While consumer complaining behaviour (CCB) has seen phenomenal scholarly interest, its effortful facets, such as complaints to regulators or the legal system, remain under investigated. Viewing complaints as deeper patterns of systemic malaise, this study has explored consumers’ legal claims from the perspective of individual complainers. Relying on informants’ lived experiences explicated through semi-structured interviews and a blend of inductive and deductive inferencing, a complaint journey framework based on the dispute tree paradigm was charted. The study’s findings map relevant complaint antecedent and exacerbator themes to the formative stages of naming, claiming, blaming and disputing and visualize consumer problems as they reach the law after germinating through these stages. The work contributes to theory and practice by broadening the understanding of CCB motives, emphasizing the role of emotions, identifying consumers’ recovery expectations and revealing legal action as a blend of agentic choice and structural necessity. In delineating the individual vigilant consumers’ role in shaping the consumer protection framework into motion and their experience of legality, we also raise the need for policy refinements.
AlbistonC. R., EdelmanL. B., & MilliganJ. (2014). The dispute tree and the legal forest. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10, 105–131.
2.
ArbelY. A., & ShapiraR. (2020a). Consumer activism: From the informed minority to the crusading minority. DePaul Law Review, 69, 601–636.
3.
ArbelY. A., & ShapiraR. (2020b). Theory of the Nudnik: The future of consumer activism and what we can do to stop it. Vanderbilt Law Review, 73(4), 929–987.
4.
AroraS. D., & ChakrabortyA. (2020). Legitimate and illegitimate consumer complaining behavior: A review and taxonomy. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(7), 921–937.
5.
AroraS. D., & ChakrabortyA. (2021). Intellectual structure of consumer complaining behavior (CCB) research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 122, 60–74.
6.
ArrawatiaR., & MisraA. (2014). Competition, concentration and the relevance of new banks’ entry in the Indian banking system. Global Business Review, 15(2), 223–236.
7.
ArsenovicJ., EdvardssonB., OtterbringT., & TronvollB. (2023). Money for nothing: The impact of compensation on customers’ bad-mouthing in service recovery encounters. Marketing Letters, 34(1), 69–82.
8.
AzzariC. N., & BakerS. M. (2020). Ten lessons for qualitative transformative service researchers. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 100–110.
9.
BrownJ., ApostolidesC., & FarquharJ.D. (2021). Blaming me, blaming you! The pendulum of blame in payday lending. Marketing Theory, 21(4), 517–538.
ClarkJ. (2022). UK customer service complaints at highest level on record, research finds. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/jul/05/uk-customer-service-complaints-at-highest-level-on-record-research-finds
12.
DavidowM. (2003). Organizational responses to customer complaints: What works and what doesn’t. Journal of Service Research, 5(3), 225–250.
13.
D’CruzP., & NoronhaE. (2008). Doing emotional labour: The experiences of Indian call centre agents. Global Business Review, 9(1), 131–147.
14.
DubbuduR. (2016). As consumer complaints grow by 70% in the last two years, government gears up to address the challenge. https://factly.in/consumer-complaints-grow-70-last-two-years-government-gears-address-challenge/
15.
FelstinerW. L., AbelR. L., & SaratA. (1980). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631–654.
16.
FolkesV. S. (1988). Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 548–565.
17.
GalanterM. (1983). Reading the landscape of disputes: What we know and don’t know (and think we know) about our allegedly contentious and litigious society. UCLA Law Review, 31, 4–71.
18.
GautamS., & JainS. (2022). Managing electronic waste: A qualitative inquiry into the behaviour of young Indian consumers. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221121714
19.
GeraI. (2023). Statsguru: Six charts show faltering consumer protection in India. Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/article/specials/statsguru-six-charts-show-faltering-consumer-protection-in-india-123011500539_1.html
20.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Publishing Co.
21.
GrégoireY., LauferD., & TrippT.M. (2010). A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: Understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(6), 738–758.
22.
GrégoireY., SalleA., & TrippT.M. (2015). Managing social media crises with your customers: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 58(2), 173–182.
23.
GrothM., GoldmanB.M., GillilandS.W., & BiesR.J. (2002). Commitment to legal claiming: Influences of attributions, social guidance and organizational tenure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 781–788.
24.
GutmanJ. (2011). Litigation as a measure of last resort: Opportunities and challenges for legal practitioners with the rise of ADR. Legal Ethics, 14(1), 1–20.
25.
Hennig-ThurauT., GwinnerK.P., WalshG., & GremlerD.D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.
26.
HsiehH.-F., & ShannonS.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
27.
IstanbulluogluD., LeekS., & SzmiginI.T. (2017). Beyond exit and voice: Developing an integrated taxonomy of consumer complaining behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 51(5/6), 1109–1128.
28.
JoiremanJ., GrégoireY., DevezerB., & TrippT.M. (2013). When do customers offer firms a ‘second chance’ following a double deviation? The impact of inferred firm motives on customer revenge and reconciliation. Journal of Retailing, 89(3), 315–337.
29.
KowalskiR. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 179–196.
30.
KrishnaA., DangayachG. S., & SharmaS. (2014). Service recovery paradox: The success parameters. Global Business Review, 15(2), 263–277.
31.
KucukS. U. (2021). Developing a theory of brand hate: Where are we now?Strategic Change, 30(1), 29–33.
32.
LenkaU., & Vandana (2015). A review on impact of socialization agents in breeding consumerism among children. Global Business Review, 16(5), 867–878.
33.
MeiX. Y., BagaasI. K., & RellingE.K. (2019). Customer complaint behaviour (CCB) in the retail sector: Why do customers voice their complaints on Facebook?The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 29(1), 63–78.
34.
MillerR. E., & SaratA. (1980). Grievances, claims, and disputes: Assessing the adversary culture. Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 525–566.
35.
MorganP. A. (1999). Risking relationships: Understanding the litigation choices of sexually harassed women. Law & Society Review, 33(1), 67–92.
36.
NøjgaardM. (2023). The value-translation model of consumer activism: How consumer watchdog organizations change markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(6), 967–986.
37.
ParameshwaraR. (2019). Customer complaints and resolution: Banking ombudsman scheme. Think India Journal, 22(25), 295–307.
38.
PfefferJ., ZorbachT., & CarleyK. M. (2014). Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1–2), 117–128.
39.
PurkayasthaS. (2013). Diversification strategy and firm performance: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. Global Business Review, 14(1), 1–23.
40.
RaginC. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
41.
RelisT. (2002). Civil litigation from litigants’ perspectives: What we know and what we don’t know about the litigation experience of individual litigants. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 25, 151–212.
42.
SathyeM. (2005). Privatization, performance, and efficiency: A study of Indian banks. Vikalpa, 30(1), 7–16.
43.
SchmitzA. J. (2016). Remedy realities in business-to-consumer contracting. Arizona Law Review, 58(2), 213–262.
44.
ShethJ. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182.
45.
SinghJ. (1988). Consumer complaint intentions and behavior: Definitional and taxonomical issues. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 93–107.
46.
SinghJ. (1989). Determinants of consumers’ decisions to seek third party redress: An empirical study of dissatisfied patients. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 23(2), 329–363.
47.
StephensN., & GwinnerK. P. (1998). Why don’t some people complain? A cognitive-emotive process model of consumer complaint behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 172–189.
48.
SturgesJ. E., & HanrahanK. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 107–118.
49.
SundaramD. S., MitraK., & WebsterC. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 527–531.
50.
TaxS. S., BrownS. W., & ChandrashekaranM. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 60–76.
51.
TronvollB. (2011). Negative emotions and their effect on customer complaint behaviour. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 111–134.
52.
UrsicM. L. (1985). A model of the consumer decision to seek legal redress. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 19(1), 20–36.
53.
Varela-NeiraC., Vázquez-CasiellesR., & IglesiasV. (2014). Intentionality attributions and humiliation: The impact on customer behavior. European Journal of Marketing, 48(5/6), 901–923.
54.
WitellL., HolmlundM., & GustafssonA. (2020). Guest editorial: A new dawn for qualitative service research. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 1–7.
