This study examines how Village Defence Party, a community-based institution around Kaziranga Tiger Reserve, shapes conservation outcomes through institutional coherence and leadership practice. Drawing on Institutional Collective Action (ICA) theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), we combine participatory rural appraisal techniques with inferential tests to assess coordination, motivations and risk attitudes. We document a rule-bound organisational structure and routine patrol practices that evidence effective inter-institutional coordination. TPB constructs, such as subjective norms and perceived behavioural control, significantly predict flood patrol participation, while qualitative narratives highlight cultural reverence and moral obligation as motivational content. Leaders function as boundary spanners under ICA dilemmas, leveraging NGO/state support, social capital and cultural norms to set expectations, and sustain vigilance beyond mandates regarded as hallmarks of collaborative governance.
AjzenIcek.1985. Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Edited by KuhlJ. and Beckmann.J.Heidelberg: Springer.
2.
AjzenIcek.1991. ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior’. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes50, no. 2: 179–211.
3.
ApipoonyanonChidchanok, SzaboSylvia, KuwornuJohn K. M., and AhmadMokbul Morshed.2020. ‘Local Participation in Community Forest Management Using Theory of Planned Behaviour: Evidence from Udon Thani Province, Thailand’. The European Journal of Development Research32, no. 1: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00219-1
4.
AshrafManisha, SaikiaAbhinandan, and Sharma.Sukanya2022. ‘Legacy of Co-Existence between Rhino and People in a Protected Area in India’. Environmental Challenges9, no. December: 100639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100639
5.
BabbieEarl.2013. The Practice of Social Research. 13th ed.Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
6.
BanduraAlbert.1977. ‘Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change’. Psychological Review84, no. 2: 191–215.
7.
BaruahSukrita.2026. How the Kaziranga Elevated Corridor Aims to Curb Animal Deaths in the National Park. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/kaziranga-elevated-corridor-10478131/
8.
BatoolNusrat, WaniMehraj Din, ShahShamim Ahmad, and Dada.Zubair Ahmad2024. ‘Theory of Planned Behavior and Value-Belief Norm Theory as Antecedents of pro-Environmental Behaviour: Evidence from the Local Community’. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment34, no. 5: 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2023.2205912
9.
BrandonKatrina Eadie, and Wells.Michael1992. ‘Planning for People and Parks: Design Dilemmas’. World Development20, no. 4: 557–70.
10.
CharmazK.2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
11.
ChaudharyAnil Kumar, WarnerLaura A., LammAlexa J., IsraelGlenn D., RumbleJoy N., and Cantrell.Randall A.2017. ‘Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Encourage Water Conservation among Extension Clients’. Journal of Agricultural Education58, no. 3: 185–202. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.03185
12.
ChawlaD., and Sondhi.N.2011. Research Methodology: Concepts and Cases. 1st ed.New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
13.
ColdingJohan, FolkeCarl, and Elmqvist.Thomas2003. ‘Social Institutions in Ecosystem Management and Biodiversity Conservation’. Tropical Ecology44, no. 1: 25–41.
14.
DasBidhan Kanti.2024. ‘Beyond the “Protected Area” Paradigm in Conservation: Exploring India’s Forest Legislation as a New Conservation Model for Developing Countries’. Environmental Management74, no. 6: 1223–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02056-3
15.
DejouhanetLucie.2010. ‘Participatory Eco-Development in Question: The Case of the Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary in South India’. Revue de Géographie Alpine98, no. March: 83–96.
16.
EkkaPawan, ParmarKavita, ParmarVineeta, KumarAmit, and Saikia.Purabi2022. ‘Role of Protected Area in Conservation and Sustainable Management of Biodiversity: An Indian Perspective’. In Land Degradation Neutrality: Achieving SDG 15 by Forest Management, 229–247. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5478-8_13
FeiockRichard C.2016. ‘Institutional Collective Action Framework’. In Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability in China, 5–10. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
19.
FlickUwe.2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
HartantoBernadus Agus, HidayatJafron Waisq, and Prasetiyono.Bambang Waluyo Hadi Eko.2019. ‘The Role of Institution Related to Conservation Area of Merbabu Mountain National Park in Boyolali District’. In The 4th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2019). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912501017
21.
HodgsonGeoffrey M.2006. ‘What are Institutions?’Journal of Economic Issues40, no. 1: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
22.
HoganQueenesther.2024. Community-Based Conservation: Success Stories from Around the World. cleancyclers.com
23.
IddrisuIssah.2025. ‘Understanding the Nexus Between Organizational Culture and Trust: The Mediating Roles of Communication, Leadership, and Employee Relationships’. Sustainable Futures9, no. June: 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100555
24.
Indian Kanoon. n.d. Section 63B in Bombay Police Act, 1951. http://indiankanoon.org/doc/79704757/
25.
JaniVincent.2022. ‘Resilience in the Face of Adversity: The Case of Zimbabwe’s Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources’. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, October. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v12n6p6
26.
Lalthanmawia, and Sinha.Harendra2023. ‘Village Police System: Its Implication for Community Policing in Mizoram’. International Journal of Advanced Research11, no. 11: 576–82. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/17859
27.
Ming’ateFelix Lamech Mogambi, RennieHamish G., and Memon.Ali2014. ‘Potential for Co-Management Approaches to Strengthen Livelihoods of Forest Dependent Communities: A Kenyan Case’. Land Use Policy41, no. November: 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.008
28.
MishraB. K., BadolaRuchi, and Bhardwaj.A. K.2009. ‘Social Issues and Concerns in Biodiversity Conservation: Experiences from Wildlife Protected Areas in India’. Tropical Ecology50, no. 1: 147–61.
29.
MisraManoj Kumar.2005. Improving Protection and Building Capacity of Staff at Kaziranga National Park. Technical Report No. 4. Delhi: UNESCO-IUCN-WII.
30.
NorthDouglass C.1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
31.
NtuliHerbert, and Muchapondwa.Edwin2018. ‘The Role of Institutions in Community Wildlife Conservation in Zimbabwe’. International Journal of the Commons12, no. 1: 134–69.
32.
OstromElinor.1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423936
33.
PatraPunyatoya.2015. ‘Joint Forest Management in India’. In Spatial Diversity and Dynamics in Resources and Urban Development, edited by DuttA., NobleA., CostaF., ThakurS., ThakurR., and SharmaH., 449–460. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9771-9_24
34.
SarmaB.1966. Assam Act XXII of 1966. https://legislative.assam.gov.in/
35.
SinghJagat.2025. Assam’s Kaziranga Records 3rd Highest Tiger Density Followed by Bandipur & Corbett. https://www.kaziranganationalpark-india.com/blog/assams-kaziranga-records-3rd-highest-tiger-density-followed-by-bandipur-corbett/
36.
ZhangKun, GaoJixi, ZouChangxin, LinNaifeng, YuDandan, CaoBingshuai, and Wang.Yan2020. ‘Expansion of Protected Area Networks Integrating Ecosystem Service and Social-Ecological Coordination’. Global Ecology and Conservation24, no. December: e01298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01298
