On 20 May 2024, the Kerala High Court ruled that the Revenue (Income Tax) Department should accept an assessee’s inventory valuation derived by consistently applying the last-in-first-out (LIFO) method before the retrospective amendment to Section 145A introduced with effect from 1 April 2017. It observed that as the assessee consistently applied the LIFO method and filed his returns, the retrospective amendment would not be applicable against him for the assessment year 2017–2018. However, upholding the retrospective amendment, the Court ordered the Revenue Department to accept the assessee’s opening and closing inventory value derived by applying the LIFO method or to permit him to switch to the FIFO or weighted average cost method. It validates the retrospective amendment, binding on all assessees, but indicates that in a conflicting scenario with fundamental accounting principles such as consistency, the tax laws shall prevail. It creates an opportunity for new vistas of accounting and taxation research.
Abdel-KhalikA. R. & McKeownJ. C. (1978). Understanding Accounting changes in an Efficient market: Evidence of differential reaction. The Accounting Review, 53(4), 851–868.
2.
Adel-KhalikA. R. (1985). The effect of LIFO-switching and firm ownership on executives pay. Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, 23(2), 427–447.
3.
AlamP., & LohE. S. (2016). Choice of inventory method and the self-selection bias. Advances in Management Accounting, 12, 237–263.
4.
BallR. (1972). Changes in accounting techniques and stock prices: Empirical research in accounting—Selected studies. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 1–38.
5.
BallR., & BrownP. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 159, 178.
6.
BiddleG. C., & RicksW. E. (1988). Analysts’ forecast errors and stock price behavior near the earnings announcement dates of LIFO adopters. Journal of Accounting Research, 26(2), 160–194.
7.
BrownR. M. (1980). Short-range market reaction to changes in LIFO accounting using preliminary earnings announcement dates. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 38–63.
8.
CarrollT., CollinsD. W., & JohnsonW. B. (1991). The LIFO–FIFO choice and the quality of earnings signals (Working paper, University of Iowa).
9.
DebR. (2021). Limning India’s tax terrorism saga. Vilakshan: XIMB Journal of Management, 18(2), 202–215.
10.
DhaliwalD. S., TrezevantR. H., & WilkinsM. S. (2000). Tests of a deferred tax explanation of the negative association between the LIFO reserve and firm value. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(3), 435–452.
11.
DopuchN., & PincusM. (1988). Evidence on the choice of inventory accounting methods: LIFO versus FIFO. Journal of Accounting Research, 26(1), 28–59.
12.
EdmondsT. P., EdmondsC. T., McNairF. M., & OldsP. R. (2016). Fundamental financial accounting concepts (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
13.
FieldsT. D., LysT. Z., & VincentL. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 255–307.
14.
HagermanR. L., & SenbetL. (1976). A test of market bias and market structure. Journal of Business, 49(4), 509–514.
15.
HagermanR. L., & ZmijewskiM. (1979). Some economic determinants of accounting policy choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1(2), 141–161.
16.
HandJ. R. M. (1993). Resolving LIFO uncertainty: A theoretical and empirical reexamination of 1974–1975 LIFO adoptions and nonadoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(1), 21–49.
17.
HandJ. R. M. (1995). 1974 LIFO excess stock return and analyst forecast error anomalies revisited. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(1), 175–191.
18.
HuntH. (1985). Potential determinants of corporate inventory accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 41–62.
19.
JaggiC. K., TiwariS., & ShafiA. (2015). Effect of deterioration on two-warehouse inventory model with imperfect quality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 88, 378–385.
20.
JenningsR., SimkoP. J., & ThompsonR. B. (1996). Does LIFO inventory accounting improve the income statement at the expense of the balance sheet?Journal of Accounting Research, 34(1), 85–109.
21.
KangS. K. (1993). A conceptual framework for the stock price effects of LIFO tax benefits. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(1), 50–61.
22.
KarimN. A., NawawiA., & SalinA. S. A. P. (2018). Inventory management effectiveness of a manufacturing company: Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(5), 1163–1178.
23.
KaufingerG. G., NeuenschwanderC., & PeddicordM. S. (2018). The economic consequences of the retail inventory method. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 24, 1–15.
24.
LeeC. J. (1988). Inventory accounting and earnings price ratios: A puzzle. Contemporary Accounting Research, 4(2), 371–388.
25.
LeeC. J. (1989). The tax effect hypothesis and inventory. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 16(4), 515–530.
26.
LeeJ. C., & HsiehD. (1985). Choice of inventory accounting methods: Comparative analyses of alternative hypotheses. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 468–485.
27.
LeeC. J., & PetruzziC. R. (1989). Inventory accounting switch and uncertainty. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(2), 277–296.
28.
LindahlF., EmbyC., & AshtonR. (1988). Empirical research on LIFO: A review and analysis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 7, 310–333.
29.
MartinJ. R. (1992). How the effect of company growth can reverse the LIFO/FIFO decision: A possible explanation for why many firms continue to use LIFO. In EpsteinM. J. (Ed.), Advances in management accounting (pp. 207–232). JAI Press.
30.
MorseD., & RichardsonG. (1983). The LIFO/FIFO decision. Journal of Accounting Research, 21(1), 106–127.
31.
NiuB., & XieJ. (2008). A note on “Two-warehouse inventory model with deterioration under FIFO dispatch policy.”European Journal of Operational Research, 190(2), 571–577.
32.
PowersJ. T. (1971). The retail inventory method made practical. Financial Executives Division, National Retail Merchants Association.
33.
PincusM., & WasleyC. E. (1996). Stock price behavior associated with post-1974–75 LIFO adoptions announced at alternative times. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 11(4), 535–564.
34.
RicksW. (1982). The market’s response to the 1974 LIFO adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 20(2), 267–287.
35.
RicksW. (1986). Firm size effects and the association between excess returns and LIFO tax savings. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 206–216.
SinghR. K., & KumarR. (2020). Strategic issues in supply chain management of Indian SMEs due to globalization: An empirical study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(3), 913–932.
38.
SticeE. K., & SticeJ. D. (2006). Financial accounting: Reporting and analysis (7th ed.). Thomson South-Western.
39.
WheelerS. W., CereolaS. J., & LouwersT. J. (2014). MD & A disclosure tendencies: The case of LIFO liquidations. Accounting Horizons, 28(4), 805–818.
