This study examines the relationship between organization’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) and non-profit organizations (NPOs) and how COVID-19 and other crises in the world today have changed that. We hypothesize that firms (for profit or non-profit) that have prior experience in sustainable innovations or innovation ecosystems or frugal innovations are better placed to respond quicker in pandemic situations with a simultaneous demand and supply shock. The article used a case study method to identify that the various CSR strategy companies and NPOs in both the USA and India have adopted to combat the impact of pandemic in their society. CSR strategies will be critically evaluated against the mechanisms of sustainability innovation for achieving better organizational outcomes. The study showed a strong relationship between NPOs and their CSR partners. While a few companies had to scale back their CSR programmes significantly, others refocused their programmes to fit the needs of society in the pandemic. Non-profit organizations had to find new ways to meet the needs of their clients, often doing more with less. This speeds up the adoption of innovative technologies and novel approaches to fundraising.
Ab SamadN. H. & AhmadN. H. (2022). Look before you leap: Which organizational factors influence non-profit organization (NPO) sustainability during the COVID-19 crisis?Global Business and Management Research, 14(3), 300–318. http://www.gbmrjournal.com/pdf/v14n3s/V14N3s-20.pdf
2.
Al-TabbanO., LeachD., & MarchJ. (2014). Collaboration between non-profit and business sectors: A framework to guide strategy development for non-profit organizations. Voluntas, 25, 657–678. http://doi.org/10-1007/s11266-013-9357-6
3.
Barreiro-GenM., LozanoR., & ZafarA. (2020). Changes in sustainability priorities in organisations due to the COVID-19 outbreak: Averting environmental rebound effects on society. Sustainability, 12(12), 5031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125031
4.
BhattiY. A., & VentrescaM. (2012, January15). The emerging market for frugal innovation: Fad, fashion, or fit?http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005983
5.
BoonsF., & Lüdeke-FreundF. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
6.
Business Wire. (2021, October14). Recent study reveals more than a third of global consumers are willing to pay more for sustainability as demand grows for environmentally-friendly alternative. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211014005090/en/Recent-Study-Reveals-More-Than-a-Third-of-Global-Consumers-Are-Willing-to-Pay-More-for-Sustainability-as-Demand-Grows-for-Environmentally-Friendly-Alternatives
7.
CamilleriM. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and responsibility: Creating value for business, society and the environment. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2(1), 59–74. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-017-0016-5
8.
ChatterjeeS., ChaudhuriR., & VrontisD. (2022). Managing knowledge in Indian Organizations: An empirical investigation to examine the moderating role of jugaad. Journal of Business Research, 141, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.005
9.
DroppertH., & BennettS. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in global health: An exploratory study of multinational pharmaceutical firms. Globalization and Health, 11(1), 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0100-5
10.
FobbeL., & HilletofthP. (2021). The role of stakeholder interaction in sustainable business models: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129510
11.
FrezeT., KomeevA., KraynevaR., OruchT., KandalovW., & StrielkowskiW. (2023). Business leadership and corporate social responsibility in the post-COVID era. Economies, 11(3), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11030098
12.
FullerR. P., & RiceR. E. (2022). Non-profit organization communication, crisis planning, and strategic response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, e1750. http://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1750
13.
GrønbjergK., McAvoyE., & HabeckerK. (2020). Indiana nonprofits and COVID-19: Impact on services, finances, and staffing. Indiana United Ways and University of Indiana. https://nonprofit.indiana.edu/doc/publications/covid-19-impact.pdf
14.
Haak-SaheemW. (2020). Talent management in Covid-19 crisis: How Dubai manages and sustains its global talent pool. Asian Business & Management, 19(3), 298–301. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00120-4
15.
HallJ., & ClarkW. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on environmental innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 343–346. http://doi.org10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00070-7
16.
HeH., & HarrisL. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176–182. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030
17.
Independent Sector. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on mid-sized nonprofits. Independent Sector. https://independentsector.org/resource/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-large-and-mid-sized-nonprofits/
18.
Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs. (2020). Annual report 2020. Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved from https://iica.nic.in/
19.
IslamT., KhanM., GhaffarA., WangY., MubarikS. M., AliH. I., ShahidA. Z., RehmaniM., & SharmaA. (2023). Does CSR influence sustained competitive advantage and behavioural outcomes? An empirical study in the hospitality sector. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 33(1), 107–132. http://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2022.2098157
20.
KaragianopoulouS., SaramidisN., RagayouK., PassaI., & GarefalakisA. (2023). Corporate social responsibility: A business strategy that promotes energy environmental transition and combats volatility in the post-pandemic world. Energies, 16. http://doi.org/10.3390/en16031102
21.
MagdH., & KaryamsettyH. (2021). Assessing the significance of corporate social responsibility actions to achieve sustainable business and organizational performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Oman. Global Business and Management Research, 13(3), 10–24. http://www.gbmrjournal.com/pdf/v13n3/V13N3-2.pdf
22.
MaherC., HoangT., & HinderyA. (2020). Fiscal responses to COVID-19: Evidence from local governments and non-profits. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13238
23.
MahmudA., DingD., & HasanM. M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Business responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. SAGE Open, 11(1), 2158244020988710. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988710
24.
ManuelT., & HerronT. L. (2020). An ethical perspective of business CSR and the COVID-19 pandemic. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 235–253. http://doi.org10.1108/SBR-06-2020-0086
25.
Martínez-FalcóJ., Marco-LajaraB., Sánchez-GarcíaE., & Millan-TudelaL. A. (2023). Sustainable Development Goals in the business sphere: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 15(6), 5075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065075
26.
McMullinC., & RaggoP. (2020). Leadership and governance in times of crisis: A balancing ace for nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020964582
27.
OksanenK., & HautamäkiA. (2015). Sustainable innovation: A competitive advantage for innovation ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10), 24–30. https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/Issue_PDF/TIMReview_October2015.pdf
28.
OrenstenN., & ButeauE. (2020). Foundations respond to crisis: A moment of transformation?The Canter for Effective Philanthropy, Inc.https://cep.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/CEP_Foundations-Respond-to-Crisis_A-Moment-of-Transformation_2020-1.pdf
29.
Padilla-LozanoC. P., & CollazzoP. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness – causality in manufacturing. Competitiveness Review, 32(7), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2020-0160
30.
PfajfarG., ShohamA., MałeckaA., & ZalaznikM. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 143, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051
31.
PlaisanceG. (2021). French non-profit organizations facing COVID-19 and lockdown: Maintaining a socio-political role in spite of the crisis of resource dependency. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 12(S1), 65–81. http://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser.2021v12nS1a411
32.
PorterM. E., & KramerM. R. (2011). Creating shared value: Redefining capitalism and the role of the corporation in society. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/2011-0609_FSG_Creating_Shared_Value_20859152-c051-44dd-a2c0-761abf6bc2d1.pdf
33.
PrenticeC. R., BrundneyJ. L., ClerkinR. M., & BrienB. (2020). At your service: Non-profit infrastructure organizations and COVID-19. The Foundation Review, 50–57. http://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1542
34.
RadjouN., PrabhuJ., & AhujaS. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. John Wiley & Sons.
35.
RenningsK. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
36.
SakuraiM., & ChughtaiH. (2020). Resilience against crises: COVID-19 and lessons from natural disasters. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814171
37.
SalamonL. M., SokolowskiS. W., & HaddockM. A. (2011). Measuring the economic value of volunteer work globally: Concepts, estimates, and a roadmap to the future. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(3), 217–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00437.x
38.
SanoranK. L. (2023). Corporate sustainability and sustainable growth: The role of industry sensitivity. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103596
39.
ShiY., JangH. S., KeyesL., & DickeL. (2020). Non-profit service community and responses in the pandemic: Disruptions, ambiguity, innovation, and challenges. Public Administration Review, 874–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13254
40.
SinghA. P., & RahmanZ. (2021). Integrating corporate sustainability and sustainable development goals: Towards a multi-stakeholder framework. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1985686. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1985686
41.
The Visual and Data Journalism Team. (2022, July5). COVID map: Coronavirus cases, deaths, vaccinations by country. Retrieved, 28July2025, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51235105
42.
Tien ThanhP., Thu HaN., Thi Hong NgocP., & Thuy HaL. T. (2023). Corporate social responsibility, corporate reputation and intention to apply for a job: Evidence from students in an emerging economy. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2022-3484
43.
TzifakisN., PetropoulosS., & HuliarasA. (2017). The impact of economic crises on NGOs: The case of Greece. Voluntas, 28, 2176–2199. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9851-3
44.
VanDoorenW., & NoordegraafM. (2020). Staging science: Authoritativeness and fragility of models and measurement in the COVID-19 crisis. Public Administration Review, 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13219
45.
WhiteK., HabibR., & HardistyD. J. (2019). How to shift consumer behaviours to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
46.
YinR. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409401500309
47.
ZhangY. (2021). Corporate responses to COVID-19: A nonmarket strategy approach. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5), 1032–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211017587
48.
ZhangD., HaoM., & MorseS. (2020). Is environmental sustainability taking a backseat in China after COVID-19? The perspective of business managers. Sustainability, 12(24), 10369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410369
