Violence Against Women in Delhi: A Sustainability Problematic

Abstract

Violence against women (VAW) has traditionally been of concern to feminists and cultural sociologists, and in recent decades, has also begun to be diagnosed and understood as a development problem. However, 20 women practitioners and scholars of development in Delhi have raised this issue explicitly as a sustainability problem while referring to the high rate of gender violence in the city’s public spaces. Sustainability is one of the most problematic political notions and scholars have been justifiably concerned that it has been hijacked to legitimise a variety of agendas, including unsustainable ones that contravene principles of social justice. However, it is also a compelling and powerful political concept and therefore, it is important to reconceptualise and reclaim from a feminist perspective, and from within the theoretical and empirical framework of equity, one of the central tenets of sustainability, and social justice. Therefore in this article, employing the primary research from Delhi, I use the notion of equity to frame the VAW in the city as a sustainability problem—the lack of which has an impact on urban design, which can constrain a city’s capacity to be sustainable.

Keywords

Violence women Delhi sustainability equity urban design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anand

(ed.). 1992. The Power to Change: Women in the Third World Redefine Their Environment. New Delhi: Women’s Feature Service, Kali for Women.

Atkinson

El Haj

M.A.

1996. ‘How to Do (or Not to Do) Domain Analysis for Qualitative Public Health’, Health Policy and Planning, 11(4): 438–42.

Baxi

2003. ‘Rape and Delhi’s Urban Environment’. Available at http://www.indiatogether.org/2003/nov/wom-delhienv.htm, accessed on 12 January 2011.

Beijing Platform for Action. 1995. The United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Available at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/violence.htm, accessed on 12 February 2011.

Bhatt

R.V.

1995. ‘Violence Against Women in Asia and Reproductive Health’, in Wallace

(ed.), Health Care of Women and Children in Developing Countries. Oakland, CA: Third Party Publishing.

Bidwai

2007. (31 May 2007) India: Bribery and Corruption Plague Judicial System. Global Information Network: New York.

Briassoulis

1999. ‘Who Plans whose Sustainability? Alternative Roles for Planners’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(6): 889–902.

Brundtland Commission. 1987. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Burke

2011. ‘The Problem with Crime Against Women in Delhi’. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/feb/22/problem-crime-against-women-delhi, accessed on 18 August 2011.

10.

Census of India. 2001. Provisional Population Data. Available at http://www.educationforallinindia.com/page133.html, accessed on 12 April 2011.

11.

Delhi Master Plan. 2011. Draft Master Plan for Delhi—2021. Available at http://dda.org.in/planning/docs/11_URBAN_DESIGN_.pdf, accessed on 28 February 2011.

12.

Delhi State Commission for Women. 1997. Situation of Girls and Women in Delhi. Available at http://socialwelfare.delhigovt.nic.in/dcwomen.htm, accessed on 3 February 2011.

13.

Domosh

Seager

J.K.

2001. Putting Women in Place: Feminist Geographers Make Sense of the World. New York and London: The Guildford Press.

14.

Dreze

Sen

1990. The Political Economy of Hunger. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

ESCAP and UN-HABITAT. 2010. Delhi: Urban Safety in the Asia and the Pacific. Available at http://asiapacific-safecity.org/city/delhi , accessed on 20 February 2011.

16.

Harding

1989. ‘The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory’, in Malson

Micheline R.

O’Barr

Jean F.

Westphall-Wihl

Sarah

Wyer

Mary

(eds.) Feminist Theory in Practise and Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

17.

Hartz-Karp

Briand

2009. ‘Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy’, Journal of Public Affairs, 9(2): 125–41.

18.

Hindustan Times . 2006. ‘Delhi Cop Dismissed for Rape’, Hindustan Times, New Delhi, 22 June.

19.

Indo-Asian News Service . 2009. ‘96 Percent Women Feel Unsafe in Delhi, Says Survey’. Indo-Asian News Service, 13 November.

20.

Jain

A.K.

1990. The Making of a Metropolis: Planning and Growth of Delhi. New Delhi: National Book Organisation.

21.

Jain

2001. ‘The Happening City’, in Varma

P. K.

Singh

B. P.

(eds), The Millennium Edition on New Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

22.

Kelly

K.D.

Caputo

Jamieson

2005. ‘Reconsidering Sustainability: Some Implications for Community-based Crime Prevention’, Critical Social Policy, 25(3): 306–24.

23.

Kern

2005. ‘In Place and At Home in the City: Connecting Privilege, Safety and Belonging for Women in Toronto’, Gender, Race and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 12(3): 357–77.

24.

Kishwar

1999. Off The Beaten Track: Rethinking Gender Justice for Indian Women. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

25.

Markusen

2003. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 37(6/7): 701–17.

26.

McGranahan

Gordon

Satterthwaite

David.

2000. ‘Environmental Health or Ecological Sustainability? Reconciling the Brown and Green Agendas in Urban Development (pp. 73–90)’, In Pugh

(Ed.), Sustainable Cities in Developing Countries: Theory and Practice at the Millennium. London: Earthscan.

27.

Mortisugu

2007. (May/June 2007) Crime and Punishment. Foreign Policy.

28.

NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau). 2007. Figures At a Glance. Available at http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2007/cii-2007/FIGURES_2007.pdf, accessed on 11 March 2011.

29.

Neuman

2005. ‘The Compact City Fallacy’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1): 11–26.

30.

Podolefsky

A.M.

1985. ‘Rejecting Crime Prevention Programmes: The Dynamics of Program Implementation in High Need Communities’, Human Organisation, 44(2): 33–40.

31.

Puri

2006. ‘Stakes and States: Sexual Discourses from New Delhi’, Feminist Review, 83(1): 139–48.

32.

Purkayastha

Subramaniam

Desai

Bose

2003. ‘The Study of Gender in India: A Partial Review’, Gender and Society, 17(4): 503–24.

33.

Ranjan Ahmed

2004. Megacity Governance in South Asia: A Comparative Study. Dhaka: The University Press Ltd.

34.

Rao

(ed.). 2005. Gender and Caste. London: Zed Books.

35.

Sandercock

1998. Towards Cosmopolis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

36.

Sathyamurthy

T.V.

(ed.). 1998. Region, Religion, Caste, Gender and Culture in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

37.

Sen

1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.

38.

Shiva

1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books.

39.

Shiva

1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology, and Politics. London: Zed Books.

40.

Shiva

(ed.). 1994. Close To Home: Women Reconnect Ecology, Health and Development Worldwide. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

41.

Siddiqui

Ghosh

Bhowmik

S.K.

Siddiqui

S.A.

Mitra

Kapuria

Rangan

Ahmed

2004. Megacity Governance in South Asia: A Comparative Study. Dhaka: The University Press Limited.

42.

Spradley

J.P.

1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

43.

Stanley

Wise

1983. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: London: Routledge and K.Paul.

44.

Tedlock

2000. ‘Ethnography and Ethnographic Representation’, in Denzin

N.K.

Lincoln

Y.S.

(eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 455–86.

45.

The Times of India . 2004. ‘Delhi: The Rape Capital of India’. Available at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow/762338.cms, accessed on 26 November 2010.

46.

The Times of India . 2005. ‘Rising Rape in the Capital’, The Times of India, New Delhi. 12 May.

47.

Tversky

Kahneman

1981. ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science, 211(4481): 453–58.

48.

UMP. 2000. ‘Violence Against Women in Urban Areas’, Urban Management Program Working Series Paper 17. Available at http://www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/1900_46700_ViolAgWomUrbnpm_pt2EN.pdf, accessed on 6 February 2011.

49.

UNFPA. Undated. Working to End Gender Inequity. Para 6. Available at http://www.unfpa.org/gender/icl_02.htm, accessed on 9 February 2011.

50.

UN Global Impact Assessment. 2007. Transparency and Anti-Corruption. Available at http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/anti-corruption.html, accessed on 11 January 2007.

51.

UN-HABITAT. 2001. Urban Millennium. Available at http://ww2.unhabitat.org/istanbul+5/booklet4.pdf, accessed on 20 February 2011.

52.

UN-HABITAT. 2007. Women’s Safety Audits for a Safer Urban Design. Available at http://www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/5544_32059_WSA%20Centrum%20report.pdf, accessed on 9 February 2011.

53.

UNIFEM. 2011. Global Safe Cities Free of Violence for Women and Girls: ‘Snapshot’ of the Cities. Available at http://www.unifem.org/attachments/stories/SafeCities_SnapshotCities_en.pdf, accessed on 18 August 2011.

54.

UN Women’s Report. 2011. Designing and Implementing an Impact Evaluation of the Safe Cities Free of Violence Against Women and Girls Project in New Delhi, India (Phase II). Available at http://www.unifem.org.au/AnnouncementRetrieve.aspx?ID=42291, accessed on 18 August 2011.

55.

Valentine

1992. ‘Images of Danger: Women’s Sources of Information about the Spatial Distribution of Male Violence’, Area, 24(1): 22–29.