This article attempts to address two research questions using a large and longitudinal sample of manufacturing firms: (a) how does supply base (or supply-side) risk affect buying firm performance, and (b) how does the presence of supply chain executive in the firm’s top management team (TMT) moderate the performance effect of supply base risk? The study uses the Prowess database and Bloomberg to operationalize empirical proxies for supply base risk drivers. Panel data regression analyses are used to test the effect of supply base risk on buying firm performance considering Indian manufacturing firms. The results show that the supply base risk has a negative and significant effect on firm performance. Moreover, the findings of the study indicate that supply chain executive representation in the firm’s TMT alleviates the negative effects of supply base risk. This study develops an objective understanding of supply chain complexity by relying on secondary panel data.
AdhikariA., KunduT., & JhaA. K. (2023). Collaboration strategies for private COVID-19 vaccine supply chain under demand uncertainty: An Indian perspective. Global Business Review, 09721509221142370.
2.
AminA. S., DuttaS., SaadiS., & VoraP. P. (2015). Institutional shareholding and information content of dividend surprises: Re-examining the dynamics in dividend-reappearance era. Journal of Corporate Finance, 31, 152–170.
3.
AqlanF., & LamS. S. (2015). Supply chain risk modelling and mitigation. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5640–5656. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1047975
4.
BabichV. (2006). Vulnerable options in supply chains: Effects of supplier competition. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 53(7), 656–673.
5.
BagS. (2018). Supplier management and sustainable innovation in supply networks: An empirical study. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S176–S195.
6.
BaltagiB. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.
7.
BaltagiB. H., BressonG., & PirotteA. (2003). Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor? A pretest estimator. Economics Letters, 79(3), 361–369.
8.
Baños-CaballeroS., García-TeruelP. J., & Martínez-SolanoP. (2012). How does working capital management affect the profitability of Spanish SMEs?Small Business Economics, 39(2), 517–529.
9.
Baños-CaballeroS., García-TeruelP. J., & Martínez-SolanoP. (2014). Working capital management, corporate performance, and financial constraints. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 332–338.
10.
BhayanaS., & NagB. (2022). Global value chain linkages and employment: Empirical assessment for India’s manufacturing sector. Global Business Review, 09721509221130232.
11.
BlackhurstJ., CraigheadC. W., ElkinsD., & HandfieldR. B. (2005). An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 43(19), 4067–4081. doi: 10.1080/00207540500151549
12.
BodeC., & WagnerS. M. (2015). Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management, 36, 215–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.12.004
13.
BodeC., WagnerS. M., PetersenK. J., & EllramL. M. (2011). Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processingAcademy of Management Journal and resource dependence perspectives., 54(4), 833–856.
14.
BozarthC. C., WarsingD. P., FlynnB. B., & FlynnE. J. (2009). The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 78–93.
15.
ChoiT. Y., & KrauseD. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652.
16.
ChopraS., MeindlP., & KalraD. V. (2013). Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation (Vol. 232). Pearson.
17.
ChopraS., & SodhiM. (2014). Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 72–80.
18.
CSC. (2010). The Fifth Annual Global Survey of Supply Chain Progress. Computer Sciences Corporation.
19.
CSC. (2012). The Ninth Annual Global Survey of Supply Chain Progress. Computer Sciences Corporation.
20.
DangC., WangF., YangZ., ZhangH., & QianY. (2022). Evaluating and forecasting the risks of small to medium-sized enterprises in the supply chain finance market using blockchain technology and deep learning model. Operations Management Research, 1–14.
21.
DeloofM. (2003). Does working capital management affect profitability of Belgian firms?Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(3-4), 573–588.
22.
Dun, & Bradstreet. (2014). Manufacturing India 2025. https://www.dnb.co.in/Publications/manufacturing_India_2025/ManufacturingIndiain2025.asp.
23.
El BazJ., & RuelS. (2021). Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107972.
24.
El GhoulS., GuedhamiO., NiY., PittmanJ., & SaadiS. (2013). Does information asymmetry matter to equity pricing? Evidence from firms’ geographic location. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 140–181.
25.
EllramL. M., TateW. L., & BillingtonC. (2008). Offshore outsourcing of professional services: A transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 148–163.
26.
Ernst, & Young. (2015). Study on Indian electronics and consumer durables segment.
27.
FanY., & StevensonM. (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
28.
FawcettS. E., MagnanG. M., & McCarterM. W. (2008). Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(1), 35–48. doi:10.1108/13598540810850300
29.
FawcettS. E., WallinC., AllredC., & MagnanG. (2009). Supply chain information-sharing: Benchmarking a proven path. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(2), 222–246.
30.
FD-Wire. (2009, December2003). Full Year 2009 Siemens AG Earnings Conference - Final, FD (Fair Disclosure) Wire.
31.
FisherM., OlivaresM., & StaatsB. R. (2019). Why empirical research is good for operations management, and what is good empirical operations management?Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(1), 170–178.
32.
FlynnB. B., KoufterosX., & LuG. (2016). On theory in supply chain uncertainty and its implications for supply chain integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 3–27.
33.
FoliS., DurstS., DaviesL., & TemelS. (2022). Supply chain risk management in young and mature SMEs. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8), 328.
34.
FurubotnE. G., & RichterR. (2010). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. University of Michigan Press.
35.
GarfamyR. M. (2012). Supply management: A transaction cost economics framework. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 7(2), 139–147.
36.
GermainR., ClaycombC., & DrögeC. (2008). Supply chain variability, organizational structure, and performance: The moderating effect of demand unpredictability. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 557–570.
37.
GilleyK. M., & RasheedA. (2000). Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance. Journal of Management, 26(4), 763–790.
38.
GopalanR., NandaV., & SeruA. (2007). Affiliated firms and financial support: Evidence from Indian business groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 759–795.
39.
GunesseeS., SubramanianN., & NingK. (2018). Natural disasters, PC supply chain and corporate performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(9), 1796–1814. doi: doi:10.1108/IJOPM-12–2016-0705
40.
HallikasJ., & LintukangasK. (2016). Purchasing and supply: An investigation of risk management performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 487–494.
41.
HammarbergK., KirkmanM., & de LaceyS. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501.
42.
HarriganK. R. (1985). Vertical integration and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 397–425.
43.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
44.
HendricksK. B., & SinghalV. R. (2005). An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 35–52.
45.
HendricksK. B., SinghalV. R., & ZhangR. (2009). The effect of operational slack, diversification, and vertical relatedness on the stock market reaction to supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management, 27(3), 233–246.
46.
HoffmannP., SchieleH., & KrabbendamK. (2013). Uncertainty, supply risk management and their impact on performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(3), 199–211.
47.
HohensteinN.-O. (2022). Supply chain risk management in the COVID-19 pandemic: Strategies and empirical lessons for improving global logistics service providers’ performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), 1336–1365.
48.
HolcombT. R., & HittM. A. (2007). Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 464–481.
49.
IiM. T. F., & HutchisonP. D. (2003). Measuring cash-to-cash performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 14(2), 83–92. doi: 10.1108/09574090310806611
50.
JacobsB. W., & SinghalV. R. (2017). The effect of the Rana Plaza disaster on shareholder wealth of retailers: Implications for sourcing strategies and supply chain governance. Journal of Operations Management, 49, 52–66.
51.
JohnsonM., & TemplarS. (2011). The relationships between supply chain and firm performance: The development and testing of a unified proxy. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(2), 88–103.
52.
JoshiS., SinghR. K., & SharmaM. (2023). Sustainable agri-food supply chain practices: Few empirical evidences from a developing economy. Global Business Review, 24(3), 451–474.
53.
Juan García-TeruelP., & Martínez-SolanoP. (2007). Effects of working capital management on SME profitability. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 3(2), 164–177. doi: doi:10.1108/17439130710738718
54.
KavilalE., VenkatesanS. P., & KumarK. H. (2017). An integrated fuzzy approach for prioritizing supply chain complexity drivers of an Indian mining equipment manufacturer. Resources Policy, 51, 204–218.
55.
KearneyA. T. (2007). How much does complexity really costs?
56.
KembroJ., NäslundD., & OlhagerJ. (2017). Information sharing across multiple supply chain tiers: A Delphi study on antecedents. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 77–86.
57.
KetokiviM., & MahoneyJ. T. (2020). Transaction cost economics as a theory of supply chain efficiency. Production and Operations Management, 29(4), 1011–1031.
58.
KimD.-Y. (2014). Understanding supplier structural embeddedness: A social network perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 219–231.
59.
KimD., JeanR.-J. B., & SinkovicsR. R. (2018). Drivers of virtual interfirm integration and its impact on performance in international customer–supplier relationships. Management International Review, 58(3), 495–522. doi: 10.1007/s11575–018-0344–4
60.
KimS. W. (2007). Organizational structures and the performance of supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 323–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.07.010
61.
KimY., ChenY.-S., & LindermanK. (2015). Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 43–59.
62.
KnemeyerA. M., ZinnW., & ErogluC. (2009). Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 141–153.
KtR., & SarmahS. P. (2021). Impact of supply risk management on firm performance: A case of the Indian electronics industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(6), 1419–1445.
65.
KTR., SarmahS. P., & TareiP. K. (2020). An integrated framework for the assessment of inbound supply risk and prioritization of the risk drivers: A real-life case on electronics supply chain. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(3), 1261–1286.
66.
KunischS., MenzM., & BirkinshawJ. (2019). Spatially dispersed corporate headquarters: A historical analysis of their prevalence, antecedents, and consequences. International Business Review, 28(1), 148–161.
67.
LiS., Ragu-NathanB., Ragu-NathanT., & RaoS. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107–124.
68.
LiX., WuQ., HolsappleC. W., & GoldsbyT. (2017). An empirical examination of firm financial performance along dimensions of supply chain resilience. Management Research Review, 40(3), 254–269. doi: doi:10.1108/MRR-02–2016-0030
69.
LiuC-L.., ShangK.-C., LirnT.-C., LaiK.-H., & LunY. H. V. (2018). Supply chain resilience, firm performance, and management policies in the liner shipping industry. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 202–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.02.004
70.
LockamyA., & McCormackK. (2010). Analysing risks in supply networks to facilitate outsourcing decisions. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 593–611. doi: 10.1080/00207540903175152
71.
LorentzH., TöyliJ., SolakiviT., HälinenH.-M., & OjalaL. (2012). Effects of geographic dispersion on intra-firm supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(6), 611–626.
72.
LuG., & ShangG. (2017). Impact of supply base structural complexity on financial performance: Roles of visible and not-so-visible characteristics. Journal of Operations Management, 53, 23–44.
73.
MackelprangA. W., HabermannM., & SwinkM. (2015). How firm innovativeness and unexpected product reliability failures affect profitability. Journal of Operations Management, 38, 71–86.
74.
MadhavanR., GnyawaliD. R., & HeJ. (2004). Two’s company, three’s a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 918–927.
75.
MajumdarA., SinhaS. K., & GovindanK. (2021). Prioritising risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chains: Insights from selected organisational theories. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 543–555.
76.
MandalS., & SarathyR. (2018). The effect of supply chain relationships on resilience: Empirical evidence from India. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S196–S217.
77.
ManujI., & MentzerJ. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192–223
78.
ManujI., & SahinF. (2011). A model of supply chain and supply chain decision-making complexity. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(5), 511–549.
79.
MarkarianG., & ParbonettiA. (2007). Firm complexity and board of director composition. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1224–1243.
80.
Mason-JonesR., & TowillD. R. (1999). Using the information decoupling point to improve supply chain performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 10(2), 13–26.
81.
McIvorR. (2009). How the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm inform outsourcing evaluation. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 45–63.
82.
MelnykS. A., LummusR. R., VokurkaR. J., BurnsL. J., & SandorJ. (2009). Mapping the future of supply chain management: A Delphi study. International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4629–4653.
83.
MenezesM. B., Ruiz-HernándezD., & ChenY.-T. (2021). On the validity and practical relevance of a measure for structural complexity. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108243.
84.
ModgilS., & SharmaS. (2017). Information systems, supply chain management and operational performance: tri-linkage: An exploratory study on pharmaceutical industry of India. Global Business Review, 18(3), 652–677.
85.
MolM. J. (2003). Purchasing’s strategic relevance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(1), 43–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969–7012(02)00033–3
86.
MurfinJ., & NjorogeK. (2015). The implicit costs of trade credit borrowing by large firms. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(1), 112–145.
87.
NeigerD., RotaruK., & ChurilovL. (2009). Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 154–168.
88.
OgdenJ. A., & CarterP. L. (2008). The supply base reduction process: An empirical investigation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(1), 5–28.
89.
PantP., DuttaS., & SarmahS. (2021). Intangible supply chain complexity, organizational structure and firm performance. International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(4), 1214–1241.
90.
PantP., DuttaS., & SarmahS. (2022). Supply chain relational capital and firm performance: An empirical enquiry from India. International Journal of Emerging Markets, Epub ahead of print.
91.
PantP., SarmahS., & VishalH. (2022). Inventory holding of firm during COVID 19 pandemic: A data-driven analysis of manufacturing industry. International Journal of Services and Operations Management. doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2022.10047178
92.
PantP., VishalH., & SarmahS. (2020). Does disruptive event affect supply base size: Evidence from an emerging economy. Foreign Trade Review, 55(4), 496–510.
93.
PaolucciE., PessotE., & RicciR. (2021). The interplay between digital transformation and governance mechanisms in supply chains: Evidence from the Italian automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(7), 1119–1144.
94.
ParkheA. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794–829.
95.
PillingB. K., CrosbyL. A., & Jackson JrD. W. (1994). Relational bonds in industrial exchange: An experimental test of the transaction cost economic framework. Journal of Business Research, 30(3), 237–251.
96.
PirttiläM. ,VirolainenV. M., LindL., & KärriT. (2020). Working capital management in the Russian automotive industry supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 221, 107474.
97.
POIRIERC. C., & SwinkM. L. (2007). 5th annual global survey of supply chain progress. Supply Chain Management Review, 11(7).
98.
RabinovichE., KnemeyerA. M., & MayerC. M. (2007). Why do Internet commerce firms incorporate logistics service providers in their distribution channels? The role of transaction costs and network strength. Journal of Operations Management, 25(3), 661–681.
99.
RaoQ., & LiW. (2022). Risk evaluation and forecast behavior analysis of supply chain financing based on blockchain. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Article Id. 7668474.
100.
RevillaE., & SaenzM. J. (2017). The impact of risk management on the frequency of supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(5), 557–576.
101.
RitchieB., & BrindleyC. (2000). Disintermediation, disintegration and risk in the SME global supply chain. Management Decision, 38(8), 575–583.
102.
RogersH., SrivastavaM., PawarK. S., & ShahJ. (2016). Supply chain risk management in India–practical insights. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(4), 278–299.
103.
RosenC. M., BercovitzJ., & BeckmanS. (2000). Environmental supply-chain management in the computer industry: A transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(4), 83–103.
104.
RotaruK., WilkinC., & CeglowskiA. (2014). Analysis of SCOR’s approach to supply chain risk management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(10), 1246–1268. doi: doi:10.1108/IJOPM-09–2012-0385
105.
SahooP., & Ashwani (2020). COVID-19 and Indian economy: Impact on growth, manufacturing, trade and MSME sector. Global Business Review, 21(5), 1159–1183.
106.
SarkarA., & MohapatraP. K. (2006). Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(3), 148–163.
107.
SharmaS. K., & BhatA. (2016). Risk mitigation in automotive supply chain: An empirical exploration of enablers to implement supply chain risk management. Global Business Review, 17(4), 790–805.
108.
ShrivastavaP., & MitroffI. I. (1984). Enhancing organizational research utilization: The role of decision makers’ assumptions. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 18–26.
109.
SiegelJ., & ChoudhuryP. (2012). A reexamination of tunneling and business groups: New data and new methods. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(6), 1763–1798.
110.
SodhiM. S., SonB.-G., & TangC. S. (2012). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1–13. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1937–5956.2011.01251.x
111.
SodhiM. S., & TangC. S. (2012). Strategic approaches for mitigating supply chain risks. Managing supply chain risk (pp. 95–108). Springer.
112.
SreedeviR., SarangaH., & GoudaS. K. (2023). Impact of a country’s logistical capabilities on supply chain risk. Supply Chain Management, 28(1), 107–121.
113.
SuT., HouW., LevitasE., & WuS. (2021). Product complexity and strategic alliance on drug approval. American Business Review.
114.
SudanT., & TaggarR. (2021). Recovering supply chain disruptions in post-COVID-19 pandemic through transport intelligence and logistics systems: India’s experiences and policy options. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 2, 660116.
115.
TangO., & MusaS. N. (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25–34.
116.
TemplarS., CosseM., CamerinelliE., & FindlayC. (2012). An investigation into current supply chain finance practices in business: A case study approach. (Unpublished paper).
117.
TemplarS., FindlayC., & HofmannE. (2016). Financing the end-to-end supply chain: A reference guide to supply chain finance. Kogan Page Publishers.
118.
TerwieschC. (2019). Empirical research in operations management: From field studies to analyzing digital exhaust. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(4), 656–668
119.
TerwieschC., OlivaresM., StaatsB. R., & GaurV. (2019). A review of empirical operations management over the last two decades. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(4), 656–668
120.
Torres-ReynaO. (2007). Panel data analysis fixed and random effects using Stata (v. 4.2). Data & Statistical Services, Princeton University (pp. 1–40).
121.
TrentR. J. (2004). The use of organizational design features in purchasing and supply management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(2), 4–18. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1745–493X.2004.tb00170.x
122.
TuncelG., & AlpanG. (2010). Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study. Computers in Industry, 61(3), 250–259.
123.
TushmanM. L., & NadlerD. A. (1978). Information processingAcademy of Management Review as an integrating concept in organizational design., 3(3), 613–624.
124.
VachonS., & KlassenR. D. (2002). An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), 218–230. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2002.803387
125.
VillenaV. H., LuG., Gomez-MejiaL., & RevillaE. (2018). Is top management team-supply chain manager interaction the missing link? An analysis of risk-bearing antecedents for supply chain managers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(8), 1640–1663
126.
Von CorswantF., & FredrikssonP. (2002). Sourcing trends in the car industry: A survey of car manufacturers’ and suppliers’ strategies and relations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(7), 741–758.
127.
WagnerS. M., & BodeC. (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 307–325.
128.
WagnerS. M., BodeC., & KoziolP. (2011). Negative default dependence in supplier networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(2), 398–406.
129.
WagnerS. M., & KemmerlingR. (2014). Supply chain management executives in corporate upper echelons. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(3), 156–166.
WangY. I., LiJ., & AnupindiR. (2017). Risky suppliers or risky supply chains? An empirical analysis of sub-tier supply network structure on firm risk in the high-tech sector. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/116385
132.
WicaksanaA., HoW., TalluriS., & DolguiA. (2022). A decade of progress in supply chain risk management: Risk typology, emerging topics, and research collaborators. International Journal of Production Research, 60(24), 7155–7177.
133.
WielandA., & Marcus WallenburgC. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(10), 887–905.
134.
WilhelmM. M., BlomeC., BhakooV., & PaulrajA. (2016). Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 42–60.
135.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, 2630.
136.
WilliamsonO. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.
137.
WilliamsonO. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York.
138.
YoonJ., TalluriS., YildizH., & HoW. (2018). Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: A holistic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 56(10), 3636–3661. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1403056
139.
ZhaoR., MashruwalaR., PanditS., & BalakrishnanJ. (2019). Supply chain relational capital and the bullwhip effect: An empirical analysis using financial disclosures. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(5), 658–689.
140.
ZsidisinG. A., EllramL. M., CarterJ. R., & CavinatoJ. L. (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 397–413.
