advocacy networks: The European Union, women’s NGOs, and the velvet triangle. In BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 266–284). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
LeggS.RoyS. (2013). Neo-liberalism, post-colonialism and hetero-sovereignties: Emergent sexual formations in contemporary India. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 15(4), 461–473.
MenonN. (2004). Recovering subversion: Feminist politics beyond the law. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
47.
NdegwaS. N. (1996). The two faces of civil society: NGOs and politics in Africa. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
48.
PedroniL. (2016). Selling queer rights: The commodification of queer rights activism. Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science, 4(1), 21–40.
49.
PuarJ. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
RahmanM. (2014). Queer rights and the triangulation of Western exceptionalism. Journal of Human Rights, 13(3), 274–289.
51.
ReddyG. (2005). With respect to sex: Negotiating Hijra identity in South India. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
RobertsM. (1994). Exploring confrontation: Sri Lanka—Politics, culture and history. Geneva: Harwood Academic.
53.
RuwanpuraK. (2007). Awareness and action: The ethno-gender dynamics of Sri Lankan NGOs. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(3), 317–333.
54.
SchecterD. (2010). The critique of instrumental reason from Weber to Habermas. New York, NY: Continuum.
55.
SeckinelginH. (2009). Colonial silences, gender and sexuality: Unpacking international HIV and AIDS policy culture. In KlotJ. F.NguyenV.-K. (Eds.), The fourth wave: Violence, gender, culture and HIV in the 21st century (pp. 279–294). Paris: UNESCO.
56.
SharmaA. (2008). Logics of empowerment: Development, gender, and governance in neoliberal India. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
57.
SpivakG. (1999). Can the subaltern speak? In SpivakG. (Ed.), A critique of postcolonial reason (pp. 2197–2208). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
StewartJ. J. (2014). Muslim-Buddhist conflict in contemporary Sri Lanka. South Asia Research, 34(3), 241–260.
60.
StirratR. L.HenkelH. (1997, November). The development gift: The problem of reciprocity in the NGO world. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554(1), 66–80.
61.
TambiahY. (1997). Women’s sexual autonomy: Some issues in South Asia. Options, 9(1), 28–32.
62.
TimmerA. D. (2010). Constructing the ‘needy subject’: NGO discourses of Roma need. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 33(2), 264–281.
63.
VanitaR. (2002). Queering India: Same-sex love and eroticism in Indian culture and society. New York, NY: Routledge.
64.
WaltonO. (2008). Conflict, peacebuilding and NGO legitimacy: National NGOs in Sri Lanka. Conflict, Security & Development, 8(1), 133–167.
65.
WijewardeneS. (2007). ‘But no one has explained to me who I am now’: ‘Trans’ self-perceptions in Sri Lanka. In WieringaS. E.BlackwoodE.BhaiyaA. (Eds.), Women’s sexualities and masculinities in a globalizing Asia (pp. 101–116). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
WoodcockS. (2004). Globalization of LGBT identities: Containment masquerading as salvation or why lesbians have less fun. In FrunzaM.VacarescuT.-E. (Eds.), Gender and the (post) East-West divide (pp. 116–128). Romania: Limes Publishing House.
68.
ZuhairA. (2016). Dynamics of Sinhala Buddhist ethno-nationalism in post-war Sri Lanka. Colombo: Centre for Policy Alternatives.
