This study examines the effects of entrepreneurial competencies on competitive agility and entrepreneurial satisfaction of startups in a hypercompetitive Korean business environment. The study adopts a framework based on a resource-based view of the resources, capabilities and processes shaping a startup performance, considering vital drivers such as information technology competency, opportunity competency and competitive agility. It highlights that entrepreneurial success should not be solely limited to financial indicators, as entrepreneurial satisfaction of young startups is also crucial. A structural equation model was employed to analyze data from 638 South Korean startups that received government support. The results show that there is a positive relationship between information technology and opportunity competency on competitive agility. Information technology competency has a positive effect on opportunity competency. Further, competitive agility and opportunity competency have a positive effect on entrepreneurial satisfaction. Additionally, competitive agility mediates the positive relationship between opportunity competency and entrepreneurial satisfaction. The study concludes that, to be successful, startups need to align their entrepreneurial competencies in an agile manner to scan the market environment, seize business opportunities and transform capabilities into actions for improved entrepreneurial satisfaction outcomes. In summary, we suggest that small and mid-size startups can improve their entrepreneurial satisfaction outcomes by linking entrepreneurial competencies with entrepreneurial action process and competitive agility.
AbreuM., OnerO., BrouwerA., & van LeeuwenE. (2019). Well-being effects of self-employment: A spatial inquiry. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.11.001
2.
Al-OmoushK. S. (2022). Understanding the impact of intellectual capital on e-business entrepreneurial orientation and competitive agility: An empirical study. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(2), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10092-7
3.
AlaviM., & LeidnerD. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
4.
AltschullerS., GelbD. S., & HenryT. F. (2010). IT as a resource for competitive agility: An analysis of firm performance during industry turbulence. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1056
5.
Amini SedehA., PezeshkanA., & CaiazzaR. (2022). Innovative entrepreneurship in emerging and developing economies: The effects of entrepreneurial competencies and institutional voids. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(4), 1198–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09874-1
6.
AndersonJ., & GerbingD. (1992). Assumptions and comparative strengths of the two-step approach: Comment on Fornell and Yi. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192020003002
7.
BalakrishnanA., KumaraS. R. T., & SundaresanS. (1999). Manufacturing in the digital age: Exploiting information technologies for product realization. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010012712144
8.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
9.
BatesT. (2005). Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: Delineating successful from unsuccessful closures. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.003
10.
BenzM., & FreyB. S. (2008). Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy. Economica (London), 75(298), 362–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x
11.
BharadwajA. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
12.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13.
ChakravartyA., GrewalR., & SambamurthyV. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976–997.
14.
ChandlerG. N., & JansenE. (1992). The founder’s self-assessed competence and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90028-P
15.
ChatterjeeN., & DasN. (2016). A study on the impact of key entrepreneurial skills on business success of Indian micro-entrepreneurs: A case of Jharkhand region. Global Business Review, 17(1), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915610729
16.
ChenY., WangY., NevoS., JinJ., WangL., & ChowW. S. (2014). IT capability and organizational performance: The roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.4
17.
CrawfordJ., LeonardL. N. K., & JonesK. (2011). The human resource’s influence in shaping IT competence. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111115128
18.
D’AveniR. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Maxwell Macmillan International.
19.
DayG. S., & SchoemakerP. J. (2016). Adapting to fast-changing markets and technologies. California Management Review, 58(4), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.59
20.
DijkhuizenJ., GorgievskiM., van VeldhovenM., & SchalkR. (2018). Well-being, personal success and business performance among entrepreneurs: A two-wave study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2187–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9914-6
21.
DillonW. R. (1984). Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications. Wiley.
22.
DoveR. (2001). Response ability: The language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise (1st ed.). Wiley.
23.
EisenhardtK. M., & MartinJ. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
24.
FazalS. A., MamunA. A., AhmadG. B., & MasudM. M. (2022). Entrepreneurs’ competencies and competitive advantages: A study on Malaysian microenterprises. Global Business Review, 23(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919854937
25.
FornellC., & LarckerD. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
26.
FriedH. O., & TauerL. W. (2015). An entrepreneur performance index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-015-0436-0
27.
GorgievskiM. J., AscalonM. E., & StephanU. (2011). Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00322.x
28.
GuptaS., DraveV. A., BagS., & LuoZ. (2019). Leveraging smart supply chain and information system agility for supply chain flexibility. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09901-5
29.
HairJ. F. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
30.
Hazlina AhmadN., RamayahT., WilsonC., & KummerowL. (2010). Is entrepreneurial competency and business success relationship contingent upon business environment? A study of Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 16(3), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551011042780
31.
HussainM., & MalikM. (2022). How do dynamic capabilities enable hotels to be agile and resilient? A mediation and moderation analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 106, 103266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103266
32.
IBM Institute for Business Value. (2021). Find your essential: How to thrive in a post-pandemic reality (Global C-Suite Series). IBM. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/WVPWGPYE
33.
IDC. (2022). IDC: AI spending will rise over $46 billion by 2026 in Asia/Pacific. IDC: The Premier Global Market Intelligence Company. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jspcontainerId=IDC_P33198
34.
IttnerC. D., & LarckerD. F. (2003). Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 81(11), 88–139.
35.
JamriskoM., LuW., & TanziA. (2021). South Korea leads world in innovation as U.S. exits top ten. Bloomberg.com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-03/south-korea-leads-world-in-innovation-u-s-drops-out-of-top-10
36.
JungS. C., & KimY. J. (2017). An empirical study on the relationship between entrepreneurship and start-up achievement considering moderating effect of government’s support policy: For start-up companies in Busan and Kyungnam regions. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), 55–70.
37.
KaurH., & BainsA. (2013). Understanding the concept of entrepreneur competency. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(11), 31–33.
38.
KOSIS. (2022). KOSIS KOrean Statistical Information Service. https://kosis.kr/eng/
39.
LansT., BiemansH. J. A., & BaggenY. (2015). Opportunity competence contributes to successfully leveraging ideas for entrepreneurship and innovativeness in enterprises: Policy brief. Proceedings of LLLight’in’Europe research project. LLLight’in’Europe. https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs%2F498718
40.
LechlerT. (2001). Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011167519304
41.
LeeW., & KimB. (2019). The effects of career orientations on entrepreneurial satisfaction and business sustainability. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no4.235
42.
LeeO., SambamurthyV., LimK., & WeiK. K. (2008). IT-enabled organizational agility and sustainable competitive advantage (SSRN Scholarly Paper 1249301). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1249301
43.
LuY., & RamamurthyK. (Ram). (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931–954. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967
44.
MacKinnonD. (2012). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Taylor and Francis.
45.
MacKinnonD. P., FairchildA. J., & FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
46.
ManT. W., LauT., & ChanK. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00058-6
47.
MikalefP., & PateliA. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004
48.
Ministry of SMEs and Startups. (2023). Startup trends in the first half of 2023. https://www.korea.net/Government/Briefing-Room/Press-Releases/view?articleId=1044731&insttCode=A260117&type=N
49.
NayyarP. R., & BantelK. A. (1994). Competitive agility: A source of competitive advantage based on speed and variety. Advances in Strategic Management, 10(1), 193–222.
50.
NeirottiP., & RaguseoE. (2017). On the contingent value of IT-based capabilities for the competitive advantage of SMEs: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. Information & Management, 54(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.004
51.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In WolmanB. B. (Ed.), Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook (pp. 97–146). SpringerUS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
52.
OverbyE., BharadwajA., & SambamurthyV. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600
53.
OyekuO., OduyoyeO., ElemoG., AkindojuA., & KarimuF. (2014). Entrepreneurial capability and entrepreneurial success of small and medium enterprises: A review of conceptual and theoretical framework. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(17), 136–143.
54.
PandaS., & RathS. K. (2018). Modelling the relationship between information technology infrastructure and organizational agility: A study in the context of India. Global Business Review, 19(2), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713545
55.
ParkerS. C., & Van PraagM. (2010). Group status and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(4), 919–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00280.x
56.
Pérez-LópezS., & AlegreJ. (2012). Information technology competency, knowledge processes and firm performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(4), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211225521
57.
PeterafM., Di StefanoG., & VeronaG. (2013). The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1389–1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2078
58.
PreissK. (1996). Cooperate to compete: Building agile business relationships. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
59.
RoseM. (2003). Good deal, bad deal? Job satisfaction in occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 17(3), 503–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170030173006
60.
SakibM. N., RabbaniM. R., HawaldarI. T., JabberM. A., HossainJ., & SahabuddinM. (2022). Entrepreneurial competencies and SMEs’ performance in a developing economy. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(20), 13643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013643
61.
SambamurthyV., BharadwajA., & GroverV. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530
62.
StaniewskiM. W., & AwrukK. (2019). Entrepreneurial success and achievement motivation—A preliminary report on a validation study of the questionnaire of entrepreneurial success. Journal of Business Research, 101, 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.073
63.
TallonP. P. (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: An information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-007-0024-8
64.
TallonP. P., & PinsonneaultA. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044052
65.
TeeceD. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
66.
TeeceD. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
67.
TeeceD., PeterafM., & LeihS. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
TehseenS., & RamayahT. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies and SMEs business success: The contingent role of external integration. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p50
70.
TippinsM. J., & SohiR. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link?Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.337
71.
TomincP., OreškiD., & RožmanM. (2023). Artificial intelligence and agility-based model for successful project implementation and company competitiveness. Information, 14(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14060337
72.
TorresR., SidorovaA., & JonesM. C. (2018). Enabling firm performance through business intelligence and analytics: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Information & Management, 55(7), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.010
73.
van OosterhoutM., WaartsE., & van HillegersbergJ. (2006). Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000601
74.
VuH. M., & NwachukwuC. (2021). Influence of entrepreneur competencies on profitability and employee satisfaction. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2021.113635
75.
WachD., StephanU., & GorgievskiM. (2016). More than money: Developing an integrative multi-factorial measure of entrepreneurial success. International Small Business Journal, 34(8), 1098–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615608469
76.
WachD., StephanU., GorgievskiM. J., & WeggeJ. (2020). Entrepreneurs’ achieved success: Developing a multi-faceted measure. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1123–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0532-5
77.
WangX., LinX., & ShaoB. (2022). How does artificial intelligence create business agility? Evidence from chatbots. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102535
78.
WickramaratneA., KimminamiA., & YagiH. (2014). Entrepreneurial competencies and entrepreneurial orientation of tea manufacturing firms in Sri Lanka. Asian Social Science, 10(18), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n18p50
79.
WiklundJ. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation—Performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400103
80.
YeowA., SohC., & HansenR. (2018). Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.09.001
81.
ZainolN. R., & Al MamunA. (2018). Entrepreneurial competency, competitive advantage and performance of informal women micro-entrepreneurs in Kelantan, Malaysia. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 12(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-11-2017-0090
82.
ZhangZ., & SharifiH. (2007). Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategy—A taxonomical approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893989
