As supply chain managers adopt more blockchain technology (BT), there is a growing demand for finding the first-rate platforms that balance effectiveness, climate, sustainability and transparency. In the context of supply chain management (SCM), this research analyzes 12 blockchain technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Sixteen performance, technological and market-based variables were identified, and their unpredictability, correlation and uncertainty, as embedded within expert opinion, were considered when weighting using the fuzzy entropy-criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) technique. A detailed comparison of blockchain technologies was conducted using the weighted sum method (WSM), the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and the ranking method of the fuzzy ViseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). As the ranking by different MCDMs may differ, we have used the Borda count method and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient to check the stability of the ranks. Sensitivity analysis is performed to check the robustness of the rankings at various fuzzification levels. The outcomes of the proposed framework will provide valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers to implement blockchain-enabled SCM solutions.
Almutairi et al., 2023; Dwivedi et al., 2023; Faggioni et al., 2023, 2024; Farshidi et al., 2020; Huimin et al., 2019; Ivanov & Dolgui, 2021; Juodis et al., 2024; Khan et al., 2022; Kumar & Anbanandam, 2020; Li et al., 2023; Liu & Li, 2023; Liu, 2023; Liu et al., 2023; Mishra et al., 2023; Mylrea & Robinson, 2023; Nabeeh & Tantawy, 2023; Shishodia et al., 2023; Su et al., 2023; Su & Jiang, 2023; Sutrisno & Kumar, 2023; Vopson et al., 2024; Xiong & Huang, 2024
2.
BagS., GuptaS., ChanH. L., & KumarA. (2024). Building smart product-service systems capabilities for circular supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 188, 103625.
3.
BagS., RahmanM. S., RoutrayS., ShrivastavS. K., & AgrawalS. (2024). Exploring the potential of blockchain-enabled smart contracts for achieving net-zero emissions: An empirical study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 3965–3985.
4.
BonabS. R., YousefiS., TosarkaniB. M., & GhoushchiS. J. (2023). A decision-making framework for blockchain platform evaluation in spherical fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 231, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120833
5.
Chaouni BenabdellahA., ZekhniniK., CherrafiA., Garza-ReyesJ. A., KumarA., & El BazJ. (2023). Blockchain technology for viable circular digital supply chains: An integrated approach for evaluating the implementation barriers. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(10), 4397–4424.
6.
ChavalalaM. M., BagS., PretoriusJ. H. C., & RahmanM. S. (2024). A multi-method study on the barriers of the blockchain technology application in the cold supply chains. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 37(2), 745–776.
7.
FoleyB., & RodgerJ. A. (2023). A Bayes Estimate Density Fuzzy Modular function for improving supply chain sustainability through blockchain entropy prediction. Supply Chain Analytics, 4, 100046.
8.
GuZ., IrfanM., SinghA. K., RamarajuH. K., MohandesS. R., & GuanY. (2025). Analyzing sustainability risks associated with blockchain technology implementation in the sustainable supply chain of construction industry: A fuzzy-based MCDM approach. Annals of Operations Research, 355, 1–26.
9.
KannanD., AmiriA. S., ShaayestehM. T., NasrA. K., & MinaH. (2024). Unveiling barriers to the integration of blockchain-based circular economy and Industry 5.0 in manufacturing industries: A strategic prioritization approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 7855–7886.
10.
Karbassi YazdiA., ÖzaydinG., TanY., IshizakaA., & LiJ. (2025). Decarbonisation in supply chain management with blockchain technology: Using multi-criteria decision-making in Industry 4.0. Annals of Operations Research, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-025-06636-2
11.
KumarR., & BishtD. C. (2023). Picture fuzzy entropy: A novel measure for managing uncertainty in multi-criteria decision-making. Decision Analytics Journal, 9, 100351.
12.
KouG., LuY., PengY., & ShiY. (2012). Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(01), 197–225.
13.
LiX., & LiuM. (2025). Scrutinizing the applicability of blockchain in the sustainability of supply chains using an intelligent fuzzy multi criteria decision making. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 27442.
14.
MaghsoodiA. I., & AsadabadiM. R. (2025). A stratified markovian multi-preference decision support system to assess supply chain blockchain platforms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 72, 491–511.
15.
MathivathananD., MathiyazhaganK., RanaN. P., KhoranaS., & DwivediY. K. (2021). Barriers to the adoption of blockchain technology in business supply chains: A total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) approach. International Journal of Production Research, 59(11), 3338–3359.
16.
ModgilS., GuptaS., ZhangB., & BagS. (2024). Blockchain-enabled supply chain finance strategies for a circular economy revolution. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 7006–7020.
17.
MovaffaghiH., & YitmenI. (2023). Framework for dynamic circular economy in the building industry: Integration of blockchain technology and multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sustainability, 15(22), 15914.
18.
NakamotoS. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system (pp. 1–10). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3440802
19.
OpricovicS., & TzengG. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
20.
PatilA., ShardeoV., DwivediA., MoktadirM. A., & BagS. (2024). Examining the interactions among smart supply chains and carbon reduction strategies: To attain carbon neutrality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1227–1246.
21.
PaulA., ShuklaN., PaulS. K., & TrianniA. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management and multi-criteria decision-making methods: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(13), 7104.
22.
SinghA. K., & KumarV. P. (2024). Integrating blockchain technology success factors in the supply chain of circular economy-driven construction materials: An environmentally sustainable paradigm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 460, 142577.
23.
SinhaA. K., & AnandA. (2018). Development of sustainable supplier selection index for new product development using multi criteria decision making. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 1587–1596.
24.
VaeziA., RabbaniE., & YazdianS. A. (2024). Blockchain-integrated sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: A hybrid BWM-MULTIMOORA and bi-objective programming approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, 141216.
YontarE. (2023). Critical success factor analysis of blockchain technology in agri-food supply chain management: A circular economy perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 330, 117173.
27.
YuK., TanL., AloqailyM., YangH., & JararwehY. (2021). Blockchain-enhanced data sharing with traceable and direct revocation in IIoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(11), 7669–7678. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3049141
