The present study examined the effect of psychological contract violation (PCV) on organizational commitment, trust and turnover intention among the employees of private and public sector Indian organizations. Data were collected from 200 middle-level managers selected randomly from private and public sector organizations in Delhi and National Capital Region of Delhi. PCV was measured by Robinson and Rousseau (1994) scale, Commitment was measured by Meyer and Allen scale, Trust by Robinson and Rousseau (1994) scale and Turnover intention by Cammann et al. (1979) scale. The mean values showed the prevalence of contract violation more in private sector than in the public sector. Regression Analysis showed that the affective commitment, trust and employee turnover were more influenced by contract violation in public sector than in the private sector. On the other hand, continuance and normative commitment were influenced more by contract violation in private sector than in the public sector. The predictors which came out to be significant were for affective and continuance commitment only. Results were interpreted in the light of existing theoretical framework and Indian sociocultural context. The implications for the present research for theory and practice were also suggested.
AbramsD.AndoK.HinkleS. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of worker’s turnover intentions. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 24(10), 1027–1039.
2.
AggarwalU.BhargavaS. (2009). Reviewing the relationship between human resource practices and psychological contract and their impact on employee attitude and behaviours: A conceptual model. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(1), 4–31.
BoseS.AgarwalM. (2003). Work environment and perceived fulfillment of psychological contract: A study of public and private sector organizations. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), 460–479.
5.
BundersonJ.S. (2001). How work ideologies shape the psychological contracts of professional employees: Doctor’s responses to perceived breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(7), 717–741.
6.
CammannC.FichmanM.JenkinsD.KleshJ. (1979). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
7.
Cooper-HakimA.ViswesvaranC. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 241–259.
8.
Coyle-ShapiroJ.A.M.KesslerI. (2002a). Exploring recipro-city through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and employer perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 69–86.
9.
Coyle-ShapiroJ.A.M.KesslerI. (2002b). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration, 80(1), 77–101.
10.
Coyle-ShapiroJ.A.M.KesslerI. (2003). The employment relationship in the UK public sector: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 213–230.
11.
Coyle-ShapiroJ.A.M.ConwayN. (2005). Exchange relationships: Examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 774–781.
12.
DalalR.S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.
13.
DelCampoR. (2007). Psychological contract violations: An individual difference perspective. International Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–52.
14.
FarrellD.StammC.L. (1988). Meta-analysis of the correlates of employee absence. Human Relations, 41(3), 211–227.
15.
FolgerR.KonovskyM.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130.
16.
GautamT. (2003). Organizational commitment in Nepal. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, submitted to Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal, Available at: http://www.onlinethesis.com.np (retrieved on 15 Jan 2010)
17.
GolembiewskiR.McConkieMark. (1975). The centrality of trust in group processes. In CooperCary L. (Ed.), Theories of group processes (pp. 131–185). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18.
GuestD.E.ConwayN. (2000). Can an organization have a psychological contract? A conceptual and empirical analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
19.
HeckerR.GrimmerM. (2006). The evolving psychological contract. In HollandP.De CieriH. (Eds), Contemporary issues in human resource development: An Australian perspective (pp. 183–207). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
20.
HerriotP.PembertonC. (1997). Facilitating new deals. Human Resource Management Journal, 7(1), 45–56.
21.
HomP.W.GriffethR.W. (1995). Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
22.
JaffriM.H.ShahnawazM.G. (2009). Development of psychological contract, and its impact on organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and trust in public and private sector employees. Ph.D. thesis, submitted to the Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi.
23.
JanssensM.SelsL.Van den BrandeI.OverlaetB. (2002). Multiple types of psychologicalcontracts. A six cluster solution. Research Report, K.U. Leuven: Department of Applied Economics.
24.
JohnsonJ.L.O’Leary-KellyA. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 627–647.
25.
KhatriN.BudhwarP.FernC.T. (2001). Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1), 54–74.
26.
KwantesC.T. (2009). Culture, job satisfaction and organizational commitment in India and United States. Journal of Indian Business Research, 1(4), 196–212.
27.
LacityM.C.IyerV.V.RudramuniyaiahP.S. (2008). Turnover intentions of Indian I.S. Professionals. Information System Frontiers (Special issue on Outsourcing), 10(2), 225–241.
28.
LemireL.RouillardC. (2005). An empirical exploration of psychological contract violation and individual behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(2), 150–163.
29.
LesterS.W.TurnleyW.H.BloodgoodJ.M.BolinoM.C. (2002). Not seeing eye to eye: Differences in supervisor and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 39–56.
30.
MarantoR.T.SkelleyB.D. (2003). Anticipating change in the higher civil service: Affective commitment, organizational ideology, and political ideology. Public Administration Quarterly, 27(4), 336–367.
31.
MathieuJ.E.ZajacD. (1990). A review and meta analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194.
32.
MeyerJ.P.AllenN.J. (1997). Commitment in the work-place: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
MishraJ.MorriseyM. (1990). Trust in employee/employer relationships: A survey of West Michigan managers. Public Personnel Management, 19(4), 443–463.
34.
MorrisonE.W.RobinsonS.L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract breach develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.
35.
NadinS.CassellC. (2007). New deal for old? Exploring the psychological contract in a small firm environment. International Small Business Journal, 25(4), 417–443.
36.
PfefferJ. (1998). The human equation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
37.
RajaU.JohnsG.NtalianisF. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 350–367.
38.
RikettaM. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 257–266.
39.
RobinsonS.L.RousseauD.M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245–259.
40.
RousseauD.M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2(2), 121–139.
41.
RousseauD.M. (2011). The idiosyncratic deal: Flexibility versus fairness?Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 260–273.
42.
SimsR.R. (1994). Human resource management’s role in clarifying the new psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33(3), 373–382.
43.
SinhaD.KaoH.S.R. (Eds) (1988). Social values and develop-ment: Asian perspective. Thousand Osks, CA: SAGE.
44.
SuazoM.M.TurnleyH.W.MaiR.R. (2005). The role of perceived violation in determining employees’ reaction to psychological contract breach. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(1), 24–36.
45.
TanH.H.TanC.S.F. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241–260.
46.
TurnleyW.H.FeldmanD.C. (1999). The impact of psychological contract violation on exit, voice, loyalty and neglect. Human Relations, 52(7), 895–922.
47.
TurnleyW.H.FeldmanD.C. (2000). Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: Unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 25–42.
48.
TyagiA.AgrawalR. (2010). Emerging employment relationship: Issues and concerns in psychological contract. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(3), 381–395.
49.
TzafrirS.S.HarelG.BaruchY.DolanL.S. (2004). The consequences of emerging HRM practices for employees trust in their managers. Personnel Review, 33(6), 628–647.
50.
Van den BrandeI. (2002). Het psychologisch contract tussen werknemer en werkgever: een surveyonderzoek bij Vlaamse werknemers [The psychological contract between employee and employer: A survey among Flemish employees]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuve.
51.
WhitenerE.M. (2001). Do high commitment human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515–535.
52.
ZandD.E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239.
53.
ZhaoH.WayneS.J.GlibkowskiB.C.BravoJ. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680.
