This study draws on social presence theory, the extended technology acceptance model and the stimulus-organism-response model to examine the interplay among significant factors affecting the consumers’ behavioural intentions to adopt artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted banking chatbots. Furthermore, it investigates the moderating role of fear of missing out between the dimensions of social presence theory and consumers’ behavioural intention. A structured questionnaire was floated among the consumers of selected Indian banks using convenience-cum-referral sampling approach. The 365 valid responses were analysed using covariance-based structural equation modelling and artificial neural network analysis. The extended technology acceptance model components partially mediate the relationship between social presence theory variables and behavioural intentions. Among the three social presence theory dimensions, social presence of interaction exerts more impact on extended technology acceptance model components. The results of the artificial neural network reveal that perceived enjoyment is the most critical predictor of consumers’ intention to adopt AI-assisted banking chatbots.
AbramsL. C., CrossR., LesserE., & LevinD. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(4), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.11851845
2.
Ah MandA., JanorH., Abdul RahimR., & SarmidiT. (2023). Herding behavior and stock market conditions. PSU Research Review, 7(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-10-2020-0033
3.
AltM.-A., VizeliI., & SăplăcanZ. (2021). Banking with a chatbot—A study on technology acceptance. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica, 66(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2021-0002
4.
AraujoT. (2018). Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183–189.
5.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2009). Amos 18 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation. https://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/pdfs/Amos_18_Users_Guide.pdf
6.
ArsenijevicU., & JovicM. (2019). Artificial intelligence marketing: Chatbots. 2019 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Applications and Innovations (IC-AIAI), 19–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC-AIAI48757.2019.00010
7.
BaekH., KimS., & LeeS. (2019). Effects of interactivity and usage mode on user experience in chatbot interface. Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 14(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.17210/jhsk.2019.02.14.1.35
8.
BeheraC. K., & KumraR. (2024). Two decades of mobile payment research: A systematic review using the TCCM approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1), e13003. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13003
9.
BhattacharyaC., & SinhaM. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in banking for leveraging customer experience. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(5), 89–105.
10.
BodhiR., LuqmanA., HinaM., & PapaA. (2023). Work-related social media use and employee-related outcomes: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(11), 4948–4967. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-09-2021-1359
11.
BrandtzaegP. B., & FølstadA. (2017). Why people use chatbots. In KompatsiarisI., CaveJ., SatsiouA., CarleG., PassaniA., KontopoulosE., DiplarisS., & McMillanD. (Eds), Internet science (Vol. 10673, pp. 377–392). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30
12.
BrandtzaegP. B., & FølstadA. (2018). Chatbots: Changing user needs and motivations. Interactions, 25(5), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236669
13.
BrowneM. W., & CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
14.
ChangH.-J., EckmanM., & YanR.-N. (2011). Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model to the retail environment: The role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 21(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2011.578798
15.
ChenY., FayS., & WangQ. (2011). The role of marketing in social media: How online consumer reviews evolve. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.01.003
16.
ChungM., KoE., JoungH., & KimS. J. (2020). Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 117, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.004
17.
CialdiniR. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion.
18.
DavisF. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. In Al-SuqriM. N., & Al-AufiA. S. (Eds), Information seeking behavior and technology adoption (pp. 205–219). IGI Global.
19.
DavisS., & WiedenbeckS. (2001). The mediating effects of intrinsic motivation, ease of use and usefulness perceptions on performance in first-time and subsequent computer users. Interacting with Computers, 13(5), 549–580.
20.
DavisF. D., BagozziR. P., & WarshawP. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
21.
DinhC.-M., & ParkS. (2023). How to increase consumer intention to use Chatbots? An empirical analysis of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on social presence and the moderating effects of fear across generations. Electronic Commerce Research, 24, 2427–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09662-5
22.
ErenB. A. (2021). Determinants of customer satisfaction in chatbot use: Evidence from a banking application in Turkey. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(2), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2020-0056
23.
ErensoyA., MathraniA., SchnackA., ElmsJ., & BaghaeiN. (2024). Consumer behavior in immersive virtual reality retail environments: A systematic literature review using the stimuli-organisms-responses (S-O-R) model. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(6), 2781–2811. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2374
24.
ErjavecJ., & ManfredaA. (2022). Online shopping adoption during COVID-19 and social isolation: Extending the UTAUT model with herd behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102867
25.
ErogluS. A., MachleitK. A., & DavisL. M. (2001). Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 177–184.
26.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
27.
GefenD., & StraubD. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424.
28.
GefenD., LeffewB. A., RagowskyA., & RiedlR. (2025). The importance of distrust in trusting digital worker chatbots. Communications of the ACM, 68(4), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3701297
29.
GeorgeA., JosephA., AbrahamM., & JosephE. T. (2023). Brand trust and engagement in social commerce. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(5), 1791–1809. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12947
30.
GuJ.-C., LeeS.-C., & SuhY.-H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605–11616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024
31.
HabibS., & AlmamyA. (2025). Impact of FOMO on social media engagement and impulse buying of lifestyle products: Mediation analysis. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation, 2(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDT-01-2025-0004
32.
HadlingtonL., & ScaseM. O. (2018). End-user frustrations and failures in digital technology: Exploring the role of Fear of Missing Out, Internet addiction and personality. Heliyon, 4(11). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(18)34623-1
33.
HairJ., SarstedtM., RingleC., & GuderganS. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications.
34.
HariH., IyerR., & SampatB. (2022). Customer brand engagement through chatbots on bank websites—Examining the antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(13), 1212–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1988487
35.
HasanS., GodhuliE. R., RahmanM. S., & MamunM. A. A. (2023). The adoption of conversational assistants in the banking industry: Is the perceived risk a moderator?Heliyon, 9(9), e20220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20220
36.
HassaneinK., & HeadM. (2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(8), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018
37.
HassaneinK., HeadM., & JuC. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of the impact of social presence on website trust, usefulness and enjoyment. International Journal of Electronic Business, 7(6), 625–641.
38.
HayranC., & AnikL. (2021). Well-being and fear of missing out (FOMO) on digital content in the time of COVID-19: A correlational analysis among university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1974.
39.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
40.
HessT. J., FullerM., & CampbellD. E. (2009). Designing interfaces with social presence: Using vividness and extraversion to create social recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(12), 1.
41.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
42.
JenneboerL. (2022). Interaction effects between anthropomorphic chatbot characteristics on the customer experience: Appearance, language style, and emoji-use[Master’s Thesis, University of Twente].
43.
JinS. V., & YounS. (2023). Social presence and imagery processing as predictors of chatbot continuance intention in human-AI-interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1874–1886. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2129277
44.
JinJ., WalkerJ., & ReczekR. W. (2025). Avoiding embarrassment online: Response to and inferences about chatbots when purchases activate self-presentation concerns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 35(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1414
45.
KaracaY., MoonisM., ZhangY.-D., & GezgezC. (2019). Mobile cloud computing based stroke healthcare system. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.012
46.
KasaraneniR. K. (2022). AI-powered chatbots in banking: Evaluating performance, user satisfaction, and operational efficiency. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, 2(1), 355–392.
47.
KimJ., Merrill Jr.K., & CollinsC. (2023). Investigating the importance of social presence on intentions to adopt an AI romantic partner. Communication Research Reports, 40(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2022.2159800
48.
KotrlikJ., & HigginsC. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43.
49.
KshetriN. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in promoting financial inclusion in developing countries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 24(1), 1–6.
50.
LeongL.-Y., HewT.-S., OoiK.-B., LeeV.-H., & HewJ.-J. (2019). A hybrid SEM-neural network analysis of social media addiction. Expert Systems with Applications, 133, 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.024
51.
LeongL.-Y., JaafarN. I., & AininS. (2018). Understanding Facebook commerce (f-commerce) actual purchase from an artificial neural network perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 75–103.
52.
Liébana-CabanillasF., MarinkovićV., & KalinićZ. (2017). A SEM-neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.008
53.
LingyunQ., & DongL. (2008). Applying TAM in B2C E-commerce research: An extended model. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 265–272.
54.
LuB., FanW., & ZhouM. (2016). Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.057
55.
MarakZ. R., PahariS., ShekharR., & TiwariA. (2025). Factors affecting chatbots in banking services: The UTAUT2 and innovation resistance theory perspective. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00514-8
56.
MehrabianA., RussellJ. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. An Approach to Environmental Psychology, xii, 266–xii, 266.
57.
MisraR., MalikG., & SinghP. (2025). A localized and humanized approach to chatbot banking companions: Implications for financial managers. Management Decision, 63(10), 3756–3785. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2023-2223
58.
MogajiE., BalakrishnanJ., NwobaA. C., & NguyenN. P. (2021). Emerging-market consumers’ interactions with banking chatbots. Telematics and Informatics, 65, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101711
59.
MyinM. T., & WatchravesringkanK. (2024). Investigating consumers’ adoption of AI chatbots for apparel shopping. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 41(3), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2022-5234
60.
NgP., ChanJ., KwongR., KwokM. L. J., & LauM. (2023). Bonus or burden? The impact of attitudes and fear of missing out (FOMO) on generative AI adoption. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4678557
61.
NguyenT. H., & LeX. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence-based chatbots—A motivation underlying sustainable development in banking: Standpoint of customer experience and behavioral outcomes. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2443570. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2443570
62.
Ning ShenK., & KhalifaM. (2008). Exploring multidimensional conceptualization of social presence in the context of online communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(7), 722–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802335789
63.
OoiK.-B., & TanG. W.-H. (2016). Mobile technology acceptance model: An investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Systems with Applications, 59, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.015
64.
PanditaS., MishraH. G., & BhatA. A. (2025). Consumer adoption behaviour in ride-sharing economy: An integrated TAM-ECM framework. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(6), 2491–2523. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2022-0837
65.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ.-Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
66.
PriyaB., & SharmaV. (2023). Exploring users’ adoption intentions of intelligent virtual assistants in financial services: An anthropomorphic perspectives and socio-psychological perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107912.
67.
RameshA., & ChawlaV. (2022). Chatbots in marketing: A literature review using morphological and co-occurrence analyses. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 57(3), 472–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221095549
68.
RaniR., KandaJ., ChanchalC., & VijT. S. (2023). A study on chatbots in the Indian banking sector. In GrimaS., SoodK., & ÖzenE. (Eds), Contemporary studies of risks in emerging technology, Part A (pp. 35–47). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-562-020231003
69.
RappA., CurtiL., & BoldiA. (2021). The human side of human-chatbot interaction: A systematic literature review of ten years of research on text-based chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 151, 102630.
70.
RohitK., KumariP., SinghN., & AlofaysanH. (2025). Smart banking chatbots and consumer engagement: The role of trust and privacy in AI-driven banking. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2025.2481140
71.
SalemM. (2024). Use of chatbots and its role in enhancing customer experience: A study of the banking industry. In HamdanA., AlareeniB., & KhamisR. (Eds), Digital technology and changing roles in managerial and financial accounting: Theoretical knowledge and practical application (Vol. 36, pp. 107–114). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220240000036010
72.
SharmaA., FadahunsiA., AbbasH., & PathakV. K. (2022). A multi-analytic approach to predict social media marketing influence on consumer purchase intention. Journal of Indian Business Research, 14(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-08-2021-0313
73.
ShawarB. A., & AtwellE. (2007). Chatbots: Are they really useful?Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, 22(1), 29–49.
74.
SheehanB., JinH. S., & GottliebU. (2020). Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research, 115, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.030
75.
ShortJ., WilliamsE., & ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
76.
SilvaG. R. S., & CanedoE. D. (2024). Towards user-centric guidelines for chatbot conversational design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2118244
77.
SmithJ. A., & SivoS. A. (2012). Predicting continued use of online teacher professional development and the influence of social presence and sociability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01223.x
78.
SrivastavaP., MishraN., SrivastavaS., & ShivaniS. (2024). Banking with chatbots: The role of demographic and personality traits. FIIB Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145241227757
79.
TeoT., & NoyesJ. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002
80.
TeoT. T., LogenthiranT., & WooW. L. (2015). Forecasting of photovoltaic power using extreme learning machine. 2015 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT ASIA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2015.7387113
81.
ToA. T., & TrinhT. H. M. (2021). Understanding behavioral intention to use mobile wallets in Vietnam: Extending the TAM model with trust and enjoyment. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1891661. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1891661
82.
TungF., ChangS., & ChouC. (2008). An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006
83.
UdehE. O., AmajuoyiP., AdeusiK. B., & ScottA. O. (2024). AI-enhanced fintech communication: Leveraging chatbots and NLP for efficient banking support. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(6), 1768–1786.
84.
UpadhyayN., & KambleA. (2024). Why can’t we help but love mobile banking chatbots? Perspective of stimulus-organism-response. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 29(3), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-023-00237-5
85.
Van der HeijdenH. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.
86.
Van PinxterenM. M., WetzelsR. W., RügerJ., PluymaekersM., & WetzelsM. (2019). Trust in humanoid robots: Implications for services marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 507–518.
87.
VenkateshV., & DavisF. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
88.
VidhyaS., JosephP. R., KanzalJ., RavindranD., SonyN., & SuryakumarS. A. (2024). Chatbot adoption and impact analysis using TAM. In AlareeniB. & HamdanA. (Eds), Navigating the technological tide: The evolution and challenges of business model innovation (pp. 190–200). Springer Nature Switzerland.
89.
WangM., ChenZ., LiuQ., PengX., LongT., & ShiY. (2024). Understanding teachers’ willingness to use artificial intelligence-based teaching analysis system: Extending TAM model with teaching efficacy, goal orientation, anxiety, and trust. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(2), 1180–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2365345
90.
YadavP., GuptaP., RaiP., NaikN., & KasipandianK. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption and continuous engagement in unlocking the potential of technology driven chatbots in banking and financial institutions. Engineered Science, 28, 1054. https://doi.org/10.30919/es1054
91.
ZhangR. W., LiangX., & WuS.-H. (2024). When chatbots fail: Exploring user coping following a chatbots-induced service failure. Information Technology & People, 37(8), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2023-0745
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
