Post-privatization, public sector organizations were encouraged to borrow and learn from private sector firms. The popular belief was that the human resource practices followed by private sector organizations were far superior and more effective than those of the public sector organizations. However, this claim lacks empirical proof. This study adds to this body of knowledge by comparing the level of work engagement in private and public sector firms of India. Given that the leadership is crucial in setting the tone of an organization, the study also analyses the dominant leadership styles and their relationship to the levels of work engagement. The study is descriptive in nature and utilizes a structured questionnaire to collect data. Individuals currently employed in Indian public and private sector firms, in managerial roles, were invited to record their responses. The final sample consisted of 240 employees, with equal representation from both sectors. The collected data was then analysed using SPSS. The findings suggested that the dominant leadership styles were not significantly different in public and private sector organizations. Private sector employees were found to be more engaged and the leadership style appeared to be significantly related to the levels of engagement in public sector firms only.
ArokiasamyA., & TatH. (2020). Exploring the influence of transformational leadership on work engagement and workplace spirituality of academic employees in the private higher education institutions in Malaysia. Management Science Letters, 10(4), 855–864.
2.
AugustyP. A., & MathewJ. (2020). Theoretical framework of the relationship between emotional intelligence and effective leadership to ensure sustainability. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 6314–6320.
3.
BassB. M., & AvolioB. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Mind Garden.
4.
BlomR., KruyenP. M., Van der HeijdenB. I., & Van ThielS. (2020). One HRM fits all? A meta-analysis of the effects of HRM practices in the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 3–35.
5.
BoxR. C. (1999). Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 19–43.
6.
BoyneG., Gould-WilliamsJ., LawJ., & WalkerR. (1999). Markets, bureaucracy and public management: competitive tendering and best value in local government. Public Money and Management, 19(4), 23–29.
7.
BoyneG. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference?Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122.
8.
BudhwarP. S., & BoyneG. (2004). Human resource management in the Indian public and private sectors: An empirical comparison. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(2), 346–370.
9.
BumsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
10.
CenkciA. T., & ÖzçelikG. (2015). Leadership styles and subordinate work engagement: The moderating impact of leader gender. Global Business & Management Research, 7(4), 8–20.
11.
ChenS. W., & PengJ. C. (2019). Determinants of frontline employee engagement and their influence on service performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(5), 1062–1085.
12.
DecuypereA., & SchaufeliW. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 69–95.
13.
DemeroutiE., BakkerA. B., NachreinerF., & SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499.
14.
FerlieE., FitzGeraldL., & AshburnerL. (1996). Corporate governance in the post 1990 NHS: The role of the board. Public Money & Management, 16(2), 15–21.
15.
GemedaH. K., & LeeJ. (2020). Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among information and communications technology professionals: A cross-national study. Heliyon, 6(4), e03699.
16.
GhadiM. Y., FernandoM., & CaputiP. (2013). Transformational leadership and work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(6), 532–550.
17.
GubmanE. (2004). From engagement to passion for work: The search for the missing person. Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 42–46.
18.
HerseyP. B., & BlanchardK. H. (1977). The management of organizational behaviour. Prentice Hall.
19.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. SAGE Publications.
20.
HoodC. (1991). A public management for all seasons?Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
21.
HoqueK., & KirkpatrickI. (2000, September). From administrative to strategic personnel management? The decentralisation of the personnel function in the UK public sector [Conference session]. Annual Employment Research Unit Conference, Cardiff Business School.
22.
LewinK., LippittR., & WhiteR. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created ‘social climates’. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269–299.
23.
RhodesR. A. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151.
24.
SalanovaM., AgutS., & PeiróJ. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217.
25.
SchaufeliW. B., SalanovaM., González-RomáV., & BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
26.
SchaufeliW. B., TarisT. W., & Van RhenenW. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?Applied Psychology, 57(2), 173–203.
27.
SchulerR. S. (2000). The internationalization of human resource management. Journal of International Management, 6(3), 239–260.
28.
SissonK., & StoreyJ. (2000). Realities of human resource management: Managing the employment relationship. McGraw-Hill Education.
29.
SonnentagS. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518.
30.
SuhartiL., & SuliyantoD. (2012). The effects of organizational culture and leadership style toward employee engagement and their impacts toward employee loyalty. World Review of Business Research, 2(5), 128–139.
31.
VoonM. L., LoM. C., NguiK. S., & AyobN. B. (2011). The influence of leadership styles on employees’ job satisfaction in public sector organizations in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 24–32.
