There has been a growing global focus on student learning outcomes. Research has
also shown that the current generation in higher education has significantly
different learning characteristics than its predecessors. It then becomes
essential to understand this generation’s learning attributes that can
provide useful guidance in designing teaching pedagogies for this generation. We
specifically study goal orientation, learning affectivity, competition and trust
in this generation. The findings indicate that this generation significantly
differs from the previous generation on the attributes of trust and competition.
Gen Y was found to be more competitive and less trusting than Gen X.
AlexanderC.S. &
SyskoJ.M.
(2013). I’m Gen Y, I love feeling entitled,
and it shows. Academy of Educational Leadership
Journal, 17(4),
127–131.
2.
AmesC. &
ArcherJ. (1988).
Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning
strategies and motivation processes. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 80(3),
260–267.
3.
BaldwinT.T.MagjukaR.J. &
LoherB.T.
(1991). The perils of participation: Effects of
choice of training on training motivation and learning.
Personnel Psychology,
44(1),
51–65.
4.
BeardC.CleggS. &
SmithK. (2007).
Acknowledging the affective in higher
education. British Educational Research
Journal, 33(2),
235–252.
5.
BeenenG. (2014).
The effects of goal orientations and supervisor concerns on
MBA Intern learning and performance. Academy of
Management Learning & Education,
13(1),
82–101.
6.
BernhardA. (2012).
Quality assurance in an international higher education area: A case
study approach and comparative analysis.
Germany: Springer
Fachmedien.
7.
CampbellJ.P.
(1989). An agenda for theory and
research. In GoldsteinI.L. (Ed.),
Training and development in organizations (pp.
469–486). San Francisco,
CA:
Jossey-Bass.
8.
ClarkC.S.DobbinsG.H. &
LaddR.T.
(1993). Exploratory field study of training
motivation: Influence of involvement, credibility, and transfer
climate. Group & Organization
Management, 18(3),
292–307.
9.
CoginJ. (2012).
Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction?
Multi-country evidence and implications. The
International Journal of Human Resource Management,
23(11),
2268–2294.
10.
ColeM.S.FieldH.S. &
HarrisH.S.
(2004). Student learning motivation and
psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions
to a management class. Academy of Management
Learning and Education, 3(1),
64–85.
11.
ColquittJ.A. &
SimmeringM.S.
(1998). Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and
motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal
study. Journal of Applied Psychology,
83(5),
654–665.
12.
ColquittJ.A.LePineJ.A. &
NoeR.A.
(2000). Toward an integrative theory of training
motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of
research. Journal of Applied Psychology,
85(5),
678–707.
13.
CraigS.D.GraesserA.C.SullinsJ. &
GholsonB. (2004).
Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of
affect in learning with Auto Tutor. Journal of
Educational Media, 29(3),
241–250.
14.
De LangeP.SuwardyT. &
MavondoF. (2003).
Integrating a virtual learning environment into an
introductory accounting course: Determinants of student
motivation. Accounting Education,
12(1),
1–14.
15.
DeterdingS.SicartM.NackeL.O’HaraK. &
DixonD. (2011).
From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining
‘gamification’. Proceedings of the
15th International Academic MindTrek Conference:
Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere,
Finland.
16.
DeutschM. (1949).
A theory of cooperation and competition.
Human Relations, 2(2),
129–152.
17.
DuqueL.C.
(2014). A framework for analysing higher education
performance: Students’ satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and
dropout intentions. Total Quality
Management, 25(1),
1–21.
18.
DweckC.S. &
LeggettE.L.
(1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation
and personality. Psychological Review,
95(2),
256–273.
19.
ElliotC.S. &
ChurchM.A.
(1997). A hierarchical model of approach and
avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology,
72(1),
218–232.
20.
ErhelS. &
JametE. (2013).
Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and
feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness.
Computers and Education, 67,
156–167.
21.
FeatherN.T.
(1982). Expectancy-value approaches: Present status
and future directions. In FeatherN.T. (Ed.),
Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in
psychology (pp. 395–420).
Hillside, NJ:
Erlbaum.
22.
FeiertagJ. &
BergeZ.L.
(2008). Training generation N: How educators should
approach the Net generation. Education+
Training, 50(6),
457–464.
23.
GistM.E. &
MitchellT.R.
(1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its
determinants and malleability. Academy of Management
Review, 17(2),
183–211.
24.
GoldsteinL.L.
(1993). Training in organizations: Needs assessment,
development, and evaluation (3rd ed.).
Monterey, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
25.
HershatterA. &
EpsteinM. (2010).
Millennials and the world of work: An organization and
management perspective. Journal of Business and
Psychology, 25(2),
211–223.
26.
HershkovitzA.BakerR.S.GobertJ. &
NakamaA. (2012).
A data-driven path model of student attributes, affect, and
engagement in a computer-based science inquiry microworld. In
Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning
Sciences, Vol 1, pp
167–174. Sydney, NSW
Australia.
27.
HicksW.D. &
KlimoskiR. (1987).
The process of entering training programs and its effect on
training outcomes. Academy of Management
Journal, 30(3),
542–552.
28.
HiltzS.R.
(1997). Impacts of college-level courses via
asynchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
1(2),
1–19.
29.
HoweN. &
StraussW. (2009).
Millennials rising: The next great generation.
New York:
Vintage.
30.
HuntJ.E. &
TucciaroneJ.,
(2011). The challenges and opportunities of teaching
‘Generation Y’. Journal of Graduate
Medical Education, 3(4),
458–461.
31.
JohnsonD.W. &
JohnsonR. (1983).
The socialization and achievement crisis: Are cooperative
learning experiences the solution? In BickmanL. (Ed.),
Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 4,
pp. 119–164). Beverly Hills,
CA: Sage.
Jonas-DwyerD. &
PospisilR. (2004).
The Millennial effect: Implications for academic
development. In Proceedings of the 2004 Annual
International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development
Society of Australasia (HERDSA), pp.
356–366. Miri,
Sarawak.
34.
KanferR. (1991).
Motivation theory and industrial and organizational
psychology. Handbook of Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, 1(2),
75–130.
35.
KazeroonyH. (2012).
The strategic management of higher education: Serving students as
customers for institutional growth. New York,
USA: Business Expert
Press.
36.
KemberD. (1995).
Open learning courses for adults: A model of student
progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Educational Technology
Publications.
37.
KnightP. &
YorkeM. (2003).
Employability and good learning in higher
education. Teaching in Higher Education,
8(1),
3–17.
38.
KozlowskiS.W. &
BellB.S.
(2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and
goal setting effects on self-regulatory processes.
Journal of Applied Psychology,
91(4),
900–916.
39.
LeeF.SheldonK.M. &
TurbanD.E.
(2003). Personality and the goal-striving process:
The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on
performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 88(2),
256–265.
40.
LinnenbrinkE.A.
(2007). The role of affect in student learning: A
multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect,
motivation, and engagement. In SchutzP.A. &
ReinhardP. (Eds),
Emotion in education (pp.
107–124). San Diego,
CA: Elsevier Academic
Press.
41.
LinnenbrinkE.A. &
PintrichP.R.
(2002). Achievement goals theory and affect: An
asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational
Psychologist, 27(2),
69–78.
42.
MartocchioJ.J. &
WebsterJ. (1992).
Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance
in microcomputer training. Personnel
Psychology, 45,
553–578.
43.
MathieuJ.E. &
MartineauJ.W.
(1997). Individual and situational influences in
training motivation. In FordJ. K.KozlowskiS. W. J.KraigerK.SalasE. &
TeachoutM. S. (Eds),
Improving training effectiveness in organizations (pp.
193–222). Hillsdale,
NJ:
Erlbaum.
44.
MathieuJ.E.TannenbaumS.I. &
SalasE. (1992).
Influences of individual and situational characteristics on
measures of training effectiveness. Academy of
Management Journal, 35(4),
828–847.
45.
MitchellT.R.
(1982). Expectancy-value models in organizational
psychology. In FeatherN. T. (Ed.),
Expectations and actions: Expectancy value models in
psychology. (pp. 293–314).
Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
46.
NoeR.A.
(1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes:
Neglected influences on training effectiveness.
Academy of Management Review,
11(4),
736–749.
47.
NunnallyJ.C.
(1978). Psychometric theory
(2nd ed.). New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill.
PeltonL.E. &
TrueS.L.
(2004). Teaching business ethics, Why Gen
Y?Marketing Education Review,
14(3),
63–70.
50.
PintrichP. (2000).
The role of goal orientation in self-regulated
learning. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. &
ZeidnerM. (Eds),
Handbook of self-regulation (pp.
452–502). San Diego,
CA: Academic
Press.
51.
PrenskyM. (2001).
Digital game based learning. New York,
NY: McGraw
Hill.
52.
QuinonesM.A.FordJ.K.SegoD.J. &
SmithE.M.
(1995). The effects of individual and transfer
environment characteristics on the opportunity to perform trained
tasks. Training Research Journal,
1,
29–48.
RovaiA.P.
(2002). A preliminary look at structural differences
in sense of classroom community between higher education traditional and ALN
courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning
Networks, 6(1),
41–56.
55.
RymanD.H. &
BiersnerR.J.
(1975). Attitudes predictive of diving training
success. Personnel Psychology,
28(2),
181–188.
56.
SchunkD.H. &
ZimmermanB.J.
(1998). Conclusions and future directions for
academic interventions. In SchunkD. H. &
ZimmermanB. J. (Eds),
Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective
practice (pp. 225–234).
Hillside, NJ:
Erlbaum.
57.
SheaP.FredericksenE.PickettA.PelzW. & SwanK. (2001).
Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY learning
network. In BourneJ. &
MooreJ. (Eds),
Online education: Proceedings of the 2000 Sloan Summer Workshop on
Asynchronous Learning Networks (Vol. 3, pp.
31–54). Needham,
MA: Sloan-C
Press.
58.
SojkaJ.Z. &
FishM.S.B.
(2013). Brief in-class role plays: An
experiential teaching tool targeted to Generation Y
students. Marketing Education Review,
18(1),
25–31.
59.
StukalinaY. (2014).
Identifying predictors of student satisfaction and student
motivation in the framework of assuring quality in the delivery of higher
education services. Business, Management and
Education, 12(1),
127–137.
60.
SwanK. (2003).
Learning effectiveness: What the research tells
us. In BourneJ. &
MooreJ. C. (Eds),
Elements of quality online education, practice and
direction (pp. 13–45).
Needham, MA: Sloan Center for
Online Education.
61.
TamM. (2007).
Assessing quality experience and learning outcomes: Part II.
Findings and discussion. Quality Assurance in
Education, 15(1),
61–67.
62.
TannenbaumS.I.MathieuJ.E.SalasE. &
Cannon-BowersJ.A.
(1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The
influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment,
self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 76(6),
759–769.
63.
TettehG.A.
(2015). Assessing indicators of motivation for
learning in a TQM class. TQM Journal,
27(4),
412–434.
64.
TintoV. (1993).
Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student
attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago,
IL: The University of Chicago
Press.
65.
TraceyJ.B.TannenbaumS.I. &
KavanaghM.J.
(1995). Applying trained skills on the job: The
importance of the work environment. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 80(2),
239–252.
66.
VroomV.H.
(1964). Work and motivation. New
York, NY:
Wiley.
67.
WilhiteS.C.
(1990). Self-efficacy, locus of control,
self-assessment of memory ability, and study activities as predictors of
college course achievement. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 82(4),
696–700.
68.
WissemaJ.G.
(2009). Towards the third generation university: Managing
the university in transition. UK:
Edward Elgar Publishing.
69.
ZaphirisP.AngC.S. &
LawD. (2007).
Individualistic versus competitive game-based
E-learning. Advanced Technology for
Learning, 4(4),
1–6.
70.
ZimmermanB.J.
(2008). Investigating self-regulation and
motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future
prospects. American Educational Research
Journal, 45(1),
166–183.
