Nutrition security is central to the sustainable development agenda of the developing nations. Productivity enhancement activities in a watershed programme have a number of positive implications, out of which nutritional security is a major one. To what extent a watershed programme is meeting the nutrition challenge of its stakeholders is the concern. The study was taken up in four watershed villages in Telangana Province of India. The performance of watershed programmes was appreciable from the point of view of increase in disposable income with an increase in crop diversification and with an increase in employment through wage works. This is resonated laterally in the form of nutritional security with an increase in access to quality foods such as milk, meat, fruits and vegetables. However, the picture is not as bright as there were many children in the watershed villages who scored less anthropometrically. This suggests the need for nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions on a watershed platform.
AshfaqM.HassanS.NaseerZ.M.BaigA.AsmaJ.2008. ‘Factors Affecting Farm Diversification in Rice–Wheat’, Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 45 (3): 45–47.
2.
BlackR.E.VictoraC.G.WalkerS.P.BhuttaZ.A.ChristianP.de OnisM.. 2013. ‘Maternal and Child Under Nutrition and Over Weight in Low Income and Middle Income Countries’, The Lancet. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X
FanS.HazellaP.HaqueP.2000. ‘Targeting the Public Investments by Agro-ecological Zone to Achieve Growth and Poverty Alleviation Goal in Rural India’, Food Policy, 25 (4): 411–28.
5.
FAO. 2012. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012: Economic Growth is Necessary but Nor Sufficient to Accelerate Reduction of Hunger and Malnutrition. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
6.
FAO. 2013. The State of Food Insecurity in the World: The Multiple Dimensions of Food Security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
7.
FarringtonJ.LoboC.1997. Scaling up Participatory Watershed Development in India: Lessons from Indo-German Watershed Development Programme. Natural Resource Perspectives Discussion Paper 17. London: Overseas Development Institute.
8.
GillespieS.HarrisJ.KadiyalaS.2012. The Agriculture: Nutrition Disconnect in India. What Do We Know? IFPRI Discussion Paper 01187. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
9.
Hanumantha RaoC.H. 2000. ‘Watershed Development in India: Recent Experience and Emerging Issues’, Economic and Political Weekly, 35 (45): 3943–47.
10.
HortonS.1999. ‘Opportunities for Investments in Nutrition in Low-income Asia’, Asian Development Review, 17 (1/2): 246–73.
IIPS. 2007. National Family Health Surveys 2005–2006. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences.
13.
JoshiL.D’SouzaM.2013. Food and Nutrition Security and Climate Change: Strategies for a Sustainable Future (p. 28). Ahmednagar, Maharashtra: Watershed Organisation Trust.
mrfcj. 2013. Human Rights: Their Role in Achieving Climate Justice and Food and Nutrition Security, Hunger, Nutrition Climate Justice, 2013: A New Dialogue: Putting People at the Heart of Global Development 2013; 15–16 April, Dublin Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.mrfcj.org/media/pdf/Human-Rights-FNS-Climate-Justice.pdf
16.
PingaliP.L.RosegrantM.W.1995. ‘Agricultural Commercialization and Diversification: Processes and Policies’, Food Policy, 20 (3): 171–85.
17.
ReddyV.R.GalabM.G.SoussanS.BaganskiO.S.2004. ‘Participatory Watershed Development in India: Can it Sustain Rural Livelihoods?’, Development and Change, 15 (2): 297–326.
18.
ShahA.2001. Who Benefits from Participatory Watershed Development? Lessons from Gujarat, India. Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods Programme Gatekeeper Series No. 97. London: International Institute for Economic Development.
19.
SmithL.S.HaddadL.2015. ‘Reducing Child Under Nutrition: Past Drivers and Priorities for the Post MDG Era’, World Development, 68 (C): 180–204.
20.
SreedeviT.K.WaniS.P.SudiR.PatelM.S.JayeshT.SinghS.N.ShahT.2006. On-site and Off-site Impact of Watershed Development: A Case Study of Rajasamadhiyala, Gujarat, India. Global Theme on Agro ecosystems Report No. 20. Andhra Pradesh: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
21.
The Lancet.2013. ‘Maternal and Child Nutrition: Executive Summary of Lancet Maternal and Child Nutrition Series.’ Retrieved from www.lancet.com (accessed in August2014).
22.
TurtonC.CoulterJ.ShahA.FarringtonJ.1998. Participatory Watershed Development in India: Impact of the New Guidelines. New Delhi: DFID and MoRAE.
23.
VedR.MenonP.2012. Analyzing Intersectoral Convergence to Improve Child under Nutrition in India. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01208. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
24.
WaniS.P.PathakP.TanH. M.RamakrishnaA.SinghP.SreedeviT.K.2001. Integrated Watershed Management for Minimizing Land Degradation and Sustaining Productivity in Asia, pp. 207–230 in Integrated land management productivity in Asia, Zafar Adeel (ed.) proceedings of joint UNU-CAS International workshop, Beijing, China.
25.
WaniS.P.SreedeviT.K.ReddyT.S.V.VenkateswarluB.PrasadC.S.2008. ‘Community Watersheds for Improved Livelihoods Through Consortium Approach in Drought Prone Rainfed Areas’, Journal of Hydrological Research and Development, 23: 55–77.
26.
WeingartnerL.2010. ‘The Concept of Food and Nutrition Security.’ In Achieving Food and Nutrition Security: Actions to Meet the global challenge—A Training Course Reader, edited by KlennertK., 3rd ed.Bonn (Ack): InWEnt.
27.
WHO Multicenter Growth Reference Study Group. 2006. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Methods and development (p. 312). Geneva: World Health Organization.
28.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2015. Report on Micro Nutrient Deficiencies. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gho/en/ (accessed 22February2017).
