This study aims to extend the understanding of user intentions towards the increasingly popular e-wallet technology among older adults in Malaysia. The research model is assessed using partial least squares–structural equation modelling and importance-performance map analysis (IPMA), drawing upon data collected from 127 older adult respondents in Malaysia. Results affirm that users’ perceived satisfaction, hedonic motivation and self-efficacy are the most influential predictors of use intention among this demographic. Perceived satisfaction is influenced not only by well-established constructs, for instance, perceived ease of use, usefulness and perceived risk, but also by grievance redressal and independent living capabilities. IPMA results align with the core drivers of self-efficacy, perceived satisfaction and hedonic motivation. These findings, derived from a survey of older adults, offer practical insights for manufacturers of innovative e-wallet solutions. Marketers can use these findings to craft targeted strategies promoting e-wallet adoption within this demographic.
Abdul-HalimN.-A., Vafaei-ZadehA., HanifahH., TeohA. P., & NawaserK. (2022). Understanding the determinants of e-wallet continuance usage intention in Malaysia. Quality & Quantity, 56(5), 3413–3439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01276-7
2.
Al-AdwanA. S., LiN., Al-AdwanA., AbbasiG. A., AlbelbisiN. A., & HabibiA. (2023). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15381–15413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3
3.
AlalwanA. A. (2020). Mobile food ordering apps: An empirical study of the factors affecting customer e-satisfaction and continued intention to reuse. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.008
4.
AlalwanA. A., DwivediY. K., RanaN. P., & AlgharabatR. (2018). Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026
5.
AldholayA. H., IsaacO., AbdullahZ., & RamayahT. (2018). The role of transformational leadership as a mediating variable in DeLone and McLean information system success model: The context of online learning usage in Yemen. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1421–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.012
6.
AliF., RyuK., & HussainK. (2015). Influence of experiences on memories, satisfaction and behavioral intentions: A study of creative tourism. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1038418
7.
Al-SaediK., Al-EmranM., RamayahT., & AbushamE. (2020). Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption. Technology in Society, 62, 101293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293
8.
AmorosoD., & LimR. (2017). The mediating effects of habit on continuance intention. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.003
9.
AndersonJ. C., & GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
10.
AnshariM., ArineM. A., NurhidayahN., AziyahH., & SallehM. H. A. (2021). Factors influencing individual in adopting eWallet. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 26(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-020-00079-5
11.
AttiéE., & Meyer-WaardenL. (2022). The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: An enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121485
12.
BalakrishnanV., & ShuibN. L. M. (2021). Drivers and inhibitors for digital payment adoption using the Cashless Society Readiness-Adoption model in Malaysia. Technology in Society, 65, 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101554
13.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
14.
BasakE., & CalisirF. (2015). An empirical study on factors affecting continuance intention of using Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.055
15.
BelmonteZ. J. A., PrasetyoY. T., CahigasM. M. L., NadlifatinR., & GumasingM. J. J. (2024). Factors influencing the intention to use e-wallet among generation Z and millennials in the Philippines: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Acta Psychologica, 250, 104526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104526
16.
BenekeJ., FlynnR., GreigT., & MukaiwaM. (2013). The influence of perceived product quality, relative price and risk on customer value and willingness to buy: A study of private label merchandise. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-02-2013-0262
17.
BommerW. H., RanaS., & MilevojE. (2022). A meta-analysis of eWallet adoption using the UTAUT model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 791–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2021-0258
18.
CarpenterJ. M. (2008). Consumer shopping value, satisfaction and loyalty in discount retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(5), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.08.003
19.
CasidyR., & WymerW. (2016). A risk worth taking: Perceived risk as moderator of satisfaction, loyalty, and willingness-to-pay premium price. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.06.014
20.
ChamT.-H., CheahJ.-H., ChengB.-L., & LimX.-J. (2022). I am too old for this! Barriers contributing to the non-adoption of mobile payment. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(5), 1017–1050. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2021-0283
21.
DaragmehA., LentnerC., & SágiJ. (2021). FinTech payments in the era of COVID-19: Factors influencing behavioral intentions of ‘Generation X’ in Hungary to use mobile payment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32, 100574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100574
22.
DurrM. (2020). World Health Organization says cash may contribute to spread of coronavirus, promotes paperless spending. MLive. https://www.mlive.com/coronavirus/2020/03/world-health-organizationsays-cash-may-contribute-to-spread-of-coronavirus-promotes-paperlessspending.html
23.
EsaweA. T. (2022). Understanding mobile e-wallet consumers’ intentions and user behavior. Spanish Journal of Marketing—ESIC, 26(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-05-2022-0105
24.
FNM. (2020). Bank Negara Malaysia unveils new eKYC guidelines ahead of its virtual banking framework. https://fintechnews.my/24197/digital-transformation/ekyc-malaysia-guideline-bnm/
25.
FrankeG., & SarstedtM. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
26.
GhaffariF., NavabiN., & Gannat AlipoorZ. (2016). Older adults’ attitudes and barriers toward the use of mobile phones. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 11, 1371–1378. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S112893
27.
HaJ., & JangS. (2010). Perceived values, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: The role of familiarity in Korean restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.03.009
28.
HahnE. D., & AngS. H. (2017). From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.003
29.
HairJ. F., HultG. T. M. M. T., RingleC., SarstedtM., HairJ. J. F., HultG. T. M. M. T., RingleC., & SarstedtM. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
30.
HairJ. F., RisherJ. J., SarstedtM., & RingleC. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
31.
HansonV. L. (2010). Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interacting with Computers, 22(6), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.09.001
32.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
33.
HsiaoC.-H., ChangJ.-J., & TangK.-Y. (2016). Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.014
34.
HsuC.-L., & LinJ. C.-C. (2016). Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.012
35.
KahnemanD., & TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
36.
KajolK., SinghR., & PaulJ. (2022). Adoption of digital financial transactions: A review of literature and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121991
37.
KumarA., AdlakahaA., & MukherjeeK. (2018). The effect of perceived security and grievance redressal on continuance intention to use M-wallets in a developing country. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(7), 1170–1189. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2017-0077
38.
LeesonG. W., HarperS., & LevinS. (2004). Independent living in later life: Literature review. DWP In-house Research report 137.
39.
LewS., TanG. W.-H., LohX.-M., HewJ.-J., & OoiK.-B. (2020). The disruptive mobile wallet in the hospitality industry: An extended mobile technology acceptance model. Technology in Society, 63, 101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101430
40.
LewinK. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Duke University Press.
41.
MalatjiW. R., EckR. Van, & ZuvaT. (2020). Understanding the usage, modifications, limitations and criticisms of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 5(6), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050612
42.
NikouS., AgahariW., Keijzer-BroersW., & de ReuverM. (2020). Digital healthcare technology adoption by elderly people: A capability approach model. Telematics and Informatics, 53, 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101315
43.
OliveiraT., ThomasM., BaptistaG., & CamposF. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.030
44.
Oppotus. (2021). Malaysian e-wallet usage as we move towards recovery. https://www.oppotus.com/malaysian-e-wallet-usage-towards-recovery-2021/
45.
PalR., & BhadadaS. K. (2020). Cash, currency and COVID-19. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 96(1137), 427–428. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138006
46.
PatilP., TamilmaniK., RanaN. P., & RaghavanV. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144
47.
Pozón-LópezI., Higueras-CastilloE., Muñoz-LeivaF., & Liébana-CabanillasF. J. (2021). Perceived user satisfaction and intention to use massive open online courses (MOOCs). Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(1), 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09257-9
48.
RahiS., AlghizzawiM., & NgahA. H. (2024). Understanding consumer behavior toward adoption of e-wallet with the moderating role of pandemic risk: an integrative perspective. Kybernetes, 53(11), 4818–4839. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2022-1431
49.
RahmanM., IsmailI., & BahriS. (2020). Analysing consumer adoption of cashless payment in Malaysia. Digital Business, 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100004
50.
RamliF. A. A., & HamzahM. I. (2021). Mobile payment and e-wallet adoption in emerging economies: A systematic literature review. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 9(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v9i2.13617
51.
RosenstockI. M. (1974). Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403
52.
SchindlerJ. (2017). FinTech and financial innovation: Drivers and depth (Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017–081).
53.
SharmaS. K., ManglaS. K., LuthraS., & Al-SaltiZ. (2018). Mobile wallet inhibitors: Developing a comprehensive theory using an integrated model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 45, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.08.008
54.
ShirahadaK., HoB. Q., & WilsonA. (2019). Online public services usage and the elderly: Assessing determinants of technology readiness in Japan and the UK. Technology in Society, 58, 101115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.02.001
55.
ShmueliG., SarstedtM., HairJ. F., CheahJ.-H., TingH., VaithilingamS., & RingleC. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
56.
SinghN., SinhaN., & Liébana-CabanillasF. J. (2020). Determining factors in the adoption and recommendation of mobile wallet services in India: Analysis of the effect of innovativeness, stress to use and social influence. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.022
57.
SreelakshmiC. C., & PrathapS. K. (2020). Continuance adoption of mobile-based payments in Covid-19 context: An integrated framework of health belief model and expectation confirmation model. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 16(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPCC-06-2020-0069
58.
SusantoA., ChangY., & HaY. (2016). Determinants of continuance intention to use the smartphone banking services. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(3), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2015-0195
59.
TalukderM. S., SorwarG., BaoY., AhmedJ. U., & PalashM. A. S. (2020). Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-neural network approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119793
60.
TengS., & KhongK. W. (2021). Examining actual consumer usage of E-wallet: A case study of big data analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106778
61.
TenkT. T. M. Y. C. H. & HeangL. T. (2020). E-wallet adoption: A case in Malaysia. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management Studies, 2(2), 216–233.
62.
VenkateshV., & DavisF. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
63.
VenkateshV., ThongJ. Y. L., & XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
64.
WangQ., & SunX. (2016). Investigating gameplay intention of the elderly using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 107, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.024
65.
WuJ.-H., & WangS.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?Information & Management, 42(5), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001
XuH., TeoH.-H., TanB. C. Y., & AgarwalR. (2009). The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 135–174. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222260305
68.
YanM., FilieriR., RaguseoE., & GortonM. (2021). Mobile apps for healthy living: Factors influencing continuance intention for health apps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120644
69.
YangH.-L., & LinS.-L. (2019). The reasons why elderly mobile users adopt ubiquitous mobile social service. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.005
70.
YapY.-Y., TanS.-H., & ChoonS.-W. (2022). Elderly’s intention to use technologies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 8(1), e08765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08765
71.
YapY.-Y., TanS.-K., TanS.-H., & ChoonS.-W. (2022). Integrating the capability approach and technology acceptance model to explain the elderly’s use intention of online grocery shopping. Telematics and Informatics, 72, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101842
72.
YapY.-Y., TanS.-H., TanS.-K., & ChoonS.-W. (2023). Online grocery shopping intention: Elderly’s perspective in Malaysia. Heliyon, 9(10), e20827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20827
73.
ZhaoY., & BacaoF. (2021). How does the pandemic facilitate mobile payment? An investigation on users’ perspective under the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031016
74.
ZhouT. (2011). An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile banking. Internet Research, 21(5), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111176353
