This article is a maiden attempt at exploring determinants of stage-specific investment choices of Indian venture capital and private equity (VCPE) firms. Analysis of 5,782 VCPE investment deals during 1998–2016 shows that firms’ preferences to invest in various stages (early vs. late) are significantly affected by the characteristics of the VCPE firms, features of the deal, and characteristics of the investee firms. More specifically, experience and ownership (foreign vs. domestic) of VCPE firm, type of deal (syndicated or otherwise), investment size of the deal, and location and industry of the investee firm influence the stage of investment. Detailed empirical analysis shows that younger VCPE firms and those with domestic investors prefer to invest in early stages, presumably because they wish to build a reputation and also leverage their proximity with investee firms to manage high market and technological risks associated with early-stage investments. Syndication is another mechanism used to manage the risks associated with early-stage deals. Investee firms in industries that have lower investment requirements or shorter gestation periods and those located in regions with a mature entrepreneurial ecosystems are more likely to attract early-stage investments.
AignerP., AlbrechtS., BeyschlagG., FriederichT. I. M., KalepkyM., & ZagstR. (2008). What drives PE? Analyses of success factors for private equity funds. The Journal of Private Equity, 11(4), 63–85.
2.
AkerlofG. A. (1978). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 235–251). Academic Press.
3.
AmitR., BranderJ., & ZottC. (1998). Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6), 441–466.
4.
AmitR., GlostenL., & MullerE. (1990). Does venture capital foster the most promising entrepreneurial firms?California Management Review, 32(3), 102–111.
5.
AnnamalaiT. R., & KamatV. P. (2012). The tigers and their stripes: Types of VC firms and their investment patterns in India. The Journal of Private Equity, 15(2), 63–74.
6.
CanoG. C. J., & CazorlaP. L. (1998). The andalusian venture capital model: Current situation and perspectives. A nationwide comparison. Journal of Regional Studies, 2, 121–143.
7.
CarterR. B., & Van AukenH. E. (1994). Venture capital firms’ preferences for projects in particular stages of development. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(1), 60.
8.
CasamattaC., & HaritchabaletC. (2007). Experience, screening and syndication in venture capital investments. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(3), 368–398.
9.
ChemmanurT. J., KrishnanK., & NandyD. K. (2011). How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A look beneath the surface. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(12), 4037–4090.
10.
ChenK., ChuT., & BillotaR. (2011). A spatial investigation of venture capital investment in the US biotechnology industry, 1995–2008. GeoJournal, 76(3), 267–282.
11.
DeliD. N., & SanthanakrishnanM. (2010). Syndication in venture capital financing. Financial Review, 45(3), 557–578.
12.
DhochakM., & SharmaA.K. (2015, March11–13). Inferring prevalence and trends of venture capital in India. Global Conference on ‘Managing in Recovering Markets’. http://gcmrm.org/GCMRM%202015%20Conference%20Schedule.pdf
13.
DossaniR., & KenneyM. (2002). Creating an environment for venture capital in India. World Development, 30(2), 227–253.
14.
DugarP., & PanditN. (2017). Growth of venture capital and private equity in India. The Journal of Private Equity, 21(1), 79–93.
15.
FloridaR., & KenneyM. (1988). Venture capital and high technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(4), 301–319.
16.
FloridaR., & Smith JrD. F. (1993). Venture capital formation, investment, and regional industrialization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(3), 434–451.
17.
GemsonJ., & AnnamalaiT. R. (2015). A new perspective on private equity stage financing: Evidence from investments in infrastructure. Venture Capital, 17(4), 299–325.
18.
GompersP. A. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1461–1489.
19.
GompersP., & LernerJ. (2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 145–168.
20.
GompersP., KovnerA., LernerJ., & ScharfsteinD. (2008). Venture capital investment cycles: The impact of public markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 1–23.
21.
GranzC., HennM., & LutzE. (2020). Research on venture capitalists’ and business angels’ investment criteria: A systematic literature review. In Contemporary developments in entrepreneurial finance (pp. 105–136). Springer.
22.
GultekinB. (2010). Interview: N. Bulent Gultekin, Wharton Professor of Finance. Knowledge® Wharton on Private Equity. Wharton University of Pennsylvania. https://kw.wharton.upenn.edu/private-equity/seminar/interview-n-bulent-gultekin/
23.
GuptaA. K., & SapienzaH. J. (1992). Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 347–362.
24.
HoppC., & RiederF. (2005). Empirical evidence on venture capital: Syndication and shared real option ownership.
25.
JainR. K., & MannaI. (2009). Evolution of global private equity market: Lessons, implications and prospects for India. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 30(1), 103–162.
26.
JoshiK., & SubrahmanyaM. B. (2015). Information asymmetry risks in venture capital investments: Strategies of transnational venture capital firms in India. South Asian Journal of Management, 22(2), 36.
27.
KerrW. R., & NandaR. (2015). Financing innovation. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7, 445–462.
28.
KhanA. M. (1987). Assessing venture capital investments with noncompensatory behavioral decision models. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 193–205.
29.
LamS. S. (1991). Venture capital financing: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 18(2), 137–149.
30.
LernerJ. (1994). The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management, 23(3), 16–27.
31.
MidiH., SarkarS. K., & RanaS. (2010). Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(3), 253–267.
32.
NanJ., & WeiL. (2014, August). Specialization and performance: Evidence from Chinese venture capital funds [paper presentation]. 2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21st Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 1504–1511). IEEE.
33.
NortonE., & TenenbaumB. H. (1993). Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5), 431–442.
34.
PruthiS., WrightM., & LockettA. (2003). Do foreign and domestic venture capital firms differ in their monitoring of investees?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(2), 175–204.
35.
RajanA. T., & DeshmukhA. (2011). Venture capital and private equity in India: An analysis of investments and exits. Journal of Indian Business Research, 3(1), 6–21.
36.
ReddyS. (2009). Financial management: Principles and practice. Himalayan Books.
37.
RobinsonR. BJr. (1987). Emerging strategies in the venture capital industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 53–77.
38.
SahlmanW. A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473–521.
39.
SchilitW. K. (1997). The nature of venture capital investments. The Journal of Private Equity, 1(2), 59–75.
40.
SchwienbacherA. (2008). Innovation and venture capital exits. The Economic Journal, 118(533), 1888–1916.
41.
SorensonO., & StuartT. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588.
42.
TripathiS. (2016). Analysis of investment strategies of VC/PE funds in the Indian infrastructure sector. The Journal of Private Equity, 19(4), 35–45.
43.
VuT.H., & MireilleJ. (2011, May11–13). Motives and effects of syndication strategy in French venture capital deals. In International Conference of the French Finance Association (AFFI). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1836906
44.
WangS., & ZhouH. (2004). Staged financing in venture capital: Moral hazard and risks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(1), 131–155.
45.
YarandiH. N., & SimpsonS. H. (1991). The logistic regression model and the odds of testing HIV positive. Nursing Research, 40(6), 372–373.
