The dynamic changes in the environment and the global market scenario, has also changed the way consumers approach a product. In the recent past, it has been observed that consumers are getting more inclined towards green purchases. This has resulted in the emergence of a new field of research called ‘green consumerism’ or green consumer behaviour. Many researchers have highlighted the reasons, patterns, barriers and enablers of green consumer behaviour. With the help of previous literature and expert opinions, 11 key determinants of green consumer behaviour have been identified operating in the Indian market. Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) has been used to develop a framework to show the interrelationship among the identified determinants and how it affects the customer’s green purchase behaviour.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
2.
AliA., & AhmadI. (2016). Environment friendly products: Factors that influence the green purchase intentions of Pakistani consumers. Pakistan Journal of Engineering, Technology & Science, 2(1), 84–117.
3.
AnannoA. A., MasudM. H., ChowdhuryS. A., DabnichkiP., AhmedN., & ArefinA. M. E. (2020). Sustainable food waste management model for Bangladesh. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 35–51.
4.
BiswasA., & RoyM. (2015). Green products: An exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 463–468.
5.
BoniniS., & OppenheimJ. (2008). Cultivating the green consumer. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 56–61.
6.
BrayJ., JohnsN., & KilburnD. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.
7.
BucicT., HarrisJ., & ArliD. (2012). Ethical consumers among the millennials: A cross-national study. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 113–131.
8.
BulutZ. A., Kökalan ÇımrinF., & DoğanO. (2017). Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: Exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(6), 597–604.
9.
CairncrossF. (1992). Costing the earth (Vol. 242). Harvard Business School Press.
10.
CaruanaR. (2007). A sociological perspective of consumption morality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 6(5), 287–304.
11.
ConnellK. Y. H. (2010). Internal and external barriers to eco-conscious apparel acquisition. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(3), 279–286.
12.
DekhiliS., & AchabouM. A. (2013). Price fairness in the case of green products: Enterprises’ policies and consumers’ perceptions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(8), 547–560.
13.
DeutzP., & GibbsD. (2008). Industrial ecology and regional development: Eco-industrial development as cluster policy. Regional Studies, 42(10), 1313–1328.
14.
EzeU. C., & NdubisiN. O. (2013). Green buyer behavior: Evidence from Asia consumers. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(4), 413–426.
15.
GhoseA., & ChandraB. (2020). Models for predicting sustainable durable products consumption behaviour: A review article. Vision, 24(1), 81–89.
16.
GinsbergJ. M., & BloomP. N. (2004). Choosing the right green marketing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 79–84.
17.
HandaS., RajT., & GroverS. (2019). Analysis of drivers for green manufacturing using ISM. Industrial Engineering Journal, 12(6). 10.26488/iej.12.6.1187
18.
HolbrookM. B. (Ed.). (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. Psychology Press.
19.
JainS. K., & KaurG. (2004). Green marketing: An attitudinal and behavioural analysis of Indian consumers. Global Business Review, 5(2), 187–205.
20.
JohnstoneM. L., & HooperS. (2016). Social influence and green consumption behaviour: A need for greater government involvement. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9–10), 827–855.
21.
JoseJ., BijuM. K., & VincentB. (2022). Does consumer attitude influence sustainable buying behavior of branded organic food consumers? The mediating role of green consumption value in predicting the relationship. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 21(1), 70–86.
22.
KalafatisS. P., PollardM., EastR., & TsogasM. H. (1999). Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(5), 441–460.
23.
KannanG., & HaqA. N. (2007). Analysis of interactions of criteria and sub-criteria for the selection of supplier in the built-in-order supply chain environment. International Journal of Production Research, 45(17), 3831–3852.
24.
KhanR., AwanT. M., FatimaT., & JavedM. (2020). Driving forces of green consumption in sharing economy. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(1), 41–63.
25.
KhareA., & RakeshS. (2011). Antecedents of online shopping behavior in India: An examination. Journal of Internet Commerce, 10(4), 227–244.
26.
KumarA., & KashyapA. K. (2018). Leveraging utilitarian perspective of online shopping to motivate online shoppers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(3), 247–263.
27.
KumarS., & PurbeyS. (2018). Benchmarking model for factors influencing creation of negative electronic word of mouth. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(9), 3592–3606.
28.
KumarS., & SadaranganiP. H. (2018). Study of shopping motivation and buying behaviour among generation Y in India. ISSN No. 2362-7832, p. 341.
29.
KumarS., & YadavR. (2021). The impact of shopping motivation on sustainable consumption: A study in the context of green apparel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126239.
30.
LiW., LiuJ., & LiD. (2012). Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 98, 65–72.
31.
LiobikienėG., & BernatonienėJ. (2017). Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 109–120.
32.
LloydA. E., ChanR. Y., YipL. S., & ChanA. (2014). Time buying and time saving: Effects on service convenience and the shopping experience at the mall. Journal of Services Marketing, 28, 36–49.
33.
LuthraS., KumarV., KumarS., & HaleemA. (2011). Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 4(2), 231–257.
34.
MaheshwariS. P. (2014). Awareness of green marketing and its influence on buying behavior of consumers: Special reference to Madhya Pradesh, India. AIMA Journal of Management & Research, 8(1/4).
35.
MaichumK., ParichatnonS., & PengK. C. (2016). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability, 8(10), 1077.
36.
MaloneD. W. (1975). An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(3), 397–404.
37.
MathiyazhaganK., GovindanK., NoorulHaqA., & GengY. (2013). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 283–297.
38.
MoisanderJ. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404–409.
39.
MoserA. K. (2016). Consumers’ purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: An empirical analysis of German consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 389–397.
40.
NathV., KumarR., AgrawalR., GautamA., & SharmaV. (2014). Impediments to adoption of green products: An ISM analysis. Journal of Promotion Management, 20(5), 501–520.
41.
NguyenH. V., NguyenC. H., & HoangT. T. B. (2019). Green consumption: Closing the intention-behavior gap. Sustainable Development, 27(1), 118–129.
42.
NittalaR. (2012). Determinants of green purchase behavior of university teachers. South Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 2(8), 292–309.
43.
NystrandB. T., & OlsenS. O. (2020). Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward consuming functional foods in Norway. Food Quality and Preference, 80, 103827.
44.
OhtomoS., & HiroseY. (2007). The dual-process of reactive and intentional decision-making involved in eco-friendly behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 117–125.
45.
ÖzenH., & KodazN. (2016). Utilitarian or hedonic? A cross cultural study in online shopping. InThriving in a new world economy (pp. 234–239). Springer.
46.
PadelS., & FosterC. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British food Journal, 107(8), 606–625.
47.
PearceM., WillisE., MamerowL., JorgensenB., & MartinJ. (2014). The prestige of sustainable living: Implications for water use in Australia. The Geographical Journal, 180(2), 161–174.
48.
PhanT. T. H., CaoT. K., & NguyenH. V. (2017). Green purchase behavior: Mitigating barriers in developing countries. Strategic Direction, 33(8), 4–6.
49.
RatherR. A., & RajendranR. (2014). A study on consumer awareness of green products and its impact on green buying behavior. International Journal of Research, 1(8).
50.
SageA. P.1997, Interpretive structural modeling: Methodology for Large-Scale Systems (pp. 91–164), McGraw-Hill.
51.
SanfeyA. G., RillingJ. K., AronsonJ. A., NystromL. E., & CohenJ. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.
52.
SchmeltzL. (2012). Consumer-oriented CSR communication: Focusing on ability or morality?Corporate Communications, 17(1), 29–49.
53.
SchultzP. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues,Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391–406.
54.
ShethJ. N., NewmanB. I., & GrossB. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170.
55.
SinghG. (2013). A study of evolution and practice of green marketing by various companies in India. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 2(7), 49–56.
56.
SinghM. D., & KantR. (2008). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(2), 141–150.
57.
SinghS., & GuptaA. (2020). An ISM modeling for factors affecting the purchase of green products. Journal of Modelling in Management, 16(1), 103–123.
58.
SudjatmikoG., & SoegotoD. S. (2018). The influence of green location strategy, green price, and green promotions toward purchase decision of the property. Journal Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 255, 263–266.
59.
SurianshahS. (2021). Environmental awareness and green products consumption behavior: A case study of Sabah State, Malaysia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 22(7), 2685–2692.
60.
TaitP., SaundersC., GuentherM., & RutherfordP. (2016). Emerging versus developed economy consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable food production: A choice experiment approach comparing Indian, Chinese and United Kingdom lamb consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 65–72.
61.
TannerC., & Wölfing KastS. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883–902.
62.
Times of India. (2022). 60% of India willing to pay a premium for sustainability products. June 6, 2022. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/92030126.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
63.
ThøgersenJ., & ZhouY. (2012). Chinese consumers’ adoption of a ‘green’ innovation–The case of organic food. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 313–333.
64.
UddinS. F., & KhanM. N. (2018). Young consumer’s green purchasing behavior: Opportunities for green marketing. Journal of Global Marketing, 31(4), 270–281.
65.
VarshneyaG., PandeyS. K., & DasG. (2017). Impact of social influence and green consumption values on purchase intention of organic clothing: A study on collectivist developing economy. Global Business Review, 18(2), 478–492.
66.
VelevaV., TodorovaS., LowittP., AngusN., & NeelyD. (2015). Understanding and addressing business needs and sustainability challenges: Lessons from Devens eco-industrial park. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 375–384.
67.
VermaV. K., & ChandraB. (2018). An application of theory of planned behavior to predict young Indian consumers’ green hotel visit intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1152–1162.
68.
VermeirI., & VerbekeW. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542–553.
69.
WangE. S. T., & LinH. C. (2017). Sustainable development: The effects of social normative beliefs on environmental behaviour. Sustainable Development, 25(6), 595–609.
70.
WangL., ZhangG., ShiP., LuX., & SongF. (2019). Influence of awe on green consumption: The mediating effect of psychological ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2484.
71.
WelchD., & SouthertonD. (2019). After Paris: Transitions for sustainable consumption. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 15(1), 31–44.
72.
WuS. I., & ChenJ. Y. (2014). A model of green consumption behavior constructed by the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(5), 119.
73.
YarimogluE., & BinbogaG. (2019). Understanding sustainable consumption in an emerging country: The antecedents and consequences of the ecologically conscious consumer behavior model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 642–651.
74.
YoungW., HwangK., McDonaldS., & OatesC. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20–31.
75.
ZhangC. Y., YuB., WangJ. W., & WeiY. M. (2018). Impact factors of household energy-saving behavior: An empirical study of Shandong Province in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 285–298.
