The article examines the process of political inclusion through representation and its promises and potentials for empowerment of Scheduled Tribes in decentralised governance in India. It perceives political representation as a process, and tries to explore the potentials of such political representation to include and empower the Scheduled Tribes in matters of decentralised governance. Based on a theoretical review of the concept of representation, the article examines the substantive and descriptive representation of Scheduled Tribes in Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). The article concludes that political representation, manifested through participation of representatives in PRIs may form necessary conditions to bring Scheduled Tribes into institutions of decision-making, but are not sufficient to empower them, especially in the absence of supportive and enabling institutional arrangements.
AlsopR.KrishnaA.SjoblomD.2000. Are Gram Panchayats Inclusive? Report of a Study Conducted in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. Background Paper No. 3, Overview of Rural Decentralisation in India. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
2.
AmbagudiaJ.2011. ‘Scheduled Tribe and the Politics of Inclusion in India’, Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 5: 33–43.
3.
BanducciS.A.DonovanT.KarpJ.A.2004. ‘Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation’, The Journal of Politics, 66 (2): 534–56.
4.
BatliwalaS.1993. Empowerment of Women in South Asia: Concepts and Practices. New Delhi: Asian South-Pacific Bureau of Adult Education and FAO’s Freedom from Hunger Campaign—Action for Development.
5.
BeharA.KumarYogesh. 2002. Decentralisation in Madhya Pradesh, India: From Panchayati Raj to Gram Swaraj. ODI Working Paper No. 170. London: Overseas Development Institute.
6.
BeresfordP.CroftS.1993. Citizen Involvement: A Practical Guide for Change. London: Macmillan.
7.
BeteilleA.1999. ‘Empowerment’, Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (10/11): 589–97.
BhargavaB.S.SamalA.2001. Lakshadweep: Towards Decentralised Governance. New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers.
10.
BirchA. H.1964. Representative and Responsible Government. London: Routledge.
11.
BirchA. H.1993. The Concept and Theories of Modern Democracy. London: Routledge.
12.
BoboL.GilliamF.D.1990. ‘Race, Socio-political Participation, and Black Empowerment’, The American Political Science Review, 84 (2): 377–94.
13.
BrowningR.MarshallD.R.TabbD.H.1984. Protest is not Enough: The Struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for Equality in Urban Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
BurkeE.1774 (1889). ‘Speech to the Electors of Bristol’, in The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. 2, Boston: Little Brown.
15.
BystydzienskyJ. (ed.). 1992. Women Transforming Politics: Worldwide Strategies for Empowerment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16.
ChandraS.K.1997. ‘Women and Empowerment’, Indian Journal of Public Administration, 43 (4): 395–99.
17.
CrookR.SverrissonA.S.2001. Decentralisation and Poverty Alleviation in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis or, is West Bengal Unique?’IDS Working Paper 130. Sussex: Institute for Development Studies.
18.
CrookR.ManorJ.1998. Enhancing Participation and Institutional Performance: Democratic Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DahlR.A.1957. ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioural Scientist, 2: 201–05.
20.
DowdingK.1996. Power. Buckingham: Open University Press.
21.
GandhiM.K.1942. ‘My Idea of Village Swaraj’, Harijan.
22.
GayC.2001. ‘The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation’, American Political Science Review, 95 (3): 589–602.
23.
GoehlerG.2000. ‘Constitution and Use of Power’, in GoverdeH.CernyPhillip G.HaugardM.LentnerH.H. (eds), Power in Contemporary Politics: Theories, Practices, Globalisations. London: Sage Publications, pp. 41–58.
24.
Government of India (GoI). 2002. Tenth Five Year Plan 2002–07, Vol. 2. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.
25.
GraziaA. De. 1968. ‘Representation: Theory’. International Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.
26.
GriffithsA.WollheimR.1960. ‘How can One Person Represent Another?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 34: 187–224.
27.
GurinP.HatchettS.JacksonJ.S.1989. Hope and Independence: Blacks’ Response to Electoral and Party Politics. New York: Russel Sage.
28.
JayalN.G.2005. From Representation to Participation: Women in Local Government. Paper prepared for Expert Group Meeting on Equal Participation of Women and Men in Decision-making Process. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
29.
JenaB.B.1995. ‘Orissa’, in MathewG. (ed.), Status of Panchayati Raj in the States of India–1994. New Delhi: Institute of Social Science and Concept Publishing, pp. 157–66.
30.
JhaS.N.1999. ‘Introduction’, in JhaS.N.MathurP.C. (eds), Decentralisation and Local Politics: Readings in Indian Government and Politics. London: Sage Publications, pp. 13–44.
31.
JohnsonC.2003. Decentralisation in India: Poverty, Politics and Panchayati Raj. ODI Working Paper No. 199. London: Overseas Development Institute.
32.
LuttrellC.QuirozS.ScruttonC.BirdK.2009. Understanding Representation. ODI Working Paper No. 308. London: Overseas Development Institute.
33.
ManorJ.1999. The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralisation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
34.
MansbridgeJ.1999. ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes’, The Journal of Politics, 61 (3): 628–57.
35.
MeenakshisundaramS.S.1999. ‘Decentralisation in Developing Countries’, in JhaS.N.MathurP.C. (eds), Decentralisation and Local Politics, Readings in Indian Government and Politics—2. New Delhi: Sage.
36.
MishraR.1998. ‘Devolution of Power to Women in Panchayati Raj in Orissa: Challenges and Opportunities’, Kurukshetra, 47 (2): 19–24.
37.
MishraS.N.KumarL.PalC.1996. New Panchayati Raj in Action. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
38.
MohantyM.1995. ‘On the Concept of Empowerment’, Economic and Political Weekly, 30 (24): 1434–36.
PhillipsA.1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
PhillipsA.1998. ‘Democracy and Representation: Or Why Should It Matter Who Our Representatives Are? In PhillipsAnne (ed.), Feminism and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 224–40.
42.
PitkinH.1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
RaoN.1998. ‘Representation in Local Politics: A Reconsideration and some New Evidence’. Political Studies, 46 (1): 19–35.
44.
RaoR.V.R. Chandrasekhar. 1977. ‘Orissa’, in ReddyG. Ram (ed.), Patterns of Panchayati Raj in India. New Delhi: McMillan Company of India Limited, pp. 197–223.
45.
RowlandsJ.1998. ‘A World of the Times, but What does it Mean? Empowerment in the Discourses and Practices of Development’, in AfsharH. (ed.), Women and Empowerment: Illustrations for the Third World. Houndsmill/London: Macmillan, pp. 11–34.
46.
SaksenaH.S.1981. Safeguards for Scheduled Castes and Tribes: Founding Fathers’ View. New Delhi: Uppall Publishing House.
47.
SamalA.BhargavaB.S.1999. ‘Panchayati Raj Under Siege: An Analysis of Orissa’s Experiment with Rural Local Government’, in GhoshR.PramanikA.K. (eds), Panchayat System in India: Historical, Constitutional and Financial Analysis. New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers, pp. 137–58.
48.
SharmaK.1992. ‘Grassroots Organisations and Women’s Empowerment: Some Issues in Contemporary Debate’, Samya Shakti, 6: 28–43.
49.
SinghV.GehlotB.StartD.JohnsonC.2003. Out of Reach: Local Politics and the Distribution of Development Fund in Madhya Pradesh. ODI Working Paper No. 200. London: Overseas Development Institute.
50.
Singha RoyD.K. 1995. ‘Peasant Movement and Empowerment of Rural Women’, Economic and Political Weekly, 30 (37): 2306–311.
51.
SpickerP.1994. Social Policy: Themes and Approaches. London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
52.
TeteK.1991. ‘Black Political Participation in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential Election’, American Political Science Review, 84 (4): 1159–76.
53.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1997. Reconceptualising Governance. Discussion Paper No. 2, United Nations, New York.
54.
VermaR.C.1990. Indian Tribes through the Ages. New Delhi: Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.
55.
WeberM.1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
WhalkeJ. C.BuchananW.FergusonL.C.1962. The Legislative System. New York: Wiley.
57.
World Bank. 2000. World Development Report 2000/1: Attacking Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
XaxaV.1999. ‘Tribals as Indigenous People of India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (51): 3589–95.
59.
YadavY.2008. ‘The Paradox of Political Representation’, Seminar, 586: 52–59.
