In antithesis to the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development (socioeconomic inclusion for all) and a relatively progressive refugee policy framework (Refugee Act 130 of 1998), refugees in South Africa continue to face targeted exclusion and reduced living potentials. Impediments to refugee groups ability to ‘thrive and not just survive’ (as called for in the 2018 Global Compact on Refugees), are examined in this paper through a synopsis of the conditions surrounding their access to legal documents (a conduit to socioeconomic rights), their equitable participation/inclusion within the formal labour markets, financial sectors etc. In examining these issues, a case-study-based interpretive research design technique with eight FGD participants and two life history participants (drawn from Congolese refugees’ residing in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa) was done. Several conceptual frameworks as well as a single principal theory (Murphy’s theory of monopolization) were utilized so as to fully examine forced migrant groups socioeconomic participation/inclusion in South Africa. This articles findings revealed that primary cultural, as well as structural agentive processes of obstruction significantly inhibit refugee groups full socioeconomic participating in the life of their host communities. The said obstructions included but were not confined to: adverse forms of incorporation, opportunity hoarding, as well as the normative unobtainability of social, cultural, and symbolic forms of capital.
AmisiB.BallardR. (2005). In the absence of citizenship: Congolese refugee struggle and organization in South Africa(Forced Migration Working Paper No. 16(04)), http://migration.wits.ac.za/AmisiBallardwp.pdf
2.
AtkinsonP.SilvermanD. (1998). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3(1), 304–325.
3.
BaronS.FieldJ.SchullerT. (2000). Social capital: Critical perspectives. Oxford University press.
4.
BeauchampT. L.FadenR. R.WallaceR. J.WaltersL. (1982). Ethical issues in social research (pp. 40–98). John Hopkins University Press.
5.
BettsT. F. (1981). Rural forced migrant’s in Africa. The International Migration Review, (1/2), 213–218.
6.
BhallaA.LapeyreF. (1997). Social exclusion: Towards an analytical and operational framework. Development and Change, 3, 413–433.
7.
CederbergM. (2012). Migrant networks and beyond: Exploring the value of the notion of social capital for making sense of ethnic inequalities. Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 59–72.
8.
CrushJ.RamachandranS.PendletonW. (2013). Soft targets: Xenophobia, public violence and changing attitudes to migrants in South Africa after May 2008. Southern African Migration Project.
9.
De HaanA. (1999). Social exclusion: Towards a holistic understanding of deprivation. Department for International Development, Social Development Division.
10.
DenzinN.LincolnY. Eds. (1998). Landscapes of qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
11.
Department of Home Affairs. (2017). http://www.homeaffairs.gov.za/index.php/refugee-status-asylum
12.
EtikanI.MusaS. A.AlkassimR. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
13.
FlahauxM. L.SchoumakerB. (2016). Democratic republic of the congo: A migration history marked by crises and restrictions. Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/democratic-republic-congo-migration-history-marked-crises-and-restrictions
14.
GrayD. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE Publications.
15.
GrootF. (2004). Challenges of the UNHCR’s programme for urban forced migrant’s in South Africa: Forced Migrant’s in the New Johannesburg: Towards a Local Government Response (pp. 37–42). University of the Witwatersrand.
16.
GrootaertC.BastelaerT. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: A synthesis of findings and recommendations from the social capital initiative(Social capital initiative working paper number 24). World Bank.
17.
HandmakerJ.ParsleyJ. (2001). Migration, forced migrants and racism in South Africa. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Forced Migrants, 20(1).
18.
HickeyS.Du ToitA. (2007). Adverse incorporation, social exclusion and chronic poverty(CPRC working paper 81). Chronic Poverty Research Center, University of Manchester.
19.
JacobsenK.BaileyS.K., 2004. Micro-credit and banking for refugees in Johannesburg. Forced migrants in the new Johannesburg: towards a local government response. Johannesburg: Forced Migration Studies Programme, pp.99–102.
20.
KabeerN. (2000). Social exclusion, poverty and discrimination towards an analytical framework. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 31(4), 83–97.
21.
KarboT.MutisiM. (2012). Ethnic conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In handbook of ethnic conflict (pp. 381–402). Springer.
22.
KavuroC. (2015). Forced migrant’s and asylum seekers: Barriers to accessing South Africa’s labor market. Law, Democracy and Development, 19, 232–260.
23.
KhanS.CombazE.McAslan FraserE. (2015). Social exclusion: Topic guide (Rev. Ed.) Governance and Social Development Resource Center, University of Birmingham.
24.
KlaarenJ.RutinwaB. (2004). Towards the harmonization of immigration and refugee law in SADC(Midsa report no. 1). MIDSA.
25.
HickeyS.Du ToitA. (2007). Adverse incorporation, social exclusion and chronic poverty(CPRC working paper 81). Chronic Poverty Research Center, University of Manchester.
26.
LandauL. B. (2005). Urbanization, nativism, and the rule of law in South Africa’s ‘forbidden’ cities. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1115–1134.
27.
LandauL. B.FreemantleI. (2010). Tactical cosmopolitanism and idioms of belonging: Insertion and self-exclusion in Johannesburg. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(3), 375–390.
28.
MaisonnaveH.DecaluweB.ChitigaM. (2016). Does South African affirmative action policy reduce poverty? A CGE analysis. Poverty and Public Policy, 8(3), 212–227.
29.
ManzoK. (2005). Exploiting West Africa’s children: Trafficking, slavery and uneven development. Area, 37(4), 393–401.
30.
MarióE.WodonQ. eds. (2001). Measurement and meaning: combining quantitative and qualitative methods for the analysis of poverty and social extension in Latin America (Vol. 518). World Bank publications.
31.
MontagueD. (2002). Stolen goods: Coltan and conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo. School of Advanced International Studies Review, 22(1).
32.
MorrowR. (1990). Social closure: The theory of monopolization and exclusion. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 27, 549–542.
33.
MosseD. (2007). Power and the durability of poverty: A critical exploration of the links between culture, marginality and chronic poverty. SSRN Electronic Journal.
34.
MurphyR. (1986). Weberian closure theory: A contribution to the ongoing assessment. British Journal of Sociology, 21–41.
35.
MurphyR. (1988). Social Closure: The theory of monopolization and exclusion. Contemporary Sociology, 18(2), 304.
36.
NganL. L. S.ChanK. W. (2013). An outsider is always an outsider: Migration, social policy and social exclusion in East Asia. The Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 12(2), 316–350.
37.
NyaoroD. (2010). Policing with prejudice: How policing exacerbates poverty among urban forced migrants. The International Journal of Human Rights, 14(1), 126–145.
38.
OnuohaE. C. (2006). Human rights and refugee protection in South Africa(doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, Graduate School for Humanities and Social Sciences. University of the Witwatersrand.
39.
PalmaryI. (2003). Forced migrant’s, safety and xenophobia in South African cities: The role of local government. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.
40.
ParkinF. (1979). Marxism and class analysis: A bourgeois critique. Columbia University Press.
41.
PhillipsN. (2011). Informality, global production networks and the dynamics of ‘adverse incorporation’. Global Networks, 11(3), 380–397.
42.
PutmanR. (2001). Bowling alone(Revised edition), Simon and Schuster.
43.
RichE.P.NkosiS.MorojeleN.K., 2015. Masculinities, alcohol consumption, and sexual risk behavior among male tavern attendees: A qualitative study in North West province, South Africa. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 16(4), 382.
44.
Sangonet. (2015). Sustainable housing still a problem: Sisulu. NGO Pulse, http://www.ngopulse.org/sustainable-housing-still-problem-sisulu.
45.
SenA. (2000, June). Social exclusion: Concept application and scrutiny(Social Development Papers 1). Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.
46.
SibandaC. A. S.VallyS. (2012). The education rights of migrants, forced migrants and Asylum seekers in South Africa. Report to the foundation for human rights. University of Johannesburg.
47.
SwartzD. (1990). Social closure: The theory of monopolization and exclusion. Raymond Murphy. American Journal of Sociology, 96(2), 480–482.
48.
TaylorJ. (2004). Forced migrants and social exclusion: What the literature says. Migration Action, 2(26), 16–31.
49.
TholenG. (2016). Symbolic closure: Towards a renewed sociological perspective on the relationship between higher education, credentials and the graduate labour market. Sara and George Journals, 51(5), 1067–1083.
50.
UNHCR. (1969). Geneva convention relating to the status of refugees, http://www.unhcr.org/1951-refugee-convention.html
51.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Readings in Economic Sociology, 24–37.
52.
WestK. (2017). The Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Act: the dawn of a new era. Without Prejudice, 17(11), 34-35.
