Ambiguous practices and identities of NGOs have become a source of increasing concern for all involved in development intervention. But apart from pointing at dishonest marketing and unfortunate unintended consequences of donors' support, how can we under-stand these ambiguities? Based on an ethnographic study of local Bangladeshi NGOs, the article explores actions and behaviour of grassroots NGO staff. The article shows how, equipped with an ideal image of the altruistic development worker, the staff's encounter with reality provides them with contradictory and confusing messages as to who they should be and how they should act, resulting in disillusion and moral discord. The analysis examines concepts such as altruism, alienation, goal ambiguity, moral selving and moral discord, with an aim to expand our understanding of some moral dilemmas of development practice, its sources and unpredictable outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrahams, A.
and
J.P. Platteau
. 2001. ‘
Participatory Development in the Presence of Endogenous Community
’. Paper presented at a Conference ‘Tragedy of the Commons: What is the Solution?’, Lund, 9–11 September.
2.
Ahmad, M.M.2002. NGO Field Workers in Bangladesh.
London: Ashgate
.
3.
Allahyari. R.1996. ‘
“Ambassadors of God” and “The Sinking Classes”: Visions of Charity and Moral Selving
’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16(1/2):
35–68
.
4.
Allahyari. R.2000. Visions of Charity:Volunteer Workers and Moral Community.
Berkley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press
.
5.
Alvesson, M.
and
H. Willmott
. 2001. Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual.
Lund: Företagsekonomiska Institutionen, Lund University
.
6.
Arvidson, M.2003. ‘Demanding Values: Participation, Empowerment, and NGOs in Bangladesh’. Thesis,
Department of Sociology, Lund University
.
7.
Bertocci, P.2001. ‘Islam and the Social Construction of the Bangladeshi Countryside’, in
R. Ahmed
(ed.), Understanding the Bengal Muslims: Interpretative Essays.
New Delhi: Oxford University Press
, 71–85.
8.
Bloem, M.
,
D. Biswas
and
S. Adhikari
. 1991. ‘Towards a Sustainable and Participatory Rural Development: Recent Experiences of an NGO in Bangladesh’, in
M. de Koening
(ed.), Participatory Research in Health: Issues and Experiences.
London and New Jersey: Zed Books
, 141–52.
9.
Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC). 1983. The Net: Power Structure in Ten Villages.
Dhaka: BRAC
.
10.
Brett, E.A.1993. ‘
Voluntary Agencies as Development Organisations: Theorizing the Problem of Efficiency and Accountability
’, Development and Change, 24(2):
269–303
.
11.
Bryant, R.L.2002. ‘
False Prophets? Mutant NGOs and Philippine Environmentalism
’, Society and Natural Resources, 15(7):
629–39
.
12.
Chambers, R.1997. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the Last First.
London: Intermediate Technology Publications
.
13.
Clarke, C.1997. Misery and Company: Sympathy in Everyday Life.
Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
.
14.
Clegg, S.R.1990. Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World.
London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
.
15.
Cook, B.
and
U. Kothari
. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books
.
16.
Davies, G.F.
,
McAdam, D.
,
Scott, R.W.
and
Zald, M.
(eds) 2005. Social Movements and Organization Theory.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
17.
de Herdt, T.
and
J. Bastiaensen
. 2004. ‘
Aid as an Encounter at the Interface: The Complexity of the Global Fight Against Poverty
’, Third World Quarterly, 25(5):
871–85
.
18.
Fisher, W.F.1997. ‘
Doing Good? The Politics and Antipolitics of NGO Practices
’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 26:
439–64
.
19.
Fowler, A.2000a. ‘
NGO Futures: Beyond Aid—NGDO Values and the Forth Position
’, Third World Quarterly, 21(4):
589–603
.
20.
Fowler, A.2000b. Striking a Balance: Effective Management and Organization for NGOs.
London: Earthscan Publications
.
21.
Fruttero, A.
and
V. Gauri
. 2005. ‘
The Strategic Choices of NGOs: Location Decisions in Rural Bangladesh
’, Journal of Development Studies, 41(5):
759–87
.
22.
Fyvie, C.
and
A. Ager
. 1999. ‘
NGOs and Innovation: Organizational Characteristics and Constraints in Development Assistance Work in the Gambia
’, World Development, 27(8):
1383–95
.
23.
Gauri, V.
and
J. Galef
. 2005. ‘
NGOs in Bangladesh: Activities, Resources and Governance
’, World Development, 33(12):
2045–65
.
24.
Goetz, A.M.2001. Women Development Workers: Implementing Rural Credit Programmes in Bangladesh.
Dhaka: University Press
.
25.
Graham, K.2004. ‘Altruism, Self-interest and the Indistinctness of Persons’, in
J. Seglow
(ed.), The Ethics of Altruism.
London and Portland, OR: Cass
, 49–67.
26.
Granovetter, M.1985. ‘
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
’, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3):
481–510
.
27.
Greenough, P.R.1983. ‘
Indulgence and Abundance as Asian Peasant Values: A Bengali Case in Point
’, Journal of Asian Studies, 42(4):
831–50
.
28.
Hailey, J.1999. ‘
Ladybirds, Missionaries and NGOs: Voluntary Organisations and Cooperatives in 50 Years of Development: A Historical Perspective on Future Challenges
’, Public Administration and Development, 19(5):
467–85
.
29.
Halder, J.1998. The Community Comes Forth.
Dhaka: NGO Forum for Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation
.
30.
Hashemi, S.1998. ‘NGO Accountability in Bangladesh: Beneficiaries, Donors and the State’, in
M. Edwards
and
D, Hulme
(eds), Non-governmental Organisations: Performance and Accountability—Beyond the Magic Bullet.
London: Earthscan Publisher
, 103–10.
31.
Haynes, J.1997. Democracy and Civil Society in the Thirds World: Politics and New Political Movements.
Cambridge, Oxford and Malden (USA): Polity Press and Blackwell Publishers
.
32.
Hillhorst, D.2003. The Real World of NGOs: Discourses, Diversity and Development.
London and New York: Zed Books
.
33.
Holloway, R.1998. Support Citizen's Initiatives. Bangladesh's NGOs and Society.
London: Intermediate Technology Publications
.
34.
Ikin, D.O.1996. ‘
Sanitation Success Stories: The Effects of Demand Creation in Bangladesh
’, Waterlines, 14(3):
9–11
.
35.
Jaffee, D.2001. Organization Theory: Tension and Change.
Singapore: McGraw Hill
.
36.
Korten, D.C.1992. ‘People-centered Development: Alternative for a World in Crisis’, in
K.E. Bauzon
(ed.), Development and Democratization in the Third World: Myths, Hopes, and Realities.
Washington. DC: Crane Russak–Taylor and Francis Group
, 53–80.
37.
Kramsjö, B.
and
G. Wood
. 1992. Breaking the Chains: Collective Action for Social Justice among the Rural Poor of Bangladesh.
Dhaka: University Press Limited
.
38.
Kreps, G.L.1990. Organizational Communications. Theory and Practice.
New York: Longman
.
39.
Lewis, D.1999. International Perspectives on Voluntary Action. Reshaping the Third Sector.
London: Earthscan Publications
.
40.
Lipsky, M.1980. Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services.
New York: Russel Sage Foundation
.
Mosse, D.
and
D. Lewis
. 2006. ‘Introduction: Theoretical Approaches to Brokerage and Translation in Development’, in
D. Lewis
and
D. Mosse
(eds), Development Brokers and Translators: the Ethnography of Aid and Agencies.
Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Books
, 1–26.
43.
O'Neill O.2002. A Question of Trust.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
44.
Olson, M.1997. ‘The New Institutional Economics: The Collective Choice Approach to Economic Development’, in
C. Clague
(ed.), Institutions and Economic Development: Growth and Governance in Less-developed and Post-socialist Countries.
Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press
.
45.
Scott, R.1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems.
New Jersey: Prentice Hall
.
46.
Scott, R.2004. ‘
Reflections on a Half-Century of Organizational Sociology
’, Annual Review of Sociology, 30:
1–21
.
47.
Steifel, M.
and
M. Wolfe
. 1994. A Voice for the Excluded. Popular Participation in Development—Utopia or Necessity?London and New Jersey: Zed Books
.
48.
Stiles, K.2002. ‘
International Support for NGOs in Bangladesh: Some Unintended Consequences
’, World Development, 30(5):
853–46
.
49.
Stirrat, R.L.
and
H. Henkel
. 1997. ‘
The Development Gift: The Problem of Reciprocity in the NGO World
’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554(November):
66–80
.
50.
Townsend, J.G.
and
A.R. Townsend
. 2004. ‘
Accountability, Motivation and Practice: NGOs North and South
’, Social and Cultural Geography, 5(2):
271–84
.
51.
van Ufford, P.Q.
and
K.A. Giri
. 2003. A Moral Critique of Development: In Search of Global Responsibilities.
London: Routledge
.
52.
Wade, R.1992. ‘
How to Make “Street Level” Bureaucracies Work Better: India and Korea
’, IDS Bulletin, 23(4):
51–4
.
53.
Wallace, T.
,
L. Bornstein
and
J. Chapman
. 2006. The Aid Chain. Coercion and Commitment in Development NGOs.
Rugby: Intermediate Technology Publications
.
54.
White, S.1999. ‘
NGOs, Civil Society and the State in Bangladesh: The Politics of Representing the Poor
’, Development and Change, 30(2):
307–26
.
55.
World Bank. 1991. World Development Report 1991: The Challenge of Development.
Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press
.
56.
World Bank. 2003. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People.
Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press
.
