This article studies the factors which influence market valuation of Russian listed firms. Several financial metrics and corporate governance indicators are analysed. Emphasis is given to multicollinearity and cause-and-effect relationships between independent variables. Main results show that there is no significant correlation between the fundamental financial indicators and the Tobin’s Q. However, state ownership, concentration of capital and size are negatively associated with the firm valuation. The evidence suggests that the costs of government ownership outweigh its benefits.
BebchukL. A., KraakmanR., & TriantisG. (2000). Stock pyramids, cross-ownership and dual class equity: The mechanisms and agency costs of separating control from cash-flow rights. In MorckR. (Ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 445–460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
ClaessensS., SimeonD., FanJ., & LangL. (1999). Corporate diversification in East Asia: The role of ultimate ownership and group affiliation(World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2089). Washington DC: World Bank.
3.
ClaessensS., SimeonD., FanJ., & LangL. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(2002), 2741–2771.
4.
DamodaranA. (1996). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
DeS. (1992). Diversification patterns and long-term corporate performance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 13(January–February), 1–13.
6.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
7.
EnriquesL., & VolpinP. (2007). Corporate governance reforms in continental Europe. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 117–140.
8.
FilatotchevI., BuckT., & ZhukovV. (2000). Downsizing in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 286–304.
9.
GibsonM. S. (2003). Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets?The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 231–250.
10.
Goґmez-MejıґaL., Nunez-NickelM., & GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95.
11.
HarveyC. R., LinsK. V., & RoperA. H. (2002). The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme (Working Paper), University of Utah.
12.
HirscheyM., & WichernW. (1984). Accounting and market-value measures of profitability: Consistency, determinants, and uses. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2(4), 375–383.
13.
JensenM., & MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1976), 305–360.
14.
JohnsonS., La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., & ShleiferA. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 90, 22–27.
15.
KhakimovS. (2012). Family-owned groups in the emerging markets: Evidence from Russia (Unpublished master thesis). ESCP Europe, p. 82.
16.
KhannaT., & RivkinJ. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.
17.
La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., & SchleiferA. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.
18.
La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., SchleiferA., & VishnyR.W. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147–1170.
19.
LangL. H. P., & StulzR. M. (1994). Tobin’s q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), December, 1248–1280.
20.
LinsK. V. (2003). Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 159–184.
21.
LloydW. P., & JaheraJ. S., Jr. (1994). Firm-diversification effects on performance as measured by Tobin’s Q. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(3), 259–266.
22.
LuoY. (2005). How does globalization affect corporate governance and accountability? A perspective from MNEs. Journal of International Management, 11(1), 19–41.
23.
MorkR., & YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382.
24.
SarkarJ., & SarkarS. (2000). Large shareholder activism in corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from India. International Review of Finance, 1(3), 161–194.
25.
SchwertG. W. (1983). Size and stock returns and other empirical regularities. Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 3–12.
26.
ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
27.
StevensJ. L. (1990). Tobin’s q and the structure-performance relationship: Comment. American economic review, 80(June), 618–623.
28.
TobinJ., & BrainardW. C. (1968). Pitfalls in financial model building. American Economic Review, 58(2), 99–122.
29.
TobinJ., & BrainardW. C. (1977). Asset markets and the cost of capital. In NelsonR. and BalassaB. (Eds), Economic progress: Private values and public policy(Essays in Honor of William Fellner), (pp. 235–262). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30.
VillalongaB., & AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.
31.
ZeckhauserR. J., & PoundJ. (1990). Are large shareholders effective monitors? An investigation of share ownership and corporate performance. In HubbardG. (Ed.), Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance, and Investment (pp. 149–180), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
