Employees who are committed to their organization confer a distinct advantage to that organization. The bases upon which employees in different occupations may become committed to their organization, and the focus of that commitment may differ, however. This research examined different occupations (physicians, staff, nurses) in a hospital in southern India to compare the strength of different components of organizational commitment (affective, continuance, normative) as well as the focus of commitment (organization, supervisor, co-worker). As hypothesized, different categories of occupations resulted in different levels of commitment as well as differential patterns of commitment to different foci. Nurses reported the highest level of overall commitment. The framework of psychological contracts is used to interpret these findings, with different needs and expectancies of each category of employee causing different psychological contract expectations. Managerial implications are discussed.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.
2.
AnandK.PrasadL.SinhaD. K.PrakhyaS. (2013). Exploring the relationship between top management’s peripheral vision, their leadership orientations and employees’ organizational identification: An empirical analysis. ASCI Journal of Management, 42(2), 1–25.
3.
AokiM.GustafssonB.WilliamsonO. E. (Eds). (1990). The firm as a nexus of treaties. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
4.
BaruchY.Winkelmann-GleedA. (2002). Multiple commitments: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation in a community health service trust. British Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–357.
5.
BeckerT. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 232–244.
6.
BeckerT. E.KernanM. C. (2003). Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human Performance, 16(4), 327–348.
7.
BegleyT. M.CzajkaJ. M. (1993). Panel analysis of the moderating effects of commitment on job satisfaction, intent to quit, and health following organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 552–556.
8.
BolemanL. G.DealT. E. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).
9.
BrayJ. H.MaxwellS. E.ColeD. (1995). Multivariate statistics for family psychology research. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(2), 144–160.
10.
ClugstonM.HowellJ. P.DorfmanP. (2000). Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment?Journal of Management, 26(1), 5–30.
11.
CoaseR. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
12.
CohenA. (1993). Organizational commitment and turnover: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1140–1157. doi:10.2307/256650
13.
CohenA. (1999). Relationships among five forms of commitment: An empirical assessment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 285–308. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379
14.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.HollandJ. L. (1984). Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 390–400.
15.
DickR. V.BeckerT. E.MeyerJ. P. (2006). Commitment and identification: Forms, foci, and future. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 545–548.
16.
GottfredsonG. D.JonesE. M.HollandJ. L. (1993). Personality and vocational interests: The relation of Holland’s six interest dimensions to five robust dimensions of personality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(4), 518–524.
17.
HuselidM. A.DayN. E. (1991). Organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover: A substantive and methodological analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 380–391.
18.
KreinerG. E.AshforthB. E. (2004). Evidence towards an expanded model of organisational identification. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 25(1), 1–27.
19.
KwantesC. T. (2003). Organizational citizenship and withdrawal behaviors in the USA and India: Does commitment make a difference?International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 3(1), 5–26.
20.
KwantesC. T. (2009). Culture, job satisfaction and organizational commitment in India and the United States. Journal of Indian Business Research, 1(4), 196–212.
21.
KwantesC. T.BoglarskyC. A. (2004). Do occupational groups vary in expressed organizational culture preferences? A study of six occupations in the United States [Special issue: Identifying culture]. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4(3), 335–353.
22.
LiL. C.GrimshawJ. M.NielsenC.JuddM.CoyteP. C.GrahamI. D. (2009). Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science, 4, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-11
23.
MathieuJ. E.ZajacD. M. (1990). A review and metaanalysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194.
24.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1988). Links between work experiences and organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(3), 195–209.
25.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
26.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J.SmithC. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551.
28.
MeyerJ. P.BeckerT. E.VandenbergheC. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991–1007. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
29.
MeyerJ. P.BeckerT. E.van DickR. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665–683.
30.
MeyerJ. P.BobocelD.AllenN. J. (1991). Development of organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal study of pre- and post-entry influences. Journal of Management, 17(4), 716.
31.
MeyerJ. P.PaunonenS. V.GellatlyI. R.GoffinR. D.JacksonD. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152–156. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.152
32.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
OuchiW. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.
34.
PinkD. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Penguin/Riverhead.
35.
ReichersA. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465–476.
36.
RosseJ. G.MillerH. E.BarnesL. K. (1991). Combining personality and cognitive ability predictors for hiring service-oriented employees. Journal of Business & Psychology, 5(4), 431–445.
37.
RousseauD. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38.
SinekS. (2009). Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
39.
TabachnikB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA, US: Allyn & Bacon.
40.
TriceH. M. (1993). Occupational subcultures in the workplace. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University.
41.
van KnippenbergD.SleebosE. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 571–584. doi:10.1002/job.359
42.
Van MaanenJ.BarleyS. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 287–365.
43.
WastiS. A.CanÃ.Z. (2008). Affective and normative commitment to organization, supervisor, and coworkers: Do collectivist values matter?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 404–413.
44.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
WengerE.SnyderW. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.
46.
WilliamsL. J.HazerJ. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219–223.
