Stock market anomalies have always attracted questions over the applicability of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) for being an efficient predictor of stock market returns. Roll (1977), Banz (1981), Bhandari (1988), Jagadeesh (1992), Lakonishok, Shleifer, and Vishney (1994), Arumugam (1996) showed market anomalies for CAPM. Fama French (1992, 1996, and 2004) demonstrated the inability of CAPMs beta to explain the cross-sectional stock market returns by introducing two other factors i.e. size and value. In this study, the Capital Asset Pricing Model and Fama French Model have been examined by taking a sample of 187 companies for a study period of five years, ranging from June 2004 to June 2009. In order to validate the results, the sample selection was made on the basis of continuous presence in S&P CNX 500 index for at least ten years without fail. The study showed that efficiency of Fama French Model, for being a good predictor, can not be ignored in India but either of the two factors (size and value) might improve the model. It is so because a high degree of correlation is found between the size and value factor returns.
AksuMine H.OnderTurkan (2003), The Size and Book-to-Market Effects and their Role as Risk Proxies in the Istanbul Stock Exchange, Koc University, Graduate School of Business, Working Paper 2000–2004. Available at http://www.ssrn.com, Dated 20 January, 2006.
3.
ArumugamS., (1996), The Effect of Diversification on Risk and Returns in Equity Investment, An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar.
4.
BanzRolfW., (1981), “The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stock,”Journal of Financial Economics, 9, pp. 3–18.
5.
BhandariLaxmiChand (1988), “Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence,”The Journal of Finance, 43.2, pp. 507–528.
6.
BahlBhavna (2006), “Testing the Fama and French Three Factor Model and Its Variants for the Indian Stock Returns,” Available at http://www.ssrn.com, Dated October 20, 2007, pp. 1–34.
7.
BundooSunilK., (2006), “An Augmented Fama and French Three Factor Model: New Evidence from An Emerging Stock Market,” Available at http://www.melbournecentre.com.au/Finsia_MCFS, Dated December 10, 2007, pp. 1–25.
8.
ChanK. C.ChenNai-Fu (1991), “Structural and Return Characteristics of Small and Large Firms,”The Journal of Finance, 46.4, pp. 1467–1484.
9.
ChanLouis K. C.HamaoYasushiLakonishokJosef (1991), “Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan,”The Journal of Finance, 46.5, pp. 1739–1764.
10.
ConnorGregorySehgalSanjay (2003), “Test of the Fama and French Model in India,”Decision, 30.2, pp. 1–19.
11.
DavisJames (2006), “Reviewing the CAPM,”Canadian Investment Review(winter), R21.
12.
FamaE. F.MacBethJ. D., (1973), “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests,”Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp. 607–636.
13.
FamaEugene F.FrenchKenneth R., (2004), “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence,”Journal of Economic Perspective, 18.3, (Summer), pp. 25–46.
14.
EugeneFama F.FrenchKennethR., (1996), “The CAPM is Wanted, Dead or Alive,”The Journal of Finance, 51.5, pp 1947–58.
15.
EugeneFama F.FrenchKennethR., (1992), “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns,”The Journal of Finance, 47, pp. 427–465.
16.
EugeneFama F.FrenchKennethR., (1993), “Common Risk Factors in the Return on Stocks and Bonds,”Journal of Financial Economics, 33, pp. 3–56.
17.
EugeneFama F.FrenchKennethR., (1995), “Size and Book to Market Factors in Earnings and Returns,”The Journal of Finance, 50, pp. 131–156.
18.
EugeneFama F.FrenchKennethR., (1996), “Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies,”The Journal of Finance, 51.1, pp. 55–84.
19.
JagadeeshNarasimhan (1992), “Does Market Risk Really Explains the Size Effect?”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, pp. 337–351.
20.
KumarM.SehgalS., (2004), “Company Characteristics and Common Stock Returns: The Indian Experience,”Vision–The Journal of Business Perspective, July-December., pp. 33–45.
21.
LakonishokJosefShleiferAndreiVishneyRobert W., (1994), “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk,”The Journal of Finance, 49.5, pp. 1541–1578.
22.
LinterJohn (1965), “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, pp. 13–27.
23.
ManjunathaT.MallikarjunappaBegumMustiary (2006), “Does Capital Asset Pricing Model Hold in the Indian Market,”The Indian Journal of Commerce, 59.2, (April-June), pp. 73–83.
24.
MohantyP., (2001), “Efficiency of the Market for Small Stocks,” available at http://www.nseindia.com, Dated March 7, 2006.
25.
NaughtonTonyVeeraraghavanMadhu (2005), “A Multifactor Model Explanation of the Anamolies in the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns: Evidence from Indonesia, Singapore and Taiwan,”Finance India, XIX. 1, pp. 135–157.
26.
RaoC. U.GolakaC. NathMalhotraManish (1998), “Capital Asset Pricing Model and Indian Stocks,”The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 4.1, pp. 65–84.
27.
RaySubrata (1994), Capital Asset Pricing Model: The Indian Context, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore.
28.
RollRichard (1977), “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests; Part I: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory,”Journal of Financial Economics, 4.2, pp. 129–176.
29.
SharmaShefaliSinghBalwinder (2006), “Determinants of Equity Share Prices in the Indian Corporate Sector: An Empirical Study,”The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance (April), pp 22–33.
30.
SharpeW. F., (1964), “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Markets Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk,”The Journal of Finance, 19.3, pp. 425–442.
31.
VaidyanathanR., (1995), “Capital Asset Pricing Model: The Indian Context,”The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 1.2, pp. 134–154.
32.
Vipul (1998), “Systematic Risk: Do Size, Industry and Liquidity Matter?”Prajnam, XXVII. 2, pp. 131–149.
