Drawing its argument from a range of theoretical perspectives, this paper proposes an integrated approach to study the role of user involvement in the continuous innovation of production technology. A framework is developed that outlines several sets of inter-organizational relationships among the organizations related to a given type of production technology. It also draws on data from questionnaire surveys and interviews in the UK to assess the extent to which supplier and user firms as well as their subcontracting firms adopt a network approach to sharing knowledge in the continuous innovation of the production technology to enhance performance.
AraujoL. (1998), “Knowing and Learning as Networking”, Management Learning, 29, (3), pp. 317–336.
2.
BoddyD.BuchananD. (1986), Managing New Technology, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
3.
BoddyD.MacbethD.WagnerB. (2000), “Implementing Collaboration between Organizations: An Empirical Study of Supply Chain Partnering”, Journal of Management Studies, 37, (7), pp. 1003–1017.
4.
BolandR.TenkasiR. (1995), “Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing”, Organization Science, 6, (4), pp. 350–372.
5.
BoldenR.WatersonP.WarrPCleggC.WallT. (1997), “A New Taxonomy of Modern Manufacturing Practices”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17, (11), pp. 1112–1130.
6.
BoxallP.PurcellJ. (2003), Strategy and Human Resource Management, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BrownJ. S.DuguidP. (1991), “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation”, Organization Science, 2, pp. 40–57.
8.
BurnsT.StalkerG. (1994), The Management of Innovation, (Revised edition), Oxford, Oxford University Press.
9.
CastellsM. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford, Blackwell.
10.
ChildJ.FaulknerD. (1998), Strategies of Cooperation: Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
11.
ClarkJ.McLoughlinI.RoseH.KingR. (1988), The Process of Technological Change: New Technology and Social Choice in the Workplace, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
12.
CookeF. L. (2002), “The Important Role of Maintenance Workforce in Technological Change: A much Neglected Aspect’Human Relations, 55, (8), pp. 963–988.
13.
CoombsR.RichardsA.SaviottiP.WalshV. (1996), “Introduction: Technological Collaboration and Networks of Alliances in the Innovation Process”, in CoombsR.RichardsA.SaviottiP.WalshV. (eds.), Technological Collaboration: The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 1–17.
14.
ContuA.WillmottH. (2000), “Knowing in Practice: A ‘Delicate Flower’ in the Organizational Learning Field”, Organization, 7, (2), pp. 269–276.
15.
DombergerS. (1998), The Contracting Organization: A Strategic Guide to Outsourcing, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
16.
DyersonR.MuellerF. (1999), “Learning, Teamwork and Appropriability: Managing Technological Change in the Department of Social Security”, Journal of Management Studies, 36, (5), pp. 629–651.
17.
EvansA.WalkerL. (1986), “Sub-contracting”, in CursonC. (ed.), Flexibility Patterns of Work, London, Institute of Personnel Management.
18.
FleckJ. (1987), “Innofusion or Diffuzation: The Nature of Technological Development in Robotics” Department of Business Studies working paper, No. 9, Edinburgh University.
19.
GherardiS.NicoliniD.OdellaF. (1998), “Towards a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations: The Notion of Situated Curriculum”, Management Learning, 29, (3), pp. 273–297.
20.
GrantR. M. (1996), “Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration”, Organization Science, 7, pp. 375–387.
21.
HardingN.LearmonthM. (2000), “Thinking Critically: The Case of Health Policy Research”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12, (3), pp. 335–341.
22.
HislopD.NewellS.ScarbroughH.SwanJ. (2000), “Networks, Knowledge and Power: Decision-making, Politics and the Process of Innovation”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12, (3), pp. 399–411.
23.
LamA. (1997), “Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures”, Organization Studies, 18, pp. 973–996.
24.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York, Cambridge University Press.
25.
Leonard-BartonD. (1988), “Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization”, Research Policy, 17, (5), pp. 251–267.
26.
Leonard-BartonD. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining Sources of Innovation, Boston, MA, Harvard University Press.
27.
LylesM. (1988), “Learning among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms”, Management International Review, Special Issue, pp. 85–97.
28.
MyersC.DavidsK. (1992), “Knowing and Doing: Tacit Skill at Work”, Personnel Management, February, pp. 45–47.
29.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York, Oxford University Press.
30.
NonakaI.TeeceD. (eds) (2001), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization, London, Sage Publications.
31.
NooteboomB. (1999), “Innovation and Inter-firm Linkages: New Implications for Policy”, Research Policy, 28, (8), pp. 793–805.
32.
OrlikowskiW.HofmanJ. D. (1997), “An Improvizational Model of Change Management”, Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp. 35–46.
33.
OrrJ. (1996), Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job, Ithaca, NY, IRL Press.
34.
PentlandB. (1995), “Information Systems and Organizational Learning: The Social Epistemology of Organizational Knowledge Systems”, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 5, (1), pp. 1–21.
PorterM. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London, Macmillan.
37.
PowellW.KoputK.Smith-DoerrL. (1996), “Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, (1), pp. 116–145.
38.
PrahaladC. K.HamelG. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 79–91.
39.
PucikV. (1988), “Strategic Alliances with Japanese: Implications for Human Resource Management”, In ContractorF. J.LorangeP. (eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, New York, Lexington Books, pp. 487–498.
40.
RajanA.LankE.ChappelK. (1998), Good Practices in Knowledge Creation and Exchange, Tunbridge Wells, Create.
41.
RichterI. (1998), “Individual and Organizational Learning at the Executive Level: Towards a Research Agenda”, Management Learning, 29, (3), pp. 299–316.
42.
ScarbroughH. (1999), “Knowledge as Work: A Conflict-based Analysis of the Management of Knowledge Workers”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11, (1), pp. 5–16.
43.
SchulerR.JacksonS. (1999), Strategic Human Resource Management, Oxford, Blackwell Business.
44.
StoreyJ.SalamanG. (2005), Managers of Innovation: Insight into Making Innovation Happen, Oxford, Blackwell.
45.
TeeceD. J.PisanoG.ShuenA. (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, (5), pp. 509–533.
46.
TsangE. (1997), “Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: A Dichotomy between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research”, Human Relations, 50, (1), pp. 73–89.
47.
UtterbackJ. M. (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
48.
von HippelE. (1976), “The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instruments Innovation Process”, Research Policy, 5, (1), pp. 36–49.
49.
von HippelE. (1982), “Getting New Products from Customers”, Harvard Business Review, 60, (2), pp. 117–122.
50.
von HippelE. (1998), “Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact of ‘Sticky’ Local Information”, Management Science, 44, (5), pp. 629–644.
51.
von HippelE.TyreM. (1995), “How ‘Learning by Doing’ is Done: Problem Identification in Novel Process Equipment”, Research Policy, 24, (1), pp. 1–12.
52.
WengerE.SnyderW. (2000), “Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 139–145.
