This study explores the young urban residents’ environmental perceptions forging intentions to adopt rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in India and the mediating role of government initiatives to propagate solar energy prospects. Primary data using convenience sampling has been corralled from young educated urban residents. Partial least square structural equation modelling has been deployed to test the hypotheses of the proposed conceptual model. The results show that young residents displayed a high degree of environmental perception and were willing to adopt rooftop solar PV systems, but the government initiatives were unable to mediate the relationships. This study recommends ways in which governments can hyperbole solar energy policies to be more effective and adds to the literature of understanding residents’ intentions to adopt solar-based systems while becoming producers and consumers (pro-sumers) of clean energy.
AggarwalA. K., SyedA. A., & GargS. (2019). Factors driving Indian consumer’s purchase intention of roof top solar. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 13(3), 539–555. 10.1108/ijesm-07-2018-0012
2.
AgrawalK. K., JhaS. K., MittalR. K., & VashishthaS. (2022). Assessment of floating solar PV (FSPV) potential and water conservation: Case study on Rajghat Dam in Uttar Pradesh, India. Energy for Sustainable Development: The Journal of the International Energy Initiative, 66, 287–295. 10.1016/j.esd.2021.12.007
3.
AlhajM. A., SvetinovicD., & DiabatA. (2016). Retracted: A carbon-sensitive two-echelon-inventory supply chain model with stochastic demand. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 108, 82–87.
4.
AlsabbaghM. (2019). Public perception toward residential solar panels in Bahrain. Energy Reports, 5, 253–261.
5.
AminS., & TarunM. T. (2022). Boosting ecological food consumption behavior among millennials: Role of health consciousness, perceived consumer effectiveness and ethical self-identity. Management of Environmental Quality. 10.1108/meq-07-2021-0180
6.
AslamH., AzeemM. U., BajwaS. U., RamishA., & SaeedA. (2021). Developing organisational citizenship behaviour for the environment: The contingency role of environmental management practices. Management Decision, 59(12), 2932–2951. 10.1108/md-05-2020-0549
7.
AteşH. (2021). Understanding students’ and science educators’ eco-labeled food purchase behaviors: Extension of theory of planned behavior with self-identity, personal norm, willingness to pay, and eco-label knowledge. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 60(4), 454–472. 10.1080/03670244.2020.1865339
8.
AtulkarS. (2022). Purchase intention of Indian customers: A study on solar PV technology. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 16(5), 946–964. 10.1108/ijesm-04-2021-0017
Baborska-NaroznyM., StevensonF., & ZiyadF. J. (2016). User learning and emerging practices in relation to innovative technologies: A case study of domestic photovoltaic systems in the UK. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 24–37.
11.
BaconL. D. (1999, February). Using LISREL and PLS to measure customer satisfaction. In Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 2–5). https://content.sawtoothsoftware.com/assets/46fb1e32-55e5-41c6-bc85-da84831fb916
12.
BagozziR. P., YiY., & NassenK. D. (1998). Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1–2), 393–421.
13.
BalderjahnI. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17(1), 51–56.
14.
BambergS. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21–32.
15.
BangH. K., EllingerA. E., HadjimarcouJ., & TraichalP. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing, 17(6), 449–468.
16.
BarclayD., HigginsC., & ThompsonR. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2.
17.
BaunerC., & CragoC. L. (2015). Adoption of residential solar power under uncertainty: Implications for renewable energy incentives. Energy Policy, 86, 27–35. 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.009
18.
BedenkS., & MiegH. A. (2018). Failure in innovation decision making. In Strategies in failure management (pp. 95–106). Springer.
19.
BenitezJ., HenselerJ., CastilloA., & SchuberthF. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168.
20.
BarmanM., MahapatraS., PalitD., & ChaudhuryM. K. (2017). Performance and impact evaluation of solar home lighting systems on the rural livelihood in Assam, India. Energy for Sustainable Development, 38, 10–20.
21.
Cesarina MasonM., PauluzzoR., & Muhammad UmarR. (2022). Recycling habits and environmental responses to fast-fashion consumption: Enhancing the theory of planned behavior to predict Generation Y consumers’ purchase decisions. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 139, 146–157. 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.012
22.
ChanR. Y. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389–413.
23.
ChaureyA., & KandpalT. C. (2009). Carbon abatement potential of solar home systems in India and their cost reduction due to carbon finance. Energy Policy, 37(1), 115–125.
24.
CheahI., & PhauI. (2011). Attitudes towards environmentally friendly products: The influence of ecoliteracy, interpersonal influence and value orientation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02634501111153674/full/html
25.
ChinW. W., GopalA., & SalisburyW. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 342–367.
26.
ChouC. J., ChenK. S., & WangY. Y. (2012). Green practices in the restaurant industry from an innovation adoption perspective: Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 703–711.
27.
CorreiaE., SousaS., ViseuC., & LeiteJ. (2022). Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the students’ pro-environmental behavior: a case study in a Portuguese HEI. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(5), 1070–1089. 10.1108/ijshe-05-2021-0201
28.
DelVecchioD. (2000). Moving beyond fit: The role of brand portfolio characteristics in consumer evaluations of brand reliability. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 457–471. 10.1108/10610420010351411
29.
DengY.-Y., & YangY.-C. (2022). Exploring the role of green attributes transparency influencing green customer citizenship behavior. British Food Journal (Croydon, England), 124(5), 1473–1484. 10.1108/bfj-03-2021-0223
30.
DiamantopoulosA., SchlegelmilchB. B., SinkovicsR. R., & BohlenG. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465–480.
31.
DütschkeE., GalvinR., & BrunzemaI. (2021). Rebound and Spillovers: Prosumers in transition. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 896.
32.
FaiersA., & NeameC. (2006). Consumer attitudes towards domestic solar power systems. Energy Policy, 34(14), 1797–1806.
33.
FaiersA., NeameC., & CookM. (2007). The adoption of domestic solar-power systems: Do consumers assess product attributes in a stepwise process?Energy Policy, 35(6), 3418–3423.
34.
FranzenA., & MeyerR. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219–234.
35.
GençerE., & AgrawalR. (2018). Toward supplying food, energy, and water demand: Integrated solar desalination process synthesis with power and hydrogen coproduction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, 331–342.
36.
GoelM. (2016). Solar rooftop in India: Policies, challenges and outlook. Green Energy & Environment, 1(2), 129–137. 10.1016/j.gee.2016.08.003
37.
GoldA. H., MalhotraA., & SegarsA. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.
38.
GoUP. (2017). Uttar Pradesh Solar Power Policy 2017, UPNEDA. http://www.upneda.org.in/policies.aspx
39.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., AndersonR. E., & TathamR. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
40.
HairJ. F., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.
41.
HairJ. F., SarstedtM., PieperT. M., & RingleC. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340.
42.
HanslaA., GambleA., JuliussonA., & GärlingT. (2008). Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy, 36(2), 768–774.
43.
HarishS. M., IychettiraK. K., RaghavanS. V., & KandlikarM. (2013). Adoption of solar home lighting systems in India: What might we learn from Karnataka?Energy Policy, 62, 697–706.
44.
HollarekM., & LeeN. C. (2022). Current understanding of developmental changes in adolescent perspective taking. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45(101308), 101308. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101308
45.
HsuC. W. (2012). Using a system dynamics model to assess the effects of capital subsidies and feed-in-tariffs on solar PV installations. Applied Energy, 100, 205–217.
46.
HullandJ. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204.
47.
HumeM. (2010). Compassion without action: Examining the young consumers consumption and attitude to sustainable consumption. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 385–394.
48.
HwangH., MalhotraN. K., KimY., TomiukM. A., & HongS. (2010). A comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 699–712.
49.
Indiastat Database. (2020). Per capita consumption of electricity in India (1950–1956, 1957–1958 to 2019–2020). Socio-Economic Statistical Information about India. https://www.indiastat.com/
50.
IrfanM., ZhaoZ. Y., AhmadM., & MukeshimanaM. C. (2019a). Critical factors influencing wind power industry: A diamond model based study of India. Energy Reports, 5, 1222–1235.
51.
IrfanM., ZhaoZ. Y., LiH., & RehmanA. (2020a). The influence of consumers’ intention factors on willingness to pay for renewable energy: A structural equation modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(17), 21747–21761.
52.
IrlandL. C. (1993). Wood producers face green marketing era: Environmentally sound products. Wood Technology, 120(2), 34–36.
53.
KaiserF. G., SchultzP. W., BerenguerJ., Corral-VerdugoV., & TankhaG. (2008). Extending planned environmentalism: Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures. European Psychologist, 13(4), 288–297.
54.
KanchanapibulM., LackaE., WangX., & ChanH. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 528–536.
55.
KapoorS., SharmaA. K., & PorwalD. (2021). Design and simulation of 60kWp solar on-grid system for rural area in Uttar Pradesh by ‘PVsyst’. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 2070(1), 012147. 10.1088/1742-6596/2070/1/012147
56.
KaratepeT., OzturenA., KaratepeO. M., UnerM. M., & KimT. T. (2022). Management commitment to the ecological environment, green work engagement and their effects on hotel employees’ green work outcomes. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 4(8), 3084–3112. 10.1108/ijchm-10-2021-1242
57.
KumarG. A. (2021). Framing a model for green buying behavior of Indian consumers: From the lenses of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126487.
58.
KumarV., & KaushikA. K. (2022). Solar rooftop adoption among Indian households: a structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of Social Marketing, 12(4), 513–533. 10.1108/jsocm-07-2021-0170
59.
KumarV., HundalB. S., & SyanA. S. (2020). Factors affecting customers’ attitude towards solar energy products. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 21(2), 271. 10.1504/ijbir.2020.104819
60.
LanT. T., JirakiattikulS., & TechatoK. (2021). The intention of households in the Daklak province to install smart grid rooftop solar electricity systems. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11(1), 1–27.
61.
LinJ., & ZhouZ. (2022). The positioning of green brands in enhancing their image: The mediating roles of green brand innovativeness and green perceived value. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(6), 1404–1424. 10.1108/ijoem-06-2020-0657
62.
LockettA., & LittlerD. (1997). The adoption of direct banking services. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(8), 791–811.
63.
LollaS., RoyS. B., & ChowdhuryS. (2015). Wind and solar energy resources in India. Energy Procedia, 76, 187–192.
64.
MahttaR., JoshiP. K., & JindalA. K. (2014). Solar power potential mapping in India using remote sensing inputs and environmental parameters. Renew Energy, 71, 255–262.
65.
MalhotraA. (2022). Trade-offs and synergies in power sector policy mixes: The case of Uttar Pradesh, India. Energy Policy, 164(112936), 112936. 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112936
66.
MalikS. A., & AyopA. R. (2020). Solar energy technology: Knowledge, awareness, and acceptance of B40 households in one district of Malaysia towards government initiatives. Technology in Society, 63, 101416.
67.
MaloneyM. P., & WardM. P. (1973). Ecology: Let’s hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 28(7), 583.
68.
MilfontT. L. (2012). The psychology of environmental attitudes: Conceptual and empirical insights from New Zealand. Ecopsychology, 4(4), 269–276. 10.1089/eco.2012.0058
69.
Ministry of New and Renewable, Energy (MNRE). (2019). State wise installed capacity of grid interactive renewable power (Posted on 13.02.2019). Government of India. https://mnre.gov.in/physical-progress-achievements
70.
Ministry of New and Renewable, Energy (MNRE). (2015). Tentative state-wise break-up of renewable power target to be achieved by the year 2022. http://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/UserFiles/Tentative-State-wise-break-up-of-Renewable-Power-by-2022.pdf
71.
MishraP. K., & ShekharB. R. (2013). Consumer behaviour, customer satisfaction vis-a-vis brand performance: An empirical study of dairy food supply chain in India. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 7(3), 399–412.
72.
MoorthyK., PatwaN., & GuptaY. (2019). Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy. Heliyon, 5(1), e01166.
73.
MoP. (2014). Deendayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY). Government of India. http://www.ddugjy.gov.in/portal/memo/DDUGJY-OM.pdf
74.
MuaafaM., AdjaliI., BeanP., FuentesR., KimbroughS. O., & MurphyF. H. (2017). Can adoption of rooftop solar panels trigger a utility death spiral? A tale of two US cities. Energy Research & Social Science, 34, 154–162.
75.
OlsonJ., & Pinto da SilvaP. (2014). Changing boundaries and institutions in environmental governance: Perspectives on sector management of the Northeast US groundfish fishery. Maritime Studies, 13(1), 3. 10.1186/2212-9790-13-3
76.
PailléP., & ValéauP. (2021). ‘I don’t owe you, but I am committed’: Does felt obligation matter on the effect of green training on employee environmental commitment?Organization & Environment, 34(1), 123–144. 10.1177/1086026620921453
77.
PakpourA. H., LinC.-K., SafdariM., LinC.-Y., ChenS.-H., & HamiltonK. (2021). Using an integrated social cognition model to explain green purchasing behavior among adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12663. 10.3390/ijerph182312663
78.
PaladinoA., & BaggiereJ. (2007). Are we ‘green’? An empirical investigation of renewable electricity consumption. European Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1), 340.
79.
PalitD., & MalhotraS. (2015). Energizing rural India using micro grids: The case of solar DC micro-grids in Uttar Pradesh State, India. In Third International Conference: Micro Perspectives for Decentralized Energy Supply.
80.
PalmJ., & TengvardM. (2011). Motives for and barriers to household adoption of small-scale production of electricity: Examples from Sweden. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 7(1), 6–15.
81.
PappZ. (2022). Environmental attitudes, environmental problems and party choice. A large-N comparative study. Political Geography, 97(102652), 102652. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102652
82.
ParkerP. (2008). Residential solar photovoltaic market stimulation: Japanese and Australian lessons for Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(7), 1944–1958.
83.
PatelS., & RaoK. V. S. (2016, April). Social acceptance of solar energy technology in India. In 2016 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability (ICEETS) (pp. 142–147). IEEE.
84.
PathakK., YadavA., SharmaS., & BhardwajR. (2022). Young residents’ household waste recycling intentions: extending TPB through place attachment. Rajagiri Management Journal. 10.1108/ramj-12-2021-0088
85.
PhamN. T., TučkováZ., & JabbourC. J. C. (2019). Greening the hospitality industry: How do green human resource management practices influence organizational citizenship behavior in hotels? A mixed-methods study. Tourism Management, 72, 386–399.
86.
PouratashiM., & ZamaniA. (2022). University students’ level of knowledge, attitude and behavior toward sustainable development: A comparative study by GAMES. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(2), 625–639. 10.1108/jarhe-06-2020-0163
87.
PurohitI., & PurohitP. (2007). CDM potential of box type solar cookers in India. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 28(1), 27–38.
88.
PurohitP., & MichaelowaA. (2008). CDM potential of solar water heating systems in India. Solar Energy, 82(9), 799–811.
89.
RaiV., & BeckA. L. (2015). Public perceptions and information gaps in solar energy in Texas. Environmental Research Letters, 10(7), 074011.
90.
RaiV., & McAndrewsK. (2012, May). Decision-making and behavior change in residential adopters of solar PV. In Proceedings of the World Renewable Energy Forum.
91.
RehmanI. H., KarA., RavenR., SinghD., TiwariJ., JhaR., & MirzaA. (2010). Rural energy transitions in developing countries: A case of the Uttam Urja initiative in India. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(4), 303–311.
92.
RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449/full/html
93.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
94.
RommeA. G. L. (1995). Self-organizing processes in top management teams: A Boolean comparative approach. Journal of Business Research, 34(1), 11–34. 10.1016/0148-2963(94)00032-a
95.
SalazarH. A., OerlemansL., & van Stroe-BiezenS. (2013). Social influence on sustainable consumption: Evidence from a behavioural experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 172–180.
96.
SasikumarN., & JayasubramaniamP. (2013). Solar energy system in India. Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 61–68.
97.
SchellyC. (2014). Residential solar electricity adoption: What motivates, and what matters? A case study of early adopters. Energy Research & Social Science, 2, 183–191.
98.
Schmidt-CostaJ. R., Uriona-MaldonadoM., & PossamaiO. (2019). Product-service systems in solar PV deployment programs: What can we learn from the California Solar Initiative?Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, 145–157.
99.
SchultzP. W., ShriverC., TabanicoJ. J., & KhazianA. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 31–42. 10.1016/s0272-4944(03)00022-7
100.
SetiawanA. D., & SinghR. (2015). Responsible innovation in practice: the adoption of solar PV in telecom towers in Indonesia. In Responsible innovation 2 (pp. 225–243). Springer.
101.
ShallcrossT., RobinsonJ., PaceP., & TamoutseliK. (2007). The role of students’ voices and their influence on adults in creating more sustainable environments in three schools. Improving Schools, 10(1), 72–85. 10.1177/1365480207073723.
102.
SharmaN. D., & RaiR. (2014). Marketing of solar products: an overview. Science, Technology and Management, 141.
103.
SinghK. (2016). Business innovation and diffusion of off-grid solar technologies in India. Energy for Sustainable Development, 30, 1–13.
104.
SmithK. T. (2010). An examination of marketing techniques that influence millennials’ perceptions of whether a product is environmentally friendly. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(6), 437–450.
105.
SolangiK. H., IslamM. R., SaidurR., RahimN. A., & FayazH. (2011). A review on global solar energy policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 2149–2163.
106.
SongZ., ZhangX., & ErikssonC. (2015b). Data center energy and cost saving evaluation. Energy Procedia, 75, 1255–1260. 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.178
107.
SpragueN. L., BancalariP., KarimW., & SiddiqS. (2022). Growing up green: a systematic review of the influence of greenspace on youth development and health outcomes. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 10.1038/s41370-022-00445-6
108.
SunH., SamadS., RehmanS. U., & UsmanM. (2022). Clean and green: the relevance of hotels’ website quality and environmental management initiatives for green customer loyalty. British Food Journal (Croydon, England). 10.1108/bfj-09-2021-1002
109.
SunP. C., WangH. M., HuangH. L., & HoC. W. (2020). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives. Energy & Environment, 31(1), 21–39.
110.
TapaninenA., SeppanenM., & MakinenS. (2009). Characteristics of innovation: a customer-centric view of barriers to the adoption of a renewable energy system. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 4(1–2), 98–113.
111.
TaraiR. K., & KaleP. (2018c). Solar PV policy framework of Indian states: Overview, pitfalls, challenges, and improvements. Renewable Energy Focus, 26, 46–57. 10.1016/j.ref.2018.07.001
112.
TaylorM. (2008). Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: Lessons from California’s solar policy. Energy Economics, 30(6), 2829–2854.
113.
TeoT. S., SrivastavaS. C., & JiangL. I. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132.
114.
TrueloveH. B., CarricoA. R., WeberE. U., RaimiK. T., & VandenberghM. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 29, 127–138. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
115.
UmarT. (2017). Rooftop solar photovoltaic energy: A case study of India. Nanomaterials and Energy, 6(1), 17–22. 10.1680/jnaen.16.00002
116.
UNFCCC. (2015). The Paris agreement: Authentic texts of the Paris agreement. http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
117.
UrbachN., & AhlemannF. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 5–40.
118.
VasishtM. S., SrinivasanJ., & RamaseshaS. K. (2016). Performance of solar photovoltaic installations: Effect of seasonal variations. Solar Energy, 131, 39–46.
119.
VinziV. E., TrincheraL., & AmatoS. (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 47–82). Springer.
120.
VollandM. F. (2019). How to intentionally forget rules in newly introduced agile projects: A case study of a multinational automotive company. Learning Organization, 26(5), 470–484.
121.
VöllinkT., MeertensR. E. E., & MiddenC. J. (2002). Innovating ‘diffusion of innovation’ theory: Innovation characteristics and the intention of utility companies to adopt energy conservation interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(4), 333–344.
122.
von BraunJ. (2017). Children as agents of change for sustainable development. In Children and sustainable development (pp. 17–30). Springer International Publishing.
123.
VuD. M., HaN. T., NgoT. V. N., PhamH. T., & DuongC. D. (2021). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green purchase intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Social Responsibility Journal. 10.1108/srj-06-2021-0220
124.
BrentW. (2019). Decentralized solar is on fire in India. Power for all. http://www.powerforall.org/blog/2016/11/1/decentralized-solar-is-on-fire-in-india
125.
WangZ., WangN., HuX., & WangH. (2022). Threshold effects of environmental regulation types on green investment by heavily polluting enterprises. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1). 10.1186/s12302-022-00606-2
126.
WhitleyC. T., TakahashiB., ZwickleA., BesleyJ. C., & LertpratchyaA. P. (2018). Sustainability behaviors among college students: An application of the VBN theory. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 245–262. 10.1080/13504622.2016.1250151
127.
WongK. (2010, November). Handling small survey sample size and skewed dataset with partial least square path modelling. Vue: The Magazine of Marketing Research and Intelligence Association, pp. 20–23.
128.
YueC. D., & HuangG. R. (2011). An evaluation of domestic solar energy potential in Taiwan incorporating land use analysis. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7988–8002.
