In contrast to the existing empirical research on the pecking order hypothesis which has been largely confined to the United States and a few other advanced countries, this article attempts to test the hypothesis for an emerging economy through a case study of the Indian corporate sector. A well diverse sample of 556 manufacturing firms over the period 1997–2007 is used in the article to test the pecking-order hypothesis. The study finds strong evidence in favour of the pecking-order hypothesis—a result that stands startlingly odd against the most recent evidence against the pecking-order theory in developed countries (Fama and French 2005; Frank and Goyal 2003; Leary and Roberts 2004; Lemmon and Zender 2004).
CherianSamuel (1996), ‘The Stock Market as a Source of Finance: A Comparison of US and Indian Firms’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1592, The World Bank.
7.
ChirinkoRobert S.SinghaAnuja (2000), ‘Testing Static Tradeoff Against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure: A Critical Comment’, Journal of Financial Economics, 58(3): 417–25.
8.
ChoeHyukMasulisRonaldNandaVikram (1993), ‘Common Stock Offerings across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(1): 3–31.
9.
CobhamDavidSubramaniamRamesh (1998), ‘Corporate Finance in Developing Countries: New Evidence for India’, World Development, 26(6): 1033–45.
10.
CooneyJohnKalayAvner (1993), ‘Positive Information from Equity Issue Announcements’, Journal of Financial Economics, 33(2): 149–72.
11.
DittmarAmyThakorAnjan (2007), ‘Why do Firms Issue Equity?’Journal of Finance, 62(1): 1–54.
12.
FamaEugene F.FrenchKenneth R. (2002), ‘Testing Trade-off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt’, The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1): 1–33.
13.
FamaEugene F.FrenchKenneth R. (2005), ‘Financing Decisions: Who Issues Stock?’Journal of Financial Economics, 76(3): 549–82.
14.
FrankMurray Z.GoyalVidhan K. (2003), ‘Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2): 217–48.
15.
FulghieriPaoloLukinDmitry (2001), ‘Information Production, Dilution Costs and Optimal Security Design’, Journal of Financial Economics, 61(1): 3–42.
16.
HalovNikolayHeiderFlorian (2004), ‘Capital Structure, Asymmetric Information and Risk’, Working Paper, New York University.
17.
HansenB. (1999), ‘Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing and Inference’, Journal of Econometrics, 93(2): 345–68.
18.
HarrisMiltonRavivArtur (1991), ‘The Theory of Capital Structure’, Journal of Finance, 46(1): 297–355.
19.
HelwegeJeanLiangNellie (1996), ‘Is there a Pecking Order? Evidence from a Panel of IPO Firms’, Journal of Financial Economics, 40: 429–58.
20.
HennessyChristopher A.LivdanDmitry (2006), ‘Do the Pecking Order’s Predictions Follow from its Premises?’Working PaperUniversity of California, Berkeley.
21.
KimChang-SooMauerDavid C.ShermanAnn E. (1998), ‘The Determinants of Corporate Liquidity: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33: 335–59.
22.
KorajczykRobertLevyAmnon (2003), ‘Capital Structure Choice: Macroeconomic Conditions and Financial Constraints’, Journal of Financial Economics, 68: 75–109.
23.
KorajczykRobertLucasDeborahMcDonaldRobert (1990), ‘Understanding Stock Price Behavior around the Time of Equity Issues’, in HubbardR. Glenn (ed.), Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance, and Investment, pp. 257–77. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
KorajczykRobertLucasDeborahMcDonaldRobert (1991), ‘The Effect of Information Releases on the Pricing and Timing of Equity Issues’, Review of Financial Studies, 4(4): 685–708.
25.
LearyM.RobertsM. (2004), ‘Financial Slack and Tests of the Pecking Order’s Financing Hierarchy’, Working Paper, Duke University.
26.
LearyMark T.RobertsMichael R. (2005), ‘Do Firms Rebalance their Capital Structures?’, Journal of Finance, 60(6): 2575–619.
27.
LemmonMichael L.ZenderJaime F. (2004), ‘Debt Capacity and Tests of Capital Structure Theories’, Working Paper, University of Utah.
28.
MayerC. (1988), ‘New Issues in Corporate Finance’, European Economic Review, 32(5): 1167–83.
29.
MayerC. (1990), ‘Financial Systems, Corporate Finance, and Economic Development’, in HubbardR. Glenn (ed.), Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance, and Investment, pp. 307–32. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
ModiglianiF.MillerM. (1958), ‘The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment’, American Economic Review, 48(June): 261–97.
31.
ModiglianiF.MillerM. (1963), ‘Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction’, American Economic Review, 53(June): 433–43.
32.
MyersStewart C. (1984), ‘The Capital Structure Puzzle’, Journal of Finance, 39(1984): 575–92.
33.
MyersStewart C.MajlufNicholas S. (1984), ‘Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors Do Not Have’, Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2): 187–221.
34.
SamuelCherian (1996), ‘The Stock Market as a Source of Finance: A Comparison of U.S. and Indian Firms’(Policy Research Working Paper No. 1592). Washington, DC: World Bank.
35.
Shyam-SunderLakshmiMyersStewart C. (1999), ‘Testing Static Trade Off Against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2): 219–44.
36.
SinghAjit (1995), ‘Corporate Financial Patterns in Industrializing Economies: A Comparative International Study’, Technical Chapter 2, International Finance Corporation.
37.
SinghA.HamidJ. (1992), Corporate Financial Structures in Developing Countries (Volume 22). Washington, DC: World Bank.
