Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Garcinia pedunculata (GP) Roxb. is a traditional medicinal plant used for treating gastrointestinal disorders. The fruit is always consumed in dried form in cuisines and as medicine.

Objectives

To study the effect of drying conditions (shade, oven, and traditional sun drying) on the nutritional profile of GP while assessing the choice of solvent extraction for the maximum phytocompounds extraction; their in vitro biological activities and chemical profiling.

Materials and Methods

The fruits were cut into thin 0.9 ± 0.3 cm slices and dried in the shade (25–30°C), sun (34–40°C), and oven (70–80°C). The extraction was done using methanol, hydromethanol, ethanol, hydroethanol, and water. HPLC and LC-ESI-MS/MS were used to identify the bioactive compounds.

Results

In this study, the impact of three drying conditions has been investigated and established that shade-dried (ShD) has a better-preserved nutritional profile. In terms of phytochemical extraction, comparatively higher amounts of phenols (394.00 ± 12.28 mg Gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of dried sample) and flavonoids (72.62 ± 2.06 mg Quercetin/g of dried sample) were recorded in the shade-dried hydromethanolic extract (ShDMH), which was directly in line with the better antioxidant activity (IC₅₀ for 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 647.99 ± 7.66 µg/mL, 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), 762.02 ± 18.74 µg/mL) and enzyme-inhibitory potential (IC₅₀ for α- glucosidase 1908.06 ± 13.26 µg/mL and for lipase 613.59 ± 7.57 µg/mL) of this extract.

Conclusion

The conclusive evidence from this study indicates that shade drying and extraction with hydromethanolic solvent preserves most of the nutritional components and has a higher extraction yield with well-conserved phytochemical composition. Also, these bioactive compounds such as hydroxycitric acid, GB-1a, garcinone A, 9-hydroxycalabaxanthone, chlorogenic acid, and garcinol are present in these extracts. This fruit, although beneficial is still underutilized, and this outcome is believed to be significantly valuable for the further aspects of GP fruit-based nutraceutical or phytopharmaceutical development.

Keywords

Antioxidant Drying conditions Garcinol LCMS Medicinal plants

Introduction

Modern medicine has a specific stratum for medicinal plants that are utilized as medicines after rigorous scientific experimentation. Traditional medicines have integrated their use in practice from the prehistoric era. Plants are rich sources of diverse bioactive molecules, including polyphenols, terpenes, alkaloids, and glycosides. According to the reports of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization in 2002, the number of medicinal plants used worldwide was more than 50,000.¹ The preservation of therapeutic potential during storage with extended shelf-life is of the highest importance for the pharmaceutical and industrial applications of plants. Drying seems to be a primary method taken up to meet these criteria of long-term preservation, employed for removing the excessive moisture content. It is important to follow regulations while drying medicinal plants, including lowering the moisture content to below 10%, preserving the bioactive composition while avoiding microbial degradation, and preventing loss of colour, flavour, and aroma.^2–4 The quality of finished products suffers due to the loss of nutrients and bioactive molecules caused by extreme drying conditions under intense heat, increased oxygen levels, microwave or UV radiations, airspeed, and humidity. Although sun-drying is the most sought-after drying technique, prolonged exposure, and excessive dependency on external weather with non-uniform drying made the samples prone to fungal or bacterial contamination. These drawbacks made the shade drying technique preferable to sun drying.^5–7 In addition to drying conditions, the solvent used, its polarity, concentration, time duration, and even the extraction temperature affect the yield and the type of phytochemicals extracted, undoubtedly affecting the antioxidant activity of the extract.^8–10 The extensive demand and interest in bioactive molecules of natural origin in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and food industries have led to the development of targeted techniques ensuring maximum extraction yield.¹¹ An aqueous mixture of solvents like ethanol and methanol is preferable for maximum recovery of polyphenolic contents, especially from medicinal plants. In an era before the concept of pharmaceutical drugs and surgical treatment, the plant realm made a significant contribution to society’s ability to provide for its health benefits.¹² It is a fact that local populations are familiar with medicinal plants and other natural resources on which they depend largely for treating a wide range of illnesses. Moreover, it is not possible to extract each compound in a single solvent successfully; hence, it is essential to devise solvent systems based on the targeted type of constituent compounds.^{10, 13}

Garcinia pedunculata (GP) Roxb. is commonly known as ‘Borthekera’ in Assam, India. It is an endemic medicinal plant of India’s North-Eastern Region (NER) and belongs to the Clusiaceae family.¹⁴ It is an evergreen tree bearing an edible, highly acidic, globose fruit that has enormous medicinal properties and is widely used in culinary applications.^{15, 16} As per the ethnomedicinal practices of NER, the juice prepared from the dried pulps of G. pedunculata (GP) fruits has immense therapeutic importance in treating gastrointestinal disorders such as jaundice, indigestion, dysentery, and diarrhoea. However, consuming fresh pulps of GP fruit is not advised since it causes dysentery. Instead, after drying in the sun for about 15 days, the pulps are used to prepare Assamese delicacies and consumed. This dried preserved product is called ‘Suthi’ locally, and it is believed that the effectiveness of its medicinal properties increases over time.^{15, 17} From earlier published reports, it is evident that GP is a rich source of polyphenols (total phenolic content of 700.1 ± 10.74 mg catechin equivalent/100 g dried pulp), flavonoids (total flavonoid content 71.4 ± 0.84 quercetin equivalent (QE)/100g dried pulp) with profound antioxidant activity as reported by Mudoi and coworkers from its methanolic extract.¹⁸ Several studies have confirmed its hypolipidemic,¹⁹ neuroprotective,²⁰ nephroprotective,²¹ and antidiabetic,²² effects using its methanolic and aqueous extracts.

Prior research on the drying of GP Roxb. focused on the development of new techniques like free convection corrugated solar dryer and comparing it to sun drying, or examining the effect of various pretreatment with 10% fructose, 10% sucrose, and 2% NaCl on drying in a humidity chamber at temperature 45°C, 50°C, and 55°C, at constant relative humidity and air velocity or to draw a comparison between GP and Garcinia cowa, while drying both the fruits in the oven at 50°C, 70°C, 90°C, in solar cabinet dryer and sun-drying and then comparing their nutritional parameters.^23–25

This study has been designed to address these points in shade drying, sun drying, and oven drying conditions, comparing any changes in their nutritional profile and extract yield, antioxidant, and enzyme inhibitory potential after extracting with different solvents. Then the chemical profiling of the extracts with comparatively higher activity in the three drying conditions was done using HPLC and UHPLC-MSMS to ascertain their bioactive components. It is believed that the outcome of the study will be significantly valuable for the further aspects of GP fruit-based nutraceutical or phytopharmaceutical development.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents Used

Ascorbic acid, quercetin, gallic acid, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline) 6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), acarbose, 4-nitrophenyl butyrate, 4-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside, orlistat, pancreatic lipase, and α-glucosidase were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals, USA. All the general chemicals and reagents used were purchased from Merck, Germany. Ethanol was obtained from Nucleus Scientific, India.

Collection of Plant Samples and Identification

The GP fruits were collected from the Sarbhog town of Barpeta district of Assam (26° 19’ 22.55’’ North latitude and 91° 00’ 22.75’’ East latitude) from May to July 2019. The identification was made at the Herbarium center at the Department of Botany, Gauhati University, and the samples were submitted there for future reference under Ref. No. Herb. /GUBH/2022/002 and accession number GUBH19815.

Processing and Extraction

After being carefully washed, the ripe GP fruits were sliced into thin slices (0.9 ± 0.3 cm) and dried. The cut pieces were shade-dried (ShD) for 20 days at a temperature of 25–30°C in well-aerated chambers. Sun-dried (SD) samples were prepared under direct sunlight and recorded between 34°C and 40°C. The sliced pieces were kept in glass trays covered with muslin cloth for 15 days while being SD. Likewise, to obtain oven-dried (OD) samples, the cut pieces were kept in a hot air oven (Ikon Instruments, Delhi), and maintained at a temperature of 70–80°C for 4–5 days. These samples were then collected and placed in dry, airtight plastic bags for storage. About 10 g of these three dried samples were then extracted with 100 mL of five different solvents viz. hydromethanolic (90% methanol, MH), methanol (M), hydroethanolic (90% ethanol, EH), ethanol (E), and water (A) each (10:100 w/v) via cold maceration technique. Each extract was set for 7 days, with occasional shaking, and extracted thrice with fresh solvents every time. They were collected at the end of the extraction. The solvents were evaporated using a rotary evaporator (Buchi R210, Switzerland) and a lyophilizer (FreeZone Freeze Dryer, Labconco) to dry the extracts’ aqueous part. The % yield of each extract was then calculated and stored at 4°C–8°C in the dark for further experiments. The nutritional contents were estimated directly from the dried samples.

Proximate Analysis

Total carbohydrate, total protein, starch, and reducing sugar contents were determined in the proximate analysis.²⁶ The total ash and moisture content were determined by following the AOAC guidelines of 2005.²⁷ To determine the moisture content, 50 g of GP sliced fruit pulp was taken in a dried Petri dish, evenly distributed, and kept in a hot air oven at a temperature of 105 ± 2°C and cooled in a desiccator. The heating and cooling process was repeated till a constant weight of the sample was achieved. The moisture content was calculated as follows:

\begin{matrix} Moisture content (%) = [(Weight of raw sample - Weight of dried sample) / Weight of \\ raw sample] \times 100 \end{matrix}

For ash content analysis, three dried samples (ShD, SD, and OD) were taken (2 g each) in clean sterile crucibles. These crucibles were heated on the Bunsen burner till the smoke emission ceased. Then, the burned-out samples were transferred to the muffle furnace (JSGW) for turning them to grey ash by heating at 500 ± 5°C. The ash content was calculated as follows:

Ash content (%) = (Weight of ash / Weight of sample) \times 100

For mineral content analysis, 100 mg of all three samples (ShD, SD, and OD) were digested with concentrated nitric acid (65%) while heating to obtain a clear solution, followed by the addition of a few drops of hydrogen peroxide. After cooling, the solution was filtered, and the final volume was made up of 100 mL of deionised distilled water. The mineral contents were then determined using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU AAC-7000).²⁸ The total phenolic content was estimated spectrophotometrically using the Folin-Ciocalteu method and gallic acid as standard and the flavonoid content was estimated using the aluminium chloride method and Quercetin as standard.²⁹

HPLC Separation and Fraction Collection

The three different types of GP extract were analyzed using Waters Binary HPLC Pump (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a manual injection valve with a loop of 20 µL and UV-visible detector controlled by Waters Breeze 2 Software. The extracts were prepared in methanol and passed through a C₁₈ column with a gradient mobile phase of solvent A: water and solvent B: acetonitrile at a constant flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The chromatogram was recorded as 254 nm.

Identification of Bioactive Compounds Through MS/MS

Exactive™ Plus-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Germany) coupled with UHPLC (Dionex Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The samples were dissolved with methanol and followed the previous method with a slight modification.^{30, 31} The extracts were passed through a Hypersil Gold C₁₈ column (1.9) with a gradient mobile phase of solvent A: water and solvent B: acetonitrile at a constant flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Using an electrospray ionisation (ESI) source, all MS/MS studies were carried out in both positive and negative modes. Xcalibur software was used for data collecting and processing. Mass spectra from m/z 100–1500 amu have a resolution of 70,000. The mass-to-charge ratio was compared to the literature and mass databases to characterize the extract contents.^{31, 32}

Free Radical Scavenging Assay

The DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays were performed using the standard protocol with slight modifications.^{8, 33} To the 100 µL of different dilutions of extracts, 100 µL of DPPH or ABTS solution was added, and the absorbance was measured using the microplate reader (Multiskan, Thermo, Germany) at 517 nm and 734 nm, respectively, after half an hour of incubation of the reaction mixture at room temperature. Ascorbic acid was used as standard.

Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay

Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) assay was performed using the standard protocol with slight modifications.³⁴ To 100 µL of extract, 250 µL of the freshly prepared 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 1% potassium ferricyanide were added, mixed thoroughly, and incubated at 50°C for 30 min. After incubation, 250 µL of 10% trichloroacetic acid solution was added, and then 250 µL of the reaction mixture was drawn out and mixed with 250 µL of double-distilled water. To this, 50 µL of freshly prepared 0.1% ferric chloride solution was added, and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm. The assay was performed in triplicates taking ascorbic acid as standard, and the increase in absorbance indicated the increase in reducing power.

Phosphomolybdenum Assay

Phosphomolybdate assay (PMD) was performed using the standard protocol with slight modifications.³⁵ About 150 µL of extracts in different concentrations were made from the 1 mg/mL stock solution, then mixed with 1500 µL of phosphomolybdate reagent (28 mM sodium phosphate, 0.6 M sulphuric acid, 4 mM ammonium molybdate) prepared freshly. This reaction mixture was mixed properly, then incubated at 95°C for 90 min and then the absorbance was measured at 695 nm, and ascorbic acid served as the standard compound.

α-Glucosidase Inhibition Potential

The assay was performed using the method of Inthongkaew et al.³⁶ with a few modifications. About 50 µL samples were plated on microtiter plates prepared in phosphate buffer solution (0.1 M, pH 6.8), mixed with 25 µL of enzyme solution (1U/mL), and set incubation at 37°C for 10 min, after which 25 µL of 4-Nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (5 mM) substrate was added and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. About 100 µL of sodium carbonate (0.2 M) was added to terminate the reaction, taking the absorbance at 405 nm. Acarbose served as a standard control. The percentage of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity is calculated as follows:

% inhibition = [\{{Absorbance}_{(Control)} - {Absorbance}_{(Sample)}\} / {Absorbance}_{(Control)}] \times 100

Pancreatic Lipase Inhibition Potential

The assay was performed following the method of Vangoori et al.,³⁷ with some modifications. To 100 µL of the sample, 700 µL of Tris buffer (10mg/mL) was added along with 200 µL of lipase enzyme, mixed properly, and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Then, 5 µL of 10 mM p-nitrophenyl butyrate (dissolved in acetonitrile) substrate was added to this reaction mixture, and then incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm with Orlistat as standard. The percentage of pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity was calculated as follows:

% inhibition = [\{{Absorbance}_{(Control)} - {Absorbance}_{(Sample)}\} / {Absorbance}_{(Control)}] \times 100

Statistical Analysis

All the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. The significance has been calculated using one-way ANOVA using the software GraphPad Prism Version 5.0 (San Diego, CA, USA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The results of the same row with different superscripts were significantly different from each other in terms of drying conditions and extraction with the same solvent at p < 0.05.

Results

Impact of Drying on Proximate Composition

The dried fruits of GP under three drying conditions (ShD, SD, and OD) (Figure 1) were utilized for proximate content analysis. Comparing the total carbohydrate content, ShD showed the highest carbohydrate content (9.78 ± 0.29 g/100 g) as compared to the SD (9.02 ± 0.19 g/100 g) and OD (8.48 ± 0.26 g/100 g). In total protein content also, ShD had significantly higher protein content, 3.56 ± 0.10 g/ 100 g of dried sample, followed by SD (2.62 ± 0.04 g/100 g) and OD (0.93 ± 0.06 g/100 g) in decreasing order. Similar trends have been followed in starch and reducing sugar analysis.

Figure 1.

Abbreviation: GP, G. pedunculata.

In moisture content analysis, ShD (11.90 ± 0.59%) had significantly higher moisture content followed by SD (10.70 ± 0.43 %) and OD (8.88 ± 0.32%). ShD had significantly higher moisture content when compared to OD. The ash content analysis revealed a reverse trend as compared to moisture content as OD had the highest content with 4.43 ± 0.230%, followed by SD with 3.91 ± 0.141% and then ShD with 3.23 ± 0.120%. The detailed nutritional parameters are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

The Comparison of Proximate Content Analysis is of GP Fruit in Three Drying Conditions.

	ShD	SD	OD
Total carbohydrate content*	9.78 ± 0.29^a	9.02 ± 0.19^b	8.48 ± 0.26^b
Total protein content*	3.56 ± 0.10^a	2.62 ± 0.04^b	0.93 ± 0.06^c
Starch content*	1.36 ± 0.10^a	0.97 ± 0.05^b	0.80 ± 0.06^b
Reducing sugar content*	1.32 ± 0.06^a	1.17 ± 0.01^b	1.14 ± 0.01^b
Moisture content (%)	11.90 ± 0.59^a	10.70 ± 0.43^b	8.88 ± 0.32^c
Total ash content (%)	3.23 ± 0.12^a	3.91 ± 0.14^b	± 0.23^c

Note: *(g/100g)). All the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. The significance has been calculated using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The results of the same row with different superscripts (a,b,c) are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05.

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata.

From the mineral content analysis, it was found that manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), magnesium (Mg), zinc and sodium (Na) were present in higher quantities in OD whereas the iron (Fe) content of ShD was significantly higher than OD. The Cr, Mg, zinc, calcium (Ca), Fe, and Mn content did not vary significantly in ShD and SD, while Ca was lower in OD when compared to ShD but was not significantly different in the three drying conditions. The detailed mineral content analysis is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

The Comparison of Mineral Composition Analysis of GP Fruit in Three Drying Conditions (mg/100 g Dried Sample).

Minerals	ShD	SD	OD
Cd	–	–	–
Cr	0.142 ± 0.004^a	0.174 ± 0.008^a	0.253 ± 0.02^b
Ca	63.25 ± 0.98^a	62.86 ± 4.34^a	60.39 ± 2.91^a
Fe	4.41 ± 0.07^a	4.30 ± 0.30^a	3.30 ± 0.04^b
Mg	3.31 ± 0.02^a	3.32 ± 0.05^a	3.39 ± 0.03^a
Na	4.16 ± 0.05^a	4.62 ± 0.10^b	4.86 ± 0.13^b
Zn	0.414 ± 0.15^a	0.509 ± 0.05^a	0.648 ± 0.07^a
Mn	0.127 ± 0.004^a	0.123 ± 0.005^a	0.228 ± 0.003^b
Ni	–	–	–
Se	–	–	–

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata.

Extractive Yield and Phytochemical Analysis

Comparing the three drying conditions, the yields of extracts with the same solvent are not significantly different, as shown in Table 3. Here, upon comparison, ShDMH was found to have a significantly higher yield when compared to shade-dried ethanolic extract (ShDE), shade-dried hydroethanolic extract (ShDEH), and shade-dried aqueous extract (ShDA). Similarly, sun-dried hydromethanolic extract (SDMH) had a significantly higher yield for sun-drying conditions than sun-dried ethanolic extract (SDE) and sun-dried aqueous extract (SDA). Oven-dried hydromethanolic extract (ODMH) had a higher yield for oven drying conditions, not so different from oven-dried methanolic extract (ODM) and oven-dried hydroethanolic extract (ODEH) while having a significantly higher yield than oven-dried ethanol extract (ODE) and oven-dried aqueous extract (ODA).

Table 3.

The Yield Extract (expressed in %) of all Extracts of GP under Three Drying Conditions.

Extract	Yield	Extract	Yield	Extract	Yield
ShDM	18.48 ± 0.68^a	SDM	17.33 ± 1.25^a	ODM	17.75 ± 0.66^a
ShDMH	19.350 ± 0.10^a	SDMH	18.91 ± 0.86^a	ODMH	18.41 ± 1.32^a
ShDE	12.76 ± 2.08^a,*	SDE	13.43 ± 1.45^a,*	ODE	11.8 ± 1.88^a,*
ShDEH	15.13 ± 0.75^a,*	SDEH	15.83 ± 0.52^a	ODEH	14.75 ± 0.30^a
ShDA	13.53 ± 1.20^a,*	SDA	12.11 ± 1.32^a,*	ODA	12.53 ± 2.57^a,*

Note: All the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. The significance has been calculated using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The results of the same row with different superscripts (a,b,c) are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05, and of the same column with (*) are significantly different when compared with MH extract of each sample at p < 0.05.

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata.

In phytochemical analysis, when compared in terms of extraction solvent and drying conditions, the phenolic content of hydromethanolic extracts under all drying conditions were found to be higher when compared to the methanolic, ethanolic, or aqueous extracts. In ShD conditions, the overall phenolic content was found to be significantly higher when compared to SD and OD conditions for each of the solvent extraction systems. In the flavonoid content analysis, ShDMH had been recorded to have the highest content, followed by shade-dried methanolic extract (ShDM) among all the samples. The exact values of phenolic and flavonoid content are given in Table 4.

Table 4.

The Effect of Drying Condition on the Total Phenolic (mg GAE/g Dried Sample) and Flavonoid (mg QE/g Dried Sample) Contents of GP When Extracted with Different Solvents.

Assay	Solvents	Drying Conditions
Assay	Solvents	ShD	SD	OD
TPC(mg GAE/g dried sample)	M	297.66 ± 16.19^a	181.00 ± 15.71^b	145.00 ± 4.58^c
	MH	394.00 ± 12.28^a	199.00 ± 4.58^b	204.66 ± 7.37^b
	E	186.00 ± 3.46^a	123.33 ± 4.93^b	113.66 ± 4.51^b
	EH	271.66 ± 7.51^a	178.66 ± 11.37^b	145.66 ± 5.03^c
	A	151.33 ± 5.85^a	121.00 ± 10.53^b	108.33 ± 10.21^b
TFC(mg QE/g dried sample)	M	71.33 ± 1.28^a	60.71 ± 0.44^b	62.63 ± 0.39^b
	MH	72.62 ± 2.06^a	62.74 ± 0.16^b	62.66 ± 0.51^b
	E	63.33 ± 0.48^a	61.29 ± 0.16^b	60.77 ± 0.44^b
	EH	67.26 ± 0.61^a	61.59 ± 0.23^b	61.00 ± 0.91^b
	A	61.81 ± 0.61^a	58.18 ± 1.00^b	59.06 ± 1.68^a

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata; MH, hydromethanolic; EH, hydroethanolic; M, methanol; E, ethanaol, A, water; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; QE, quercetin equivalent.

HPLC/LCMS-MS Analysis

In preliminary investigation and identification of the GP bioactive compounds, the HPLC technique demonstrated linearity, precision, and accuracy in the concentration range, meeting regulatory criteria. Different wavelengths and sample run times were attempted before the concluded protocol. Nine peaks were obtained at the optimized wavelength of 254 nm. The comparisons of the HPLC chromatogram of these three extracts are shown in Figure 2. Qualitative screening of multiclass secondary metabolites present in the fruit extracts of GP was carried out using UHPLC-Orbitrap-MS/MS analysis. This UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS has well-equipped to differentiate the masses, even if they can be eluted. Together, HPLC profile and UHPLC-MS/MS confirmed that the compounds, hydroxycitric acid, GB-1a, Garcinone A, 9-hydroxycalabaxanthone, chlorogenic acid, and garcinol (Figure 3) were present in these extracts. All the compounds have shown the corresponding [M-H]⁻ peak in the negative mode of ionization. The retention time, percentage area, and percentage height of the peaks are listed in Table 5. The compound with m/z 207.01 [M-H]⁻ is identified as hydroxycitric acid. The compound, GB-1a has 541.06 [M-H]⁻ and Garcinone A has 379.01 [M-H]⁻. Similarly, it has to be understood that the molecules such as 9-hydroxycalabaxanthone has 407.03 [M-H]⁻, chlorogenic acid has 353.08 [M-H]⁻, and Garcinol has 601.36 [M-H]⁻ as shown in Table 6.

Figure 2.

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata.

Figure 3.

Abbreviation: GP, G. pedunculata.

Table 5.

HPLC Details for all the Extracts of GP Under Three Drying Conditions.

Peaks	RT (min)	%Area	%Height	%Area	%Height	%Area	%Height
Peak 1	3.0	3.94	6.55	5.60	11.43	6.30	10.75
Peak 2	3.2	3.51	5.89	9.66	19.51	6.29	13.11
Peak 3	5.9	2.2	1.5	4.4	5.69	–	–
Peak 4	8.8–9.0	40.84	30.6	–	–	3.76	6.85
Peak 5	9.8–10.0	22.23	17.0	1.93	1.48	11.72	8.73
Peak 6	11.5–12.0	9.97	11.13	7.43	9.10	13.6	16.4
Peak 7	15.0–16.0	3.13	1.72	34.19	20.0	26.1	15.72
Peak 8	21.7–21.9	–	–	5.22	6.89	2.74	3.92
Peak 9	27.0	–	–	19.36	24.45	5.89	6.94

Abbreviation: GP, G. pedunculata.

Table 6.

Compounds Identified from GP by UHPLC-Orbitrap-MS/MS Analysis.

Sl.No.	Formula	[M-H]⁻ Calculated	[M-H]⁻ Observed	Compound	SD	ShD	OD
1	C₆H₈O₈	207.01	207.01	Hydroxycitric acid	P	P	P
2	C₃₀H₂₂O₁₀	541.11	541.06	GB-1a	P	P	P
3	C₂₃H₂₄O₅	379.15	379.01	Garcinone A	P	P	P
4	C₂₄H₂₄O₆	407.4	407.03	9-Hydroxy calabaxanthone	N	N	P
5	C₁₆H₁₈O₉	353.31	353.08	Chlorogenic acid	N	P	N
6	C₃₈H₅₀O₆	601.8	601.36	Garcinol	P	P	P

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata.

Antioxidant Properties of the Different Extracts

The antioxidant properties had been assessed using DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging assays and the IC₅₀ for all 15 extracts, as shown in Figure 4. In the DPPH assay, ShDMH had been found to have a significantly lower IC₅₀, indicating the highest antioxidant activity among all the extracts. Also, in shade drying conditions, the IC₅₀ of ShDMH was followed by ShDM, ShDEH, ShDE, and ShDA in increasing order. In sun drying conditions also, SDMH had been found to have the lowest IC₅₀ amongst the five different extracts which followed the trend of SDMH <SDEH < SDM < SDE < SDA in increasing order, while in the oven drying conditions, the IC₅₀ varies along with the increasing order of ODMH< ODM < ODEH < ODE < ODA. Also, all the hydromethanolic extracts had better activity in three drying conditions, and ShDMH had significantly lower IC₅₀ when compared to SDMH and ODMH. In comparing a particular solvent extract among three drying conditions, it was found that ShD extract has better activity when compared with SD and OD conditions in their respective solvents.

Figure 4.

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata; MH, hydromethanolic; EH, hydroethanolic; M, methanol; E, ethanaol, A, water; ABTS, 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)6-sulfonic acid, DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl.

In the ABTS scavenging assay as well, ShDMH exhibited the best scavenging activity amongst all the extracts under consideration, while ODA had the least recorded activity. In shade drying conditions, the IC₅₀ is seen to be increasing in order of ShDMH < ShDM < ShDEH < ShDE < ShDA. The values found are significantly different from each other within the same drying condition. In sun drying conditions, the IC₅₀ is in the order of SDMH < SDEH < SDM < SDE < SDA, with the best activity recorded in SDMH and the least activity in SDA. In oven drying conditions, ODMH < ODM < ODEH < ODE < ODA order is followed by IC₅₀ values, which showed that ODMH had better activity among the five extracts. In terms of drying conditions, ShD samples had significantly lower IC₅₀ values in comparison with their respective solvent extracts in the two other drying conditions, while hydromethanolic extract showed higher activity amongst all the three drying conditions and their respective extracts with different solvents.

In FRAP and PMD assays also, ShDMH revealed the highest reduction capability among all the extracts. In a comparison drawn between the three drying conditions, the ShD samples showed better preserved, reducing activity when compared to SD and OD conditions. In between all the five extraction solvent systems in all three drying conditions, hydromethanolic extracts showed the maximum activity. Their comparative results are shown graphically in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata; MH, hydromethanolic; EH, hydroethanolic; M, methanol; E, ethanaol, A, water.

Enzyme Inhibition Properties of Different Extracts

In the α-glucosidase inhibition assay, amongst all the extracts, ShDMH had the maximum enzyme-inhibiting activity compared to other extracts. While comparing respective solvents under different drying conditions, it has been found that ShDMH and SDMH had nearly the same activity. In contrast, ODMH had a much-reduced inhibitory effect, while sun-dried methanolic extract (SDM), ShDM, and ODM showed significantly different inhibitory capacities. In between the three drying conditions, the ShD samples had shown better activity when compared to their respective solvent extracts of the SD and OD samples. In lipase inhibition assay as well, ShDMH had been found to have the maximum activity, which is significantly higher than the SDMH and ODMH extracts. In a comparison of the drying conditions, ShD samples had shown much better lipase inhibiting activity than the other two drying conditions as well as for the solvent extraction system among the three drying conditions (Table 7).

Table 7.

The Effect of Drying Conditions on the α-Glucosidase and Lipase Enzyme Inhibition Activity of GP When Extracted with Different Solvents.

Assay	Drying Conditions Solvents	ShD	SD	OD
α-Glucosidase enzyme inhibition(IC₅₀ in µg/mL)	M	2193.72 ± 13.59^{a, #}	3326.06 ± 23.46^b,*	3714.10 ± 9.40^c,♦
	MH	1908.06± 13.26^a	1915.42 ± 15.26^a	3479.16 ± 20.31^b
	E	3517.34 ± 6.69^a,#	7646.31 ± 29.32^b,*	7897.69 ± 58.40^c,♦
	EH	3234.95 ± 34.72^a,#	6565.45 ± 16.15^b,*	4525.61 ± 12.83^c,♦
	A	5144.71 ± 37.34^a,#	15543.79 ± 57.89^b,*	12065.33 ± 46.06^c,♦
Lipase enzyme inhibition(IC₅₀ in µg/mL)	M	1197.04 ± 12.68^a,#	1240.64 ± 22.66^a,*	1499.66 ± 50.28^b,♦
	MH	613.59 ± 7.57^a	924.81 ± 10.95^b	1082.43 ± 18.06^c
	E	1317.59 ± 8.72^a,#	1378.62 ± 18.15^b,*	2117.3 ± 21.09^c,♦
	EH	1180.17 ± 15.69^a	1234.13 ± 14.75^b,*	1829.28 ± 16.82^c,♦
	A	964.83 ± 11.58^a,#	994.77 ± 12.05^a	1080.78 ± 33.33^b

Note: All the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. The significance has been calculated using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The results of the same row and same solvent with different superscripts (a,b,c) significantly different from each other at p < 0.05. In the same drying conditions down the same column and different solvents, a significant difference is depicted via superscripts #, *, ♦ in comparison with MH extract of ShD, SD and OD respectively at p < 0.05.

Abbreviations: ShD, shade-dried; SD, sun-dried; OD, oven-dried; GP, G. pedunculata; MH, hydromethanolic; EH, hydroethanolic; M, methanol; E, ethanaol, A, water.

Discussion

Drying fruits and vegetables are often associated with reducing their weight, color, and size shrinkage, which increases their preservation time, and helps in easy packaging, handy storage, and transportation with less spoilage. Although, with drying conditions, the end product’s antioxidant capacity changes, along with colour, texture, physical shape, and nutritional and phytochemical composition. Hence, the appropriate drying condition must maintain the quality during preservation.³⁸ The raw fruit pulp of GP is off-whitish, which after drying is turned into deep brown to blackish brown, and the weight was reduced by almost 85 ± 3.3135% in shade drying, 88 ± 5.2489% in the sun drying, and 91 ± 6.8322% in the oven drying conditions as represented in Figure 1.

Traditionally, dried GP fruit is used in preparing culinary delicacies. These dried fruit pulps are also used in different herbal formulations for treating gastrointestinal disorders. Also, as per popular belief, the therapeutic potential of dried GP increases as its ages in storage.¹⁷ The results of this study clearly established that shade-dried GP (ShD) had the highest preserved carbohydrates, proteins, and moisture while OD samples had the highest ash content. The significant reduction of carbohydrates and protein, as noted in OD, might be attributed to its exposure to very high drying temperatures, which is not the case with ShD and SD being dried at much lower temperatures. It is already reported that simple sugar such as fructose, glucose (carbohydrates), and proteins undergo degradation with exposure to higher drying temperatures, and the browning of the sample after drying might be because of high amounts of reducing sugar in them. Since the fruit of GP is highly acidic, it might be a reason for the fruit not undergoing severe degradation in its macronutrients even with a longer dehydration time. The loss of nutrients that happened might be attributed to the high temperature of the drying conditions, which induces non-enzymatic browning involving a complex degradation reaction amongst the amino groups of proteins or amino acids and the reducing sugar moieties in the fruit. This reaction, called the Maillard reaction, with the production of brown melanoidin pigments, is also responsible for changing the colour, taste, and lower protein nutritive value of the fruit after drying.^{25, 38, 39} The results of this study in terms of nutritional profiling are similar to the earlier studies published on Moringa oleferia leaves, Musa paradisiaca, Dioscorea srotundata, Colocasia esculenta, Garcinia cowa, Garcinia indica, Vernonia amygdalina (bitter leaf), and leaves of Mentha spicata.^{25, 40–44} This study also found that the fresh fruit has the highest moisture, and after drying, ShD has higher moisture content followed by SD and OD had the lowest. Also, OD had the highest ash content, and ShD had the lowest. Moreover, OD samples have higher mineral contents when compared to ShD or sun-dried which is mainly because of its reduced minimal moisture content and thus, concentrated dry matter. These results are in accord with the earlier published studies on Vernonia amygdalina (bitter leaf), leaves of Mentha spicata, and Hibiscus sabdariffa, where in oven drying conditions, due to the availability of uniform heating and high temperature the moisture loss is more as compared shade drying and sun drying. And the ash content is often inversely proportional to moisture content and with the loss of moisture, the minerals were more concentrated in the OD samples, as compared to the sun-dried and the ShD ones.^43–47 In this study, Ca and Fe are found to be the most abundant minerals in all three samples similar to the previous report.²⁵ In comparison to the reports published by Parthasarathy and Nandakishore 2014, the Ca content reported here is much higher, while the Mg content is lower in quantity.⁴⁸ Also, the Mn, Zn, and Cd levels were much similar, while the Na and Fe were somewhat higher than the reports of Sarma et al., 2016. These differences in the minerals in the analyzed data for this study and the earlier reports might be because of the surrounding environmental factors, availability of nutrients, time, and collection of the fruit.^{49, 50}

In this study, the trend in extract yield is in agreement with the previous studies, where the most efficient extraction of antioxidants and highest yield in the methanolic extract compared to acetone and water.^{51, 52} In yet another study, with methanolic, ethanolic, and hydroethanolic extracts of various medicinal plants in comparison, the hydroethanolic extracts were reported to have maximum yield. One of the crucial reasons behind the highest total phenolic and flavonoid content in ShDMH, followed by ShDM might be attributed to the higher polarity of aqueous methanol or ethanol compared to pure methanol and ethanol.⁵³

The phenolic and flavonoid contents in this study are found to be better preserved in the ShD conditions, and were much reduced in OD samples which are in line with earlier studies on black chokeberries, black rice, Dryopteris erythrosora, Pimpinella anisum seeds, and with rising in drying temperature, a loss to the phenolic compounds was observed, which might actually be due to their thermal degradation owning to their heat-sensitive nature, or they may even chemically interact with other biomolecules forming conjugated products which might be out of scope for the detection technique used. They may also be acted upon by oxidative enzymes which may reduce their levels in the end products. The phenolic and flavonoid content is also directly related to the antioxidant capacity of these extracts. This explains the better antioxidant activity in terms of radical scavenging and metal-reducing power which lies in direct correlation with the higher phenolic and flavonoid content of the ShD samples, as compared to the SD or OD.^54–57 For the enzyme inhibitory potential as well, a similar trend was followed, and with the reduction in phenolics and flavonoids, the inhibitory potential also decreased.^58–62 Hence, this study concludes that these dried fruit pulps would be of utmost benefit if the fruits were shade-dried and extracted with hydromethanolic solvent for better yield and preserved phytochemical extractions.

Summary

The fruit of GP Roxb. is a sour-tasting, acidic fruit consumed only in its dried form, especially in Assam, where it is an integral part of ethnic cuisine. In traditional practice, the fruit is sun-dried for at least 15 days, and this dried fruit is then stored over time as per the widespread belief that its medicinal properties enhance as the fruit ages. Keeping the importance of drying in mind for this fruit, we designed this study to ascertain the impact of drying techniques and different extraction solvents on the nutritional, antioxidant, and enzyme inhibitory activity of GP fruit. From this study, we have established that shade-dried samples exhibited better preserved nutritional properties, phenolics, and flavonoids compared to sun-dried and oven-dried conditions. The antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory potential were also higher in the shade-dried samples, especially in the hydromethanolic extracts compared to the other solvents. The significant finding from the HPLC analysis revealed the presence of garcinol, hydroxycitric acid, GB-1a, garcinone A, 9-hydroxycalabaxanthone, and chlorogenic acid from the hydromethanolic extracts of the GP fruit. These bioactive compounds are believed to be responsible for the potent antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory potential of the hydromethanolic extracts under the three drying conditions.

Footnotes

Abbreviations

ABTS: 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)6-sulfonic acid; Ca: Calcium; Cd: Cadmium; Cr: Chromium; DPPH: 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; Fe: Iron; FRAP: Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay; GAE: Gallic acid equivalent; GP: Garcinia pedunculata; Mg: Magnesium; Mn: Manganese; Na: Sodium; Ni: Nickel; OD: Oven-dried; ODMH: Oven-dried hydromethanolic extract; ODM: Oven-dried methanolic extract; ODEH: Oven-dried hydroethanolic extract; ODE: Oven-dried ethanol extract; ODA: Oven-dried aqueous extract; PMD: Phosphomolybdenum assay; QE: Quercetin equivalent; ShD: Shade-dried GP; ShDMH: Shade-dried hydromethanolic extract; ShDM: Shade-dried methanolic extract; ShDEH: Shade-dried hydroethanolic extract; ShDE: Shade-dried ethanolic extract; ShDA: Shade-dried aqueous extract; SD: Sun-dried; GP; SDMH: Sun-dried hydromethanolic extract; SDM: Sun-dried methanolic extract; SDEH: Sun-dried hydroethanolic extract; SDE: Sun-dried ethanolic extract; SDA: Sun-dried aqueous extract; Se: Selenium.

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to the Director, IASST, Guwahati, and the Vice-Chancellor, Annamalai University for giving us the facility to carry out this work. We also thank IASST and Annamalai University for providing instrumentation facilities.

Authors’ Contributions

S.B. conducted all the experiments and analysis of results; D.C. (Trainee at IASST) helped in the experiments; P.P.S helped with the HPLC experiment; R.E. helped in analysing the HPLC, LCMS-MS results, identification of compounds; P.K.D. helped in the concept, and analysis of results; S.B., R.E., P.K.D. helped in the writing of the paper; R.D. and S.K. have overall conceptualized and supervised the project.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding

S.K. is a recipient of the UGC-BSR Faculty fellowship, and DST PURSE Phase-II, has been provided to Elancheran Ramakrishnan by Annamalai University as Research Associate.

References

Chen

, Yu

, Luo

, . Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: Problems, progress, and prospects. Chin Med 2016; 11(1): 37. DOI: 10.1186/s13020-016-0108-7, PMID 27478496.

Thamkaew

, Sjöholm

and Galindo

FG.

A review of drying methods for improving the quality of dried herbs. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2021; 61(11): 1763–86. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1765309, PMID 32423234.

Rocha

RP.

Influence of drying process on the quality of medicinal plants: A review. J Med Plants Res 2011; 5(33): 7076–84. DOI: 10.5897/JMPRX11.001.

Dziadek

, Kopeć

, Dziadek

, . The changes in bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) herb under storage and different drying conditions: A comparison with other species of sage. Molecules 2022; 27(5): 1569. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051569, PMID 35268670.

Nguyen

, Van Vuong

, Bowyer

, . Effects of different drying methods on bioactive compound yield and antioxidant capacity of Phyllanthus amarus. Drying Technol 2015; 33(8): 1006–17. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2015.1013197.

Chua

LYW

, Chong

, Chua

, . Influence of drying methods on the antibacterial, antioxidant and essential oil volatile composition of herbs: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol 2019; 12(3): 450–76. DOI: 10.1007/s11947-018-2227-x.

Onwude

, Iranshahi

, Rubinetti

, . How much do process parameters affect the residual quality attributes of dried fruits and vegetables for convective drying. Food Bioprod Process 2022; 131: 176–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2021.11.005.

Iloki-Assanga

, Lewis-Luján

, Lara-Espinoza

, . Solvent effects on phytochemical constituent profiles and antioxidant activities, using four different extraction formulations for analysis of Bucida buceras L. and Phoradendron californicum. BMC Res Notes 2015; 8(1): 396. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1388-1, PMID 26323940.

Truong

, Nguyen

, Ta

NTA

, . Evaluation of the use of different solvents for phytochemical constituents, antioxidants, and in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of Severinia buxifolia. J Food Qual 2019; 2019: 1–9. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8178294.

10.

Nawaz

, Shad

, Rehman

, . Effect of solvent polarity on extraction yield and antioxidant properties of phytochemicals from bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds. Braz J Pharm Sci 2020; 56. DOI: 10.1590/s2175-97902019000417129.

11.

Azmir

, Zaidul

ISM

, Rahman

, . Techniques for extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials: a review. J Food Eng 2013; 117(4): 426–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.014.

12.

Barua

, Yasmin

and Elancheran

A review on effective utilization, phytochemical compounds, pharmacological intervention of a popularly used plant for developing a new drug: Zanthoxylum armatum with reference to its anticancer activity. MOJBB 2018; 5(3): 156–67. DOI: 10.15406/mojbb.2018.05.00097.

13.

Marambio

, Rodriguez

, Mendez

, . Photosynthetic performance and pigment composition of Macrocystis pyrifera (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) along a gradient of depth and seasonality in the ecoregion of Magellan, Chile. J Appl Phycol 2017; 29(5): 2575–85. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1136-0.

14.

Bhattacharjee

and Devi

. A comprehensive review of Garcinia pedunculata Roxb. and its therapeutic potential. Mini Rev Med Chem 2021; 21(20): 3113–43. DOI: 10.2174/1389557521666210217094152, PMID 33596803.

15.

Baruah

and Borthakur

. Studies on morphology and ethnobotany of six species of Garcinia L. (Clusiaceae) found in the Brahmaputra valley, Assam, India. J Nat Prod Plant Resour 2012; 2(3): 389–96.

16.

Gupta

, Kar

, Sharma

, . Morpho-anatomical and physicochemical evaluation of Garcinia pedunculata Roxb. Ex. Buch.-Ham. Int J Pharmacogn 2018; 5(9): 630–36.

17.

Sarma

and Devi

. Ethnopharmacological survey of Garcinia pedunculata Roxb. fruit in six different districts of Assam, India. Int J PharmSci Invent 2015; 4(1): 20–28.

18.

Mudoi

, Deka

, and Devi

. In vitro antioxidant activity of Garcinia pedunculata, an indigenous fruit of North Eastern (NE) region of India. Int J PharmTech Res 2012; 4(1): 334–42.

19.

Sarma

, Kumari

, Elancheran

, . Polyphenol rich extract of Garcinia pedunculata fruit attenuates the hyperlipidemia induced by high fat diet. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 294. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00294, PMID 27642282.

20.

Mundugaru

, Narayana

SKK

, Ballal

, . Neuroprotective activity of Garcinia pedunculata roxb ex buch ham fruit extract against aluminium chloride induced neurotoxicity in mice. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 2016; 50(3): 435–41. DOI: 10.5530/ijper.50.3.17.

21.

Mundugaru

, Sivanesan

, Udaykumar

, . Quality standardization and nephroprotective effect of Garcinia pedunculata roxb. fruit rind. IJPER 2017; 51(4): 713–21. DOI: 10.5530/ijper.51.4.105.

22.

Ali

, Paul

, Tanvir

, . Antihyperglycemic, antidiabetic, and antioxidant effects of Garcinia pedunculata in rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2017; 2017: 2979760. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2979760, PMID 29234381.

23.

Hossain

, Dey

, and Joy

. Effect of osmotic pretreatment and drying temperature on drying kinetics, antioxidant activity, and overall quality of taikor (Garcinia pedunculata Roxb.) slices. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021; 28(12): 7269–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.038, PMID 34867031.

24.

Dutta

, Dutta

, Kalita

Thermal performance studies for drying of Garcinia pedunculata in a free convection corrugated type of solar dryer. Renew Energy 2021; 163: 599–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.118.

25.

Sagolsem

, Rathi

, and Baishya

. Impact of different drying methods on nutritional quality of Garcinia cowa and Garcinia pedunculata fruits. JEB 2021; 42(3): 714–19. DOI: 10.22438/jeb/42/3/MRN-1484.

26.

Sadasivam

and Manickam

. Biochemical Methods . 3rd ed. India: New Age International Publishers [reprint]. 2016.

27.

AOAC. Determination of moisture, ash, protein and fat. Official method of analysis of the association of analytical chemists. 18th ed. Washington DC: AOAC, 2005.

28.

Deori

, Boruah

, Devi

, . Antioxidant and antigenotoxic effects of pupae of the muga silkworm Antheraea assamensis. Food Biosci 2014; 5: 108–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2013.12.001.

29.

Das

, Islam

, Jahan

, . Antioxidant activities of ethanol extracts and fractions of Crescentia cujete leaves and stem bark and the involvement of phenolic compounds. BMC Complement Altern Med 2014; 14(1): 45. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-45, PMID 24495381.

30.

Barua

, Saikia

, Ren

, . Zanthoxylum alatum attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced depressive-like behavior in mice hippocampus. Phcog Mag 2018; 14(59): 673. DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_606_17.

31.

Parasar

, Ramakrishnan

, Kabilan

, . Characterization of β‐cryptoxanthin and other carotenoid derivatives from Rhodotorula taiwanensis, A novel yeast isolated from traditional starter culture of Assam. Chem Biodivers 2020; 17(12): e2000198. DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202000198, PMID 33094905.

32.

Barua

, Sulakhiya

, Haloi

, . Erigeron linifolius attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced depressive-like behavior in mice by impeding neuroinflammation, oxido-nitrosative stress, and upregulation of tropomyosin receptor kinase B-derived neurotrophic factor and monoaminergic pathway in the hippocampus. Pharmacogn Mag 2019; 15(62): 92. DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_258_18.

33.

Bekir

, Mars

, Souchard

, . Assessment of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cholinesterase and cytotoxic activities of pomegranate (Punica granatum) leaves. Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 55: 470–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.01.036, PMID 23380204.

34.

Vijayalakshmi

and Ruckmani

. Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay in plant extract. Bangladesh J Pharmacol 2016; 11(3): 570–72. DOI: 10.3329/bjp.v11i3.27663.

35.

Khan

, Khan

, Sahreen

, . Assessment of flavonoids contents and in vitro antioxidant activity of Launaea procumbens. Chem Cent J 2012; 6(1): 43. DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-6-43, PMID 22616896.

36.

Inthongkaew

, Chatsumpun

, Supasuteekul

, . α-glucosidase and pancreatic lipase inhibitory activities and glucose uptake stimulatory effect of phenolic compounds from Dendrobium formosum. Rev Bras Farmacognosia 2017; 27(4): 480–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2017.05.005.

37.

Vangoori

, Dakshinamoorthi

, and Kavimani

. Prominent pancreatic lipase inhibition and free radical scavenging activity of a Myristica fragrans ethanolic extract in vitro. Potential Role in Obesity Treatment. Maedica 2019; 14(3): 254–59. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2019.14.3.254, PMID 31798741.

38.

Calín-Sánchez

, Lipan

, Cano-Lamadrid

, . Comparison of traditional and novel drying techniques and its effect on quality of fruits, vegetables and aromatic herbs. Foods 2020; 9(9): 1261. DOI: 10.3390/foods9091261, PMID 32916839.

39.

Derossi

, Severini

, and Cassi

. Mass transfer mechanisms during dehydration of vegetable food: traditional and innovative approaches. In: Prof El-Amin M (ed) Advanced Topics in Mass Transfer . Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2011, p. 305–54.

40.

Tilara

and Guhathakurta

. Effect of traditional and modern drying methods on nutrients, total polyphenol and anthocyanin content of Garcinia indica rinds. FSRJ 2017; 8(2): 260–65. DOI: 10.15740/HAS/FSRJ/8.2/260-265.

41.

Agoreyo

, Akpiroroh

, Orukpe

, . The effects of various drying methods on the nutritional composition of Musa paradisiaca, Dioscorea rotundata and Colocasia esculenta. Asian J Biochem 2011; 6(6): 458–64. DOI: 10.3923/ajb.2011.458.464.

42.

Olabode

, Akanbi

, Olunlade

, . Effects of drying temperature on the nutrients of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) leaves and sensory attributes of dried leaves infusion. Direct Res J Agric Food Sci 2015; 3(5): 117–22.

43.

Garba

, Oviosa

The effect of different drying methods on the elemental and nutritional composition of Vernonia amygdalina (bitter leaf). J Taibah Univ Sci 2019; 13(1): 396–401. DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2019.1582148.

44.

Shittu

, Shehu

, and Suleiman

. Effect of the drying method on the quality and drying characteristic of mint leaves (Mentha spicata L.). FJS 2021; 5(2): 72–78. DOI: 10.33003/fjs-2021-0502-525.

45.

Amoasah

, Appiah

, Kumah

Effects of different drying methods on proximate composition of three accessions of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) calyces. IJPSS 2018; 21(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.9734/IJPSS/2018/38550.

46.

Garti

, Garti

, and Nyarko

. Comparative studies on the nutrient composition of shade-dried and sun-dried leaves of Rosselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Afr J Hortic Sci 2019; 16: 29–42.

47.

Salve

, Syed

, More

, . Effect of different drying treatment on composition, nutritional and phytochemical content of curry leaves. The pharma Innov J 2020; 9(7): 568–73.

48.

Parthsarathy

and Nandakishore

. A study on nutrient and medicinal compositions of selected Indian garcinia species. Curr Bioact Compd 2014; 10(1): 55–61. DOI: 10.2174/157340721001140725001152.

49.

Thompson

, Morris

, Peffley

, . Flavonol content and composition of spring onions grown hydroponically or in potting soil. J Food Compos Anal 2005; 18(7): 635–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2004.06.009.

50.

Arslan

and Musa Özcan

. Study the effect of sun, oven and microwave drying on quality of onion slices. LWT Food Sci Technol 2010; 43(7): 1121–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.02.019.

51.

Peschel

, Sánchez-Rabaneda

, Diekmann

, . An industrial approach in the search of natural antioxidants from vegetable and fruit wastes. Food Chem 2006; 97(1): 137–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.03.033.

52.

Arabshahi-Delouee

and Urooj

. Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of mulberry (Morus indica L.) leaves. Food Chem 2007; 102(4): 1233–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.013.

53.

Sultana

, Anwar

, and Ashraf

. Effect of extraction solvent/technique on the antioxidant activity of selected medicinal plant extracts. Molecules 2009; 14(6): 2167–80. DOI: 10.3390/molecules14062167, PMID 19553890.

54.

Thi

and Hwang

ES.

Effects of drying methods on contents of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities of black chokeberries (Aronia melanocarpa). Food Sci Biotechnol 2016; 25(1): 55–61. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-016-0008-8, PMID 30263236.

55.

Zhang

, Wang

, . Effects of different pretreatments on flavonoids and antioxidant activity of Dryopteris erythrosora leave. PLOS ONE 2019; 14(1): e0200174. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200174, PMID 30601805.

56.

Lang

, Lindemann

IDS

, Ferreira

, . Effects of drying temperature and long-term storage conditions on black rice phenolic compounds. Food Chem 2019; 287: 197–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.028, PMID 30857689.

57.

Rebey

, Bourgou

, Kaab

, . On the effect of initial drying techniques on essential oil composition, phenolic compound and antioxidant properties of anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) seeds. Food Measure 2020; 14(1): 220–28. DOI: 10.1007/s11694-019-00284-4.

58.

Park

, Kim

, and Park

. Antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of different solvent extracts of skullcap (Scutellaria baicalensis). Food Sci Biotechnol 2011; 20(4): 1107–12. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-011-0150-2.

59.

You

, Chen

, Wang

, . Anti-diabetic activities of phenolic compounds in muscadine against alpha-glucosidase and pancreatic lipase. LWT Food Sci Technol 2012; 46(1): 164–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.10.011.

60.

Birari

and Bhutani

. Pancreatic lipase inhibitors from natural sources: Unexplored potential. Drug Discov Today 2007; 12(19–20): 879–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.07.024, PMID 17933690.

61.

Kim

, Lee

, Kim

, . Anti-obesity effect of Morus bombycis root extract: Anti-lipase activity and lipolytic effect. J Ethnopharmacol 2010; 130(3): 621–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.053, PMID 20669373.

62.

Calabrone

, Larocca

, Marzocco

, . Total phenols and flavonoids content, antioxidant capacity and lipase inhibition of root and leaf horseradish Armoracia rusticana extracts. Food Nutr Sci 2015; 06(1): 64–74. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2015.61008.

Influence of Drying Condition on Nutritional and Chemical Profile of Garcinia pedunculata Roxb. Fruit

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents Used

Collection of Plant Samples and Identification

Processing and Extraction

Proximate Analysis

HPLC Separation and Fraction Collection

Identification of Bioactive Compounds Through MS/MS

Free Radical Scavenging Assay

Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay

Phosphomolybdenum Assay

α-Glucosidase Inhibition Potential

Pancreatic Lipase Inhibition Potential

Statistical Analysis

Results

Impact of Drying on Proximate Composition

The Comparison of Proximate Content Analysis is of GP Fruit in Three Drying Conditions.

The Comparison of Mineral Composition Analysis of GP Fruit in Three Drying Conditions (mg/100 g Dried Sample).

Extractive Yield and Phytochemical Analysis

The Yield Extract (expressed in %) of all Extracts of GP under Three Drying Conditions.

The Effect of Drying Condition on the Total Phenolic (mg GAE/g Dried Sample) and Flavonoid (mg QE/g Dried Sample) Contents of GP When Extracted with Different Solvents.

HPLC/LCMS-MS Analysis

HPLC Details for all the Extracts of GP Under Three Drying Conditions.

Compounds Identified from GP by UHPLC-Orbitrap-MS/MS Analysis.

Antioxidant Properties of the Different Extracts

Enzyme Inhibition Properties of Different Extracts

The Effect of Drying Conditions on the α-Glucosidase and Lipase Enzyme Inhibition Activity of GP When Extracted with Different Solvents.

Discussion

Summary

Footnotes

Abbreviations

Acknowledgment

Authors’ Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References