The aim of this study is to explore the interrelationship between agriculture growth, inequality and poverty in Pakistan. To this end, the study examines as to what extent the poor have benefited from growth while taking into account the magnitude of growth and the benefits of growth achieved by the poor from 1984–85 to 2004–05.The research concludes that the proportional reduction in poverty is an increasing function of the Pro-Poor Growth Index (PPGI) and Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR) as proposed by Kakwani and Pernia (2000) and Kakwani and Son (2004). Results indicate that higher the PEGR, higher will be the poverty reduction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amjad, R. and A.R. Kemal . 1997. ‘ Macroeconomic Policies and Their Impact on Poverty Alleviation in Pakistan ’, The Pakistan Development Review, 36 (1): 39–68 .
2.
Anwar, Talat . 2005. Long-Term Changes in Income Distribution in Pakistan: Evidence Based on Consistent Series of Estimates. Islamabad: Centre for Research on Poverty Reduction and Income Distribution . (Discussion Paper Series No. 03).
3.
Anwar, T.2006. Changes in Inequality of Consumption and Opportunities in Pakistan during 2001/02 and 2004/05. Islamabad: Centre for Research on Poverty Reduction and Income Distribution (CRPRID) .
4.
Datt, G. and M. Ravallion . 1992. ‘ Growth and Redistribution Component of Changes in Poverty Measures: A decomposition with application to Brazil and India in the 1980s ’, Journal of Development Economics, 38 (2): 275–95 .
5.
Dollar, D. and A. Kraay . 2001. ‘Growth is Good for the Poor’. Policy Research Working Paper 2587:50, Washington, DC, World Bank .
6.
Foster, J. and M. Szekely . 2000. ‘ How Good is Growth? ’, Asian Development Review, 18 (2): 59–73 .
7.
Government of Pakistan. 2005. Economic Survey 2004–05. Islamabad: Finance Division, Economic Advisor's Wing .
8.
Kakwani, N.1993. ‘ On a Class of Poverty Measures ’, Econometrica, 48 (2): 437–46 .
9.
Kakwani, N. and E. Pernia . 2000. ‘ What is Pro-poor Growth , Asian Development Review, 16 (1): 1–22 .
10.
Kakwani, N. and H.H. Son . 2004. ‘ Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement ’. PIDE, 19th Annual Conference, 13–15 January, Islamabad.
11.
Kanbur, R.2002. ‘Conceptual Challenges in Poverty and Inequality: One Development Economist's Perceptive’. Working Paper 2002–09, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cormell University .
12.
Knowles, Stephen2001. ‘ Inequality and Economic Growth: The Empirical Relationship Reconsidered in the Light of Comparable Data ’. Paper for UNU/Wider Development Conference on Growth and Poverty, Helsinki, World Institute for Development Economic Research (WIDER).
13.
Kuznets, S.1955. ‘ Economic Growth and Income Inequality ’, American Economic Review, 45 (March): 1–28 .
14.
Ravallion, M. and S. Chen . 2003. ‘ Measuring Pro-Poor Growth ’, Economic Letters, 78 (1): 93–99 .
15.
Saboor, Abdul . 2004. ‘Agricultural Growth, Rural Poverty and Income Inequality in Pakistan: A Time Series Analysis’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad .
16.
World Bank. 1990. World Development Report: Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press .
