Practices of corporate social responsibility often generate synergetic effects and improve financial and overall firm’s performance. However, in the high-tech industries, research and development (R&D) efficiency remains a key element of development strategy, and a shift towards sustainable activities can be considered as a trade-off. This study investigates the empirical link between corporate social responsibility practices and R&D effectiveness in R&D-intensive industries. Specifically, this research assesses the impact of environmental, social, and governance information disclosure, the availability of third-party rating, and long-termism on R&D returns. We employ the Hausman–Taylor estimator to analyze three R&D-intensive industries, namely pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and software, for the period from 2012 to 2019. Empirical results show that, in general, higher values of corporate social responsibility metrics are associated with the weaker R&D returns. The findings of this research might be meaningful for managers in making informed decisions with respect to corporate social responsibility practices.
AguinisH., & GlavasA. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
2.
AlamA., UddinM., YazdifarH., ShafiqueS., & LarteyT. (2020). R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 106, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.018
3.
AmuiL. B. L., JabbourC. J. C., de Sousa JabbourA. B. L., & KannanD. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: A systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Cleaner Production towards a Sustainable Transition, 142, 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103
4.
AtifM., & AliS. (2021). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and default risk. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3937–3959. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2850
5.
BaltagiB. H., BressonG., & PirotteA. (2003). Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor? A pretest estimator. Economics Letters, 79(3), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00007-7
6.
BiswasS. (2022). Can R&D investment reduce the impact of COVID-19 on firm performance?—Evidence from India. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1), e2773. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2773
7.
BocquetR., Le BasC., MotheC., & PoussingN. (2013). Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data. European Management Journal, 31(6), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.07.001
8.
BorghesiS., CainelliG., & MazzantiM. (2015). Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 44(3), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.014
9.
BroadstockD. C., ChanK., ChengL. T. W., & WangX. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
10.
CarrollA. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In CraneA., MattenD., McWilliamsA., MoonJ., & SiegelD. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002
11.
ChakrabartiA. B., & MondalA. (2020). The effect of institutional transition on entrepreneurial orientation of family businesses. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2017-0179
12.
ChakrabartyS., & WangL. (2012). The long-term sustenance of sustainability practices in MNCs: A dynamic capabilities perspective of the role of R&D and internationalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1422-3
13.
ChenL., KhurramM. U., GaoY., AbedinM. Z., & LuceyB. (2023). ESG disclosure and technological innovation capabilities of the Chinese listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101974
14.
ChenZ., & XieG. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291
15.
EpsteinM. J., BuhovacA. R., & YuthasK. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.11.001
16.
Escrig-OlmedoE., Fernández-IzquierdoM. Á., Ferrero-FerreroI., Rivera-LirioJ. M., & Muñoz-TorresM. J. (2019). Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915
17.
FlammerC., & BansalP. (2017). Does a long-term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1827–1847. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2629
18.
ForbessJ., & LlewellynR. C. (2022). Biotech’s ESG crossroads. Fenwick.
19.
FuL., BoeheD., & OrlitzkyM. (2020). Are R&D-intensive firms also corporate social responsibility specialists? A multicountry study. Research Policy, 49(8), 104082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104082
20.
FuT., YangS., & JianZ. (2022). Government support for environmental regulation: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102135
21.
Galindo-RuedaF., & VergerF. (2016). OECD taxonomy of economic activities based on R&D intensity. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/5jlv73sqqp8r-en
22.
Gallego‐ÁlvarezI., Manuel Prado‐LorenzoJ., & García‐SánchezI. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource‐based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709–1727. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183843
23.
GillanS. L., KochA., & StarksL. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
24.
GyönyörováL., StachoňM., & StašekD. (2023). ESG ratings: Relevant information or misleading clue? Evidence from the S&P Global 1200. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1075–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062
25.
HallB. H., MairesseJ., & MohnenP. (2010). Chapter 24—Measuring the returns to R&D. In HallB. H. & RosenbergN. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1033–1082). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02008-3
26.
HamdounM., AchabouM. A., & DekhiliS. (2022). Could CSR improve the financial performance of developing countries’ firms? Analyses of mediating effect of intangible resources. European Business Review, 34(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2019-0236
27.
HartzmarkS. M., & SussmanA. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841
28.
HausmanJ. A., & TaylorW. E. (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1377–1398. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911406
29.
HienN. N., LongN. T., GhiT. N., & NganN. T. T. (2024). Country-of-brand, corporate social responsibility and customer responds: Moderating role of country-of-manufacture and corporate reputation. Global Business Review, 09721509231221983. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231221983
30.
HullC. E., & RothenbergS. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.675
31.
HussainiM., HussainN., NguyenD. K., & RigoniU. (2021). Is corporate social responsibility an agency problem? An empirical note from takeovers. Finance Research Letters, 43, 102007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102007
32.
HustedB. W., & de Sousa-FilhoJ. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017
33.
JiaX. (2020). Corporate social responsibility activities and firm performance: The moderating role of strategic emphasis and industry competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1774
34.
KarimS., ManabN. A., & IsmailR. B. (2023). Assessing the governance mechanisms, corporate social responsibility and performance: The moderating effect of board independence. Global Business Review, 24(3), 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920917773
35.
KuriakoseF. (2022). Measuring corporate social responsibility in India: A composite indicator model. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 15(2), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/09746862221129334
36.
LeeC. L., & WuH. C. (2016). How do slack resources affect the relationship between R&D expenditures and firm performance? R&D Management, 46(S3), 958–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12141
37.
LeeM. T., RaschkeR. L., & KrishenA. S. (2022). Signaling green! Firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation. Journal of Business Research, 138, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061
38.
LuH., OhW. Y., KleffnerA., & ChangY. K. (2021). How do investors value corporate social responsibility? Market valuation and the firm specific contexts. Journal of Business Research, 125, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.063
39.
McKinsey. (2017). Measuring the economic impact of short-termism. McKinsey & Company.
40.
MishraP. (2017). Green human resource management. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5), 762–788. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2016-1079
41.
MithaniM. A. (2017). Innovation and CSR—do they go well together? Long Range Planning, 50(6), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.002
42.
MohantyS. S., & RathS. (2023). Does CSR make business? Insights from structural equation model analysis of Indian companies. Global Business Review, 09721509231173112. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231173112
43.
NirinoN., SantoroG., MigliettaN., & QuagliaR. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
44.
OrianiR., & SobreroM. (2008). Uncertainty and the market valuation of R&D within a real options logic. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.664
45.
OrlitzkyM., SchmidtF. L., & RynesS. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
46.
PatelP. C., PearceJ. A., & OghaziP. (2021). Not so myopic: Investors lowering short-term growth expectations under high industry ESG-sales-related dynamism and predictability. Journal of Business Research, 128, 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.013
47.
PetkovićM., & ĐorđevićM. (2021). Intellectual capital investments and company’s profitability. Economic Analysis, 54(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.21.54.1.pp104-117
48.
RandrianasoloA. A., & SemenovA. V. (2022). Synergy versus trade-off: The influence of national philanthropic environment and industry on the relationship between research and development and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Marketing, 30(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211054
49.
SalamM. A., & JahedM. A. (2023). CSR orientation for competitive advantage in business-to-business markets of emerging economies: The mediating role of trust and corporate reputation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(11), 2277–2293. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2021-0591
50.
SchrettleS., HinzA., Scherrer-RathjeM., & FriedliT. (2014). Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms’ sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.030
51.
SurrocaJ., TribóJ. A., & WaddockS. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.820
52.
TangZ., HullC. E., & RothenbergS. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274–1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01068.x
53.
WangC. H., LuY. H., HuangC. W., & LeeJ. Y. (2013). R&D, productivity, and market value: An empirical study from high-technology firms. Omega, 41(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.12.011
54.
YuF., ShiY., & WangT. (2020). R&D investment and Chinese manufacturing SMEs’ corporate social responsibility: The moderating role of regional innovative milieu. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120840
55.
ZhangJ., ZhangY., & SunY. (2022). Restart economy in a resilient way: The value of corporate social responsibility to firms in COVID-19. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102683
56.
ZumenteI., & LāceN. (2021). ESG rating—necessity for the investor or the company?Sustainability, 13(16), 8940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168940
