The study explores the scope of integrating metaverse and social commerce platforms and their impact on consumers’ purchase intention. The study also explores the moderating role of avatar customization using the Measurement Invariance of Composite Models and Multi-Group Analysis approach. The authors developed the research model by combining the Technology Readiness Index and Technology Acceptance Model and coupling it with three other critical constructs, that is, content quality, social support and social presence. The research employs a cross-sectional quantitative approach, where a sample of 593 responses was drawn from respondents having prior experience with metaverse and social commerce platforms. The gathered data were analyzed using SmartPLS4, a programme designed for partial least squares structural equation modelling. The analysis demonstrated the significance of all hypotheses except for discomfort, and also, the moderating role of avatar customization was found to be insignificant. This study will help developers and businesses to develop more immersive and engaging platforms that will create a new way of shopping.
AbubakreM., ZhouY., & ZhouZ. (2022). The impact of information technology culture and personal innovativeness in information technology on digital entrepreneurship success. Information Technology & People, 35(1), 204–231.
2.
AkourI. A., Al-MaroofR. S., AlfaisalR., & SalloumS. A. (2022). A conceptual framework for determining metaverse adoption in higher institutions of gulf area: An empirical study using hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100052.
3.
Al-MakhmariL., TarhiniA., NikhashemiS. R., NusairK., & Al ShaqsiJ. (2024). Factors influencing user adoption of social commerce in the metaverse: The moderating role of technology comfort, e-word-of-mouth, and endowment effect. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(17), 10895–10910.
4.
AlmarzouqiA., AburayyaA., & SalloumS. A. (2022). Prediction of user’s intention to use metaverse system in medical education: A hybrid SEM-ML learning approach. IEEE Access, 10, 43421–43434.
5.
Al-TitA. A., OmriA., & HadjT. B. (2020). The driving factors of the social commerce intention of Saudi Arabia’s online communities. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12(1), 1–8.
6.
AminM., RyuK., CobanogluC., & NizamA. (2021). Determinants of online hotel booking intentions: Website quality, social presence, affective commitment, and e-trust. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 30(7), 845–870.
7.
AndersonJ. C., & GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
8.
BalharethH., Al-AdwanA. S., AlsoudA. R., Abd-AljaberO., Al-RahmiW. M., & UrbaníkováM. (2024). Journey into meta-commerce: Unveiling the driving forces of consumer adoption. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.
9.
BartaS., GurreaR., & FlaviánC. (2023). Telepresence in live-stream shopping: An experimental study comparing Instagram and the metaverse. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 1–21.
10.
BaruchY., & HoltomB. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.
11.
BioccaF., HarmsC., & BurgoonJ. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480.
12.
BlutM., & WangC. (2020). Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 649–669.
13.
BusalimA. H., & HussinA. R. C. (2016). Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1075–1088.
14.
ChengJ. H., & LinL. W. (2023). The role of senses on purchase intention in social commerce. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(1), 44–67.
15.
ChevalierS. (2023). Social commerce sales value worldwide 2022–2030.
16.
ChinW. W., ThatcherJ. B., WrightR. T., & SteelD. (2013). Controlling for common method variance in PLS analysis: The measured latent marker variable approach. In New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods. Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics (Vol. 56, pp. 231–239). Springer.
17.
ChuahF., & ChamT. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(June), i–xx.
18.
CobbS. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300–314.
19.
DavisF. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. InAl-SuqriM. N., & Al-AufiA. S.(Eds), Information seeking behavior and technology adoption (pp. 205–219). IGI Global.
20.
DhingraS.; & Abhishek. (2024). Metaverse adoption: A systematic literature review and roadmap for future research. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 74(9–10), 3242–3273.
21.
DhingraS., GuptaA., ChaudhryK., KumarA., & FalwadiyaH. (2026). Unlocking learning potentials: Understanding user intentions in AI-fueled metaverse education. Computers & Education: X Reality, 8, 100131.
22.
DwivediY. K., HughesL., BaabdullahA. M., Ribeiro-NavarreteS., GiannakisM., Al-DebeiM. M., DennehyD., MetriB., BuhalisD., CheungC. M. K., ConboyK., DoyleR., DubeyR., DutotV., FelixR., GoyalD. P., GustafssonA., HinschC., JebabliI., . . . WambaS. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66(July), 102542.
23.
FaisalC. M. N., Gonzalez-RodriguezM., Fernandez-LanvinD., & Andres-SuarezJ. D. (2017). Web design attributes in building user trust, satisfaction, and loyalty for a high uncertainty avoidance culture. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 47(6), 847–859.
24.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research (Vol. 27). Addison-Wesley.
25.
GhanbarzadehR., & GhapanchiA. H. (2021). Uncovering educational outcomes deriving from Students’ acceptance and involvement with 3D virtual worlds. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 311–337.
26.
Giang BarreraK., & ShahD. (2023). Marketing in the metaverse: Conceptual understanding, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 155(PA), 113420.
27.
GodoeP., & JohansenT. S. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. Journal of European Psychology Students, 3(1), 38.
28.
GuptaA., KhanH. U., NazirS., ShafiqM., & ShabazM. (2023). Metaverse security: Issues, challenges and a viable ZTA model. Electronics, 12(2), 391.
29.
HaikalS. F., & KuswatiR. (2025). Rethinking trust: The role of social support, presence, and content quality in shaping social commerce intentions. Permana: Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 17(3), 1260–1273.
30.
HairJ.Jr, HairJ. F.Jr, HultG. T. M., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed). Sage Publications.
31.
HairJ. F., HultG. T. M., RingleC., & SarstedtM. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed). Sage Publications.
32.
HairJ. F., RisherJ. J., SarstedtM., & RingleC. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
33.
HajliN., & SimsJ. (2015). Social commerce: The transfer of power from sellers to buyers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 350–358.
34.
HandarkhoY. D. (2020). The intentions to use social commerce from social, technology, and personal trait perspectives: Analysis of direct, indirect, and moderating effects. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14(3).
35.
HennigT., DorotheaT., AlinaN. A., GerritM. H., MarcP. C., & KüblerR. V. (2022). Social interactions in the metaverse: Framework, initial evidence, and research roadmap. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51, 889–913.
36.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431.
37.
HuX., ChenZ. J., DavisonR. M., & LiuY. Q. (2022). Charting consumers’ continued social commerce intention. Internet Research, 32(1), 120–149.
38.
IsmailK. A., & Abdul WahidN. (2020). A review on technology readiness concept to explain consumer’s online purchase intention. International Journal of Industrial Management, 6(2000), 49–57.
39.
JaungW. (2022). Digital forest recreation in the metaverse: Opportunities and challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122090.
40.
KampaR. K. (2023). Combining technology readiness and acceptance model for investigating the acceptance of m-learning in higher education in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 18(2), 105–120.
41.
KangH., & KimH. K. (2020). My avatar and the affirmed self: Psychological and persuasive implications of avatar customization. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106446.
42.
KimT., & ChiuW. (2019). Consumer acceptance of sports wearable technology: The role of technology readiness. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20(1), 109–126.
43.
KockN. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
44.
KuoK. M., LiuC. F., & MaC. C. (2013). An investigation of the effect of nurses’ technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(1), 1–14.
45.
LahiriR., SahaS., & ChakrabartiS. (2026). Exploring user trust in non-fungible tokens: A structural equation modelling perspective. Global Business Review.
46.
LarasatiN. (2017). Technology readiness and technology acceptance model in new technology implementation process in low technology SMEs. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 8(2), 113–117.
47.
LeeL.-H., BraudT., ZhouP., WangL., XuD., LinZ., KumarA., BermejoC., & HuiP. (2021). All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda. Journal of Latex Class Files, 14(8), 1–66.
48.
LiangT., HoY., LiY., & TurbanE. (2012). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69–90.
49.
LimC. V, ChiuJ. L., KimE., & MirandaA. T.Jr. (2026). Factors affecting customer engagement in the metaverse: The future of fashion industry. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 15(2), 233–248.
50.
LinX., LiY., & WangX. (2017). Social commerce research: Definition, research themes and the trends. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 190–201.
51.
LiuY., SuX. W., DuX. J., & CuiF. (2019). How social support motivates trust and purchase intentions in mobile social commerce. RBGN-Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 21(4), 839–860.
52.
Mior ShariffuddinN. S., AzinuddinM., YahyaN. E., & HanafiahM. H. (2023). Navigating the tourism digital landscape: The interrelationship of online travel sites’ affordances, technology readiness, online purchase intentions, trust, and E-loyalty. Heliyon, 9(8), e19135.
53.
MouJ., & BenyoucefM. (2021). Consumer behavior in social commerce: Results from a meta-analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120734.
54.
MoussawiS., KoufarisM., & Benbunan-FichR. (2021). How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 343–364.
55.
MukA., & ChungC. (2015). Applying the technology acceptance model in a two-country study of SMS advertising. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 1–6.
56.
ParasuramanA. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.
57.
ParasuramanA., & ColbyC. L. (2014). An updated and streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74.
58.
PerdanaC. C., MustikariniC. N., & ParegaE. (2023). The impact of social media influencers and content quality unraveling the mediating role of trust on purchase intention. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6(1), 263–270.
59.
PillaiR., SivathanuB., & RanaN. P. (2025). Unveiling virtual interactive marketplaces: Shopping motivations in the metaverse through the lens of uses and gratifications theory. Journal of Business Research, 190(January), 115219.
60.
PirisL. (2019). Perceptions of risk and security (Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 1–8). www.prevention-cybercrime.ca
61.
QuY., CieślikA., FangS., & QingY. (2023). The role of online interaction in user stickiness of social commerce: The shopping value perspective. Digital Business, 3(2), 100061.
62.
RashidR. M., RashidQ. U., & PitafiA. H. (2020). Examining the role of social factors and mooring effects as moderators on consumers’ shopping intentions in social commerce environments. Sage Open, 10(3).
63.
RatanR., BeyeaD., LiB. J., & GracianoL. (2020). Avatar characteristics induce users’ behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: A meta-analysis of the proteus effect. Media Psychology, 23(5), 651–675.
64.
RenL., YangF., GuC., SunJ., & LiuY. (2022). A study of factors influencing Chinese college students’ intention of using metaverse technology for basketball learning: Extending the technology acceptance model. In Frontiers in psychology (Vol. 13, p. 1049972).
65.
ShenS., XuK., SotiriadisM., & WangY. (2022). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption and usage of augmented reality and virtual reality applications in tourism education within the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 30, 100373.
66.
SinhaN., DhingraS., SehrawatR., JainV., & HimanshuH. (2024). Customers’ intention to use virtual reality in tourism: A comprehensive analysis of influencing factors. Tourism Review, 80(3).
67.
Statista. (2023). Metverse: Market data and analysis. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/metaverse/worldwide
68.
UmN.-H. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of consumers’ attitude toward social commerce sites. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(4), 500–519.
69.
WaddellT. F., SundarS. S., & AuriemmaJ. (2015). Can customizing an avatar motivate exercise intentions and health behaviors among those with low health ideals? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(11), 687–690.
70.
WangP., & HuangQ. (2023). Digital influencers, social power and consumer engagement in social commerce. Internet Research, 33(1), 178–207.
71.
WangG., & ShinC. (2022). Influencing factors of usage intention of metaverse education application platform: Empirical evidence based on PPM and TAM Models. Sustainability, 14(24), 17037.
72.
WangF., XuH. F., HouR. L., & ZhuZ. (2023). Designing marketing content for social commerce to drive consumer purchase behaviors: A perspective from speech act theory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103156.
73.
YangF., RenL., & GuC. (2022). A study of college students’ intention to use metaverse technology for basketball learning based on UTAUT2. Heliyon, 8(9), e10562.
74.
YulianaA., & WahyudiL. (2021). The relationship between trust and intention to recommend: The role of content quality, website design and enjoyment. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(2), 241–248.
75.
ZhangJ., QuoquabF., & MohammadJ. (2024). Metaverse tourism and Gen-Z and Gen-Y’s motivation: “Will you, or won’t you travel virtually?”Tourism Review, 79(2), 304–320.
76.
ZhangJ., QuoquabF., & MohammadJ. (2025). Embracing the new reality: Gen Y’s intention to use metaverse apps and devices. Current Psychology, 44(1), 398–417.
