This article explains India’s trade from an environmental perspective. Besides explaining trends and patterns of trade in pollution-intensive products, we investigate India’s comparative advantage in these products and discuss the emerging issues. The exercise based on the UN Comtrade dataset reveals that much of India’s exports happen under this category with better revealed comparative advantage (RCA) values, which do have high environmental concerns. We sum up the article by arguing that there is a need to attend to sector-specific problems encountered by these industries and have a well-knit environmental policy, so that trade and industrial expansion do not have a major environmental concern.
AbhimanyuA. (1996). Impact of free trade on industrial pollution: Do pollution havens exist?ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 13(1), 39–51.
2.
AggarwalM. (2020, March18). India’s proposed overhaul of environment clearance rules could dilute existing regulations. Mongabay. https://india.mongabay.com/2020/03/indias-proposed-overhaul-of-environment-clearance-rules-could-dilute-existing-regulations/
3.
AlbrechtJ. (1998). Environmental policy and the inward investment position of US ‘dirty’ industries. Intereconomics, 33(4), 186–194.
4.
AzharA. K. M., & ElliottR. J. R. (2007). Trade and specialisation in pollution-intensive industries: North–south evidence. International Economic Journal, 21(3), 361–380.
5.
BalassaB. (1965). Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33(2), 99–123.
6.
BalassaB. (1977). ‘Revealed’ comparative advantage revisited: An analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries, 1953–1971. The Manchester School, 45(4), 327–344.
7.
BalassaB. (1979). The changing pattern of comparative advantage in manufactured goods. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 259-266.
8.
BalassaB. (1986). Comparative advantage in manufactured goods: A reappraisal. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 315–319.
9.
BIO Intelligence Service. (2013). Study on the environmental risks of medicinal products: Final report prepared for Executive Agency for Health and Consumers. https://ec.europa.eu/health/system/files/2016-11/study_environment_0.pdf
10.
BronerF., BustosP., & CarvalhoV. M. (2012). Sources of comparative advantage in polluting industries (NBER Working Paper No. 18337). NBER.
11.
BusseM. (2004). Trade, environmental regulations, and the World Trade Organization: New empirical evidence (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3361). World Bank.
12.
Cement Manufacturers Association. (2021). Indian cement industry—Contribution to domestic economy. https://www.cmaindia.org/indian-cement-industry-contribution-to-domestic-economy/
13.
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). (2016). Final document on revised classification of industrial sectors under red, orange, green and white categories. CPCB.
14.
Changing Markets. (2016). Impacts of pharmaceutical pollution on communities and environment in India. https://www.nordea.com/en/doc/impacts-of-pharmaceutical-pollution-on-communities-and-environment-in-india.pdf
15.
CII (n.d.). Chemicals. Confederation of Indian Industry. https://www.cii.in/sectors.aspx?enc=prvePUj2bdMtgTmvPwvisYH+5EnGjyGXO9hLECvTuNskmvgGjRIRgzWycLq2dn10
16.
ColeM. A., ElliottR. J. R., & ShimamotoK. (2005). Why the grass is not always greener: The competing effects of environmental regulations and factor intensities on US specialization. Ecological Economics, 54(1), 95–109.
17.
Deloitte (2016). Options for a strategic approach to pharmaceuticals in the environment (Task 1 report—Revised version). https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/study_report_public_consultation_pharmaceuticals_environment.pdf
18.
Economic Times. (2007, October, 1). Govt removes riders on import of GM edible oil. Ahmedabad, India. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/govt-removes-riders-on-import-of-gm-edible-oil/articleshow/2417431.cms?from=mdr
19.
FeinbergS., & MajumdarS. (2001). Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 421–437. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3069489.pdf
20.
FerrariniB., & ScaramozzinoP., (2011). Indicators and patterns of specialization in international trade (Papers 148). World Trade Institute. https://www.wti.org/media/filer_public/3c/45/3c450e2f-21a9-4ce0-846b-f33acb38b7b5/indicators_and_patterns_of_specialization.pdf
21.
FICCI Mines and Metals Division. (2013). Development of Indian mining industry—The way forward. http://ficci.in/spdocument/20317/Mining-Industry.pdf
22.
GallagherK., & AckermanF. (2000). Trade liberalization and pollution-intensive industry in developing countries: A partial equilibrium approach (Working Paper No. 00-03). Global Development and Environment Institute. http://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/00-03_Pollution.pdf
GoenkaP. (2016). India’s auto sector is today’s promise, tomorrow’s pride. https://www.forbesindia.com/article/2016-a-make-or-break-year-for-india/indias-auto-sector-is-todays-promise-tomorrows-pride-pawan-goenka/41913/1
25.
Government of India. (2000). EXIM Policy 1997–2002. Directorate General of Foreign Trade.
26.
Government of India. (2016). Indian Petroleum & Natural Gas Statistics 2015–2016. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. http://petroleum.nic.in/sites/default/files/pngstat_1.pdf
27.
Government of India. (2018–2019). Annual Report 2018–2019. Government of India and Ministry of Mines. https://mines.gov.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/English637094270360450099.pdf
28.
GretherJ., & de MeloJ. (2004). Globalization and dirty industries: Do pollution havens matter? In BaldwinR. E., & WintersL. A. (Eds.), Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics (pp. 167–203). NBER Economic Research Conference Report Series. University of Chicago Press.
29.
HettigeH., MartinP., SinghM., & WheelerD. R. (1995). IPPS: The industrial pollution projection system (Policy Research Department Working Paper No. 1431). World Bank.
30.
IBEF. (2020). Indian metals and mining industry analysis. https://www.ibef.org/industry/metals-and-mining-presentation
31.
IBEF (2021). Indian cement industry report. https://www.ibef.org/industry/cement-india.aspx
32.
India Environment Portal—Knowledge for Change. (2008). Compliance of environmental laws by the textile industry not satisfactory: Expert. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/46091/compliance-of-environmental-laws-by-the-textile-industry-not-satisfactory-expert/
33.
Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID). (2012). Sustainable development: Emerging issues in India’s mineral sector. Sponsored by Planning Commission, Government of India.
34.
Invest India. (n.d.). Pharmaceuticals. https://www.investindia.gov.in/sector/pharmaceuticals
35.
JosephR., & RanganathanK. (2016). Trends in foreign investment in healthcare sector of India. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
36.
KapoorM. (2020, January15). How govt push for ease of doing business is compromising environment regulation. IndiaSpend.
37.
KPMG. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the mining sector in India. https://home.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/in/pdf/2020/05/impact-of-covid19-on-mining-sector.pdf
38.
KulkarniM. (2019, June19). Iron exports from Karnataka set to resume. Deccan Herald. https://www.deccanherald.com/business/iron-ore-exports-from-karnataka-set-to-resume-741367.html
39.
Larsson (2014). Pollution from drug manufacturing: Review and perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1656). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213584/
40.
LaursenK. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5, 99–115.
41.
LowP. (1992). Trade measures and environmental quality: The implications for Mexico’s exports. In LowP. (Ed.), International trade and the environment (World Bank Discussion Paper No. 159, pp. 105–120). World Bank.
42.
LowP., & YeatsA. (1992). Do ‘dirty’ industries migrate? In LowP. (Ed.), International trade and the environment (World Bank Discussion Paper No. 159, pp. 89–103). World Bank.
43.
ManiM. (1996). Environmental tariffs on polluting imports: An empirical study. Environmental and Resource Economics, 7(4), 391–411.
44.
ManiM., & JhaS. (2006). Trade liberalization and the environment in Vietnam (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3879). World Bank.
45.
ManiM., & WheelerD. (1998). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960–1995. Journal of Environment and Development, 7(3), 215–247.
46.
MehtaP. S. (2002). The Indian Mining Sector: Effect on the Environment and FDI Inflow. CCNM Global Forum on International Investment. Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 7-8 February 2002, OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/env/1830307.pdf
47.
MehtaR., & RaniA. (2018). Indian pharma and health sector emerging as a substantial job creator. Employment News, 2, 14–20. http://employmentnews.gov.in/newemp/MoreContentNew.aspx?n=InDepthJobs&k=156#:~:text=Finally%2C%20Pharmaceutical%20and%20healthcare%20sector,about%205.5%2D5.7%20lakh%20people
48.
Ministry of Steel. (2017). National Steel Policy, 2017. Government of India. https://steel.gov.in/national-steel-policy-nsp-2017
NashJ. P., KimeD. E., Van der VenL. T., WesterP. W., BrionF., MaackG., Stahlschmidt-AllnerP., & TylerC. R. (2004). Long-term exposure to environmental concentrations of the pharmaceutical ethynylestradiol causes reproductive failure in fish. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(17), 1725–1733. 10.1289/ehp.7209
52.
NeumayerE. (2000). Trade and the environment: A critical assessment and some suggestions for reconciliation. The Journal of Environment and Development, 9(2), 138–159. 10.1177/107049650000900203
53.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2010). Global pharma looks to India: Prospects for growth. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/pharma-life-sciences/pdf/global-pharma-looks-to-india-final.pdf
54.
RayS., & MiglaniS. (2016). Innovation (and upgrading) in the automobile industry: The case of India (ICRIER Working Paper). ICRIER.
55.
Reserve Bank of India. (2019). State-wise ease of doing business rank. https://m.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=18911
56.
SahayA. (2020, May7). India can become the pharmacy of the world. BusinessLine. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/india-can-become-the-pharmacy-of-the-world/article31516558.ece
57.
SawhneyA., & RastogiR. (2015). Is India specialising in polluting industries? Evidence from US-India bilateral trade. The World Economy, 38(2), 360–378.
58.
TantriM. L. (2016). Imperatives of trade facilitation on trade performance: An appraisal in the context of India’s select SEZs. ISEC.
59.
The Times of India. (2010, June30). Karnataka bans export and transport of iron ore. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Karnataka-bans-export-and-transport-of-iron-ore/articleshow/6234786.cms
60.
TobeyJ. A. (1990). The effects of domestic environmental policies on pattern of world trade: An empirical test. Kyklos, 43(2), 191–209.
61.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Environmental rule of law: First global report. United Nations Environment Programme.
62.
Van BeersC., & Van den BerghJ. C. J. M. (1997). An empirical multi-country analysis of the impact of environmental regulations on foreign trade flows. Kyklos, 50(1), 29–46.
WBCSD. (2019). Indian cement sector SDG roadmap. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. https://www.wbcsd.org/contentwbc/download/7018/116131/1
