Many timber enterprises in India walk a narrow path between profitability and bankruptcy. Such cases are several. This paper examines the reasons for poor investments in forests in India, and draws policy implications on how to overcome these obstacles. In India, many international funding agencies are supporting several forestry projects; however, the government's enthusiasm for pursuing forestry activities can largely be explained by its concern for attracting greater external funding. The Indian timber import bill increased eight-fold from 1991 to 2006. The domestic and export demand for processed wood products offer scope for value-added exports from India. Traditionally, forests have not been viewed as an industry, and therefore resource mobilisation has always been limited, perhaps because of inappropriate prioritisation. One of the largest and least-addressed obstacles constraining the expansion of the sustainable forestry sector in India is the industry's lack of integration into the capital markets, and consequently its poor access to the mainstream private capital. In order to achieve the target of raising forest cover from 21% now to 33% by 2012, the government of India is promoting public-private partnerships in forestry. The challenge for policymakers in India is to find the best mix of policies and incentives to attract private investment that can partner with the communities.
Anonymous (2007), “India on Fire: India's Growth Rate is Close to China's; But Signs of Overheating Suggest that This Pace cannot be Sustained”, The Economist, London, 3–9 (February), pp. 73–75.
2.
BhattK. (1992), “Changing Scenario of Rattan Trade in India”, in BashaChand S.BhattK. M. (Eds.), Rattan Management and Utilisation Proceedings, seminar held on 29–31, January in Trichur, Kerala, pp. 335–339.
3.
BrahmaneGPanda, B. K and AMSS, (2000), The Adivasis and the World Bank-aided Madhya Pradesh Forestry Project: A Case Study of Indigenous Experience, discussion document prepared for the Workshop on Indigenous Peoples, Forests and the World Bank: Policies and Practice, May 9–10, Washington DC.
4.
CrossleyR.LentT.PropperD.SethareC. (1997), “Innovative Financing for Sustainable Forestry”, Unasylva, 48.188, pp. 23–31.
5.
CanbyK.RaditzC. (2005), “Opportunities and Constraints to Investment: Natural Tropical Forest Industries”, Forest Trends and International Tropical Timber Organisation, pp. 1–2.
6.
CanbyK. (2006), “Investing in Natural Tropical Forest Industries”, Tropical Forest Update, 16.2, pp. 4–8.
7.
Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) (2004), National Accounts Statistics of India, 1950–51 to 2002–03, New Delhi.
8.
ColchesterM. (1989), “Indian Development in Amazonian: Risk and Strategies”, The Ecologist, 19.6, pp. 248–256.
9.
Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) (2004), Ecology as a Source of Sustainable Livelihoods, Regional Media Briefing Workshop, Manav Adhikar Seva Samiti (MASS), Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, December 22–23.
10.
Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (2006), Monthly Statistics of Monthly Trade, Kolkata.
11.
FAO (2005), “Microfinance and Forest-based Small-scale Enterprises”, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, FAO Forestry Paper 146.
12.
GadgilM. (1991), “Deforestation: Problems and Prospects”, in RawatA. S. (eds). History of Forestry in India, Indus Publishing, New Delhi.
13.
Government of India (GoI), (2001), Census of India, New Delhi.
14.
GoI. (2004), National Common Minimum Programme of Government of India, May 2004, New Delhi.
15.
GoI. (2004), National Environment Policy 2004, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.
16.
GoI. (2006), Report of the National Forest Commission, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.
17.
Government of Tripura (GoT), (2004), “State Bamboo Policy, Department of Forest”, accessed on February 22, 2007 from http://tripuraforest.nic.in/policy3.htm.
18.
Grieg-GranM.PorrasI.WunderS. (2005), “How Can Market Mechanisms for Forest Environmental Services Help the Poor? Preliminary Lessons from Latin America”, World Development, 33.9, pp. 1511–1527.
19.
HunterI. (2003), “Bamboo Resources, Uses and Trade: The Future?”, Journal of Bamboo and Rattan, 2.4, pp. 319–326.
20.
JacobsGSwaminathanM. S. (2004), “Uncommon Opportunities: An Agenda for Peace and Equitable Development”, the report of the International Commission on Peace and Food, Chennai, India.
21.
International Labour Organisation (ILO), (1988), Employment and Income Generation through Social Forestry in India: Review of Issues and Evidence, ILO Asian Employment Programme (ARTEP), New Delhi.
22.
ILO., (2001), Social and Labour Dimensions of the Forestry and Wood Industries on the Move, International Labour Organisation, Geneva.
23.
International Tropical Timber Organisation (ITTO), (2004), “Review of the Indian Timber Market”, Preliminary Pre-Project Report, Yokohama.
24.
ITTO (2005), Review and Assessment of the World Timber Situation, Yokohama.
25.
KhanN. (2006), “International Aid Agencies and Social forestry Management in Bangladesh: A Case Study”, Decision, 23, pp. 1–4.
26.
LintuL. (1995), “Marketing of Non-wood Forest Products in Developing Countries”, Unasylva, 183.46, pp. 37–41.
27.
MahapatraA. K.TewariD. D. (2005), “Importance of Non-timber Forest Products in the Economic Valuation of Dry Deciduous Forests of India”, Forest Policy and Economics, 7.3, pp. 455–467.
28.
MayP.da VinhaV.MacqueenD. (2003), Small and Medium Forest Enterprise in Brazil, Grupo de Economia do Meio Ambiente eDesenvolvimento Sustentável, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Internacional Institute for Environment and Development, London.
29.
MilnerH.KubotaK. (2005), “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries”, International Organisation, 59.1, pp. 157–193.
30.
MOEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests), (1988), The National Forest Policy, Government of India, New Delhi.
31.
MOEF., (2002), Interim Country Report – India for United Nations Forum on Forest (UNFF – II), Government of India, New Delhi.
32.
MOEF. (2003), State of Forest Report, Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, India.
Planning Commission (2001), “Approach Paper to the Tenth Five Year Plan (2002–2007)”, New Delhi, pp. 33–35.
35.
Planning Commission (2002), “Report of the Steering Committee on Environment, Forest and Wildlife for the Tenth Five-Year Plan (2002–2007)”, Government of India, New Delhi.
36.
PrasadR. (2006), The Present Forest Scenario in India, compilation of papers for preparation of national status Report on Forests and Forestry in India (Survey and Utilisation Division), Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, pp. 1–20.
37.
ProffenbergerM.McGeanB.BhatiaK. (1990), “Forest Management Partnerships: Regenerating India's Forests”, Executive Summary of the Workshop on Sustainable Forestry, 10–12 September, New Delhi.
38.
RajagopalanS. (2002), “Study on Tribal Cooperatives in India: A Situation Analysis Report with Recommendations for Future Action”, INDISCO Programme, International Labour Organisation.
39.
RanjanA. (2006), “To Reach Green Cover Target, Ministry Says Let Private Sector Help Out”, Indian Express, 4 December, pp. 5.
40.
RaoK.RaoP.SinghN., (2006), “Reviving the Degraded Forests of Andhra Pradesh, India: An Effort through Joint Forest Management”, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 5.1, pp. 96–107.
41.
SaxenaN. C. (1995), People, Profit and Forest, Natraj Publishers, New Delhi.
SaxenaN. C., (1999), “World Bank and the Forestry Sector in India”, in Alleviating Poverty through Participatory Forest Management: An Evaluation of India s Forest Development and World Bank Assistance, Operations Evaluation Department, Washington, D.C.
44.
SunC.ChenX. (2003), “Small and Medium Forestry Enterprises in China: An Initial Review of Sustainability and Livelihood Issues”, Research Center of Ecological and Environmental Economics, Beijing, China and International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
45.
SwaminadhanD. (2006), “Tribal Welfare and Development: Draft Paper”, concept paper for discussion in the National Advisory Council (NAC), Government of India, New Delhi.
46.
SwamyS.PuriS. (2005), “Biomass Production and C-sequestration of Gmelina Arborea in Plantation and Agro-forestry System in India”, Agro-Forestry Systems, 64.3, pp. 181–190.
47.
ThomasR.MacqueenD.HawkerY.DeMendoncaT. (2003), Small and Medium Forest Enterprise in Guyana, Guyana Forestry Commission, Georgetown, Guyana and International Institute of United Nations (1995): World Urbanisation Prospects, Population Division, New York.
48.
VermaM. (2000), Economic Valuation of Forests of Himachal Pradesh, Annex 7, International Institute for Environment and Development, Himachal Forest Department, and Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal.
49.
VictorD.AusubelJ. (2000), “Restoring the Forests”, Foreign Affairs, 79, pp. 6.
50.
VirmaniA., (2006), Sustaining Employment and Equitable Growth: Policies For Structural Transformation of The Indian Economy, Planning Commission, working paper no. 3/2006-PC.
51.
WhiteT. A.MartinA.. (2002), “Who Owns the World's Forests?” Forest Trends, Washington DC as cited in ‘Unlocking’ Opportunities for Forest-Dependent People in India, World Bank Report No. 34481 – IN, I.
52.
World Bank (1994), “Staff Appraisal Report”, Madhya Pradesh Forestry Project, Washington DC.
53.
World Bank (1996), The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, Washington DC.
54.
World Bank (2004), Sustaining Forests: A Development Strategy, Washington DC.
55.
World Bank (2005), Small-Medium Scale Forest Enterprises in India: Opportunities for IFC and World Bank Engagement, Discussion Note. Agriculture and Rural Development Forest Team, Washington DC.
56.
World Bank (2006), Unlocking Opportunities for Forest-Dependent People in India, Report No. 34481 – IN, I, Washington DC.
