This study explores the ambidexterity of learning (AOL) in Indonesian digital startups. To obtain a better grasp of digital startups, we will examine the moderating effect of internationalization and the dual role of the leader. Both of these factors contribute to increased innovation capabilities. AOL’s direct influence on innovation abilities and the moderating effect of internationalization and leader duality are supported by an analysis of 109 SMEs. These results highlight the importance of AOL for fostering innovation in SMEs. Our further analysis shows that firms pursuing both national and global markets and those where the CEO assumes dual roles are significantly more likely to benefit from AOL. This research uses a knowledge-based perspective of the firm to elucidate ways SMEs can enhance their innovation capability. This research provides valuable insights to managers. It highlights the importance of having effective learning strategies for firms and how to navigate internationalization more effectively.
AmitR., & ZottC. (2012). Creating-value-through-business-model-innovation Amit and Zottt. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53310. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/creating-value-through-business-model-innovation/
2.
AnggadwitaG., & IndartiN. (2023). Women entrepreneurship in the internationalization of SMEs: A bibliometric analysis for future research directions. European Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2023-0006
3.
AntonioT., IndriantoA. T. L., & PadmawidjajaL. (2022). In search of mediators of leadership behavior to team creativity in team start-ups. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951603
4.
Atuahene-GimaK. (2003). The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter?Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040629
5.
AwateS., LarsenM. M., & MudambiR. (2015). Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.46
6.
Baier-FuentesH., GuerreroM., & AmorósJ. E. (2021). Does triple helix collaboration matter for the early internationalisation of technology-based firms in emerging economies?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163(September2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120439
7.
BradleyF., MeyerR., & GaoY. (2006). Use of supplier-customer relationships by SMEs to enter foreign markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.005
8.
BuligaO., ScheinerC. W., & VoigtK. I. (2016). Business model innovation and organizational resilience: Towards an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of Business Economics, 86(6), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0796-y
9.
CaliendoM., KünnS., & WeissenbergerM. (2020). Catching up or lagging behind? The long-term business and innovation potential of subsidized start-ups out of unemployment. Research Policy, 49(10), 104053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104053
10.
CaoL., NavareJ., & JinZ. (2018). Business model innovation: How the international retailers rebuild their core business logic in a new host country. International Business Review, 27(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.10.005
11.
CavalloA., GhezziA., Dell’EraC., & PellizzoniE. (2019). Fostering digital entrepreneurship from startup to scaleup: The role of venture capital funds and angel groups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145(August2018), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.022
12.
ChakabvaO., & TengehR. K. (2023). The relationship between SME owner-manager characteristics and risk management strategies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100112
13.
ChivaR., GhauriP., & AlegreJ. (2014). Organizational learning, innovation and internationalization: A complex system model. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12026
14.
ClaussT., AbebeM., TangpongC., & HockM. (2021). Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(3), 767–784. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2910381
15.
ColakogluS., YamaoS., & LepakD. P. (2014). Knowledge creation capability in MNC subsidiaries: Examining the roles of global and local knowledge inflows and subsidiary knowledge stocks. International Business Review, 23(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.009
16.
DunningJ. H. (1998). Location enterprise: The multinational neglected. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 45–66.
17.
El-BassiounyD., & El-BassiounyN. (2019). Diversity, corporate governance and CSR reporting: A comparative analysis between top-listed firms in Egypt, Germany and the USA. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0150
18.
ElidjenE., PertiwiA., MursitamaT. N., & BengJ. T. (2022). How potential and realized absorptive capacity increased ability to innovate: The moderating role of structural ambidexterity. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 084. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0298
19.
FossN. J., & StiglitzN. (2015). Business model innovation: The role of leadership. Oxford Academic.
20.
FournéS. P. L., RosenbuschN., HeydenM. L. M., & JansenJ. J. P. (2019). Structural and contextual approaches to ambidexterity: A meta-analysis of organizational and environmental contingencies. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.002
21.
GanD., & EriksonT. (2022). Venture governance: CEO duality and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17(October2021), e00304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00304
22.
GimaK. A., & MurrayJ. Y. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing, 15(2), 1–29.
23.
GrantR. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
24.
GrantR., & PheneA. (2022). The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential. Global Strategy Journal, 12(1), 3–30.
25.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
26.
HendratmiA., RyandonoM. N. H., & SukmaningrumP. S. (2020). Developing Islamic crowdfunding website platform for startup companies in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(5), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2019-0022
27.
HughesD. J., LeeA., TianA. W., NewmanA., & LegoodA. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
28.
IndartiN. (2017). Impacts of external knowledge and interaction on innovation capability among Indonesian SMEs. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 13(4), 430. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2017.085100
29.
JansenJ. J. P., BoschF. A. J. Van Den, & VolberdaH. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
30.
JunniP., ChangY., & LaamanenT. (2020). Ambidextrous orientation and performance in corporate venture units: A multilevel analysis of CV units in emerging market multinationals. Long Range Planning, 53(6), 1–13.
31.
KhanH. ur R., AliM., OlyaH. G. T., ZulqarnainM., & KhanZ. R. (2018). Transformational leadership, corporate social responsibility, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: Symmetrical and asymmetrical analytical approaches. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Forthcoming, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1637
32.
KimY., & VonortasN. S. (2014). Managing risk in the formative years: Evidence from young enterprises in Europe. Technovation, 34(8), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.004
33.
KusumastutiR., KasimA., & HardjosoekartoS. (2018). Strategic ambidexterity learning of innovation activities: A study of Indonesian business group leader. Policy & Governance Review, 2(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v2i1.70
34.
LeeO. K., SambamurthyV., LimK. H., & WeiK. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility?Information Systems Research, 26(2), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0577
35.
LindgrenP. (2012). Business model innovation leadership: How do SME’s strategically lead business model innovation?International Journal of Business and Management, 7(14), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n14p53
36.
LiuY., CollinsonS., CooperS. C., & BaglieriD. (2022). International business, innovation and ambidexterity: A micro-foundational perspective. International Business Review, 31(3), 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101852
37.
LuJ. W., & BeamishP. W. (2006). SME internationalization and performance: Growth vs. profitability. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-006-8000-7
38.
MukherjeeD., LahiriS., AshS. R., & GaurA. S. (2019). Search motives, local embeddedness, and knowledge outcomes in offshoring. Journal of Business Research, 103(February), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.035
39.
NeumanW. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
40.
NofianiD., IndartiN., Lukito-BudiA. S., & ManikH. F. G. G. (2021). The dynamics between balanced and combined ambidextrous strategies: A paradoxical affair about the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on SMEs’ performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1262–1286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2020-0331
41.
NoorderhavenN., & HarzingA. W. (2009). Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 719–741. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.106
42.
NyamrundaF. C., & FreemanS. (2021). Strategic agility, dynamic relational capability and trust among SMEs in transitional economies. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101175
43.
PramonoC. A., ManurungA. H., HeriyatiP., & KosasihW. (2021). Factors affecting start-up behavior and start-up performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0809
44.
PrangeC., & BruyakaO. (2016). Better at home, abroad, or both? How Chinese firms use ambidextrous internationalization strategies to drive innovation. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 23(2), 306–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-07-2014-0079
45.
PrashanthamS. (2008). New venture internationalization as strategic renewal. European Management Journal, 26(6), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.09.005
46.
QiaoP. H., JuX. F., & FungH. G. (2014). Industry association networks, innovations, and firm performance in Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. China Economic Review, 29, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.04.011
47.
ReimW., SjödinD., & ParidaV. (2018). Mitigating adverse customer behaviour for product-service system provision: An agency theory perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 74(April), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.04.004
48.
RezaeiR., & FanakD. A. (2019). Mediation effect of organizational learning on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance in the agriculture Jihad organization of West Azerbaijan province, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21, 37–50.
49.
RogerS. (2012). The internationalization process of SMEs: A muddling-through process. Journal of Business Research, 65(6), 745–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.011
50.
SapienzaH. J., AutioE., GeorgeG., & ZahraS. A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527465
51.
SaunilaM. (2019). Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(4), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002
52.
SheremataW. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3312925
53.
SiswantoV. K., Ulfa AuliaB., DadiaraA. R., AdlinaY. Y. N., & DzakiH. M. (2020). Best practice of start up in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 562(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/562/1/012026
54.
SmithK. G., CollinsC. J., & ClarkK. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928421
55.
SnihurY., & ZottC. (2020). The genesis and metamorphosis of novelty imprints: How business model innovation emerges in young ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 554–583. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0706
56.
SuC. Y., LinB. W., & ChenC. J. (2016). Knowledge co-creation across national boundaries: trends and firms’ strategies. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 14(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1057/KMRP.2015.14
57.
SudarmajiE., & NasipI. (2018). Service innovation capability, that spurs internationalization in Indonesian SMEs. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(2), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13326
58.
SurosoJ. S., TariganR. E., & SetyawanF. B. (2018). Information systems strategic planning: Using design thinking method at startup company. In Proceedings of the 2017 4th international conference on computer applications and information processing technology, CAIPT, 2018–January (August), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIPT.2017.8320738
59.
TimmonsJ. (1990). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship in the 1990s. Irwin Professional Publishing.
60.
WeerawardenaJ. (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254032000096766
61.
www.statista.com. (2024). Startups in Indonesia – Statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/10216/startups-in-indonesia/#topicOverview
62.
ZahoorN., Al-TabbaaO., KhanZ., & WoodG. (2020). Collaboration and internationalization of SMEs: Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(4), 427–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12238
