The article explores the relationship between volatility and liquidity, as there is a change in market capitalisation (cap). Using three regimes of volatility, identified by the threshold vector auto-regression method, the results show that volatility affects liquidity differently for the three volatility regimes during the two periods (crisis and post-crisis) of study. The results show that there is inconsistency in how volatility affects liquidity across the Indian large-, mid- and small-cap indices.
AfonsoA.BaxaJ. & SlavikM. (2011). Fiscal developments and financial stress: A threshold VAR analysis (2011-03 No 2011/11, Working Papers). Department of Economics from ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
2.
AhmedH. J. A.HassanA. & NasirA. M. D. (2005). The relationship between trading volume, volatility and stock market returns: A test of mixed distribution hypothesis for a pre and post crisis on Kuala Lumpur stock exchange. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3, 146–158.
3.
AmihudY. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31–56.
4.
BeaupainR.GiotP. & PetitjeanM. (2011). Liquidity co-movements, market capitalization, and volatility. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=970309
5.
ChordiaT.SarkarA. & SubrahmanyamA. (2005). The joint dynamics of liquidity, returns, and volatility across small and large firms (Staff Report No. 207). New York, NY: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
6.
ClarkP. A. (1973). subordinated stochastic process model with finite speculative prices. Econometrica, 41, 135-155
7.
DieboldF. X. (2007). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers: With application to global equity markets [Elektronische Ressource].
8.
DomowitzI.GlenJ. & MadhavanA. (2001). Liquidity, volatility and equity trading costs across countries and over time. International Finance, 4(2), 221–255.
9.
EppsT. & EppsM. (1976). The stochastic dependence of security price changes and transaction volumes: Implications for the mixture of distributions hypothesis. Econometrica, 44(2), 305–321.
10.
JonesC. M.KaulG. & LipsonM. L. (1994). Transactions, volume, and volatility. Review of Financial Studies, 7(4), 631–651.
11.
KimS. & LeeK. H. (2011). Pricing of liquidity risks by alternative liquidity measures. Korea: Korea University Business School.
12.
KyawK. & HillierD. (2013). A reexamination of the relationship between volatility, liquidity and trading activity. Pecvnia: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, (Monogr), 2011, 33–45.
13.
MadhavanA. (2000). Market microstructure: A survey. Journal of Financial Markets, 3(3), 205–258.
14.
ParkinsonM. (1980). The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return. Journal of Business, 61–65.
15.
StambaughR. F. (2003). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 642–685
16.
TongH. (1990). Non-linear time series: A dynamical system approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
