Amedzro St-HilaireW. (2018). Industrial relations research and analysis. World Scientific Publishing.
2.
Amedzro St-HilaireW. (2022a). Agribusiness economics: Advances in renewable energy and global sustainability. MAER.
3.
Amedzro St-HilaireW. (2022b). Global strategic challenges: Opportunities for business improvement and decision making. Routledge.
4.
Amedzro St-HilaireW., & ChiassonG. (2012). Forest policy reform in Quebec: A new framework of reference in the state. Revue Française Administration Publique, 142(2), 517–532.
5.
Amedzro St-HilaireW., ChiassonG., & LeclercE. (2013). Local governance of Québec’s public forests: An avenue for the development of peripheral regions? In The internal dynamics of state management structures (Chapter 2). PUQ.
6.
BeaudoinJ.-M., BouthillierL., BulkanJ., NelsonH., TrosperR., & WyattS. (2016). What does “First Nation deep roots in the forests” mean? Identification of principles and objectives for promoting forest-based development. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 46(4), 508–519.
7.
BiarezS. (1989). The local power. Économica.
8.
BlouinD., BissonnetteJ.-F., & BouthillierL. (2020). Vers l’émergence d’une gouvernance territoriale régionale autochtone?Revue Gouvernance/Governance Review, 17(2), 78–104.
9.
BoutinG. (2000). Behaviorism and constructivism or the war of paradigms. Québec français, (119), 37–40.
10.
ChiassonG., AndrewC., & PerronJ. (2006). Territorial development and forests: The creation of new forest lands in Abitibi and Outaouais. Sociographic Research, 47(3), 555–572.
11.
CrozierM., & FriedbergE. (1997). The actor and the system: The constraints of collective action. Seuil.
12.
DallaireJ.-F. (2009). Trial on sustainable forest management. University Environmental Training Center, Sherbrooke University.
13.
FedeleP., BrusatiL., & IannielloM. (2016). Organizational underpinnings of interactive decision making: An empirical inquiry. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29, 310–326.
14.
FortierJ.-F., & WyattS. (2019). Émergence et évolution de la collaboration dans la planification forestière du Nitaskinan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 49(4), 350–360.
15.
FussG. E., StennbergJ. W. N., WeberM. L., SmithM. A., & CreedI. F. (2018). Governance as a driver of change in the Canadian boreal zone. Environmental Reviews, 27(3), 318–332.
16.
LagroyeJ. (1997). Sociologie politique (3rd ed.). Presses de Sciences Po.
17.
L’écuyerR. (1990). Méthodologie de l’analyse développementale de contenu. Méthode GPS et Concept de soi. (p. 153). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
18.
Leclerc-OliveM., & RochegudeA. (Dir.) (2001). Decentralization: Between local dynamics and globalization [GEMDEV paper].
19.
LemieuxV. (2001). Decentralization, public policy and power relations (p. 204). University of Montreal Press, College of Politics and Economy.
20.
MabileauA. (Eds). (1983). Local authorities under the test of decentralization. CERVL, Pedone.
21.
MyersR., & HansenC. P. (2019). Revisiting a theory of access: A review. Society and Natural Resources, 33(2), 146–166. 10.1080/08941920.2018.1560522
22.
TeitelbaumS., BeckleyT., & NadeauS. (2006). A national portrait of community forestry on public land in Canada. The Forestry Chronicle, 82(3), 416–428.
23.
TeitelbaumS., MontpetitA., BissonnetteJ.-F., ChionC., ChiassonG., DoyonF., DuprasJ., FortinM.-J., LeclercE., St-AmourC., & TardifJ. (2019). Studying resource-dependent communities through a social-ecological lens? Examining complementarity with existing research traditions in Canada. Society and Natural Resources, 32(1), 93–112.