The present study has been carried out to investigate empirically the impact of capital structure on a firm’s performance in the Indian manufacturing sector from the year 2013 to 2022 and a comparative analysis of its findings with the results of previous studies. A sample of 51 firms from the Nifty India Manufacturing Index is selected for the study. The data are analyzed by employing the panel data technique and the random effect model is found to be consistent as per the results of Hausman test. The capital structure is proxied by debt-equity ratio, whereas return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA) are used as firm performance indicators. Apart from these, some control variables such as firm size, liquidity, tangibility and growth are also included in the study. The results exhibit that the debt-equity ratio has a detrimental effect on the performance of the Indian manufacturing firms. This negative association is substantial when performance is measured using ROA as opposed to ROE. Among the control variables, only size revealed a negative relationship with firm performance. The comparative analysis highlighted that for the time being, the negative association between capital structure and performance is consistent over time for the developing nations. The outcomes of the study will have ramifications for the managers and policymakers responsible for decision making to enhance performance and will drive them to consider the influence of debt financing on performance before deciding the debt level. It also provides updated insights that can guide the strategic and financial decisions of the manufacturing firms in India.
AborJ. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: An empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/15265940510633505
2.
Ahmed SheikhN., & WangZ. (2013). The impact of capital structure on performance: An empirical study of non-financial listed firms in Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(4), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-11–2011-0034
3.
ArdalanK. (2017). Capital structure theory: Reconsidered. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 696–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.010
4.
AyazM., Mohamed ZabriS., & AhmadK. (2021). An empirical investigation on the impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Finance, 47(8), 1107–1127. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2019-0586
5.
BergerA. N., & Bonaccorsi di PattiE. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), 1065–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.05.015
6.
ChadhaS., & SharmaA. K. (2015). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Vision, 19(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915610852
7.
DawarV. (2014). Agency theory, capital structure and firm performance: Some Indian evidence. Managerial Finance, 40(12), 1190–1206. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-10-2013-0275
8.
El-Sayed EbaidI. (2009). The impact of capital-structure choice on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Egypt. The Journal of Risk Finance, 10(5), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/15265940911001385
9.
FarhanN. H. S., TabashM. I., AlsamhiM. H., & YahyaA. T. (2020). The relationship between capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Indian service sector. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 12(2), 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2020.110262
FrankM. Z., & GoyalV. K. (2004). The effect of market conditions on capital structure adjustment. Finance Research Letters, 1(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1544-6123(03)00005-9
12.
GaniL., & JermiasJ. (2006). Investigating the effect of board independence on performance across different strategies. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.009
HutchinsonM., & GulF. A. (2004). Investment opportunity set, corporate governance practices and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00022-1
15.
JaisinghaniD., & KanjilalK. (2017). Non-linear dynamics of size, capital structure and profitability: Empirical evidence from Indian manufacturing sector. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.12.003
16.
JavidM., Chandia, ZamanQ. U., & AkhterW. E. (2022). Examining the effect of liquidity creation on banking profitability and stability: Moderating role of political instability. Kybernetes (Epub ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2022-0021
17.
JensenM. C., & MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
18.
KrausA., & LitzenbergerR. H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978343
19.
KrishnanV. S., & MoyerR. C. (1997). Performance, capital structure and home country: An analysis of Asian corporations. Global Finance Journal, 8(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0283(97)90010-7
20.
LeT. P. V., & PhanT. B. N. (2017). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from a small transition country. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.012
21.
MargaritisD., & PsillakiM. (2007). Capital structure and firm efficiency. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34(9–10),1447–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02056.x
22.
MathurN., TiwariS. C., Sita RamaiahT., & MathurH. (2021). Capital structure, competitive intensity and firm performance: An analysis of Indian pharmaceutical companies. Managerial Finance, 47(9), 1357–1382. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2020-0009
23.
MishraS., & DasguptaR. (2019). Cross-impact of leverage and firm performance: Developed vs frontier bank-based economies. Managerial Finance, 45(8), 982–1000. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2018-0435
24.
ModiglianiF., & MillerM. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
25.
ModiglianiF., & MillerM. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443.
26.
MyersS. C. (1984). Capital structure puzzle (Working Paper). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1393
27.
MyersS. C., & MajlufN. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
28.
NenuE. A., VintilăG., & GherghinaŞ. C. (2018). The impact of capital structure on risk and firm performance: Empirical evidence for the Bucharest stock exchange listed companies. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6020041
29.
NguyenD. T. (2020). The effect of financial structure on business performance of industrial enterprises listed in Vietnam. Accounting, 6(7), 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.8.021
30.
NguyenH. T., & NguyenA. H. (2020). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO4.97
31.
NguyenT. H., & NguyenH. A. (2020). Capital structure and firm performance of non-financial listed companies: Cross-sector empirical evidences from Vietnam. Accounting, 6(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2019.11.002
32.
NunesP. J. M., SerrasqueiroZ. M., & SequeiraT. N. (2009). Profitability in Portuguese service industries: A panel data approach. The Service Industries Journal, 29(5), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902720188
33.
ÖztekinÖ., & FlanneryM. J. (2012). Institutional determinants of capital structure adjustment speeds. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.014
34.
PandeyK. D., & SahuT. N. (2019). Debt financing, agency cost and firm performance: Evidence from India. Vision, 23(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919859203
35.
RajanR. G., & ZingalesL. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x
36.
RamaswamyK. (2001). Organizational ownership, competitive intensity, and firm performance: An empirical study of the Indian manufacturing sector. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.204
37.
RaoN., Al-YahyaeeK., & SyedL. (2007). Capital structure and financial performance: Evidence from Oman. Indian Journal of Economics & Business, 6, 1–14.
38.
SalimM., & YadavR. (2012). Capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.105
39.
SalmerónR., GarcíaC. B., & GarcíaJ. (2018). Variance inflation factor and condition number in multiple linear regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(12), 2365–2384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1463376
40.
TripathyS., & ShaikA. R. (2019). Leverage and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Indian food processing industry. Management Science Letters, 10(6), 1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.035
41.
UllahA., PingluC., UllahS., ZamanM., & HashmiS. H. (2020). The nexus between capital structure, firm-specific factors, macroeconomic factors and financial performance in the textile sector of Pakistan. Heliyon, 6(8), e04741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04741
42.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
