Operation Barga in West Bengal caused a decline in the institution of tenancy over a period of two decades. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the field-level data shows that the tenant households are placed in a highly heterogeneous and differentiated manner in society, which is similar to that of the pattern of distribution of general (tenant plus non-tenant) households. We find that tenant households are less productive than the general category of households and, therefore, less efficient. The yield level of recorded tenant households is also distinctly higher than unrecorded tenant households. Recorded tenants are enjoying lower rental rate than unrecorded tenants. The possibility of interlinked transactions has been remote among tenant households.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banerjee, Sumanta
. 2006. ‘
Peasant Hares and Capitalist Hounds of Singur
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 41(52):
5296–8
.
2.
Bardhan, P.K.1976. ‘
Variations in Extent and Forms of Agricultural Tenancy: Analysis of Indian Data across Regions and Over Time
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 11(37–8):
1505–11, 1541–6
.
3.
Bardhan, P.K.
and
A. Rudra
. 1978. ‘
Interlinkage of Land, Labour, and Credit Relations: An Analysis of Village Survey Data in East India
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 13(February, Annual Number):
367–84
.
4.
Bhaduri, A.1973. ‘
A study in Agricultural Backwardness under Semi-feudalism
’, Economic Journal, 83(1):
120–37
.
5.
Bhaduri, A.1984. The Economic Structure of Backward Agriculture.
London: Academic Press
.
6.
Bharadwaj, K.1974. Production Conditions in Indian Agriculture.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
7.
Bhattacharyya, Sudipta
. 2001. ‘
Capitalist Development, Peasant Differentiation and the State: Survey Findings from West Bengal
’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 28(4):
95–126
.
8.
Bhattacharyya, Sudipta
. 2003. ‘
Agrarian Reform, Growth and Development: Recent Debates on Rural Transformation in West Bengal
’, Mainstream, 41(34):
21–30
.
9.
Bhattacharyya, Sudipta
. 2005. ‘
Interest Rates, Collateral and (De-)interlinkage: A Micro Study of Rural Credit in West Bengal
’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(3):
439–62
.
10.
Bhaumik, S.K.1993. Tenancy Relations and Agrarian Development: A Study of West Bengal.
New Delhi: Sage Publications
.
11.
Boyce, James K.1987. Agrarian Impasse in Bengal, Institutional Constraints to Technological Change.
New Delhi: Oxford University Press
.
12.
Braverman, A.
and
T.N. Srinivasan
. 1984. ‘Agrarian Reform in Developing Rural Economies Characterised by Interlinked Credit and Tenancy Markets’, in
Hans P.Binswanger
and
Mark R. Rosenzweig
(eds), Contractual Arrangements, Employment and Wages in Rural Labour Markets in Asia.
New Haven: Yale University Press
, 63–81.
13.
Braverman, A.
and
J.E. Stiglit
. 1982. ‘
Sharecropping and the Interlinkage of Agrarian Markets
’, American Economic Review, 72(4):
695–715
.
14.
citation>
. 1986. ‘
Landlords, Tenants and Technological Innovation
’, Journal of Development Economics, 23(2):
313–32
.
15.
Chandrasekhar, C.P.
, 1993. ‘
Agrarian Change and Occupational Diversification: Nonagricultural Employment and Rural Development in West Bengal
’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 20(2):
205–70
.
16.
Chayanov, A.V.1966. Theory of Peasant Economy (
D. Thorner
,
R. E. F. Smith
and
B. Karblay
, eds).
Homewood, IL: Irwin
.
17.
Cheung, S.N.S.1969. The Theory of Share Tenancy.Chicago: University of Chicago
.
18.
Dasgupta, Biplab
. 1984. ‘
Sharecropping in West Bengal: From Independence to Operation Barga
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 19(26):
A85–A96
.
19.
Dattaray, S.1994. ‘
Agricultural Growth in West Bengal
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 29(29):
1883–4
.
20.
Government of India. 1991. Provisional Population Totals: Workers and their Distribution, Series 1, Paper 3, India.New Delhi: Census of India
.
21.
Government of West Bengal. 2004. West Bengal Human Development Report 2004.
Kolkata: Development and Planning Department
.
22.
Johnson, D.G.1950. ‘
Resource Allocation under Share-Contracts
’, Journal of Political Economy, 58(2):
111–23
.
23.
Khasnabis, Ratan
. 1981. ‘
Operation Barga: Limits to Social Democratic Reformism
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 16(25–6):
A43–A48
.
24.
citation>
. 1994. ‘
Tenurial Conditions in West Bengal: Continuity and Change
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 29(53):
A189–A199
.
25.
Lenin, V.I.1975. ‘Two Tactics of Social Democracy in the First Russian Revolution’, in Selected Works, Vol.1.
Moscow: Progress Publishers
, 425–527.
26.
Lenin, V.I.1977. The Development of Capitalism in Russia.
Moscow: Progress Publishers
.
27.
Lieten, G.K.1990. ‘
Depeasantisation Discontinued: Land Reforms in West Bengal
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 25(40):
2265–71
.
28.
Marshall, Alfred
. 1952. Principles of Economics.
London: Macmillan
.
29.
Mitra, Pradeep K.1983. ‘
A Theory of Interlinked Rural Transactions
’, Journal of Public Economics, 20(2):
167–91
.
30.
Patnaik, Utsa
. 1979. ‘
Neo-populism and Marxism: The Chayanovian View of the Agrarian Question and its Fundamental Fallacy
’, Journal of Peasant Studies, l6(4):
375–420
.
31.
Patnaik, Utsa
. 1987. Peasant Class Differentiation: A Study in Method with Reference to Haryana.
New Delhi: Oxford University Press
.
32.
Patnaik, Utsa
. 1997. ‘Tenancy and Accumulation’, in
Kaushik Basu
(ed.), Agrarian Questions.
New Delhi: Oxford University Press
, 155–201.
33.
Rawal, Vikas
. 2001. ‘
Agrarian Reform and Land Markets: A Study of Land Transactions in Two Villages of West Bengal, 1977–95
’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(3):
611–29
.
34.
Rudra, Ashok
. 1981. ‘
One Step Forward—Two Steps Backward
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 16(25–6):
A61–A68
.
35.
Rudra, Ashok
. 1992. Political Economy of Indian Agriculture.
Kolkata: K.P. Bagchi
.
36.
Saha, Anamitra
and
Madhura Swaminathan
. 1994. ‘
Agricultural Growth in West Bengal in the 1980s: A Disaggregation by Districts and Groups
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 29(13):
A2–A11
.
37.
Sen, Abhijit
and
Ranja Sengupta
. 1995. ‘
The Recent Growth in Agricultural Output in Eastern India, with Special Reference to the Case of West Bengal
’. Paper presented at a workshop on ‘Agricultural Growth and Agrarian Structure in Contemporary West Bengal and Bangladesh’, Kolkata, January.
38.
Schickele, R.1941, ‘
Effect of Tenure System on Agricultural Efficiency
’, Journal of Farm Economics, 23(1):
185–207
.
39.
Sen, Abhijit
. 1996. ‘
Economic Reforms, Employment and Poverty: Terms and Options
’, Economic and Political Weekly, 31(35–7):
2459–77
.
40.
Sen, A.K.1966. ‘
Peasants and Dualism With and Without Surplus Labor
’, Journal of Political Economy, 74(5):
425–50
.
